Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Study

Gloria D. Coronado, Jamie H. Thompson, Amanda F. Petrik, Denis B. Nyongesa, Michael C. Leo, Melissa Castillo, Brittany Younger, Anne Escaron and Alex Chen
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2019, 32 (3) 318-328; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2019.03.180275
Gloria D. Coronado
From Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR (GDC, JHT, AFP, DBN, MCL); AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, CA (MC, BY, AE, AC).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jamie H. Thompson
From Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR (GDC, JHT, AFP, DBN, MCL); AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, CA (MC, BY, AE, AC).
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda F. Petrik
From Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR (GDC, JHT, AFP, DBN, MCL); AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, CA (MC, BY, AE, AC).
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Denis B. Nyongesa
From Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR (GDC, JHT, AFP, DBN, MCL); AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, CA (MC, BY, AE, AC).
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael C. Leo
From Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR (GDC, JHT, AFP, DBN, MCL); AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, CA (MC, BY, AE, AC).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melissa Castillo
From Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR (GDC, JHT, AFP, DBN, MCL); AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, CA (MC, BY, AE, AC).
MSW
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brittany Younger
From Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR (GDC, JHT, AFP, DBN, MCL); AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, CA (MC, BY, AE, AC).
MSW
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Escaron
From Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR (GDC, JHT, AFP, DBN, MCL); AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, CA (MC, BY, AE, AC).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex Chen
From Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, OR (GDC, JHT, AFP, DBN, MCL); AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, CA (MC, BY, AE, AC).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Lin JS,
    2. Piper MA,
    3. Perdue LA,
    4. et al
    . Screening for colorectal cancer: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2016;315:2576–94.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Steele CB,
    2. Rim SH,
    3. Joseph DA,
    4. King JB,
    5. Seeff LC
    . Colorectal cancer incidence and screening—United States, 2008 and 2010. MMWR Suppl 2013;62:53–60.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Meester RG,
    2. Doubeni CA,
    3. Lansdorp-Vogelaar I,
    4. et al
    . Colorectal cancer deaths attributable to nonuse of screening in the United States. Ann Epidemiol 2015;25:208–13.e201.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Health Resources and Services Administration. 2016 National Health Center Data. Available from: https://bphc.hrsa.gov/uds/datacenter.aspx. Published 2016. Accessed November 2, 2017.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Baker DW,
    2. Brown T,
    3. Buchanan DR,
    4. et al
    . Comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:1235–41.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Goldman SN,
    2. Liss DT,
    3. Brown T,
    4. et al
    . Comparative effectiveness of multifaceted outreach to initiate colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30:1178–84.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Gupta S,
    2. Halm EA,
    3. Rockey DC,
    4. et al
    . Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:1725–32.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Coronado GD,
    2. Golovaty I,
    3. Longton G,
    4. Levy L,
    5. Jimenez R
    . Effectiveness of a clinic-based colorectal cancer screening promotion program for underserved Hispanics. Cancer 2011;117:1745–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Coronado GD,
    2. Vollmer WM,
    3. Petrik A,
    4. et al
    . Strategies and opportunities to STOP colon cancer in priority populations: pragmatic pilot study design and outcomes. BMC Cancer 2014;14:55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Jean-Jacques M,
    2. Kaleba EO,
    3. Gatta JL,
    4. Gracia G,
    5. Ryan ER,
    6. Choucair BN
    . Program to improve colorectal cancer screening in a low-income, racially diverse population: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med 2012;10:412–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Singal AG,
    2. Gupta S,
    3. Tiro JA,
    4. et al
    . Outreach invitations for FIT and colonoscopy improve colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized controlled trial in a safety-net health system. Cancer 2016;122:456–63.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Baker DW,
    2. Brown T,
    3. Goldman SN,
    4. et al
    . Two-year follow-up of the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers. Cancer Causes Control 2015;26:1685–90.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Coronado GD,
    2. Vollmer WM,
    3. Petrik A,
    4. et al
    . Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations: design of a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2014;38:344–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Coronado GD,
    2. Rivelli JS,
    3. Fuoco MJ,
    4. et al
    . Effect of reminding patients to complete fecal immunochemical testing: a comparative effectiveness study of automated and live approaches. J Gen Intern Med 2018;33:72–8.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Thompson JH,
    2. Davis MM,
    3. Leo MC,
    4. et al
    . Participatory Research to Advance Colon Cancer Prevention (PROMPT): study protocol for a pragmatic trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2018;67:11–5.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Norman N,
    2. Bennett C,
    3. Cowart S,
    4. et al
    . Boot camp translation: a method for building a community of solution. J Am Board Fam Med 2013;26:254–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Thompson JH DM,
    2. Michaels L,
    3. Rivelli JS,
    4. et al
    . Patient-refined Messaging for a mailed colorectal cancer screening program: application of boot camp translation in a Latino-based community health center. J Am Board Fam Med 2019;18–0026.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Coronado GD,
    2. Burdick T,
    3. Petrik A,
    4. Kapka T,
    5. Retecki S,
    6. Green B
    . Using an automated data-driven, EHR-embedded program for mailing FIT kits: lessons from the STOP CRC pilot study. J Gen Pract (Los Angel) 2014;2:1000141.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Petrik AF,
    2. Green BB,
    3. Vollmer WM,
    4. et al
    . The validation of electronic health records in accurately identifying patients eligible for colorectal cancer screening in safety net clinics. Fam Pract 2016;33:639–43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Nagelhout E,
    2. Comarell K,
    3. Samadder NJ,
    4. Wu YP
    . Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in a racially diverse population served by a safety-net clinic. J Community Health 2017;42:791–6.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Roundtable NCC
    . Hispanics/Latinos and colorectal cancer companion guide. Available: http://nccrt.org/resource/hispanicslatinos-colorectal-cancer-companion-guide/. Published 2016. Accessed July 27, 2018.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Seeff LC,
    2. Nadel MR,
    3. Klabunde CN,
    4. et al
    . Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population. Cancer 2004;100:2093–103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Nadel MR,
    2. Berkowitz Z,
    3. Klabunde CN,
    4. Smith RA,
    5. Coughlin SS,
    6. White MC
    . Fecal occult blood testing beliefs and practices of U.S. primary care physicians: serious deviations from evidence-based recommendations. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:833–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Green BB,
    2. Fuller S,
    3. Anderson ML,
    4. Mahoney C,
    5. Mendy P,
    6. Powell SL
    . A quality improvement initiative to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening: collaboration between a primary care clinic and research team. J Fam Med 2017;4:1115.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. Hendren S,
    2. Winters P,
    3. Humiston S,
    4. et al
    . Randomized, controlled trial of a multimodal intervention to improve cancer screening rates in a safety-net primary care practice. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29:41–9.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Byrd TL,
    2. Wilson KM,
    3. Smith JL,
    4. et al
    . AMIGAS: a multicity, multicomponent cervical cancer prevention trial among Mexican American women. Cancer 2013;119:1365–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Schlichting JA,
    2. Mengeling MA,
    3. Makki NM,
    4. et al
    . Increasing colorectal cancer screening in an overdue population: participation and cost impacts of adding telephone calls to a FIT mailing program. J Community Health 2014;39:239–47.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Meenan RT,
    2. Anderson ML,
    3. Chubak J,
    4. et al
    . An economic evaluation of colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice. Am J Prev Med 2015;48:714–21.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Smith DH,
    2. Feldstein AC,
    3. Perrin N,
    4. et al
    . Automated telephone calls to enhance colorectal cancer screening: economic analysis. Am J Manag Care 2012;18:691–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Vidal C,
    2. Garcia M,
    3. Benito L,
    4. Mila N,
    5. Binefa G,
    6. Moreno V
    . Use of text-message reminders to improve participation in a population-based breast cancer screening program. J Med Syst 2014;38:118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Potter MB,
    2. Ackerson LM,
    3. Gomez V,
    4. et al
    . Effectiveness and reach of the FLU-FIT program in an integrated health care system: a multisite randomized trial. Am J Public Health 2013;103:1128–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 32 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 32, Issue 3
May-June 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Study
Gloria D. Coronado, Jamie H. Thompson, Amanda F. Petrik, Denis B. Nyongesa, Michael C. Leo, Melissa Castillo, Brittany Younger, Anne Escaron, Alex Chen
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2019, 32 (3) 318-328; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.03.180275

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Study
Gloria D. Coronado, Jamie H. Thompson, Amanda F. Petrik, Denis B. Nyongesa, Michael C. Leo, Melissa Castillo, Brittany Younger, Anne Escaron, Alex Chen
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2019, 32 (3) 318-328; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.03.180275
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Developing Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in a Latino-Based Community Health Center
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Evaluating the implementation of a multicomponent intervention to improve faecal immunochemical test-based (FIT) colorectal cancer screening in primary care
  • Family Medicine: Data Driven Practice with Emphasis on Underserved Patients
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Colon Cancer
  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Community Health Centers
  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Hispanic Americans
  • Occult Blood
  • Text Messaging

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire