Research ArticleOriginal Research

Stakeholder Engagement in a Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measure Implementation: A Report from the SAFTINet Practice-based Research Network (PBRN)

Bethany M. Kwan, Marion R. Sills, Deborah Graham, Mika K. Hamer, Diane L. Fairclough, K. E. Hammermeister, Alicyn Kaiser, Maria de Jesus Diaz-Perez and Lisa M. Schilling
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2016, 29 (1) 102-115; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2016.01.150141

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hickam D,
    2. Totten A,
    3. Berg A,
    4. Rader K,
    5. Goodman S,
    6. Newhouse R
    . The PCORI methodology report. Washington, DC: Patient-centered Outcomes Research Institute; 2013.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Concannon TW,
    2. Meissner P,
    3. Grunbaum JA,
    4. et al
    . A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27:985–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Calvert M,
    2. Blazeby J,
    3. Altman DG,
    4. Revicki DA,
    5. Moher D,
    6. Brundage MD
    . Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA 2013;309:814–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Reeve BB,
    2. Wyrwich KW,
    3. Wu AW,
    4. et al
    . ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Qual Life Res 2013;22:1889–905.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Greenhalgh J
    . The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why? Qual Life Res 2009;18:115–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Greenhalgh J,
    2. Meadows K
    . The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review. J Eval Clin Pract 1999;5:401–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Valderas JM,
    2. Kotzeva A,
    3. Espallargues M,
    4. et al
    . The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res 2008;17:179–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Concannon TW,
    2. Meissner P,
    3. Grunbaum JA,
    4. et al
    . A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27:985–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Marshall S,
    2. Haywood K,
    3. Fitzpatrick R
    . Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review. J Eval Clin Pract 2006;12:559–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Rose M,
    2. Bezjak A
    . Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples. Qual Life Res 2009;18:125–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Donaldson MS
    . Taking PROs and patient-centered care seriously: incremental and disruptive ideas for incorporating PROs in oncology practice. Qual Life Res 2008;17:1323–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Fung CH,
    2. Hays RD
    . Prospects and challenges in using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. Qual Life Res 2008;17:1297–302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Lohr KN,
    2. Zebrack BJ
    . Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: challenges and opportunities. Qual Life Res 2009;18:99–107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Concannon T,
    2. Fuster M,
    3. Saunders T,
    4. et al
    . A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29;1692–701.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Deverka PA,
    2. Lavallee DC,
    3. Desai PJ,
    4. et al
    . Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement. J Comp Eff Res 2012;1:181–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Cella D,
    2. Riley W,
    3. Stone A,
    4. et al
    . The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–8. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:1179–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidance. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006;4:79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Snyder CF,
    2. Jensen RE,
    3. Segal JB,
    4. Wu AW
    . Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): putting the patient perspective in patient-centered outcomes research. Med Care 2013;51(8 Suppl 3):S73–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Basch E
    . New frontiers in patient-reported outcomes: adverse event reporting, comparative effectiveness, and quality assessment. Annu Rev Med 2014;65:307–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Boyce MB,
    2. Browne JP
    . Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review. Qual Life Res 2013;22:2265–78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Rothwell PM,
    2. McDowell Z,
    3. Wong CK,
    4. Dorman PJ
    . Doctors and patients don't agree: cross sectional study of patients' and doctors' perceptions and assessments of disability in multiple sclerosis. BMJ 1997;314:1580–3.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Espallargues M,
    2. Valderas JM,
    3. Alonso J
    . Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: a systematic review of its impact. Med Care 2000;38:175–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Jagsi R,
    2. Chiang A,
    3. Polite BN,
    4. et al
    . Qualitative analysis of practicing oncologists' attitudes and experiences regarding collection of patient-reported outcomes. J Oncol Pract 2013;9:e290–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Varni JW,
    2. Burwinkle TM,
    3. Lane MM
    . Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric clinical practice: an appraisal and precept for future research and application. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005;3:34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Gilbody SM,
    2. House AO,
    3. Sheldon T
    . Routine administration of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and needs assessment instruments to improve psychological outcome–a systematic review. Psychol Med 2002;32:1345–56.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Balasubramanian BA,
    2. Cohen DJ,
    3. Clark EC,
    4. et al
    . Practice-level approaches for behavioral counseling and patient health behaviors. Am J Prev Med 2008;35(5 Suppl):S407–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Pace WD,
    2. Staton EW
    . Electronic data collection options for practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med 2005;3(Suppl 1):S21–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Fernald DH,
    2. Froshaug DB,
    3. Dickinson LM,
    4. et al
    . Common measures, better outcomes (COMBO): a field test of brief health behavior measures in primary care. Am J Prev Med 2008;35(5 Suppl):S414–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Peters M,
    2. Crocker H,
    3. Jenkinson C,
    4. Doll H,
    5. Fitzpatrick R
    . The routine collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for long-term conditions in primary care: a cohort survey. BMJ Open 2014;4:e003968.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Weenink JW,
    2. Braspenning J,
    3. Wensing M
    . Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in primary care: an observational pilot study of seven generic instruments. BMC Fam Pract 2014;15:88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Brundage M,
    2. Blazeby J,
    3. Revicki D,
    4. et al
    . Patient-reported outcomes in randomized clinical trials: development of ISOQOL reporting standards. Qual Life Res 2013;22:1161–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Bogart LM,
    2. Uyeda K
    . Community-based participatory research: partnering with communities for effective and sustainable behavioral health interventions. Health Psychol 2009;28:391–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Spertus J
    . Barriers to the use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical care. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2014;7:2–4.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Hartung DM,
    2. Guise JM,
    3. Fagnan LJ,
    4. Davis MM,
    5. Stange KC
    . Role of practice-based research networks in comparative effectiveness research. J Comp Eff Res 2012;1:45–55.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Mold JW,
    2. Peterson KA
    . Primary care practice-based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med 2005;3(Suppl 1):S12–20.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Maro JC,
    2. Platt R,
    3. Holmes JH,
    4. et al
    . Design of a national distributed health data network. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:341–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Schilling LM,
    2. Kwan BM,
    3. Drolshagen CT,
    4. et al
    . Scalable Architecture for Federated Translational Inquiries Network (SAFTINet) technology infrastructure for a distributed data network. EGEMS (Wash DC) 2013;1:1027.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Snyder CF,
    2. Aaronson NK,
    3. Choucair AK,
    4. et al
    . Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations. Qual Life Res 2012;21:1305–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    1. Aaronson N,
    2. Choucair A,
    3. Elliott T,
    4. et al
    . User's guide to implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice. November 11, 2011. Milwaukee, WI: International Society for Quality of Life Research. Available from: http://www.isoqol.org/UserFiles/file/UsersGuide.pdf. Accessed November, 12, 2014.
  40. 40.↵
    1. Baroletti S,
    2. Dell'Orfano H
    . Medication adherence in cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2010;121:1455–8.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Ho PM,
    2. Bryson CL,
    3. Rumsfeld JS
    . Medication adherence: its importance in cardiovascular outcomes. Circulation 2009;119:3028–35.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Moczygemba LR,
    2. Goode JV,
    3. Gatewood SB,
    4. et al
    . Integration of collaborative medication therapy management in a safety net patient-centered medical home. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2011;51:167–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  43. 43.↵
    1. Epstein RM,
    2. Fiscella K,
    3. Lesser CS,
    4. Stange KC
    . Why the nation needs a policy push on patient-centered health care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:1489–95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Aaronson N,
    2. Alonso J,
    3. Burnam A,
    4. et al
    . Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 2002;11:193–205.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    1. Garfield S,
    2. Clifford S,
    3. Eliasson L,
    4. Barber N,
    5. Willson A
    . Suitability of measures of self-reported medication adherence for routine clinical use: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011;11:149.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    1. Gehi A,
    2. Ali S,
    3. Whooley M
    . Self-reported medication adherence and cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary heart disease: The Heart and Soul Study. Circulation 2007;115:E584–4.
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.↵
    1. Gellad WF,
    2. Grenard JL,
    3. Marcum ZA
    . A systematic review of barriers to medication adherence in the elderly: looking beyond cost and regimen complexity. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 2011;9:11–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Studer Q
    . Making process improvement ‘stick’. Healthc Financ Manage 2014;68:90–4, 96.
    OpenUrl
  49. 49.↵
    Patient reported outcomes (PROs) in performance measurement. Washington, DC: National Quality Forum; 2013. Available from: https://www.qualityforum.org/Publications/2012/12/Patient-Reported_Outcomes_in_Performance_Measurement.aspx. Accessed November 24, 2015.
  50. 50.↵
    1. Santana MJ,
    2. Feeny D
    . Framework to assess the effects of using patient-reported outcome measures in chronic care management. Qual Life Res 2014;23:1505–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    1. Rumsfeld JS,
    2. Alexander KP,
    3. Goff DC Jr.,
    4. et al
    . Cardiovascular health: the importance of measuring patient-reported health status: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013;127:2233–49.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  52. 52.↵
    1. Tipirneni R,
    2. McMahon LF Jr.
    . Measuring value in primary care: enhancing quality or checking the box? Health Serv Res 2014;49:1724–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Poissant L,
    2. Pereira J,
    3. Tamblyn R,
    4. Kawasumi Y
    . The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:505–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section

Keywords