A Review of 50-Years of International Literature on the Internal Environment of Building Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRNs)

References

1. 1.↵
   Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [Internet]. Practice-based research networks; 2016. Available from: https://pbrn.ahrq.gov.
2. 2.↵
   1. Mold JW,
   2. Pasternak A,
   3. McCaulay A

   , Practice-Based Research Subcommittee of North American Primary Care Research Group Committee on Advancing Science of Family Medicineet al. Definitions of common terms relevant to primary care research. Ann Fam Med 2008;6:570–1.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Robinson G,
   2. Gould M

   . What are the attitudes of general practitioners towards research? Br J Gen Pr 2000;50:390–2.

   OpenUrl
4. 4.↵
   1. Thomas P,
   2. Griffiths F,
   3. Kai J,
   4. O'Dwyer A

   . Networks for research in primary health care. Br Med J 2001;322:588–90.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Green LA,
   2. Hickner J

   . A short history of primary care practice-based research networks: from concept to essential research laboratories. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:1–10.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Fleming DM,
   2. Norbury CA,
   3. Crombie DL

   . Annual and seasonal variation in the incidence of common diseases. Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract 1991;1–24.
7. 7.↵
   1. Van Weel C

   . The continuous morbidity registration Nijmegen: background and history of a Dutch general practice database. Eur J Gen Pract 2008;14(Suppl. 1):5–12.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Smith H

   . The Federation of Primary Care Research Networks: a national initiative to enhance networking locally. Prim Heal Care Res Dev 2000;1:3–4.

   OpenUrl
9. 9.↵
   1. Van Weel C,
   2. Smith H,
   3. Beasley JW

   . Family practice research networks: experiences from 3 countries. J Fam Pract 2000;49.
10. 10.↵
    1. Gunn JM

    . Should Australia develop primary care research networks? Med J Aust 2002;177:62–6.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Pirotta M,
    2. Temple-Smith M

    . Practice-based research networks. Aust Fam Physician 2017;46:793–5.

    OpenUrl
12. 12.↵
    1. Van Weel C

    . General practice research networks: gateway to primary care evidence. Med J Aust 2002;177:62–3.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Rhyne RL,
    2. Fagnan LJ

    . Practice-based research network (PBRN) engagement: 20+ years and counting. J Am Board Fam Med 2018;31:833–9.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Willis CD,
    2. Riley BL,
    3. Herbert CP,
    4. Best A

    . Networks to strengthen health systems for chronic disease prevention. Am J Public Health 2013;103:e39–e48.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. 15.↵
    1. Kennedy ED,
    2. Chester P,
    3. Majeed A,
    4. Wallace P,
    5. Matthews DR

    . Networks offer new opportunities for diabetes research. Prim Care Diabetes 2010;4:3–8.

    OpenUrl
16. 16.↵
    1. Tapp H,
    2. Dulin M

    . The science of primary health-care improvement: potential and use of community-based participatory research by practice-based research networks for translation of research into practice. Exp Biol Med 2010;235:290–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Dusek JA,
    2. Abrams DI,
    3. Roberts R,
    4. et al

    . Patients Receiving Integrative Medicine Effectiveness Registry (PRIMIER) of the BraveNet practice-based research network: study protocol. BMC Complement Altern Med 2015;16.
18. 18.↵
    1. Baldwin LM,
    2. Keppel GA,
    3. Davis A,
    4. Guirguis-Blake J,
    5. Force RW,
    6. Berg AO

    . Developing a practice-based research network by integrating quality improvement: challenges and ingredients for success. Clin Transl Sci 2012;5:351–5.

    OpenUrlPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Gaglioti AH,
    2. Werner JJ,
    3. Rust G,
    4. Fagnan LJ,
    5. Neale AV

    . Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) bridging the gaps between communities, funders, and policymakers. J Am Board Fam Med 2016;29.
20. 20.↵
    1. Krist AH,
    2. Green LA,
    3. Phillips RL

    , NAPCRG Health Information Technology Working Groupet al. Health information technology needs help from primary care researchers. J Am Board Fam Med 2015;28:306–10.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Pace WD,
    2. Cifuentes M,
    3. Valuck RJ,
    4. Staton EW,
    5. Brandt EC,
    6. West DR

    . An electronic practice-based network for observational comparative effectiveness research. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:338.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Nagykaldi Z,
    2. Fox C,
    3. Gallo S,
    4. et al

    . Improving collaboration between primary care research networks using Access Grid technology. Inform Prim Care 2008;16:51–8.

    OpenUrlPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Peterson KA,
    2. Fontaine P,
    3. Speedie S

    . The electronic Primary Care Research Network (ePCRN): a new era in practice-based research. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:93–7.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Booth M,
    2. Hill G,
    3. Moore MJ,
    4. Dalla D,
    5. Moore MG,
    6. Messenger A

    . The new Australian Primary Health Networks: how will they integrate public health and primary care? Public Heal Res Pract 2016;26.
25. 25.↵
    Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Primary Health Care Research, Evaluation and Development (PHCRED) strategy phase three: 2010–2014; 2010.
26. 26.↵
    1. Westfall JM,
    2. Mold J,
    3. Fagnan L

    . Practice-based research—“blue highways” on the NIH roadmap. JAMA 2007;297:403–6.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    Department for Health. Best research for best health: introducing a new national health research strategy; 2006.
28. 28.↵
    1. Arksey H,
    2. O'Malley L

    . Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol Theory Pract 2005;8.
29. 29.↵
    1. Binstock R,
    2. et al

    1. Moren-Cross J,
    2. Lin N

    . Social networks and social integration. In: Binstock R, et al. editors. Handbook of aging and the social sciences. Academic Press; 2006. p. 111–5.
30. 30.↵
    1. Thomas P,
    2. Graffy J,
    3. Wallace P,
    4. Kirby M

    . How primary care networks can help integrate academic and service initiatives in primary care. Ann Fam Med 2006;4:235–9.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    1. Brass DJ,
    2. Galaskiewicz J,
    3. Greve HR,
    4. Tsai W

    . Taking stock of networks and organizations: a multilevel perspective. Acad Manag J 2004;47.
32. 32.↵
    1. Braun V,
    2. Clarke V

    . Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3.
33. 33.↵
    1. Maguire M,
    2. Delahunt B

    . Doing a thematic analysis: a practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Irel J Teach Learn High Educ 2017;8.
34. 34.↵
    1. Vaismoradi M,
    2. Turunen H,
    3. Bondas T

    . Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Heal Sci 2013;15.
35. 35.↵
    1. Green LA,
    2. Wood M,
    3. Becker L,
    4. et al

    . The Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network: purpose, methods, and policies. J Fam Pract 1984;18.
36. 36.↵
    1. Iverson DC,
    2. Calonge N,
    3. Miller RS,
    4. Niebauer LJ,
    5. Reed FM

    . The development and management of a primary care research network. Fam Med 1988;20:1978–87.

    OpenUrl
37. 37.↵
    1. Rosser WW,
    2. Green L

    . Update from ASPN. Can Fam Physician 1989;35.
38. 38.↵
    1. Fontaine P,
    2. Mendenhall TJ,
    3. Peterson K,
    4. Speedie SM

    . The “Measuring Outcomes of Clinical Connectivity” (MOCC) trial: investigating data entry errors in the electronic Primary Care Research Network (ePCRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20.
39. 39.↵
    1. Delaney BC,
    2. Peterson KA,
    3. Speedie S,
    4. Taweel A,
    5. Arvanitis TN,
    6. Richard HF

    . Envisioning a learning health care system: the electronic primary care research network, a case study. Ann Fam Med 2012;10.
40. 40.↵
    1. Peterson KA,
    2. Delaney BC,
    3. Arvanitis TN,
    4. et al

    . A model for the electronic support of practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med 2012;10.
41. 41.↵
    1. Culpepper L,
    2. Froom J

    . The international primary care network: purpose, methods, and policies. Fam Med 1988;20.
42. 42.↵
    1. Butler CC,
    2. Hood K,
    3. Verheij T,
    4. et al

    . Variation in antibiotic prescribing and its impact on recovery in patients with acute cough in primary care: prospective study in 13 countries. BMJ 2009;338:b2242.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
43. 43.↵
    1. Nuttall J,
    2. Hood K,
    3. Verheij TJ,
    4. et al

    . Building an international network for a primary care research program: reflections on challenges and solutions in the set-up and delivery of a prospective observational study of acute cough in 13 European countries. BMC Fam Pract 2011;12.
44. 44.↵
    1. del Torso S,
    2. van Esso D,
    3. Gerber A,
    4. et al

    . European Academy of Paediatrics Research in Ambulatory Setting Network (EAPRASnet): a multi-national general paediatric research network for better child health. Child Care Health Dev 2010;36.
45. 45.↵
    1. Lamont R,
    2. Fishman T,
    3. Sanders PF,
    4. ‘Ofanoa M,
    5. Goodyear-Smith F

    . View from the canoe: co-designing research Pacific style. Ann Fam Med 2020;18:172–5.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
46. 46.↵
    1. Clothier HJ,
    2. Fielding JE,
    3. Kelly HA

    . An evaluation of the Australian Sentinel Practice Research Network (ASPREN) surveillance for influenza-like illness. Commun Dis Intell 2005;29.
47. 47.↵
    1. Schweikardt C,
    2. Verheij RA,
    3. Donker GA,
    4. Coppieters Y

    . The historical development of the Dutch Sentinel General Practice Network from a paper-based into a digital primary care monitoring system. J Public Heal 2016;24.
48. 48.↵
    1. Volmink JA,
    2. Furman SN

    . The South African Sentinel Practitioner Research Network Organization, Objectives, Policies and Methods; 1991.
49. 49.↵
    1. Fleming DM

    . Weekly returns service of the Royal College of General Practitioners. Commun Dis Public Heal 1999;2:96–100.

    OpenUrl
50. 50.↵
    1. Cooke J,
    2. Nancarrow S,
    3. Dyas J,
    4. Williams M

    . An evaluation of the “designated research team” approach to building research capacity in primary care. BMC Fam Pract 2008;9.
51. 51.↵
    1. Abbott S,
    2. Gunnell C

    . Developing R&D capacity in primary care nursing: report of a research project. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2005;6:95–100.

    OpenUrl
52. 52.↵
    1. Carter Y

    . Research opportunities in primary care. Radcliffe Medical Press; 1998.
53. 53.↵
    1. Anderko L,
    2. Lundeen S,
    3. Bartz C

    . The Midwest Nursing Centers Consortium Research Network: translating research into practice. Policy Polit Nurs Pract 2006;7:101–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
54. 54.↵
    1. Nelson EC,
    2. Kirk JW,
    3. Bise BW,
    4. et al

    . The cooperative information project: part 2: some initial clinical, quality assurance, and practice management studies. J Fam Pract 1981;13.
55. 55.↵
    1. Wasserman R,
    2. Serwint JR,
    3. Kuppermann N,
    4. Srivastava R,
    5. Dreyer B

    . The APA and the rise of pediatric generalist network research. Acad Pediatr 2011;11:195–204.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
56. 56.↵
    1. Solberg LI,
    2. Cole PM,
    3. Seifert MH

    . The Minnesota Academy of Family Physicians' Research Network: a vehicle for practice-based research. Minn Med 1986;69.
57. 57.↵
    1. Middelkoop BJC,
    2. Bohnen AM,
    3. Duisterhout JS,
    4. Hoes AW,
    5. Pleumeekers HJCM,
    6. Prins A

    . Rotterdam General Practitioners Report (ROHAPRO): a computerised network of general practices in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health 1995;49:231–3.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
58. 58.↵
    1. Davies J,
    2. Heyman B,
    3. Bryar R,
    4. et al

    . The research potential of practice nurses. Heal Soc Care Community 2002;10:370–81.

    OpenUrl
59. 59.↵
    1. Davies J,
    2. Heyman B,
    3. Bryar R,
    4. et al

    . Building practice nurse research capacity. Pract Nurs 2002;13:449–53.

    OpenUrl
60. 60.↵
    1. Sullivan F,
    2. Hinds A,
    3. Pitkethly M,
    4. Treweek S,
    5. Wilson P,
    6. Wyke S

    . Primary care research network progress in Scotland. Eur J Gen Pract 2014;20.
61. 61.↵
    1. Hannay DR

    . Evaluation of a primary care research network in rural Scotland. Prim Heal Care Res Dev 2006;7.
62. 62.↵
    1. Comino E,
    2. Zwar NA,
    3. Hermiz OH

    . PHReNet: a general practice research network in South Western Sydney, Australia; 2002.
63. 63.↵
    1. Waters RL,
    2. Weston KM,
    3. Farmer E

    [Internet]. Linking primary health care researchers in South Australia: a network strategy; 2004. Available from: https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1564&context=medpapers.
64. 64.↵
    1. Ried K,
    2. Farmer EA,
    3. Weston KM

    . Setting directions for capacity building in primary health care: a survey of a research network. BMC Fam Pract 2006;7.
65. 65.↵
    1. Ried K,
    2. Farmer EA,
    3. Weston KM

    . Bursaries, writing grants and fellowships: a strategy to develop research capacity in primary health care. BMC Fam Pract 2007;8:13.

    OpenUrlPubMed
66. 66.↵
    1. Soós M,
    2. Temple-Smith M,
    3. Gunn J,
    4. Johnston-Ata'Ata K,
    5. Pirotta M

    . Establishing the Victorian primary care practice based research network. Aust Fam Physician 2010;39.
67. 67.↵
    1. Dijkmans-Hadley B,
    2. Bonney A,
    3. Barnett SR

    . Development of an Australian practice-based research network as a community of practice. Aust J Prim Health 2015;21.
68. 68.↵
    1. Robertson S,
    2. Hornby C,
    3. Jones R

    . Joint working to develop R&D capacity in three rural primary care trusts. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2005;6:1–4.

    OpenUrl
69. 69.↵
    Trent Focus Group. For the promotion of research and development in primary health care: annual report 1996–97; 1997.
70. 70.↵
    1. Comino E

    [Internet]. The Winston Churchill Memorial Trust of Australia Churchill Fellowship 2002: primary health care research (networks) in the United Kingdom. Available from: http://nswcfa.churchilltrust.com.au/media/fellows/Comino_Elizabeth_2002-1.pdf.
71. 71.↵
    1. Cooke J,
    2. Owen J,
    3. Wilson A

    . Research and development at the health and social care interface in primary care: a scoping exercise in one National Health Service region. Heal Soc Care Community 2002;10.
72. 72.↵
    1. Graffy J,
    2. Hines M,
    3. Fosam H

    . Annual Report for ELENoR; 2002.
73. 73.↵
    1. Pitkethly M,
    2. Sullivan F N

    . Four years of TayRen, a primary care research and development network. Prim Heal Care Res Dev 2003;4.
74. 74.↵
    1. Porcheret M,
    2. Hughes R,
    3. Evans D,
    4. et al

    . Data quality of general practice electronic health records: the impact of a program of assessments, feedback, and training. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 2004;11.
75. 75.↵
    1. Sullivan F,
    2. Butler C,
    3. Cupples M,
    4. Kinmonth AL

    . Primary care research networks in the United Kingdom. Br Med J 2007;334:1093–4.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
76. 76.↵
    1. Visentin GR

    . The multiple meaning of a research project in general practice. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005;59:S89–S92.

    OpenUrl
77. 77.↵
    1. Okkes IM,
    2. Groen A,
    3. Oskam SK,
    4. Lamberts H

    . Advantages of long observation in episode-oriented electronic patient records in family practice. Methods Inf Med 2001;40:229–35.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
78. 78.↵
    1. Smith HD,
    2. Dunleavey J

    . Wessex primary care research network: a report on two years progress. Southampt Heal J 1996;3:43–7.

    OpenUrl
79. 79.↵
    1. Duggan A,
    2. Minkovitz CS,
    3. Chaffin M,
    4. et al

    . Creating a national home visiting research network. Pediatrics 2013;132:S82–S89.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
80. 80.↵
    1. Adams J,
    2. Steel A,
    3. Moore C,
    4. Amorin-Woods L,
    5. Sibbritt D

    . Establishing the ACORN National Practitioner Database: strategies to recruit practitioners to a national practice-based research network. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2016;39:594–602.].

    OpenUrl
81. 81.↵
    1. Tyler CV,
    2. Werner JJ

    . Community-engagement strategies of the Developmental Disabilities Practice-Based Research Network (DD-PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27.
82. 82.↵
    1. Frayne SM,
    2. Carney DV,
    3. Bastian L,
    4. et al

    . The VA women's health practice-based research network: amplifying women veterans' voices in VA research. J Gen Intern Med 2013;28:504–9.

    OpenUrlPubMed
83. 83.↵
    1. Jensen IB,
    2. Brämberg EB,
    3. Wåhlin C,
    4. et al

    . Promoting evidence-based practice for improved occupational safety and health at workplaces in Sweden: report on a practice-based research network approach. IJERPH 2020;17:5283–15.

    OpenUrl
84. 84.↵
    1. Dovey SM,
    2. Tilyard MW

    . The computer research network of the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners: an approach to general practice research in New Zealand. Br J Gen Pract 1996;46.
85. 85.↵
    1. Pickstone C,
    2. Nancarrow SA,
    3. Cooke JM,
    4. et al

    . Building research capacity in the allied health professions. Evid Policy 2008;4:53–68.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
86. 86.↵
    1. Thomas P,
    2. While A

    . Increasing research capacity and changing the culture of primary care towards reflective inquiring practice: the experience of the West London research network (WeLReN). J Interprof Care 2001;15.
87. 87.↵
    1. Lieberman MI

    [Internet]. Medical Quality Improvement Consortium (MQIC) presentation; 2006. Available from: https://www.amia.org/sites/amia.org/files/2006-Policy-Meeting-Medical-2006-Policy-Meeting-Quality-Improvement-Consortium.pdf.
88. 88.↵
    1. Sills MR

    [Internet]. SAFTINet overview for EDRC: presented to the Emergency Department Research Committee, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine; 2015 [cited 2020 June 29]. Available from: https://www.slideshare.net/MarionSills/saftinet-overview-for-edrc.
89. 89.↵
    1. O'Regan A,
    2. Hayes P,
    3. O'Connor R,
    4. et al

    . The University of Limerick Education and Research Network for General Practice (ULEARN-GP): practice characteristics and general practitioner perspectives. BMC Fam Pract 2020;21:25.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
90. 90.↵
    1. DeVoe JE,
    2. Gold R,
    3. Spofford M,
    4. et al

    . Developing a network of community health centers with a common electronic health record: description of the Safety Net West Practice-Based Research Network (SNW-PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24.
91. 91.↵
    1. Ornstein SM,
    2. Jenkins RG

    . The Practice Partner Research Network: description of a novel national research network of computer-based patient records users. Carolina Heal Serv Policy Rev 1997;4:145–51.

    OpenUrl
92. 92.↵
    1. DeVoe JE,
    2. Likumahuwa S,
    3. Eiff MP,
    4. et al

    . Lessons learned and challenges ahead: report from the OCHIN Safety Net West Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25:560–4.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
93. 93.↵
    1. Kwan BM,
    2. Sills MR,
    3. Graham D,
    4. et al

    . Stakeholder engagement in a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure implementation: a report from the SAFTINet practice-based research network (PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2016;29:102–15.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
94. 94.↵
    1. Rodnick JE,
    2. Francisco S

    . Papers by family physicians that have influenced the way i practice. J Fam Pract 1999; 48. Available from: https://www.mdedge.com/familymedicine/article/183548/papers-family-physicians-have-influenced-way-i-practice.
95. 95.↵
    1. Stephens KA,
    2. Lin C-P,
    3. Baldwin L-M,
    4. et al

    . LC Data QUEST: a technical architecture for community federated clinical data sharing. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci 2012;2012:57–62.

    OpenUrl
96. 96.↵
    1. Slora EJ,
    2. Wasserman RC

    . PROS: a research network to enhance practice and improve child health. Pediatr Ann 2010;39:352–61.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
97. 97.↵
    1. McCloskey B,
    2. Grey M,
    3. Deshefy-Longhi T,
    4. Grey LJ

    . APRN practice patterns in primary care. Nurse Pract 2003;28:39–44.

    OpenUrlPubMed
98. 98.↵
    1. Pearce KA,
    2. Love MM,
    3. Barron MA,
    4. Matheny SC,
    5. Mahfoud Z

    . How and why to study the practice content of a practice-based research network. Ann Fam Med 2004;2.
99. 99.↵
    1. Kuo GM,
    2. Steinbauer JR,
    3. Spann SJ

    . Conducting medication safety research projects in a primary care physician practice-based research network. J Am Pharm Assoc 2008;48.
100. 100.↵
     1. Ried K,
     2. Farmer EA,
     3. Weston KM

     . Setting directions for capacity building in primary health care: a survey of a research network. BMC Fam Pract 2006;7:1–11.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
101. 101.↵
     1. Vessey JA

     . A practice-based research network to improve the quality of school nursing practice. J Sch Nurs 2007;23.
102. 102.↵
     1. Gibson K,
     2. Szilagyi P,
     3. Swanger CM,
     4. et al

     . Physician perspectives on incentives to participate in practice-based research: a Greater Rochester practice-based research network (GR-PBRN) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2010;23.
103. 103.↵
     1. Liaw ST,
     2. Taggart J,
     3. Dennis S,
     4. Yeo A

     . Data quality and fitness for purpose of routinely collected data—a general practice case study from an electronic practice-based research network (ePBRN). AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2011;2011:785–94.

     OpenUrlPubMed
104. 104.↵
     1. Green LA,
     2. Hames CG,
     3. Nutting PA

     . Potential of practice-based research networks: experiences from ASPN. J Fam Pract 1994;38.
105. 105.↵
     1. Kwan BM,
     2. Graham D,
     3. Sills M,
     4. et al

     . SAFTINet: Scalable Architecture for Federated Translational Inquiries Network methods for the collection of patient reported outcomes in a safety net-oriented practice based research network: a SAFTINet demonstration project patient—reported outcome; 2015.
106. 106.↵
     1. Boydell L,
     2. Grandidier H,
     3. Rafferty C,
     4. McAteer C,
     5. Reilly P

     . General practice data retrieval: The Northern Ireland project. J Epidemiol Community Health 1995;49:22–5.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
107. 107.↵
     1. Dulin MF

     . The creation of PBRN to study health care delivery to a transitioning community (HS16023); 2005.
108. 108.↵
     1. Likumahuwa S,
     2. Song H,
     3. Singal R,
     4. et al

     . Building research infrastructure in community health centers: a Community Health Applied Research Network (CHARN) report. J Am Board Fam Med 2013;26.
109. 109.↵
     1. Metsemakers JFM,
     2. Hoppener P,
     3. Knottnerus JA,
     4. Kocken RJJ,
     5. Limonard CBG

     . Computerized health information in the Netherlands: a registration network of family practices. Br J Gen Pract 1992;42.
110. 110.↵
     1. DeVoe JE,
     2. Sears A

     . The Ochin community information network: bringing together community health centers, information technology, and data to support a patient-centered medical village. J Am Board Fam Med 2013;26:271–8.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
111. 111.↵
     1. Sardell A

     . Clinical networks and clinician retention: the case of CDN. J Community Health 1996;21:437–51.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
112. 112.↵
     1. Mold JW,
     2. Peterson KA

     . Primary care practice-based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med 2005;3.
113. 113.↵
     1. Mold JW,
     2. Barton ED

     . OAFP starts practice-based resource/research network. J Okla State Med Assoc 1996;89.
114. 114.↵
     1. Serwint JR

     . Multisite survey of pediatric residents' continuity experiences: their perceptions of the clinical and educational opportunities. Pediatrics 2001;107:e78.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
115. 115.↵
     1. Fagnan LJ

     . ORPRN “Blue Highways” reflections; 2018.
116. 116.↵
     1. Libby AM,
     2. Pace W,
     3. Bryan C,
     4. et al

     . Comparative effectiveness research in DARTNet primary care practices: point of care data collection on hypoglycemia and over-the-counter and herbal use among patients diagnosed with diabetes. Med Care 2010;48(Suppl.).
117. 117.↵
     1. Cole AM,
     2. Stephens KA,
     3. Keppel GA,
     4. Lin CP,
     5. Baldwin LM

     . Implementation of a health data-sharing infrastructure across diverse primary care organizations. J Ambul Care Manage 2014;37:164–70.

     OpenUrl
118. 118.↵
     1. Koskela TH

     . Building a primary care research network—lessons to learn. Scand J Prim Health Care 2017;35.
119. 119.↵
     1. Davies J,
     2. Heyman B,
     3. Bryar R,
     4. et al

     . Building practice nurse research capacity. Pract Nurs 2002;13.
120. 120.↵
     1. Graham DG,
     2. Spano MS,
     3. Stewart TV,
     4. Staton EW,
     5. Meers A,
     6. Pace WD

     . Strategies for planning and launching PBRN research studies: a project of the Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network (AAFP NRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20.
121. 121.↵
     1. Burge SK,
     2. Hill JH

     . The medical student summer research program in family medicine. Fam Med 2014;46:45–8.

     OpenUrl
122. 122.↵
     1. Kavanagh KE,
     2. O'Brien N,
     3. Glynn LG,
     4. Vellinga A,
     5. Murphy AW

     . WestREN: a description of an Irish academic general practice research network. BMC Fam Pract 2010;11.
123. 123.↵
     Trent Focus Group. For the promotion of research and development in primary health care: annual report 2000-2001; 2001.
124. 124.↵
     1. Beasley JW,
     2. Cox NS,
     3. Livingston BT

     . Development and operation of the Wisconsin Research Network. Wis Med J 1991;90.
125. 125.↵
     Pearls of Research [Internet]. American Academy of Family Physicians. Practice-based research networks in the 21st century; 1998. Available from: https://www.aafp.org/dam/AAFP/documents/patient_care/nrn/pearlsofresearch.pdf.
126. 126.↵
     1. Birtwhistle R,
     2. Keshavjee K,
     3. Lambert-Lanning A,
     4. et al

     . Building a pan-Canadian primary care sentinel surveillance network: initial development and moving forward. J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22.
127. 127.↵
     1. Croughan-Minihane MS,
     2. Thom DH,
     3. Petitti DB

     . Research interests of physicians in two practice-based primary care research networks. West J Med 1999;170:19–24.

     OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
128. 128.↵
     IPCRN [Internet]. Irish Primary Care Research Network [cited 2017 May 17]. Available from: http://www.ipcrn.ie/.
129. 129.↵
     1. Sayer GP,
     2. McGeechan K,
     3. Kemp A,
     4. et al

     . The general practice research network: the capabilities of an electronic patient management system for longitudinal patient data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2003;12.
130. 130.↵
     1. Nelson EC,
     2. Kirk JW,
     3. Bise BW,
     4. et al

     . The Cooperative Information Project: part 1: a sentinel practice network for service and research in primary care. J Fam Pract 1981;13.
131. 131.↵
     1. Williamson HA,
     2. Hector MG,
     3. LeFevre M,
     4. White RD

     . Establishing a rural family practice research network. Fam Med 1988;20.
132. 132.↵
     1. Wasserman RC,
     2. Slora EJ,
     3. Bocian AB,
     4. et al

     . Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS): a national practice-based research network to improve children's health care. Pediatrics 1998;102:1350–7.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
133. 133.↵
     1. Peterson KA,
     2. Lipman PD,
     3. Lange CJ,
     4. Cohen RA,
     5. Durako S

     . Supporting better science in primary care: a description of practice-based research networks (PBRNs) in 2011. J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25.
134. 134.↵
     1. Love MM,
     2. Pearce KA,
     3. Williamson MA,
     4. Barron MA,
     5. Shelton BJ

     . Patients, practices, and relationships: challenges and lessons learned from the Kentucky Ambulatory Network (KAN) CaRESS clinical trial. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:75–84.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
135. 135.↵
     National Institute for Health Research, Clinical Research Network. LCRN guidance suite: provision of infratsructure support for research delivery in primary care settings. Vol V2.0.; 2014.
136. 136.↵
     1. Laurence CO,
     2. Beilby JJ,
     3. Marley JE,
     4. Newbury J,
     5. Wilkinson D,
     6. Symon B

     . Establishing a practice based primary care research network: the University Family Practice Network in South Australia. Aust Fam Physician 2001;30.
137. 137.↵
     1. Schers H,
     2. Bor H,
     3. van den Hoogen H,
     4. van Weel C

     . What went and what came? Morbidity trends in general practice from the Netherlands. Eur J Gen Pract 2008;14:13–24.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
138. 138.↵
     1. Osborn EH,
     2. Petitti DB

     . Physician interest in collaborative research. J Am Board Fam Pract 1988;1.
139. 139.↵
     1. Anderko L,
     2. Bartz C,
     3. Lundeen S

     . Practice-based research networks: nursing centers and communities working collaboratively to reduce health disparities. Nurs Clin North Am 2005;40.
140. 140.↵
     1. Sloane PD,
     2. Callahan L,
     3. Kahwati L,
     4. Mitchell CM

     . Development of a practice-based patient cohort for primary care research. Fam Med 2006;38.
141. 141.↵
     Trent Focus Group. For the promotion of research and development in primary health care: annual report 1999–2000; 1999.
142. 142.↵
     1. Thomas P,
     2. Griffiths F,
     3. Kai J,
     4. O'Dwyer A

     . Primary care networks for research in primary health care. Br Med J 2001;322:588–90.

     OpenUrlFREE Full Text
143. 143.↵
     1. Magin PJ,
     2. Marshall MJ,
     3. Goode SM,
     4. Cotter GL,
     5. Pond CD,
     6. Zwar NA

     . How generalisable are results of studies conducted in practice-based research networks? A cross-sectional study of general practitioner demographics in two New South Wales networks. Med J Aust 2011;195.
144. 144.↵
     1. De Clercq E,
     2. Vandenberghe H,
     3. Jonckheer P,
     4. Bastiaens H,
     5. Lafontane MF,
     6. Van Gasteren V

     . Assessment of a three-year experience with a Belgian primary care data network. Stud Health Technol Inform 2002;93.
145. 145.↵
     1. Marley J

     . Establishing a rural research network. Med J Aust 1992;156.
146. 146.↵
     1. Volmink J

     . SASPREN—a new development in family practice research in South Africa. South African Med J 1996;86.
147. 147.↵
     1. Truyers C,
     2. Goderis G,
     3. Dewitte H,
     4. Akker MV,
     5. Buntinx F

     . The Intego database: background, methods and basic results of a Flemish general practice-based continuous morbidity registration project. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2014;14.
148. 148.↵
     1. Carsley S,
     2. Borkhoff CM,
     3. Maguire JL,
     4. et al

     . Cohort profile: the Applied Research Group for Kids (TARGet Kids!). Int J Epidemiol 2015;44.
149. 149.↵
     1. Morinis J,
     2. Maguire J,
     3. Khovratovich M,
     4. McCrindle BW,
     5. Parkin PC,
     6. Birken CS

     . Paediatric obesity research in early childhood and the primary care setting: the TARGet Kids! research network. IJERPH 2012;9:1343–54.

     OpenUrl
150. 150.↵
     1. Laux G,
     2. Koerner T,
     3. Rosemann T,
     4. Beyer M,
     5. Gilbert K,
     6. Szecsenyi J

     . The CONTENT project: a problem-oriented, episode-based electronic patient record in primary care. Inform Prim Care 2005;13.
151. 151.↵
     1. Metsemakers JFM,
     2. Knottnerus JA,
     3. Van Schendel GJ,
     4. Kocken RJJ,
     5. Limonard CBG

     . Unlocking patients' records in general practice for research, medical education and quality assurance: the Registration Network Family Practices. Int J Biomed Comput 1996;42:1–2.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
152. 152.↵
     1. Taggart J,
     2. Liaw ST,
     3. Dennis S,
     4. et al

     . The University of NSW electronic practice based research network: disease registers, data quality and utility. Stud Heal Technol Inform 2012;178.
153. 153.↵
     1. Pace WD,
     2. Fox C,
     3. White T,
     4. Graham D,
     5. Schilling LM,
     6. West DR

     . The DARTNet Institute: seeking a sustainable support mechanism for electronic data enabled research networks. eGEMs 2014;2:6.

     OpenUrl
154. 154.↵
     1. Dillon P,
     2. O'Brien KK,
     3. McDonnell R,
     4. et al

     . Prevalence of prescribing in pregnancy using the Irish primary care research network: a pilot study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15.
155. 155.↵
     1. Boffin N,
     2. Bossuyt N,
     3. Vanthomme K,
     4. Van Casteren V

     . Readiness of the Belgian network of sentinel general practitioners to deliver electronic health record data for surveillance purposes: results of survey study. BMC Fam Pract 2010;11.
156. 156.↵
     1. Fagnan LJ,
     2. Morris C,
     3. Shipman SA,
     4. Holub J,
     5. King A,
     6. Angier H

     . Characterizing a practice-based research network: Oregon rural practice-based research network (ORPRN) survey tools. J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20.
157. 157.↵
     1. Dulin MF,
     2. Tapp H,
     3. Smith HA,
     4. Urquieta D. H B,
     5. Furuseth OJ

     . A community based participatory approach to improving health in a Hispanic population. Implement Sci 2011;6.
158. 158.↵
     1. Fleming DM,
     2. Crombie DL

     . The incidence of common infectious diseases: the weekly returns service of the Royal College of General Practitioners. Health Trends 1985;17.
159. 159.↵
     1. Birtwhistle RV

     . Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network: a developing resource for family medicine and public health. Can Fam Physician 2011;57.
160. 160.↵
     1. Wasserman RC,
     2. Croft CA,
     3. Brotherton SE

     . Preschool vision screening in pediatric practice: a study from the Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS) network. Pediatrics 1992;89:834–8.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
161. 161.↵
     1. Lobet MP,
     2. Stroobant A,
     3. Mertens R,
     4. et al

     . Tool for validation of the network of sentinel general practitioners in the Belgian health care system. Int J Epidemiol 1987;16:612–8.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
162. 162.↵
     AAFP [Internet]. Affiliated PBRNs–National Research Network [cited 2020 Aug 13]. Available from: https://www.aafp.org/patient-care/nrn/nrn/pbrns.html.
163. 163.↵
     PBRN Resource Center A. Centers for Primary Care Practice-Based Research and Learning: nurture partnerships, method development, and trans-network collaborations; n.d.
164. 164.↵
     1. Lindbloom EJ,
     2. Ewigman BG,
     3. Hickner JM

     . Practice-based research networks: the laboratories of primary care research. Med Care 2004;42(Suppl).
165. 165.↵
     1. Schilling LM,
     2. Kwan BM,
     3. Drolshagen CT,
     4. et al

     . Scalable Architecture for Federated Translational Inquiries Network (SAFTINet) Technology Infrastructure for a Distributed Data Network. eGEMs 2013;1:11.

     OpenUrl
166. 166.↵
     1. Vessey JA

     , the Founding Oversight Board Members of MASNRN. Development of the Massachusetts School Nurse Research Network (MASNRN): a practice-based research network to improve the quality of school nursing practice. J Sch Nurs 2007;23:65–72.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
167. 167.↵
     1. LeBailly S,
     2. Ariza A,
     3. Bayldon B,
     4. Binns HJ

     . The origin and evolution of a regional pediatric practice-based research network: practical and methodological lessons from the Pediatric Practice Research Group. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2003;33.
168. 168.↵
     1. Nagykaldi Z,
     2. Mold JW,
     3. Aspy CB

     . Practice facilitators: a review of the literature. Fam Med 2005;37:581–8.

     OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
169. 169.↵
     1. Deshefy-Longhi T,
     2. Swartz MK,
     3. Grey M

     . Establishing a practice-based research network of advanced practice registered nurses in southern New England. Nurs Outlook 2002;50:127–31.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
170. 170.↵
     1. Christoffel KK,
     2. Binns HJ,
     3. Stockman JA,
     4. et al

     . Practice-based research: opportunities and obstacles. Pediatrics 1988;82.
171. 171.↵
     1. Solberg LI,
     2. Mayer TR,
     3. Seifert M,
     4. Cole PM

     . The Minnesota AFP research panel: a model for collaborative practicing family physician research. Fam Med 1983;15:139–42.

     OpenUrl
172. 172.↵
     1. Hayes H,
     2. Parchman ML,
     3. Howard R

     . A logic model framework for evaluation and planning in a primary care practice-based research network (PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24.
173. 173.↵
     1. Williams RL,
     2. McPherson L,
     3. Kong A,
     4. Skipper B,
     5. Weller N

     . Internet-based training in a practice-based research network consortium: a report from the primary care multiethnic network (PRIME Net). J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22.
174. 174.↵
     1. Volmink J,
     2. Laubscher J,
     3. Furman S

     . The SASPREN primary care survey—who consults the family doctor? South African Med J 1996;86.
175. 175.↵
     1. Serwint JR,
     2. Thoma KA,
     3. Dabrow SM

     , for the CORNET Investigators, et al. Comparing patients seen in pediatric resident continuity clinics and National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey practices: a study from the Continuity Research Network. Pediatrics 2006;118:e849–e858.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
176. 176.↵
     1. Selby K,
     2. Cornuz J,
     3. Senn N

     . Establishment of a representative practice-based research network (PBRN) for the monitoring of primary care in Switzerland. J Am Board Fam Med 2015;28.
177. 177.↵
     1. Galliher JM,
     2. Bonham AJ,
     3. Dickinson LM,
     4. Staton EW,
     5. Pace WD

     . Representativeness of PBRN physician practice patterns and related beliefs: the case of the AAFP National Research Network. Ann Fam Med 2009;7:547–54.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
178. 178.↵
     1. Slora EJ,
     2. Thoma KA,
     3. Wasserman RC,
     4. Pedlow SE,
     5. Bocian AB

     . Patient visits to a national practice-based research network: comparing pediatric research in office settings with the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Pediatrics 2006;118:e228–e234.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
179. 179.↵
     1. De VP

     . Home violence in South Africa: surveillance during 1996 by SASPREN, a sentinel network of general/family practitioners: SASPREN news. South Africa Fam Pract 1998;19.
180. 180.↵
     1. Green LA,
     2. Miller RS,
     3. Reed FM,
     4. Iverson DC,
     5. Barley GE

     . How representative of typical practice are practice-based research networks? A report from the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network Inc (ASPN). Arch Fam Med 1993;2:939–49.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
181. 181.↵
     1. Nutting PA,
     2. Baier M,
     3. Werner JJ,
     4. Cutter G,
     5. Reed FM,
     6. Orzano AJ

     . Practice patterns of family physicians in practice-based research networks: a report from ASPN. J Am Board Fam Pract 1999;12:278–84.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
182. 182.↵
     1. Van den Akker M,
     2. Buntix F,
     3. Metsemakers JFM,
     4. Roos S,
     5. Knottnerus JA

     . Multimorbidity in general practice: prevalence, incidence, and determinants of co-occurring chronic and recurrent diseases. J Clin Epidemiol 1998;51.
183. 183.↵
     1. Gourlay ML,
     2. Lewis CL,
     3. Preisser JS,
     4. Mitchell CM,
     5. Sloane PD

     . Perceptions of informed decision making about cancer screening in a diverse primary care population. Fam Med 2010;42:421–7.

     OpenUrlPubMed
184. 184.↵
     1. Mold J,
     2. Gregory ME

     . Best practices research. Fam Med 2003;35:131–4.

     OpenUrlPubMed
185. 185.↵
     1. Gill JM,
     2. Chen YX,
     3. Grimes A,
     4. Klinkman MS

     . Using electronic health record-based tools to screen for bipolar disorder in primary care patients with depression. J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25:283–90.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
186. 186.↵
     1. Venmans LMAJ,
     2. Hak E,
     3. Gorter KJ,
     4. Rutten GEHM

     . Incidence and antibiotic prescription rates for common infections in patients with diabetes in primary care over the years 1995 to 2003. Int J Infect Dis. 2009;13.
187. 187.↵
     1. Chmiel C,
     2. Bhend H,
     3. Senn O,
     4. et al

     . The FIRE project: a milestone for research in primary care in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly 2011;141:1–7.

     OpenUrl
188. 188.↵
     1. Pace WD,
     2. West DR,
     3. Valuck RJ,
     4. Cifuentes M,
     5. Staton EW

     . Distributed Ambulatory Research in Theurapeutics Network (DARTNet): summary report; 2009.
189. 189.↵
     1. Slawson DC,
     2. Herman JM,
     3. Bennett JH

     . Single community research networks: the HARNET experience. Arch Fam Med 1993;2:725–8.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
190. 190.↵
     1. Green LA,
     2. White LL,
     3. Barry HC,
     4. Nease DE,
     5. Hudson BL

     . Infrastructure requirements for practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med 2005;3.
191. 191.↵
     1. Harvey J,
     2. Fenton E,
     3. Sturt J

     . Evaluation of primary care R&D networks in North Thames region: final report; 2002.
192. 192.↵
     1. Tierney WM,
     2. Oppenheimer CC,
     3. Hudson BL,
     4. et al

     . A national survey of primary care practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med 2007;5.
193. 193.↵
     1. Griswold KS

     . Communities of solution: the Folsom report revisited. Ann Fam Med 2012;10:250–60.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
194. 194.↵
     Primary Care MultiEthnic Network (PRIMENet) [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2020 Nov 29]. Available from: http://www.prime-net-consortium.org/.
195. 195.↵
     1. Darbyshire J,
     2. Sitzia J,
     3. Cameron D,
     4. et al

     . Extending the clinical research network approach to all of healthcare. Ann Oncol 2011;22.
196. 196.↵
     1. Binienda J,
     2. Neale AV,
     3. Wallace LS

     . Future directions for practice-based research networks (PBRNs): a CERA survey. J Am Board Fam Med 2018;31.
197. 197.↵
     1. Mayo M,
     2. Meindl JR,
     3. Pastor JC

     . Shared leadership in work teams: a social network approach. In: Shared leadership: reframing the hows and whys of leadership. London: SAGE; 2003.
198. 198.↵
     1. Burt RS

     . Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence. Am J Sociol 1987;92.
199. 199.↵
     1. Liu W,
     2. Sidhu A,
     3. Beacom AM,
     4. Valente TW

     . Social network theory. In: The international encyclopedia of media effects. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2017. p. 1–12.
200. 200.↵
     1. Crossland L,
     2. Janamian T,
     3. Jackson CL

     . Key elements of high-quality practice organisation in primary health care: a systematic review. Med J Aust 2014;201.
201. 201.↵
     1. Solberg LI,
     2. Hroscikoski MC,
     3. Sperl-Hillen JAM,
     4. Harper PG,
     5. Crabtree BF

     . Transforming medical care: case study of an exemplary, small medical group. Ann Fam Med 2006;4.
202. 202.↵
     1. Van Weel C

     . Longitudinal research and data collection in primary care. Ann Fam Med 2005;3.
203. 203.↵
     1. Beasley JW,
     2. Starfield B,
     3. Van Weel C,
     4. Rosser WW,
     5. Haq CL

     . Global health and primary care research. J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20.
204. 204.↵
     1. Nagykaldi Z

     . Practice-based research networks at the crossroads of research translation. J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:725–9.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
205. 205.↵
     1. Schwartz A,
     2. Young R,
     3. Hicks PJ,
     4. Learn FA

     . Medical education practice-based research networks: facilitating collaborative research. Med Teach 2016;38.
206. 206.↵
     1. Werner JJ,
     2. Stange KC

     . Praxis-based research networks: An emerging paradigm for research that is rigorous, relevant, and inclusive. J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27.
207. 207.↵
     1. Etz RS,
     2. Hahn KA,
     3. Gonzalez MM,
     4. Crabtree BF,
     5. Stange KC

     . Practice-based innovations: more relevant and transportable than NIH-funded studies. J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27.
208. 208.↵
     1. Del MC.,
     2. Askew D

     . Building family/general practice research capacity. Ann Fam Med 2004;2.
209. 209.↵
     1. Dwan KM,
     2. Magin PJ

     . The desire for research in general practice. Aust Fam Physician 2008;37:871–3.

     OpenUrlPubMed
210. 210.↵
     1. Marshall M,
     2. Pagel C,
     3. French C,
     4. et al

     . Moving improvement research closer to practice: the researcher-in-residence model. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:801–5.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
211. 211.↵
     1. Marshall M,
     2. Eyre L,
     3. Lalani M,
     4. et al

     . Increasing the impact of health services research on service improvement: the researcher-in-residence model. J R Soc Med 2016;109:220–5.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
212. 212.↵
     1. Marshall M

     [Internet]. Negotiating evidence; the researcher-in-residence model; 2016. Available from: https://piru.ac.uk/assets/files/Marshall Researcher in Residence.pdf.
213. 213.↵
     1. Cadwallader JS,
     2. Lebeau JP,
     3. Lasserre E,
     4. Letrilliart L

     . Patient and professional attitudes towards research in general practice: the RepR qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2014;15.
214. 214.↵
     SDO. NHS Service Delivery and Organization, R&D Programme. Key lessons for network management in health care; 2005.
215. 215.↵
     1. Exworthy M,
     2. Day P,
     3. Robinson R,
     4. Peckham S,
     5. Evans D

     [Internet]. Primary care research networks; 1997 [cited 2020 Oct 13]. Available from: https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/1102793.
216. 216.↵
     1. Beasley JW,
     2. Starfield B,
     3. Van Weel C,
     4. Rosser WW,
     5. Haq CL

     . Global health and primary care research. J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20:518–26.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
217. 217.↵
     1. Beasley JW,
     2. Hahn DL,
     3. Wiesen P,
     4. Plane MB,
     5. Manwell L

     . The cost of primary care research. J Fam Pract 2000;49:985.

     OpenUrlPubMed
218. 218.↵
     1. Hahn DL

     . Physician opportunity costs for performing practice-based research. J Fam Pract 2000;49.
219. 219.↵
     Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality PRC [Internet]. Practice-based research network business opportunities with ACOs and other health care systems: training and technical assistance; 2015. Available from: https://pbrn.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/page/Primer-for-PBRN-Business-Opportunities.pdf.
220. 220.↵
     Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [Internet]. PBRN registry, practice-based research networks, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2019. [cited 2020 Oct 13]. Available from: https://pbrn.ahrq.gov/pbrn-registry.
221. 221.↵
     APCReN [Internet]. Available from: www.apcren.org.au.
222. 222.↵
     1. Jones C

     [Internet]. An environmental scan of practice-based research networks; 2006. Available from: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/23017131/an-environmental-scan-of-practice-based-research-networks.
223. 223.
     1. Van den Bosch WJ

     . Forty years family-based morbidity data in general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care 1993;11:31–2.

     OpenUrlPubMed
224. 224.
     1. Nelson E

     . Functional health status levels of primary care patients. JAMA 1983;249:3331.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
225. 225.
     1. Main DS,
     2. Lutz LJ,
     3. Barrett JE,
     4. Matthew J,
     5. Miller RS

     . The role of primary care clinician attitudes, beliefs, and training in the diagnosis and treatment of depression: a report from the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network Inc. Arch Fam Med 1993;2:1061–6.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
226. 226.
     1. Boffin N,
     2. Moreels S,
     3. Casteren VV

     [Internet]. The Belgian Network of Sentinel General Practices between 2007 and 2012: a short report; 2013. Available from: https://www.wiv-isp.be/Epidemio/epien/medven/D_2013_2505_40.pdf.
227. 227.
     1. Ariza AJ,
     2. Binns HJ,
     3. Christoffel KK

     . Evaluating computer capabilities in a primary care practice-based research network. Ann Fam Med 2004;2.
228. 228.
     1. LaBresh KA,
     2. Lazorick S,
     3. Ariza AJ,
     4. et al

     . Implementation of the NHLBI Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health and Risk Reduction in Children and Adolescents: rationale and study design for Young Hearts, Strong Starts, a cluster-randomized trial targeting body mass index, blood pressure, and tobacco. Contemp Clin Trials 2014;37.
229. 229.
     1. Froom J,
     2. Culpepper L

     . Otitis media in day-care children: a report from the International Primary Care Network. J Fam Pract 1991;32.
230. 230.
     1. Okkes IM,
     2. Polderman GO,
     3. Fryer GE,
     4. et al

     . The role of family practice in different health care systems: a comparison of reasons for encounter, diagnoses, and interventions in primary care populations in the Netherlands, Japan, Poland, and the United States. J Fam Pract 2002;51.
231. 231.
     1. Kljakovic M,
     2. Seddon T,
     3. Reinken J,
     4. McLeod D

     . The rise and fall of a general practice information network. N Z Fam Physician 1992;73–6.
232. 232.
     1. Leitch S

     . New Zealand needs a practice based research network. J Prim Health Care 2016;8:9.

     OpenUrl
233. 233.
     1. Shaughnessy AF,
     2. Cincotta JA,
     3. Adelman A

     . Family for the Harrisburg Area Research Network (HARNET). Practice patients' attitudes toward firearm safety as a preventive medicine issue: a HARNET study. J Am Board Fam Pract 1999;12:354–9.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
234. 234.
     1. Knottnerus J,
     2. Metsemakers J,
     3. Hoppener P,
     4. Limonard C

     . Chronic illness in the community and the concept of social prevalence. Fam Pract 1992;9:15–21.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
235. 235.
     1. de Lusignan S,
     2. van Weel C

     . The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. Fam Pract 2006;23.
236. 236.
     1. Tilyard MW,
     2. Dovey SM,
     3. Spears GF

     . Biases in estimates from the RNZCGP computer research group. N Z Med J 1995;108.
237. 237.
     1. Rodnick JE

     . Research fellowships: a road less traveled. Fam Med 1999;31.
238. 238.
     1. Hall J,
     2. Martin IR

     . The Dunedin RNZCGP Research Unit Computer Research Network: an update to 2003 and beyond. N Z Fam Physician 2003;30:181–5.

     OpenUrl
239. 239.
     1. Hak E,
     2. Van Essen GA,
     3. Buskens E,
     4. Stalman W,
     5. De MR

     . Is immunising all patients with chronic lung disease in the community against influenza cost effective? Evidence from a general practice based clinical prospective cohort study in Utrecht, The Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:120–5.

     OpenUrlAbstract
240. 240.
     1. Hak E,
     2. Van Essen GA,
     3. Stalman WAB,
     4. De MR

     . Improving influenza vaccination coverage among high-risk patients: a role for computer-supported prevention strategy? Fam Pract 1998;15:138–43.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
241. 241.
     1. Middelkoop BJ,
     2. Bohnen AM,
     3. Duisterhout JS,
     4. Pleumeekers HJ,
     5. Prins A

     . A computerized network of general practices in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Am J Public Health 1994;84:1852–3.

     OpenUrlPubMed
242. 242.
     1. Noël PH,
     2. Zeber JE,
     3. Pugh MJ,
     4. Finley EP,
     5. Parchman ML

     . A pilot survey of post-deployment health care needs in small community-based primary care clinics. BMC Fam Pract 2011;12.
243. 243.
     1. Hayes H,
     2. Burge S

     . Creating a practice-based research network from scratch: where do I begin? Progress in Community Health Partnerships 2012;6:369–80.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
244. 244.
     STARNet [Internet]. About STARNet, Institute for Integration of Medicine and Science [cited 2020 June 28]. Available from: https://iims.uthscsa.edu/STARNet/about.
245. 245.
     1. Nagykaldi Z,
     2. Mold JW,
     3. Robinson A,
     4. Niebauer L,
     5. Ford A

     . Practice facilitators and practice-based research networks. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:506–10.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
246. 246.
     1. Van Casteren VFA,
     2. Bossuyt NHE,
     3. Moreels SJS,
     4. et al

     . Does the Belgian diabetes type 2 care trajectory improve quality of care for diabetes patients? Arch Public Heal 2015;73.
247. 247.
     1. Nemeth LS,
     2. Wessell AM,
     3. Jenkins RG,
     4. Nietert PJ,
     5. Liszka HA,
     6. Ornstein SM

     . Strategies to accelerate translation of research into primary care within practices using electronic medical records. J Nurs Care Qual 2007;22:343–9.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
248. 248.
     1. Wessell AM,
     2. Liszka HA,
     3. Nietert PJ,
     4. Jenkins RG,
     5. Nemeth LS,
     6. Ornstein S

     . Achievable benchmarks of care for primary care quality indicators in a practice-based research network. Am J Med Qual 2008;23:39–46.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
249. 249.
     1. Etz RS,
     2. Keith RE,
     3. Maternick AM,
     4. et al

     . Supporting Practices to Adopt Registry-Based Care (SPARC): protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci 2015;10:1–9.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
250. 250.
     ACORN [Internet]. ACORN, Department of Family Medicine, VCU School of Medicine [cited 2020 June 28]. Available from: https://familymedicine.vcu.edu/research/family-medicine-research/acorn/.
251. 251.
     1. Thiru K,
     2. de Lusignan S,
     3. Sullivan F,
     4. Brew S,
     5. Cooper A

     . Three steps to data quality. JHI 2003;11:95–102.

     OpenUrl
252. 252.
     1. Albright TL,
     2. Parchman M,
     3. Burge SK

     . Predictors of self-care behavior in adults with type 2 diabetes: an RRNeST study. Fam Med 2001;33:354–60.

     OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
253. 253.
     1. Hill JH,
     2. Burge S,
     3. Haring A,
     4. Young RA

     . Communication technology access, use, and preferences among primary care patients: from the Residency Research Network of Texas (RRNeT). J Am Board Fam Med 2012;25.
254. 254.
     RRNET [Internet]. About RRNeT, Institute for Integration of Medicine and Science [cited 2020 June 28]. Available from: https://iims.uthscsa.edu/RRNeT/about.
255. 255.
     1. Westfall JM,
     2. VanVorst RF,
     3. Main DS,
     4. Herbert C

     . Community-based participatory research in practice-based research networks. Ann Fam Med 2006;4.
256. 256.
     1. Frew EJ,
     2. Hammersley V,
     3. Wolstenholme J,
     4. Whynes DK

     . Collaborating with a primary care-based research network. J Eval Clin Pract 2001;7:339–42.

     OpenUrlPubMed
257. 257.
     1. Hammersley VS,
     2. Hippisley-Cox J,
     3. Wilson A,
     4. Pringle M

     . A comparison of research general practices and their patients with other practices—a cross-sectional survey in Trent. Br J Gen Pract 2002;52:463–8.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
258. 258.
     Trent Focus Group. For the promotion of research and development in primary health care: annual report 2001–2002; 2002.
259. 259.
     1. Graffy J

     . News from ELENoR. ELENoR NEWS 2003 (April).
260. 260.
     1. Hayward RA,
     2. Porcheret M,
     3. Mallen CD,
     4. Thomas E

     . Recruiting patients and collecting data for an observational study using computerised record pop-up prompts: the PROG-RES study. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2013;14:21–8.

     OpenUrl
261. 261.
     1. Zwar NA,
     2. Weller DP,
     3. McCloughan L,
     4. Traynor VJ

     . Supporting research in primary care: are practice-based research networks the missing link? Med J Aust 2006;185.
262. 262.
     1. Olsen DP,
     2. Dixon JK,
     3. Grey M,
     4. Deshefy-Longhi T,
     5. Demarest JC

     . Privacy concerns of patients and nurse practitioners in primary care—an APRNet study. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2005;17.
263. 263.
     1. Deshefy-Longhi T,
     2. Swartz MK,
     3. Grey M

     . Characterizing nurse practitioner practice by sampling patient encounters: an APRNet study. J Am Acad Nurse Practitioners 2008;20:281–7.

     OpenUrl
264. 264.
     1. Chuan TN,
     2. Gan GL

     . Primary care research—a blueprint for action for Singapore. Asia Pac J Public Health 2001;13:49–53.

     OpenUrlPubMed
265. 265.
     1. Trinh L,
     2. Macartney K,
     3. McIntyre P,
     4. Chiu C,
     5. Dey A,
     6. Menzies R

     . Investigating adverse events following immunisation with pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine using electronic general practice data. Vaccine 2017;35:1524–9.

     OpenUrl
266. 266.
     1. Sinclair-Lian N,
     2. Rhyne RL,
     3. Alexander SH,
     4. Williams RL

     . Practice-based research network membership is associated with retention of clinicians in underserved communities: a research involving outpatient settings network (RIOS Net) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2008;21.
267. 267.
     1. Williams RL,
     2. Shelley BM,
     3. Sussman AL

     . The marriage of community-based participatory research and practice-based research networks: can it work? A research involving outpatient settings network (RIOS Net) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22.
268. 268.
     1. Sloane P,
     2. Donahue K,
     3. Daaleman T,
     4. Mitchell CM

     [Internet]. North Carolina Family Medicine Research Network (NC-FP-RN), grant final report; 2005. Available from: https://www.science.gov/scigov/desktop/en/service/link/track?redirectUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fntrl.ntis.gov%2FNTRL%2Fdashboard%2FsearchResults%2FtitleDetail%2FPB2007107879.xhtml&collectionCode=NTIS&searchId=65b6e4c3-63cb-4c1f-ad52-4c5d4e561228&type=RESULT&signat.
269. 269.
     1. Mehmet S,
     2. Comino E,
     3. Traynor VJ,
     4. Zwar NA

     . PHReNet: running a primary health care network: issues and challenges; 2004.
270. 270.
     1. Anderko L,
     2. Bartz C,
     3. Lundeen S

     . Wellness for a lifetime: improving lifestyle behaviors of low-income, ethnically diverse populations. Ann Fam Med 2005;3.
271. 271.
     1. Ried K,
     2. Farmer EA,
     3. Weston KM

     . Aims and objectives for the SARNet research network. BMC Fam Pract 2006;7.
272. 272.
     1. Farmer E,
     2. Ried K,
     3. Weston KM

     . Primary Health Care Research Evaluation and Development Program, annual report; 2005.
273. 273.
     1. Dulin MF,
     2. Ludden TM,
     3. Tapp H,
     4. et al

     . Geographic information systems (GIS) demonstrating primary care needs for a transitioning Hispanic community. J Am Board Fam Med 2010;23.
274. 274.
     1. Dulin MF,
     2. Tapp H,
     3. Smith HA,
     4. et al

     . A trans-disciplinary approach to the evaluation of social determinants of health in a Hispanic population. BMC Public Health 2012;12.
275. 275.
     MAPPR [Internet]. Home page [cited 2020 June 28]. Available from: https://www.mapprnc.org/.
276. 276.
     1. Pulcini J,
     2. Sheetz A,
     3. Desisto M

     . Establishing a practice-based research network: lessons from the Massachusetts experience. J School Health 2008;78:172–4.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
277. 277.
     1. De Clercq E,
     2. Van Casteren V,
     3. Jonckheer P,
     4. Burggraeve P

     . Primary healthcare research network: the Belgian ResoPrim recommendations. In: Studies in health technology and informatics. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2009.
278. 278.
     Department of Health, Research and Development Directorate. Best research for best health: a new national health research strategy; 2006.
279. 279.
     National Institute for Health Research, Clinical Research Network. Five year strategic plan for research delivery: 2012–2017; 2012.
280. 280.
     National Institute for Health Research, Clinical Research Network [Internet]. Income distribution from NIHR CRN industry portfolio studies; 2014.
281. 281.
     Local Clinical Research Networks [Internet]; 2016. Available from: http://www.nihr.ac.uk/nihr-in-your-area/local-clinical-research-networks.htm.
282. 282.
     1. Maro JC,
     2. Platt R,
     3. Holmes JH,
     4. et al

     . Design of a national distributed health data network. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:341.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
283. 283.
     1. Arkind J,
     2. Likumahuwa-Ackman S,
     3. Warren N,
     4. et al

     . Lessons learned from developing a patient engagement panel: an OCHIN report. J Am Board Fam Med 2015;28:632–8.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
284. 284.
     1. Peckham S,
     2. Hutchison B

     . Developing primary care: the contribution of primary care research networks. Healthc Policy 2012;8.
285. 285.
     1. Coleman N,
     2. Halas G,
     3. Peeler W,
     4. Casaclang N,
     5. Williamson T,
     6. Katz A

     . From patient care to research: a validation study examining the factors contributing to data quality in a primary care electronic medical record database. BMC Fam Pract 2015;16:11.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
286. 286.
     1. Abdullah K,
     2. Thorpe KE,
     3. Mamak E,
     4. et al

     . Optimizing early child development for young children with non-anemic iron deficiency in the primary care practice setting (OptEC): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015;16.
287. 287.
     1. Rizza A,
     2. Kaplan V,
     3. Senn O,
     4. et al

     . Age- and gender-related prevalence of multimorbidity in primary care: the Swiss FIRE project. BMC Fam Pract 2012;13:113.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
288. 288.
     1. Zellweger U,
     2. Bopp M,
     3. Holzer BM,
     4. Djalali S,
     5. Kaplan V

     . Prevalence of chronic medical conditions in Switzerland: exploring estimates validity by comparing complementary data sources. BMC Public Health 2014;14:1–12.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
289. 289.
     1. Gill JM,
     2. Klinkman MS,
     3. Chen YX

     . Antidepressant medication use for primary care patients with and without medical comorbidities: a national electronic health record (EHR) network study. J Am Board Fam Med 2010;23:499–508.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
290. 290.
     Electronic Practice Based Research Network, Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity [cited 2020 June 28]. Available from: https://cphce.unsw.edu.au/research/informatics-and-ehealth/electronic-practice-based-research-network.
291. 291.
     1. Kwan BM,
     2. Graham DG,
     3. Sills MR,
     4. et al.

     [Internet]. Methods for the collection of patient reported outcomes in a safety net-oriented practice based research network: a SAFTINet demonstration project. Poster presentation, AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting, June 24, 2013 [cited 2020 June 29]. Available from: https://www.slideshare.net/MarionSills/academy-health-pro-poster-final-2013-0620.
292. 292.
     1. Pomernacki A,
     2. Carney DV,
     3. Kimerling R,
     4. et al

     . Lessons from initiating the first Veterans Health Administration (VA) Women's Health Practicebased Research Network (WH-PBRN) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2015;28:649–57.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
293. 293.
     1. Cole AM,
     2. Stephens KA,
     3. Keppel GA,
     4. Estiri H,
     5. Baldwin L-M

     . Extracting electronic health record data in a practice-based research network: processes to support translational research across diverse practice organizations. eGEMs 2016;4:1206.

     OpenUrl
294. 294.
     1. Galvin S,
     2. Callan A,
     3. Cormican M,
     4. et al

     . Improving antimicrobial prescribing in Irish primary care through electronic data collection and surveillance: a feasibility study. BMC Fam Pract 2015;16.
295. 295.
     1. Adams J,
     2. Steel A,
     3. Chang S,
     4. Sibbritt D

     . Helping address the national research and research capacity needs of Australian chiropractic: introducing the Australian Chiropractic Research Network (ACORN) project. Chiropr Man Ther 2015;23.
296. 296.
     1. Adams J,
     2. Peng W,
     3. Steel A,
     4. et al

     . A cross-sectional examination of the profile of chiropractors recruited to the Australian Chiropractic Research Network (ACORN): a sustainable resource for future chiropractic research. BMJ Open 2017;7:e015830.e015830.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text