Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Primary Care Physicians' Conceptualization of Quality in Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System

Carl T. Berdahl, Molly C. Easterlin, Gery Ryan, Jack Needleman and Teryl K. Nuckols
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2021, 34 (3) 590-601; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2021.03.200555
Carl T. Berdahl
From the Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (CTB, TKN); Department of Emergency Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA (CTB); University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) National Clinician Scholars Program (CTB, MCE); Department of Pediatrics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (MCE); Division of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center (MCE); Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA (GR); Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health (JN).
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Molly C. Easterlin
From the Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (CTB, TKN); Department of Emergency Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA (CTB); University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) National Clinician Scholars Program (CTB, MCE); Department of Pediatrics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (MCE); Division of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center (MCE); Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA (GR); Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health (JN).
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gery Ryan
From the Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (CTB, TKN); Department of Emergency Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA (CTB); University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) National Clinician Scholars Program (CTB, MCE); Department of Pediatrics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (MCE); Division of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center (MCE); Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA (GR); Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health (JN).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jack Needleman
From the Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (CTB, TKN); Department of Emergency Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA (CTB); University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) National Clinician Scholars Program (CTB, MCE); Department of Pediatrics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (MCE); Division of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center (MCE); Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA (GR); Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health (JN).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Teryl K. Nuckols
From the Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (CTB, TKN); Department of Emergency Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA (CTB); University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) National Clinician Scholars Program (CTB, MCE); Department of Pediatrics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (MCE); Division of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center (MCE); Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA (GR); Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health (JN).
MD, MSHS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Laiteerapong N,
    2. Huang ES
    . The pace of change in medical practice and health policy: collision or coexistence? J Gen Intern Med 2015;30:848–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, US Department of Health and Human Services. Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015. Pub. L. No 2015;114:2015.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, US Department of Health and Human Services. Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Overview. 2020. Available from: https://qpp.cms.gov/mips/overview. Accessed April 9, 2020.
  4. 4.↵
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, US Department of Health and Human Services. Medicare Program; Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) Incentive Under the Physician Fee Schedule, and Criteria for Physician-Focused Payment Models. Final rule with comment period. Fed Regist 2016;81:77008–831. Available from: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/11/04/2016-25240/medicare-program-merit-based-incentive-payment-system-mips-and-alternative-payment-model-apm. Accessed May 4, 2021.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Verma S
    . Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, US Department of Health and Human Services. Quality Payment Program (QPP) Year 1 Performance Results. 2018. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/blog/quality-payment-program-qpp-year-1-performance-results. Accessed June 3, 2019.
  6. 6.↵
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, US Department of Health and Human Services. 2017 Quality Payment Program Reporting Experience. 2018.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Henry J
    Commonwealth Fund; Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Primary Care Providers' Views of Recent Trends in Health Care Delivery and Payment. Findings from the Commonwealth Fund/Kaiser Family Foundation 2015 National Survey of Primary Care Providers. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015;24:1–13.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Friedberg MW,
    2. Chen PG,
    3. Van Busum KR,
    4. et al
    . Factors affecting physician professional satisfaction and their implications for patient care, health systems, and health policy. Rand Health Q 2014;3:1.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Marmor RA,
    2. Clay B,
    3. Millen M,
    4. Savides TJ,
    5. Longhurst CA
    . The impact of physician EHR usage on patient satisfaction. Appl Clin Inform 2018;9:11–4.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Panagioti M,
    2. Geraghty K,
    3. Johnson J,
    4. et al
    . Association between physician burnout and patient safety, professionalism, and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2018;178:1317–30.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kuhn T,
    2. Basch P,
    3. Barr M,
    4. Yackel T
    . Medical Informatics Committee of the American College of Physicians. Clinical documentation in the 21st century: executive summary of a policy position paper from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2015;162:301–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Meyer GS,
    2. Nelson EC,
    3. Pryor DB,
    4. et al
    . More quality measures versus measuring what matters: a call for balance and parsimony. BMJ Qual Saf 2012;21:964–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Casalino LP,
    2. Gans D,
    3. Weber R,
    4. et al
    . US physician practices spend more than $15.4 billion annually to report quality measures. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016;35:401–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Meltzer DO,
    2. Chung JW
    . The population value of quality indicator reporting: a framework for prioritizing health care performance measures. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33:132–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Panzer RJ,
    2. Gitomer RS,
    3. Greene WH,
    4. Webster PR,
    5. Landry KR,
    6. Riccobono CA
    . Increasing demands for quality measurement. JAMA 2013;310:1971–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, US Department of Health and Human Services. Reducing Burden. 2019 Available from: https://www.cms.gov/About-CMS/Components/CPI/Reducing-Burden. Accessed May 4, 2021.
  17. 17.↵
    1. MacLean CH,
    2. Kerr EA,
    3. Qaseem A
    . Time Out - Charting a Path for Improving Performance Measurement. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1757–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    Medicare Payment Policy: Report to Congress. Washington, DC: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission; 2018. Available from: http://www.medpac.gov/docs/default-source/reports/mar18_medpac_entirereport_sec.pdf?sfvrsn=0. Accessed May 4, 2021.
  19. 19.↵
    1. Firth S
    . MIPS Takes a Beating at MedPAC - Medicare advisory panel says it needs to go. MedPage Today. 2017. Available from: https://www.medpagetoday.com/publichealthpolicy/medicare/68362. Accessed April 9, 2020.
  20. 20.↵
    1. Soylu TG,
    2. Goldberg DG,
    3. Cuellar AE,
    4. Kuzel AJ
    . Medicare access and CHIP reauthorization act in small to medium-sized primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:942–52.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Berdahl CT,
    2. Easterlin MC,
    3. Ryan G,
    4. Needleman J,
    5. Nuckols TK
    . Primary care physicians in the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): a qualitative investigation of participants' experiences, self-reported practice changes, and suggestions for program administrators. J Gen Intern Med 2019;34:2275–81.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Liao JM,
    2. Shea JA,
    3. Weissman A,
    4. Navathe AS
    . Physician perspectives in year 1 of MACRA and its merit-based payment system: a national survey. Health Aff (Millwood) 2018;37:1079–86.
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Wiig S,
    2. Aase K,
    3. von Plessen C
    , For QUASER-team, et al. Talking about quality: exploring how ‘quality’ is conceptualized in European hospitals and healthcare systems. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:478.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Barriball KL,
    2. While A
    . Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper. J Adv Nurs 1994;19:328–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Patton MQ
    . Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002. xxiv, 598, 65 p. p.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, US Department of Health and Human Services. QPP Participation Status. 2020. Available from: https://qpp.cms.gov/participation-lookup. Accessed April 9, 2020.
  27. 27.↵
    Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC. 2001.
  28. 28.↵
    The development and implementation of quality improvement systems (QIS) in health care. Strasbourg: Council of Europe; 1997. Recommendation No. R(97)17 adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 30 September 1997 and explanatory memorandum.
  29. 29.↵
    1. Arah OA,
    2. Westert GP,
    3. Hurst J,
    4. Klazinga NS
    . A conceptual framework for the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project. Int J Qual Health Care 2006;18 Suppl 1:5–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    World Health Organization. Handbook for national quality policy and strategy: a practical approach for developing policy and strategy to improve quality of care. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018.
  31. 31.↵
    European Commission. Key findings and recommendations on reporting and learning systems for patient safety incidents across Europe. Report of the reporting and learning subgroup of the European Commission. 2014.
  32. 32.↵
    1. Busse R,
    2. Klazinga N,
    3. Panteli D,
    4. Quentin W
    , eds. Improving healthcare quality in Europe: Characteristics, effectiveness and implementation of different strategies. European Observatory Health Policy Series. Copenhagen (Denmark); 2019.
  33. 33.↵
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, US Department of Health and Human Services. Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) for the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) Survey via CMS-Approved Survey Vendor Reporting. 2019. Available from: https://qpp.cms.gov/resource/CAHPS%20for%20MIPS%20Fact%20Sheet. Accessed May 4, 2021.
  34. 34.↵
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, US Department of Health and Human Services. CAHPS for MIPS Survey. 2020. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Research/CAHPS/mips.html. Accessed April 9, 2020.
  35. 35.↵
    1. Khullar D,
    2. Wolfson D,
    3. Casalino LP
    . Professionalism, performance, and the future of physician incentives. JAMA 2018;320:2419–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 34 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 34, Issue 3
May/June 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Primary Care Physicians' Conceptualization of Quality in Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Primary Care Physicians' Conceptualization of Quality in Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System
Carl T. Berdahl, Molly C. Easterlin, Gery Ryan, Jack Needleman, Teryl K. Nuckols
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2021, 34 (3) 590-601; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.03.200555

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Primary Care Physicians' Conceptualization of Quality in Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System
Carl T. Berdahl, Molly C. Easterlin, Gery Ryan, Jack Needleman, Teryl K. Nuckols
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2021, 34 (3) 590-601; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.03.200555
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Background
    • Methods
    • Description of Interview Sessions
    • Analysis
    • Ethics
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Appendix A1: Pre-Session Survey and Semi-Structured Interview Guide Pre-Session Survey
    • Appendix
    • Appendix
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • COVID-19 Pandemic Practices, Payment Models, and Publication Successes: Family Medicine Studies a Variety of Primary Care Questions
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Health Policy
  • Medicare
  • Outcomes Assessment
  • Patient-Centered Care
  • Pay for Performance
  • Physician-Patient Relations
  • Primary Health Care
  • Qualitative Research
  • Quality Improvement

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire