Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Primary Care Physicians' Conceptualization of Quality in Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System

Carl T. Berdahl, Molly C. Easterlin, Gery Ryan, Jack Needleman and Teryl K. Nuckols
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2021, 34 (3) 590-601; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2021.03.200555
Carl T. Berdahl
From the Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (CTB, TKN); Department of Emergency Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA (CTB); University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) National Clinician Scholars Program (CTB, MCE); Department of Pediatrics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (MCE); Division of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center (MCE); Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA (GR); Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health (JN).
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Molly C. Easterlin
From the Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (CTB, TKN); Department of Emergency Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA (CTB); University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) National Clinician Scholars Program (CTB, MCE); Department of Pediatrics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (MCE); Division of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center (MCE); Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA (GR); Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health (JN).
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gery Ryan
From the Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (CTB, TKN); Department of Emergency Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA (CTB); University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) National Clinician Scholars Program (CTB, MCE); Department of Pediatrics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (MCE); Division of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center (MCE); Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA (GR); Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health (JN).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jack Needleman
From the Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (CTB, TKN); Department of Emergency Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA (CTB); University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) National Clinician Scholars Program (CTB, MCE); Department of Pediatrics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (MCE); Division of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center (MCE); Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA (GR); Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health (JN).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Teryl K. Nuckols
From the Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (CTB, TKN); Department of Emergency Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA (CTB); University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) National Clinician Scholars Program (CTB, MCE); Department of Pediatrics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (MCE); Division of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Los Angeles County and University of Southern California Medical Center (MCE); Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA (GR); Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health (JN).
MD, MSHS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Conceptual Framework: What Makes The Quality Of Health Care Exceptional?

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Physician and Practice Characteristics Self-Reported by Study Participants, (n = 20)

    QuestionResponseN (%)
    Do you consider yourself a primary care physician?
    Yes20 (100)
    No0
    Within the past 12 months have you had an active medical license?
    Yes20 (100)
    No0
    Are you board certified in Family Medicine or Internal Medicine?
    Yes - Family medicine7 (35)
    Yes - Internal medicine11 (55)
    No2 (10)
    How many physicians are in your practice?
    1–14 (small)9 (45)
    15 (large)11 (55)
    How many years have you been practicing after residency?
    1–43 (15)
    5-95 (25)
    10–141 (5)
    15–195 (25)
    ≥206 (30)
    How would you define your practice setting?
    Urban9 (45)
    Suburban6 (30)
    Rural5 (25)
    In what region of the United States do you practice?
    Mid-Atlantic or Northeast2 (10)
    Midwest3 (15)
    Northwest5 (25)
    2 (10)
    West8 (40)
    What percent of your patients are covered by Medicare Part B?
    0–191 (5)
    2 (10)
    30–3910 (50)
    40–494 (20)
    ≥503 (15)
    What percent of your patients do you think suffer from financial challenges such as housing, utility, or food instability?
    01 (5)
    1–96 (30)
    10–193 (15)
    20–292 (10)
    30–-392 (10)
    40–491 (5)
    ≥505 (25)
    How large is your personal panel of patients?
    <10009 (45)
    1000–14993 (15)
    1500–19992 (10)
    2000–24991 (5)
    ≥25005 (25)
    How are you primarily compensated?
    Fee for service9 (45)
    Capitation2 (10)
    Salary9 (45)
    What percent of your practice's income comes from fee-for-service payments?
    01 (5)
    1–243 (15)
    25–491 (5)
    50–742 (10)
    75–999 (45)
    1003 (15)
    Not sure1 (5)
    Do you have staff on hand to help manage quality of care?
    Yes17 (85)
    No3 (15)
    Did you or your group participate in the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS)?
    Yes12 (60)
    No6 (30)
    I don't know2 (10)
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    List of Study Themes, Associated Study Sub-Themes, and Relevant Institute of Medicine Domains

    Study ThemesStudy Sub-themesRelevant IOM Domain
    Evidence-based care that is safeProviding recommended health maintenanceEffective
    Controlling chronic diseasesEffective
    Knowing and following current recommendationsEffective
    Making accurate diagnoses; not missing diagnosesSafe
    Delivering efficient care (not too much and not too little)Efficient
    Patient-centered careProviding personalized carePatient-centered
    Providing well-coordinated carePatient-centered
    Spending enough time with patientsPatient-centered
    Responsiveness to patient concernsPatient-centered
    Being an advocate for patientsPatient-centered
    Understanding social needsPatient-centered
    Helping patients achieve their goalsPatient-centered
    Prioritizing quality of lifePatient-centered
    Listening to patientsPatient-centered
    Educating patientsPatient-centered
    Establishing trust and long-term relationshipsPatient-centered
    Demonstrating compassionPatient-centered
    Providing timely careTimely
    • IOM, Institute of Medicine.

    • Note: Participants did not mention the concept of equity, which is one of 6 IOM Domains of the quality of healthcare.

    • Box 1: Key questions for study participants.

    • What do you consider to be “good” quality of care? What does it “look” like?

    • What is exceptional quality of care, and how is it different than good quality of care?

    • What is low quality care, and how is it different than good quality of care?

    • What kinds of things can a primary care physician do to ensure he/she is providing exceptional quality of care?

    • View popup
    Appendix A2:

    List of Representative Quotes for Themes and Sub-themes

    ThemeSub-Theme
    Delivering evidence-based care that is safeProviding recommended health maintenance“I believe that there are certain elements of providing care that are standard of care and that are proven to be beneficial to patients. Flu vaccine, pneumonia vaccine, vaccines in general, cancer screenings, like breast screening, colon cancer screening, cervical cancer screening.” (P4)
    “To deliver high-quality healthcare, first you have to talk about annual screening.” (P2)
    “For example, you have to make sure that patients are screened for colon cancer appropriately, for breast cancer, cervical cancer, that they're getting their vaccinations, that they are meeting the blood pressure goals.” (P6)
    Controlling chronic diseases“When people have certain chronic diseases there are certain measures that are just proven, like having an A1C that's as close to normal, having blood pressure at certain levels, having cholesterol--being on certain medications when you have certain chronic diseases--I think those things are quality to me.” (P4)
    “When a physician is taking care of a patient with diabetes… the patient should come in at 1 month, then 3 months, then 6-month intervals. [The physician] should know what blood work they're getting at that interval. At every visit, [the physician] should take off their shoes and socks, check monofilaments on them, make sure that the medications are reconciled, and that this information is communicated with the patient's other physicians. This should be a set protocol.” (P12)
    Knowing and following current recommendations“I think good quality care has to be evidence-based. That's considered the standard of care.” (P3)
    “Lifelong learning and staying engaged with the latest literature, guidelines, and evidence-based recommendations [can help physicians provide high-quality healthcare].” (P16)
    “Do the basics really well. Like getting everyone who has diabetes to have an A1C less than 9%, people's blood pressure less than 140/90, just the things that you--except for the small number of cases--you should be able to help patients to get to.” (P15)
    “I would say that practices making every effort to ensure that they are meeting the standard of care as put forth from well-established bodies such as US Preventive Services Task Force, from CMS, and from our own organizations such as the American Academy of Family Physicians.” (P6)
    Making accurate diagnoses“Part of the key to being a good doctor is making the right diagnosis.” (P7)
    “Everybody can do checklist medicine and check [a hemoglobin A1C] twice this calendar year. [On the other hand,] when you have a patient with a difficult diagnosis which you establish and come up with an effective treatment for--now that's good care.” (P11)
    “If you ever come up with a diagnosis that someone else had missed, I think that's when I think high-quality care.” (P7)
    Delivering efficient care (not too much or too little)“High-quality care is medical care that's a universal standard, done in an efficient way that minimizes costs.” (P12)
    “My grandma was a very wealthy person, and she was very demanding. Basically, she would want you to forget about standards in healthcare and spend every healthcare dollar on her and waste everything on her to get every test possible, which is absolutely not right.” (P12)
    “What I learned is that quality equals appropriateness times the combination of outcomes and service and then dividing that by waste. I kind of like thinking about it as an equation-based definition.” (P15)
    Delivering patient-centered careProviding personalized care“I think I include the patient in all the decision-making. I present it to them like a buffet, where they get to pick and choose. I'll say, 'You know, at this age, I would love for you to have these three screening tests.' Then, they may say, 'I don't want to have a colonoscopy. What are my options? Can I have a stool test?' I would say that incorporating them into the decision-making is all about establishing a good relationship.” (P1)
    “Quality of care is all the care you need and none of the care that you don't need, delivered in a personalized way…working within the flow of patients' lives.” (P16)
    Providing well-coordinated care“About 20% of our patients are non-English speaking….So, also making sure that care is coordinated well so that all pieces of the care get accomplished and get coordinated in a way that it's doable for the patients and also provides a good health outcome is challenging.” (P9)
    “I think developing systems as an individual or with teams in your clinic to ensure good follow-up for patients. So, seeing patients and tracking patients over time--Looking across your panel…and trying to be systematic and proactive about having patients come back in or refer to sites of care expeditiously and effectively.” (P16)
    “I can see records on a lot of different systems. So that kind of coordination of care is really important, in terms of making sure that we know what's going on with our patients….It requires a little bit of diligence, just making sure that your support staff, your medical assistants, whoever it is that's tracking down records, that they're doing that.” (P19)
    “I was very satisfied with the process because we're fortunate enough to have a referral team within our clinic so that I could get him to this study, then get the biopsy, the pathologist's report, and get him into the oncologist's office so that he was being treated within 5 days of the original study.” (P20)
    “You have to connect all the dots for the patients so that they have less to think about and less to worry about.” (P12)
    Providing timely care“I personally give my patients my email address so they can directly contact me with any concerns without being filtered by my staff. I try to have good hours, leave slots for urgent care, essentially have them be able to access me so that they can get care.” (P1)
    “It's more and more incumbent on doctors to manage your staff… so that if someone calls and they have a reason they need to get in, we need to do everything we can do to get them in.” (P5)
    Spending enough time with patients“There are some primary care physicians who are seeing outrageous numbers of patients a day. 30, 40, and I'm doing about half that at most….I have time to review everything while I'm there. So, for example, if they're there for a hypertension visit and I'm adjusting their medications, I can also say, 'Ok, let me make sure you're up-to-date with your mammogram, with your colonoscopy, and I'll take a look at your vaccinations.'” (P6)
    “I think a good doctor has to spend enough time with the patient. Doctors shouldn't overbook themselves, and that means they have to be choosey about what insurances they accept.” (P7)
    “The key for most primary care doctors I believe is generally spending enough time, being responsive, and being accessible.” (P3)
    Responsiveness to patient concerns“Sometimes the difference between a good outcome and a bad outcome is just someone who is really paying attention.” (P4)
    “I think we want to provide healthcare for each individual, and we want to provide healthcare that addresses their needs.” (P17)
    “For me, good quality care is really trying to hear the patient out…Do they have any new or active issues that need to be addressed and then if so, properly addressing them.” (P1)
    Being an advocate for patients“When I think of a doctor who is exceptional, I think of someone who is an awesome patient advocate who makes sure that patients get what they need.” (P4)
    “I had a patient who was scheduled for a 15-minute visit on Saturday for a red swollen leg. [After getting a lower extremity ultrasound and a chest CT that were both positive for clots done from clinic], we directly admitted her from clinic. The patient was really grateful. It's not often that I get to deliver really good care like that but I definitely felt like it was high-quality because we bypassed the ED. She didn't have to go sit there for hours before being seen.” (P15)
    Understanding social needs“Our population of patients have [poorly reimbursing insurance], don't speak English, don't have stable housing, and have been to jail. So, we definitely think about [food and housing security] first before we are able to get them their blood pressure medication and that sort of stuff.” (P17)
    “When I have patients who have certain socioeconomic challenges, it may be that they're homeless and it doesn't make sense to have them on nine medications a day for their heart failure, because there's no way they can possibly be compliant with it.” (P5)
    Helping patients achieve their goals“Having a person or system or team that is able to meet individual [needs and concerns], that's exceptional care.” (P17)
    “I think our job as doctors is to help patients achieve their life goals, their health-related life goals. So for me, that's what quality is about….At the end of the day, if I'm achieving perfect scores [on quality measures] but not meeting the patients' goals, helping advance what they want, I'm not doing a good job.” (P5)
    Prioritizing quality of life“You have to keep the patient happy. I mean, they should be productive and happy and carrying on their daily living.” (P2)
    “The goal is to help patients achieve a better quality of life, and that is basically having people be as active as they want to be, having people be productive members of society, having them enjoy going for a walk.” (P10)
    “A lot of time it's balancing quality of life versus longevity and frequently we will opt for a shared decision-making process to focus more on quality of life, which may mean foregoing many recommended treatments, including certain ones that would achieve higher quality measure scores.” (P5)
    Listening to patients“I think the patients are looking for someone who will listen, someone who seems to be interested in the problems that they're presenting….Obviously, they want you to be knowledgeable and compassionate and timely and everything else. But I think patients want to be listened to and taken more seriously than anything else.” (P20)
    “I think the important thing about patient care is about hearing people and really listening, letting them know that you're there.” (P1)
    Educating patients“It comes down not only to making an accurate diagnosis but also making sure that the patient understands [the rationale with the care plan] and is on board with it--and that's frankly one of the more difficult things to do these days.” (P11)
    “The patient population we serve here--We have to hold them by the hands….You hold them by their hands and you educate them. They're going to be like, 'Why do I have to take my blood pressure medication when I feel okay?' So, it's all about education, education, education.” (P13)
    Establishing trust and long-term relationships“Any time I see a patient, they're my number one priority. We are engaged and so, their perception of my time with them…whether I spend two minutes with them or 10 minutes with them, they always thought I spent enough time….So then what happens when people are satisfied is they go around and they tell their neighbors and they tell the family and so I have more patients coming in to be established and so on.” (P10)
    “What people don't get is that if patients go to the person that they trust, they're more likely to be adherent to their medication or adherent to whatever regimen, if they know and trust the physician. I just think that's not there with virtual medicine or Uber docs or whatever.” (P1)
    “The quality movement has been perverted to a kind of big data enterprise now and really, I think the focus of primary care is actually about relationships and building sort of meaningful relationships with people over time….My quality metric--definition of quality is really much more around interpersonal relationships.” (P18)
    Demonstrating compassion“There was this patent who just passed with severe COPD and she lived to be 86 with a disease that should have potentially taken her--in my mind, she should have gone 10 years ago. But you know, we kept in close contact. There's this human component that's hard to measure, the connection that people feel with their primary care doctor for those who feel connected.” (P10)
    “I think that you have to be aware, first and foremost, for meeting a quality standard for all your patients but you also have to make sure that you have a heart for them as well. There is real truth to the statement that there is an art form in addition to the hard, basic science.” (P6)
    • View popup
    Appendix A3:

    Participant-level Characteristics

    Participant numberPractice sizePractice settingCompensationRegionPatient Panel Size
    P1LargeUrbanSalaryWest2500 or more
    P2SmallUrbanCapitationWest2000-2499
    P3SmallSuburbanFee-for-serviceWest<1000
    P4LargeUrbanFee-for-serviceWest<1000
    P5LargeUrbanSalaryWest<1000
    P6SmallUrbanCapitationWest1000-1499
    P7SmallSuburbanFee-for-serviceWest2500 or more
    P8SmallRuralFee-for-serviceMidwest1500-1999
    P9SmallRuralSalaryWest<1000
    P10LargeSuburbanFee-for-serviceMidatlantic or Northeast2500 or more
    P11LargeSuburbanFee-for-serviceMidwest2500 or more
    P12LargeUrbanSalarySouth Midatlantic or Northeast<1000
    P13SmallRuralFee-for-serviceSouth<1000
    P14SmallRuralFee-for-serviceSouth2500 or more
    P15LargeUrbanSalaryNorthwest1000-1499
    P16LargeSuburbanSalaryNorthwest<1000
    P17LargeUrbanSalaryNorthwest<1000
    P18LargeUrbanSalaryNorthwest<1000
    P19SmallSuburbanSalaryNorthwest1000-1499
    P20LargeRuralFee-for-serviceWest1500-1999
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 34 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 34, Issue 3
May/June 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Primary Care Physicians' Conceptualization of Quality in Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Primary Care Physicians' Conceptualization of Quality in Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System
Carl T. Berdahl, Molly C. Easterlin, Gery Ryan, Jack Needleman, Teryl K. Nuckols
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2021, 34 (3) 590-601; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.03.200555

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Primary Care Physicians' Conceptualization of Quality in Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System
Carl T. Berdahl, Molly C. Easterlin, Gery Ryan, Jack Needleman, Teryl K. Nuckols
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2021, 34 (3) 590-601; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.03.200555
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Background
    • Methods
    • Description of Interview Sessions
    • Analysis
    • Ethics
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Appendix A1: Pre-Session Survey and Semi-Structured Interview Guide Pre-Session Survey
    • Appendix
    • Appendix
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • COVID-19 Pandemic Practices, Payment Models, and Publication Successes: Family Medicine Studies a Variety of Primary Care Questions
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Health Policy
  • Medicare
  • Outcomes Assessment
  • Patient-Centered Care
  • Pay for Performance
  • Physician-Patient Relations
  • Primary Health Care
  • Qualitative Research
  • Quality Improvement

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire