Barriers to Patient Portal Access and Use: Evidence from the Health Information National Trends Survey

References

1. 1.↵
   Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Federal health IT strategic plan: 2015–2020. Available from: https://dashboard.healthit.gov/strategic-plan/federal-health-it-strategic-plan-2015-2020.php. Accessed October 15, 2018.
2. 2.↵
   1. Detmer D,
   2. Bloomrosen M,
   3. Raymond B,
   4. Tang P

   . Integrated personal health records: transformative tools for consumer-centric care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008;8:45.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Maurer M,
   2. Dardess P,
   3. Carman KL,
   4. Frazier K,
   5. Smeeding L

   . Guide to patient and family engagement: environmental scan report. Rockville, MD; 2012.
4. 4.↵
   1. Roehrs A,
   2. da Costa CA,
   3. da Rosa Righi R,
   4. de Oliveira KSF

   . Personal health records: a systematic literature review. J Med Internet Res 2017;19:e13.

   OpenUrl
5. 5.↵
   Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. What is a patient portal? Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-patient-portal. Accessed June 2, 2018.
6. 6.↵
   1. Ross SE,
   2. Lin CT

   . The effects of promoting patient access to medical records: a review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10:129–38.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Ammenwerth E,
   2. Schnell-Inderst P,
   3. Hoerbst A

   . The impact of electronic patient portals on patient care: a systematic review of controlled trials. J Med Internet Res 2012;14:e162.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Kaelber DC,
   2. Jha AK,
   3. Johnston D,
   4. Middleton B,
   5. Bates DW

   . A research agenda for personal health records (PHRs). J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:729–36.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   111th Congress. American recovery and reinvestment act. In. Pub.L 111–5. 2009.
10. 10.↵
    111th Congress. Health information technology for economic and clinical health. In. TITLE XIII 2009.
11. 11.↵
    104th Congress. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. In. Public Law 1996;104–191.
12. 12.↵
    Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine Staff. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
13. 13.↵
    1. Chaudhry B,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Wu S,
    4. et al

    . Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:742–52.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Henry J,
    2. Pylypchuk Y,
    3. Searcy T,
    4. Patel V

    . Adoption of electronic health record systems among US non-federal acute care hospitals:2008–2015. ONC Data Brief 35. 2016.
15. 15.↵
    1. Blumenthal D,
    2. Tavenner M

    . The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 2010;363:501–4.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare and Medicaid programs; Electronic health record incentive program—Stage 2. Federal Register. 2012. Available from: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2012/09/04/2012-21050/medicare-and-medicaid-programs-electronic-health-record-incentive-program-stage-2. Accessed June 2, 2018.
17. 17.↵
    1. Westin A,
    2. Lemieux J,
    3. Subias S

    . Americans overwhelmingly believe electronic personal health records could improve their health. New York, NY: Markle Foundation; 2008.
18. 18.↵
    1. Turvey C,
    2. Klein D,
    3. Fix G,
    4. et al

    . Blue Button use by patients to access and share health record information using the Department of Veterans Affairs’ online patient portal. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014;21:657–63.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Jones JB,
    2. Weiner JP,
    3. Shah NR,
    4. Stewart WF

    . The wired patient: patterns of electronic patient portal use among patients with cardiac disease or diabetes. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e42.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Ancker JS,
    2. Barrón Y,
    3. Rockoff ML,
    4. et al

    . Use of an electronic patient portal among disadvantaged populations. J Gen Intern Med 2011;26:1117–23.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Sarkar U,
    2. Karter AJ,
    3. Liu JY,
    4. et al

    . The literacy divide: Health literacy and the use of an internet-based patient portal in an integrated health system—Results from the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE). J Health Communicat 2010;15:183–96.

    OpenUrl
22. 22.↵
    1. Smith SG,
    2. O’conor R,
    3. Aitken W,
    4. Curtis LM,
    5. Wolf MS,
    6. Goel MS

    . Disparities in registration and use of an online patient portal among older adults: findings from the LitCog cohort. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015;22:888–95.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Anthony DL,
    2. Campos-Castillo C,
    3. Lim PS

    . Who isn’t using patient portals and why? Evidence and implications from a national sample of US adults. Health Aff (Millwood) 2018;37:1948–54.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Irizarry T,
    2. Dabbs AD,
    3. Curran CR

    . Patient portals and patient engagement: a state of the science review. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e148.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Lin SC,
    2. Lyles CR,
    3. Sarkar U,
    4. Adler-Milstein J

    . Are patients electronically accessing their medical records? Evidence from national hospital data. Health Aff (Millwood) 2019;38:1850–7.

    OpenUrl
26. 26.↵
    1. Tieu L,
    2. Sarkar U,
    3. Schillinger D,
    4. et al

    . Barriers and facilitators to online portal use among patients and caregivers in a safety net health care system: a qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e275.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Mishuris RG,
    2. Stewart M,
    3. Fix GM,
    4. et al

    . Barriers to patient portal access among veterans receiving home‐based primary care: a qualitative study. Health Expect 2015;18:2296–305.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Pérez-Stable EJ,
    2. El-Toukhy S

    . Communicating with diverse patients: how patient and clinician factors affect disparities. Patient Educ Couns 2018;101:2186–94.

    OpenUrl
29. 29.↵
    1. Little RJ

    . A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. J Am Statistic Assoc 1988;83:1198–202.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Mukhopadhyay PK

    . Paper SAS3520-2016. Survey data imputation with PROC SURVEYIMPUTE. 2016. Available from: https://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings16/SAS3520-2016.pdf. Accessed October 19, 2018.
31. 31.↵
    1. Ettner SL

    . The timing of preventive services for women and children: the effect of having a usual source of care. Am J Public Health 1996;86:1748–54.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Fung CS,
    2. Wong CK,
    3. Fong DY,
    4. Lee A,
    5. Lam CL

    . Having a family doctor was associated with lower utilization of hospital-based health services. BMC Health Serv Res 2015;15:42.

    OpenUrl
33. 33.↵
    1. Lambrew JM,
    2. Defriese GH,
    3. Carey TS,
    4. Ricketts TC,
    5. Biddle AK

    . The effects of having a regular doctor on access to primary care. Med Care 1996;34:138–51.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Petersen LA,
    2. Burstin HR,
    3. O’Neil AC,
    4. Orav EJ,
    5. Brennan TA

    . Nonurgent emergency department visits: The effect of having a regular doctor. Med Care 1998;36:1249–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Promoting interoperability programs. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/index. Accessed May 30, 2020.
36. 36.↵
    1. Adler-Milstein J,
    2. Holmgren AJ,
    3. Kralovec P,
    4. Worzala C,
    5. Searcy T,
    6. Patel V

    . Electronic health record adoption in US hospitals: the emergence of a digital “advanced use” divide. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017;24:1142–8.

    OpenUrlPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Powell KR

    . Patient-perceived facilitators of and barriers to electronic portal use: a systematic review. Comput Inform Nurs 2017;35:565–73.

    OpenUrl
38. 38.↵
    1. Sox CM,
    2. Swartz K,
    3. Burstin HR,
    4. Brennan TA

    . Insurance or a regular physician: Which is the most powerful predictor of health care? Am J Public Health 1998;88:364–70.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    1. Freeman JD,
    2. Kadiyala S,
    3. Bell JF,
    4. Martin DP

    . The causal effect of health insurance on utilization and outcomes in adults: a systematic review of US studies. Med Care 2008;46:1023–32.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
40. 40.↵
    1. Sarkar U,
    2. Karter AJ,
    3. Liu JY,
    4. et al

    . Social disparities in internet patient portal use in diabetes: evidence that the digital divide extends beyond access. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:318–21.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Yamin CK,
    2. Emani S,
    3. Williams DH,
    4. et al

    . The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:568–74.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    1. North F,
    2. Hanna BK,
    3. Crane SJ,
    4. Smith SA,
    5. Tulledge-Scheitel SM,
    6. Stroebel RJ

    . Patient portal doldrums: does an exam room promotional video during an office visit increase patient portal registrations and portal use? J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:i24–i27.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. Krist AH,
    2. Woolf SH

    . A vision for patient-centered health information systems. JAMA 2011;305:300–1.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
44. 44.↵
    1. Mahmood A,
    2. Mosalpuria K,
    3. Wyant DK,
    4. Bhuyan SS

    . Association between having a regular health provider and access to services linked to electronic health records. Hosp Top 2019;97:1–10.

    OpenUrl
45. 45.↵
    Federal Communications Commission. Lifeline program for low-income consumers. Available from: https://www.fcc.gov/general/lifeline-program-low-income-consumers. Accessed Feb. 4, 2019.
46. 46.↵
    Mobile for All. https://mobileforall.org/. Accessed Feb. 4, 2019.
47. 47.↵
    1. Gibbons MC,
    2. Fleisher L,
    3. Slamon RE,
    4. Bass S,
    5. Kandadai V,
    6. Beck JR

    . Exploring the potential of Web 2.0 to address health disparities. J Health Commun 2011;16:77–89.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
48. 48.↵
    1. Matoff-Stepp S,
    2. Applebaum B,
    3. Pooler J,
    4. Kavanagh E

    . Women as health care decision-makers: implications for health care coverage in the United States. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2014;25:1507–13.

    OpenUrl
49. 49.↵
    1. Umberson D,
    2. Karas Montez J

    . Social relationships and health: a flashpoint for health policy. J Health Soc Behav 2010;51:S54–S66.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
50. 50.↵
    1. Sarkar U,
    2. Lyles CR,
    3. Parker MM,
    4. et al

    . Use of the refill function through an online patient portal is associated with improved adherence to statins in an integrated health system. Med Care 2014;52:194–201.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
51. 51.↵
    1. Lin CT,
    2. Wittevrongel L,
    3. Moore L,
    4. Beaty BL,
    5. Ross SE

    . An Internet-based patient-provider communication system: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2005;7:e47.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
52. 52.↵
    1. Kim KK,
    2. Rudin RS,
    3. Wilson MD

    . Health information technology adoption in California community health centers. Am J Manag Care 2015;21:e677–e683.

    OpenUrl
53. 53.↵
    1. Henshaw D,
    2. Okawa G,
    3. Ching K,
    4. Garrido T,
    5. Qian H,
    6. Tsai J

    . Access to radiology reports via an online patient portal: experiences of referring physicians and patients. J Am Coll Radiol 2015;12:582–6. e581.

    OpenUrl
54. 54.↵
    1. Johnson AJ,
    2. Easterling D,
    3. Nelson R,
    4. Chen MY,
    5. Frankel RM

    . Access to radiologic reports via a patient portal: clinical simulations to investigate patient preferences. J Am Coll Radiol 2012;9:256–63.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
55. 55.↵
    1. Czaja SJ,
    2. Zarcadoolas C,
    3. Vaughon WL,
    4. Lee CC,
    5. Rockoff ML,
    6. Levy J

    . The usability of electronic personal health record systems for an underserved adult population. Hum Factors 2015;57:491–506.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
56. 56.↵
    1. Middleton B,
    2. Bloomrosen M,
    3. Dente MA,
    4. et al

    . Enhancing patient safety and quality of care by improving the usability of electronic health record systems: recommendations from AMIA. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:e2–e8.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
57. 57.↵
    1. Furukawa MF,
    2. King J,
    3. Patel V,
    4. Hsiao CJ,
    5. Adler-Milstein J,
    6. Jha AK

    . Despite substantial progress in EHR adoption, health information exchange and patient engagement remain low in office settings. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33:1672–9.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
58. 58.↵
    1. Rao SR,
    2. DesRoches CM,
    3. Donelan K,
    4. Campbell EG,
    5. Miralles PD,
    6. Jha AK

    . Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:271–5.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
59. 59.↵
    1. Adler-Milstein J,
    2. Jha AK

    . HITECH Act drove large gains in hospital electronic health record adoption. Health Aff (Millwood) 2017;36:1416–22.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
60. 60.↵
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare and Medicaid Promoting Interoperability Program Basics. Modified July 20, 2020. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/Basics.html.Accessed Jan. 13, 2019.
61. 61.↵
    1. Fiscella K,
    2. Shin P

    . The inverse care law: Implications for healthcare of vulnerable populations. J Ambul Care Manage 2005;28:304–12.

    OpenUrlPubMed