Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Patient–Provider Communication: Does Electronic Messaging Reduce Incoming Telephone Calls?

Eve N. Dexter, Scott Fields, Rebecca E. Rdesinski, Bhavaya Sachdeva, Daisuke Yamashita and Miguel Marino
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2016, 29 (5) 613-619; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2016.05.150371
Eve N. Dexter
From the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (ED, SF, RER, DY, MM); the Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Division of Biostatistics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MM); and the Department of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (BS).
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott Fields
From the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (ED, SF, RER, DY, MM); the Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Division of Biostatistics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MM); and the Department of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (BS).
MD, MHA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca E. Rdesinski
From the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (ED, SF, RER, DY, MM); the Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Division of Biostatistics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MM); and the Department of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (BS).
MSW, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bhavaya Sachdeva
From the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (ED, SF, RER, DY, MM); the Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Division of Biostatistics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MM); and the Department of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (BS).
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daisuke Yamashita
From the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (ED, SF, RER, DY, MM); the Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Division of Biostatistics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MM); and the Department of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (BS).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miguel Marino
From the Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (ED, SF, RER, DY, MM); the Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Division of Biostatistics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (MM); and the Department of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland (BS).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Monthly trends in patient panel sizes per clinic between February 2009 and February 2011. Clinic 1 is a commercial community-based health center, clinic 2 is a university-based health center, clinic 3 is a rural health center, and clinic 4 is a federally qualified health center.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2.

    Correlation between monthly rates of MyChart messages and rates of incoming telephone calls per 1000 patients from each clinic between February 2009 and February 2011. Smoothed locally weighted scatter-plot smoother (LOESS) curves are presented to highlight the trend over time. Thick solid lines denote the observed monthly incoming telephone calls. Thick dashed lines denote the observed monthly MyChart messages. Thin solid lines represent the smoothed LOESS curves of monthly incoming telephone calls. Thin dashed lines represent the smoothed LOESS curves of monthly MyChart messages. Smoothed LOESS curves are created by a locally weighted regression fitting technique that provides a generally smoother curve. The Spearman correlation coefficient is denoted by r and the P value for significance testing is denoted by p.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Clinic Rates of MyChart Messages and Incoming Telephone Calls per 1000 Patients per Month Between February 2009 and February 2011

    Clinic 1Clinic 2Clinic 3Clinic 4
    Clinic typeCHCUHCRHCFQHC
    Start dateFebruary 2009February 2009April 2011February 2011
        Panel size (n)11,87811,1797,53811,010
        MyChart messages*4314211
        Telephone calls†439739508755
    End dateJune 1, 2014June 1, 2014June 1, 2014June 1, 2014
        Panel size (n)10,88918,2439,68511,868
        MyChart messages*1691822419
        Telephone calls†5845026361002
    • ↵* Number of patient-to-physician MyChart messages per 1000 patients per month.

    • ↵† Number of incoming telephone calls received at a clinic per 1000 patients per month.

    • CHC, community-based health center; FQHC, federally quality health center; RHC, rural health center; UHC, university-based health center.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 29 (5)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 29, Issue 5
September-October 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patient–Provider Communication: Does Electronic Messaging Reduce Incoming Telephone Calls?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Patient–Provider Communication: Does Electronic Messaging Reduce Incoming Telephone Calls?
Eve N. Dexter, Scott Fields, Rebecca E. Rdesinski, Bhavaya Sachdeva, Daisuke Yamashita, Miguel Marino
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2016, 29 (5) 613-619; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.05.150371

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Patient–Provider Communication: Does Electronic Messaging Reduce Incoming Telephone Calls?
Eve N. Dexter, Scott Fields, Rebecca E. Rdesinski, Bhavaya Sachdeva, Daisuke Yamashita, Miguel Marino
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2016, 29 (5) 613-619; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.05.150371
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Do Medical Scribes Help Primary Care Providers Respond More Quickly to Out-of-Visit Tasks?
  • High Volume Portal Usage Impacts Practice Resources
  • Tethered to the EHR: Primary Care Physician Workload Assessment Using EHR Event Log Data and Time-Motion Observations
  • Content Usage and the Most Frequently Read Articles of 2016
  • Re: Patient-Provider Communication: Does Electronic Messaging Reduce Incoming Telephone Calls?
  • Evidence, Engagement, and Technology: Themes of and the State of Primary Care Practice-based Network Research
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Electronic Health Records
  • Health Personnel
  • Information Systems
  • Internet
  • Motivation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Telephone
  • Workload

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire