Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Patient or Clinician: Duration of Use of Intrauterine Devices Based on Who Initiated Discussion of Placement

Tammy Chang, Michelle H. Moniz, Melissa A. Plegue, Kathryn Sage Shaffer, Heather B. Vance and Katherine J. Gold
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2016, 29 (1) 24-28; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2016.01.150192
Tammy Chang
From the Department of Family Medicine (TC, MAP, KJG), the Institute for Health Policy and Innovation (TC, MHM), Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology (MHM, KJG), and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program (MHM), the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; the Providence Family Medicine Residency, Southfield, MI (KSS); and the Department of Family Medicine, Boulder Medical Center, Boulder, CO (HBV).
MD, MPH, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle H. Moniz
From the Department of Family Medicine (TC, MAP, KJG), the Institute for Health Policy and Innovation (TC, MHM), Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology (MHM, KJG), and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program (MHM), the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; the Providence Family Medicine Residency, Southfield, MI (KSS); and the Department of Family Medicine, Boulder Medical Center, Boulder, CO (HBV).
MD, MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melissa A. Plegue
From the Department of Family Medicine (TC, MAP, KJG), the Institute for Health Policy and Innovation (TC, MHM), Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology (MHM, KJG), and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program (MHM), the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; the Providence Family Medicine Residency, Southfield, MI (KSS); and the Department of Family Medicine, Boulder Medical Center, Boulder, CO (HBV).
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathryn Sage Shaffer
From the Department of Family Medicine (TC, MAP, KJG), the Institute for Health Policy and Innovation (TC, MHM), Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology (MHM, KJG), and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program (MHM), the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; the Providence Family Medicine Residency, Southfield, MI (KSS); and the Department of Family Medicine, Boulder Medical Center, Boulder, CO (HBV).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heather B. Vance
From the Department of Family Medicine (TC, MAP, KJG), the Institute for Health Policy and Innovation (TC, MHM), Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology (MHM, KJG), and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program (MHM), the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; the Providence Family Medicine Residency, Southfield, MI (KSS); and the Department of Family Medicine, Boulder Medical Center, Boulder, CO (HBV).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katherine J. Gold
From the Department of Family Medicine (TC, MAP, KJG), the Institute for Health Policy and Innovation (TC, MHM), Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology (MHM, KJG), and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program (MHM), the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; the Providence Family Medicine Residency, Southfield, MI (KSS); and the Department of Family Medicine, Boulder Medical Center, Boulder, CO (HBV).
MD, MSW, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Finer LB,
    2. Jerman J,
    3. Kavanaugh ML
    . Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007–2009. Fertil Steril 2012;98:893–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Trussell J
    . Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 2011;83:397–404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Jones J,
    2. Mosher W,
    3. Daniels K
    . Current contraceptive use in the United States, 2006–2010, and changes in patterns of use since 1995. 2012. Natl Health Stat Report 2012;(60):1–25. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr060.pdf. Accessed January 27, 2015.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Cox M,
    2. Tripp J,
    3. Blacksell S
    . Clinical performance of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in routine use by the UK Family Planning and Reproductive Health Research Network: 5-year report. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2002;28:73–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice; Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working Group. ACOG Committee Opinion no. 450: increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1434–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Delbanco TL,
    2. Daley J
    . Through the patient's eyes: strategies toward more successful contraception. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88(3 Suppl):41S–7S.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    HealthCare.gov. Birth control benefits. Available from: http://www.healthcare.gov/coverage/birth-control-benefits/. Accessed February 5, 2015.
  8. 8.↵
    1. Tugrul S,
    2. Yavuzer B,
    3. Yildirim G,
    4. Kayahan A
    . The duration of use, causes of discontinuation, and problems during removal in women admitted for removal of IUD. Contraception 2005;71:149–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Cea-Soriano L,
    2. Garcia Rodriguez LA,
    3. Machlitt A,
    4. Wallander MA
    . Use of prescription contraceptive methods in the UK general population: a primary care study. BJOG 2014;121:53–60, discussion 60–1.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Dickerson LM,
    2. Diaz VA,
    3. Jordon J,
    4. et al
    . Satisfaction, early removal, and side effects associated with long-acting reversible contraception. Fam Med 2013;45:701–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Werth SR,
    2. Secura GM,
    3. Broughton HO,
    4. Jones ME,
    5. Dickey V,
    6. Peipert JF
    . Contraceptive continuation in Hispanic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212:312.e1–8.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. Dehlendorf C,
    2. Diedrich J,
    3. Drey E,
    4. Postone A,
    5. Steinauer J
    . Preferences for decision-making about contraception and general health care among reproductive age women at an abortion clinic. Patient Educ Couns 2010;81:343–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Dehlendorf C,
    2. Kimport K,
    3. Levy K,
    4. Steinauer J
    . A qualitative analysis of approaches to contraceptive counseling. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2014;46:233–40.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Alnakash AH
    . Influence of IUD perceptions on method discontinuation. Contraception 2008;78:290–3.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Dehlendorf C,
    2. Tharayil M,
    3. Anderson N,
    4. Gbenedio K,
    5. Wittman A,
    6. Steinauer J
    . Counseling about IUDs: a mixed-methods analysis. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2014;46:133–40.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. O'Neil-Callahan M,
    2. Peipert JF,
    3. Zhao Q,
    4. Madden T,
    5. Secura G
    . Twenty-four-month continuation of reversible contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:1083–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Madden T,
    2. Mullersman JL,
    3. Omvig KJ,
    4. Secura GM,
    5. Peipert JF
    . Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception 2013;88:243–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Halpern V,
    2. Lopez LM,
    3. Grimes DA,
    4. Stockton LL,
    5. Gallo MF
    . Strategies to improve adherence and acceptability of hormonal methods of contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;10:CD004317.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Anderson N,
    2. Steinauer J,
    3. Valente T,
    4. Koblentz J,
    5. Dehlendorf C
    . Women's social communication about IUDs: a qualitative analysis. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2014;46:141–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 29 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 29, Issue 1
January-February 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patient or Clinician: Duration of Use of Intrauterine Devices Based on Who Initiated Discussion of Placement
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Patient or Clinician: Duration of Use of Intrauterine Devices Based on Who Initiated Discussion of Placement
Tammy Chang, Michelle H. Moniz, Melissa A. Plegue, Kathryn Sage Shaffer, Heather B. Vance, Katherine J. Gold
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2016, 29 (1) 24-28; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.01.150192

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Patient or Clinician: Duration of Use of Intrauterine Devices Based on Who Initiated Discussion of Placement
Tammy Chang, Michelle H. Moniz, Melissa A. Plegue, Kathryn Sage Shaffer, Heather B. Vance, Katherine J. Gold
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2016, 29 (1) 24-28; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.01.150192
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Family Medicine Research That Provides Compelling, Urgent Data to Improve Patient Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Intrauterine Devices
  • Physician–Patient Relations
  • Social Networks

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire