Fundamental Issues in Implementing an Ambulatory Care Electronic Health Record

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Hsiao C,
   2. Hing E,
   3. Socey TC,
   4. Cai B

   . Electronic health record systems and intent to apply for meaningful use incentives among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001–2011. NCHS Data Brief 2011;79:1–8.

   OpenUrlPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Kokkonen EW,
   2. Davis SA,
   3. Lin H,
   4. Dabade TS,
   5. Feldman SR,
   6. Fleischer AB

   . Use of electronic medical records differs by specialty and office settings. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:e33–8.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Rao SR,
   2. Desroches CM,
   3. Donelan K,
   4. Campbell EG,
   5. Miralles PD,
   6. Jha AK

   . Electronic health records in small physician practices: availability, use, and perceived benefits. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:271–5.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Simon SR,
   2. McCarthy ML,
   3. Kaushal R,
   4. et al

   . Electronic health records: which practices have them, and how are clinicians using them? J Eval Clin Pract 2008;14:43–7.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Blumenthal D,
   2. DesRoches C,
   3. Donelan K

   . Health information technology in the United States: where we stand, 2008. Health Information Technology Initiative, Massachusetts General Hospital and the School of Public Health and Health Services at George Washington University. Princeton (NJ): Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; 2008.
6. 6.↵
   1. Burt CW,
   2. Hing E,
   3. Woodwell D

   . NCHS Health E-Stat. Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians: United States, 2005. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2006. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/electronic/electronic.htm. Accessed November 10, 2014.
7. 7.↵
   1. DesRoches CM,
   2. Campbell EG,
   3. Rao SR,
   4. et al

   . Electronic health records in ambulatory care—a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med 2008;359:50–60.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Lorenzi NM,
   2. Kouroubali A,
   3. Detmer DE,
   4. Bloomrosen M

   . How to successfully select and implement electronic health records (EHR) in small ambulatory practice settings. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2009;9:15.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Greiver M,
   2. Barnsley J,
   3. Glazier RH,
   4. Moineddin R,
   5. Harvey BJ

   . Implementation of electronic medical records: theory-informed qualitative study. Can Fam Physician 2011;57:e390–7.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Ash JS,
    2. Bates DW

    . Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005;12:8–12.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Simon SR,
    2. Kaushal R,
    3. Cleary PD,
    4. et al

    . Correlates of electronic health record adoption in office practices: a statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:110–7.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Boonstra A,
    2. Broekhuis M

    . Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10:231.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. McGinn CA,
    2. Grenier S,
    3. Duplantie J,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review. BMC Med 2011;9:46.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Menachemi N,
    2. Brooks R

    . Reviewing the benefits and costs of electronic health records and associated patient safety technologies. J Med Syst 2006;30:159–68.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Wang SJ,
    2. Middleton B,
    3. Prosser LA,
    4. et al

    . A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. Am J Med 2003;114:397–403.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Hillestad R,
    2. Bigelow J,
    3. Bower A,
    4. et al

    . Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24:1103–17.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Bar-Dayan Y,
    2. Saed H,
    3. Boaz M,
    4. et al

    . Using electronic health records to save money. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:e17–20.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Shekelle PG,
    2. Morton SC,
    3. Keeler EB

    . Costs and benefits of health information technology. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2006;(132):1–71.
19. 19.↵
    1. Adler-Milstein J,
    2. Salzberg C,
    3. Franz C,
    4. Orav EJ,
    5. Newhouse JP,
    6. Bates DW

    . Effect of electronic health records on health care costs: longitudinal comparative evidence from community practices. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:97–104.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Bonner LM,
    2. Simons CE,
    3. Parker LE,
    4. Yano EM,
    5. Kirchner JE

    . ‘To take care of the patients’: Qualitative analysis of Veterans Health Administration personnel experiences with a clinical informatics system. Implement Sci 2010;5:63.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Lau F,
    2. Kuziemsky C,
    3. Price M,
    4. Gardner J

    . A review on systematic reviews of health information system studies. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010;17:637–45.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Poon EG,
    2. Wright A,
    3. Simon SR,
    4. et al

    . Relationship between use of electronic health record features and health care quality: results of a statewide survey. Med Care 2010;48:203–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Miller WL,
    2. Crabtree BF

    . Doing qualitative research. Vol. 3. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1999.
24. 24.↵
    1. McCracken G

    . The long interview. Vol. 13. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1988.
25. 25.↵
    1. Glaser B,
    2. Strauss A

    . The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. In: The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 1967:101–15.
26. 26.↵
    1. Constas MA

    . Qualitative analysis as a public event: the documentation of category development procedures. Am Educ Res J 1992;29:253–66.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Hayden SR,
    2. Jouriles NJ,
    3. Rosen P

    . Requiem for “non-urgent” patients in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 2010;38:381–3.

    OpenUrlPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. McAlearney AS,
    2. Song PH,
    3. Robbins J,
    4. et al

    . Moving from good to great in ambulatory electronic health record implementation. J Healthc Qual 2010;32:41–50.

    OpenUrlPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Nambisan P,
    2. Kreps GL,
    3. Polit S

    . Understanding electronic medical record adoption in the United States: communication and sociocultural perspectives. Interact J Med Res 2013;2:e5.

    OpenUrl
30. 30.↵
    1. Rogers E

    . Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York: Free Press; 1995.
31. 31.↵
    1. Maxson E,
    2. Jain S,
    3. Kendall M,
    4. Mostashari F,
    5. Blumenthal D

    . The Regional Extension Center Program: helping physicians meaningfully use health information technology. Ann Intern Med 2010;153:666–70.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Keenan CR,
    2. Nguyen HH,
    3. Srinivasan M

    . Electronic medical records and their impact on resident and medical student education. Acad Psychiatry 2006;30:522–7.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Stephens MB,
    2. Gimbel RW,
    3. Pangaro L

    . Commentary: The RIME/EMR scheme: an educational approach to clinical documentation in electronic medical records. Acad Med 2011;86:11–4.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Peled JU,
    2. Sagher O,
    3. Morrow JB,
    4. Dobbie AE

    . Do electronic health records help or hinder medical education? PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000069.

    OpenUrlPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Frankovich J,
    2. Longhurst CA,
    3. Sutherland SM

    . Evidence-based medicine in the EMR era. N Engl J Med 2011;365:1758–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science