Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Fundamental Issues in Implementing an Ambulatory Care Electronic Health Record

Ann Scheck McAlearney, Jennifer L. Hefner, Cynthia Sieck, Milisa Rizer and Timothy R. Huerta
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2015, 28 (1) 55-64; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2015.01.140078
Ann Scheck McAlearney
From the Departments of Family Medicine (ASM, JLH, CS, MR, TRH) and Biomedical Informatics (MR, TRH), The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus; the Division of Health Services Management and Policy, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus (ASM); and the Department of Corporate Strategy and Innovation, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (ASM).
ScD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer L. Hefner
From the Departments of Family Medicine (ASM, JLH, CS, MR, TRH) and Biomedical Informatics (MR, TRH), The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus; the Division of Health Services Management and Policy, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus (ASM); and the Department of Corporate Strategy and Innovation, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (ASM).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cynthia Sieck
From the Departments of Family Medicine (ASM, JLH, CS, MR, TRH) and Biomedical Informatics (MR, TRH), The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus; the Division of Health Services Management and Policy, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus (ASM); and the Department of Corporate Strategy and Innovation, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (ASM).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Milisa Rizer
From the Departments of Family Medicine (ASM, JLH, CS, MR, TRH) and Biomedical Informatics (MR, TRH), The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus; the Division of Health Services Management and Policy, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus (ASM); and the Department of Corporate Strategy and Innovation, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (ASM).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy R. Huerta
From the Departments of Family Medicine (ASM, JLH, CS, MR, TRH) and Biomedical Informatics (MR, TRH), The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus; the Division of Health Services Management and Policy, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus (ASM); and the Department of Corporate Strategy and Innovation, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland (ASM).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1. Participants in Interviews and Focus Groups across the 6 Study Sites
    Participants (n)
    Administrators
        Leaders/managers18
        Information technology professionals and leaders13
        Staff4
        Total35
    Physicians
        Physicians in practice (attendings, private practice physicians)26
        Physicians in training (interns, residents)17
        Physician leaders4
        Total47
    • View popup
    Table 2. Physician and Administrator Comments from Interviews and Focus Groups Regarding the Need to Change Medical Practice to Accommodate Electronic Health Record Implementation
    Representative Physician CommentsRepresentative Administrator Comments
    Need to change practice style
    • “I do almost all of my documentation and things before or after I leave the patient's room.”

    • “I would not document the majority of my patients as I saw them. I would leave everything ‘til the end. Once patients are out by 5 or 5:30, then I sit down and do all my paperwork. And I get home by 7:30. I'm dead and hungry and cranky.”

    • “It's far faster to dictate than it is to type.”

    • “…just the transition of going from a paper record to an electronic medical record-change. Some of our physicians, in that practice, some of them are a little bit older and you know it's not like they're 30 or 40 that had computers as part of their schooling and training.”

    • “And some people are better typists than others—that comes into play.”

    • “They've done it for all these years, it works. They know, practices would know, ‘well if I put the chart on this side of the desk it means blah, and if these were this kind, I would put them over here, and these charts I put over here on the cart.’ And over time the practice knew what all of that meant. Well if you're in electronic world, you don't have this side of the desk and the cart.”

    Threat to professionalism
    • “I've really gotten to the point that I don't do much in the patient room because what you find, you're sitting there struggling to write a prescription and the patient's looking at you like, ‘What's wrong with you?’ You know, I mean, you really, I think, lose a lot of credibility when you're struggling or getting an order written and most people are pretty understanding yet. At the same time you feel like you're not competent.”

    • “You become a data entry person. And I think we haven't come to terms with the fact that we have to insulate that thought process of the docs better than we are doing it.”

    • “We're trying to standardize the way that they conduct their patient visit because they have to go through it screen by screen in the order that we offer them. That's not something physicians are used to.”

    • “They're a little embarrassed, quite frankly, by some of these documents that look like the computer examines the patient, this is the computer's opinion of what's there. Their medical judgment and you know, it's an ego thing. I mean we all have our style. We all like the way to do certain things. That gets lost in the shuffle.”

    • “It's very hard on the physicians, not only because we're now making them data entry people but the sequence of how they examine people, how they traditionally interviewed you and assessed you, could be disrupted because the EMR goes in one linear step. It's a linear thing.”

    Shift of expertise
    • “Attendings have absolutely . . no idea what they're doing with [the EHR].”

    • “Some of it's being accessible, some of it's being efficient with your time and not keeping your patients waiting, and you know the whole package is what medical care to me is and I think the EMR can flip it. It flips that relationship.”

    • “I think we have a unique perspective on [the EHR] as opposed to everyone else in the hospital … I feel that from an [EHR] knowledge standpoint, the interns are the ones in the hospital that are most knowledgeable.”

    • “I actually showed one of the attendings a shortcut that I, I said, ‘You know, in our EMR stuff we can do this, this.’ He said, ‘Oh my gosh I've been using it for 4 years and I never knew that.’”

    • “And most of the docs, they coach each other. They're pretty good at it.”

    • “They sit there and say, ‘Well how am I supposed to remember everything I'm going to do if I don't have something to write it on?’ Well if you're really younger generation, you're used to working on the computer and you're used to doing that and then walk and talk to them and then … ‘oh ok,’ and go back and you're not uncomfortable with that.”

    Changed interactions with patients
    • “Even if you can position it so you're sort of looking at the screen and the patient, I think there's always the feeling that the patient is going, ‘Are they really thinking about what's on the computer or… .’ It's just a different relationship. And so I think that concerns almost every physician I've talked to.”

    • “I think if you don't talk and you're just on there and you're typing and you're looking in data and you're sort of internally processing all this stuff and the patients over here and they're not just watching you do that, I think they feel really alienated. Now, if you're on here and you're saying, ‘ok, well lets look at your old labs here … OK, I can see your cholesterol was … this … and oh I see we started you on this new drug and … how've you been doing on that drug?”

    • “You usually have a doc with their face buried in the computer because they're dealing with this new thing that they're not used to and so the patient's like, ‘Hey I'm over here’ kind of thing.”

    • “There are probably 1 or 2 having a really hard time where they still can't find that groove, that ‘sweet spot’ between interacting with the patient and looking on the computer. And I think they are at a disadvantage because having it right there in the room and dynamically looking at it … I mean a lot of discussions that go on are ‘well, my patient[s] feel alienated if I'm looking at my computer screen.’”

    Impact on medical education
    • “We really effectively completely learned 3 systems, outpatient, inpatient [EHR], and then whatever the old one was called within those few months. So in addition to being brand new doctors, it's a lot.”

    • “Oh, nobody thinks anymore. Everybody stops thinking, I mean, I think you just end up becoming automated. You just sort of go, OK did I go down my list? Did I fill all my little criteria? OK, did I do this? And you're not independently thinking anymore, you're sort of just thinking toward the computer.”

    • “When the student hasn't been brought up to speed with [the EMR] or doesn't have a log on, then the student's involvement is really diminished in the clinic[,] also because they can't really do their own notes or documentation and we lose a teaching opportunity there as well.”

    • “Some of these young new nurses have never seen a paper chart.”

    Impact on clinical practice
    • “These aren't necessarily items that can be created in smart phrases. You need to understand who's making decisions … who's able to make decisions for the patient, where is his family, who can I contact, his other providers who are providing psychiatric care. It's extremely complicated.”

    • “So there are some levels of detail with a family history, with a medical history where maybe the problems aren't in the available possibilities and so it become[s] a question of you look 3 or 4 times under different things and then you can't find the phrase anywhere so do you type “other” and then go and do free text over or do you just not document that problem?”

    • “Even though physicians are very busy, they want to give their patients time, they want to connect with them and it's difficult to do that when you're typing on a computer.”

    • “They've got so many issues, and they're all very complex… . They didn't become a primary care doctor and take this 30-hour-a-week job, so that they could work 50.”

    • EHR, electronic health record; EMR, electronic medical record.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 28 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 28, Issue 1
January-February 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Fundamental Issues in Implementing an Ambulatory Care Electronic Health Record
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Fundamental Issues in Implementing an Ambulatory Care Electronic Health Record
Ann Scheck McAlearney, Jennifer L. Hefner, Cynthia Sieck, Milisa Rizer, Timothy R. Huerta
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2015, 28 (1) 55-64; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.01.140078

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Fundamental Issues in Implementing an Ambulatory Care Electronic Health Record
Ann Scheck McAlearney, Jennifer L. Hefner, Cynthia Sieck, Milisa Rizer, Timothy R. Huerta
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2015, 28 (1) 55-64; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.01.140078
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Electronic Health Record Challenges, Workarounds, and Solutions Observed in Practices Integrating Behavioral Health and Primary Care
  • Practical, Office-based Interventions That Improve Care Today
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Electronic Medical Records
  • Practice Management
  • Qualitative Research

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire