Inaccurate Risk Perceptions and Individualized Risk Estimates by Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Smith SM,
   2. Soubhi H,
   3. Fortin M,
   4. Hudon C,
   5. O'Dowd T

   . Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;(4):CD006560.
2. 2.↵
   1. Brown LC,
   2. Johnson JA,
   3. Majumdar SR,
   4. Tsuyuki RT,
   5. McAlister FA

   . Evidence of suboptimal management of cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and symptomatic atherosclerosis. CMAJ 2004;171:1189–92.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Grant RW,
   2. Cagliero E,
   3. Murphy-Sheehy P,
   4. Singer DE,
   5. Nathan DM,
   6. Meigs JB

   . Comparison of hyperglycemia, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia management in patients with type 2 diabetes. Am J Med 2002;112:603–9.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Hemmingsen B,
   2. Lund SS,
   3. Gluud C,
   4. et al

   . Targeting intensive glycaemic control versus targeting conventional glycaemic control for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(6):CD008143.
5. 5.↵
   1. Clarke PM,
   2. Gray AM,
   3. Briggs A,
   4. et al

   . A model to estimate the lifetime health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) outcomes model (UKPDS no. 68). Diabetologia 2004;47:1747–59.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Waldron CA,
   2. van der Weijden T,
   3. Ludt S,
   4. Gallacher J,
   5. Elwyn G

   . What are effective strategies to communicate cardiovascular risk information to patients? A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 2011;82:169–81.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   University of Oxford Diabetes Trials Unit and Health Economics Research Centre. UKPDS outcomes model user manual, version 1.3. Oxford: ISIS Innovation Ltd; 2010. Available from: http://www.dtu.ox.ac.uk/outcomesmodel/UKPDSOutcomesManual.pdf. Accessed May 22, 2014.
8. 8.↵
   1. Baker DW,
   2. Williams MV,
   3. Parker RM,
   4. Gazmararian JA,
   5. Nurss J

   . Development of a brief test to measure functional health literacy. Patient Educ Couns 1999;38:33–42.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Nurss JR,
   2. Parker RM,
   3. Williams MV,
   4. Baker DW

   . Test of functional literacy in adults, 2nd ed. Snow Camp, NC: Peppercorn Books and Press; 2001.
10. 10.↵
    1. Lipkus IM,
    2. Samsa G,
    3. Rimer BK

    . General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Med Decis Making 2001;21:37–44.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Garcia-Retamero R,
    2. Galesic M

    . Communicating treatment risk reduction to people with low numeracy skills: a cross-cultural comparison. Am J Public Health 2009;99:2196–202.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Nelson W,
    2. Reyna VF,
    3. Fagerlin A,
    4. Lipkus I,
    5. Peters E

    . Clinical implications of numeracy: theory and practice. Ann Behav Med 2008;35:261–74.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Goodyear-Smith F,
    2. Arroll B,
    3. Chan L,
    4. Jackson R,
    5. Wells S,
    6. Kenealy T

    . Patients prefer pictures to numbers to express cardiovascular benefit from treatment. Ann Fam Med 2008;6:213–7.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Lipkus IM

    . Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations. Med Decis Making 2007;27:696–713.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Edwards A,
    2. Elwyn G,
    3. Mulley A

    . Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures. BMJ 2002;324:827–30.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Edwards AG,
    2. Evans R,
    3. Dundon J,
    4. Haigh S,
    5. Hood K,
    6. Elwyn GJ

    . Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(4):CD001865.
17. 17.↵
    1. Thomas DR

    . A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval 2006;27:237–46.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Mazor KM,
    2. Calvi J,
    3. Cowan R,
    4. et al

    . Media messages about cancer: what do people understand? J Health Commun 2010;15(Suppl 2):126–45.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Goodyear-Smith F,
    2. Kenealy T,
    3. Wells S,
    4. Arroll B,
    5. Horsburgh M

    . Patients' preferences for ways to communicate benefits of cardiovascular medication. Ann Fam Med 2011;9:121–7.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Sheridan SL,
    2. Viera AJ,
    3. Krantz MJ,
    4. et al

    . The effect of giving global coronary risk information to adults: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:230–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Powers BJ,
    2. Danus S,
    3. Grubber JM,
    4. Olsen MK,
    5. Oddone EZ,
    6. Bosworth HB

    . The effectiveness of personalized coronary heart disease and stroke risk communication. Am Heart J 2011;161:673–80.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Parkes G,
    2. Greenhalgh T,
    3. Griffin M,
    4. Dent R

    . Effect on smoking quit rate of telling patients their lung age: the Step2quit randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008;336:598–600.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Welschen LM,
    2. Bot SD,
    3. Kostense PJ,
    4. et al

    . Effects of cardiovascular disease risk communication for patients with type 2 diabetes on risk perception in a randomized controlled trial: the @RISK study. Diabetes Care 2012;35:2485–92.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Harle CA,
    2. Downs JS,
    3. Padman R

    . Effectiveness of personalized and interactive health risk calculators: a randomized trial. Med Decis Making 2012;32:594–605.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Asimakopoulou KG,
    2. Fox C,
    3. Spimpolo J,
    4. Marsh S,
    5. Skinner TC

    . The impact of different time frames of risk communication on type 2 diabetes patients' understanding and memory for risk of coronary heart disease and stroke. Diabet Med 2008;25:811–7.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Hill S,
    2. Spink J,
    3. Cadilhac D,
    4. et al

    . Absolute risk representation in cardiovascular disease prevention: comprehension and preferences of health care consumers and general practitioners involved in a focus group study. BMC Public Health 2010;10:108.

    OpenUrlPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Walter FM,
    2. Emery J,
    3. Braithwaite D,
    4. Marteau TM

    . Lay understanding of familial risk of common chronic diseases: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. Ann Fam Med 2004;2:583–94.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Cameron LD,
    2. Leventhal H

    1. Leventhal H,
    2. Brissette I,
    3. Leventhal EA

    . The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and illness. In: Cameron LD, Leventhal H , eds. The self-regulation of health and illness behaviour. New York: Routledge; 2003:42–66.
29. 29.↵
    1. Dearborn JL,
    2. McCullough LD

    . Perception of risk and knowledge of risk factors in women at high risk for stroke. Stroke 2009;40:1181–6.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Mazor KM,
    2. Baril J,
    3. Dugan E,
    4. Spencer F,
    5. Burgwinkle P,
    6. Gurwitz JH

    . Patient education about anticoagulant medication: is narrative evidence or statistical evidence more effective? Patient Educ Couns 2007;69:145–57.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Kreuter MW,
    2. Holmes K,
    3. Alcaraz K,
    4. et al

    . Comparing narrative and informational videos to increase mammography in low-income African American women. Patient Educ Couns 2010;81(Suppl):S6–14.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. McQueen A,
    2. Kreuter MW

    . Women's cognitive and affective reactions to breast cancer survivor stories: a structural equation analysis. Patient Educ Couns 2010;81(Suppl):S15–21.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Stern RH

    . The discordance of individual risk estimates and the reference class problem. Available from: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1001.2499v1. Accessed January 18, 2014.
34. 34.↵
    1. Saver BG,
    2. Hargraves JL,
    3. Mazor KM

    . Are population-based diabetes models useful for individual risk estimation? J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24:399–406.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text