Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
OtherEvidence-Based Clinical Medicine

Persistence, Adherence, and Risk of Discontinuation Associated with Commonly Prescribed Antihypertensive Drug Monotherapies

William J. Elliott, Craig A. Plauschinat, Grant H. Skrepnek and Douglas Gause
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2007, 20 (1) 72-80; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2007.01.060094
William J. Elliott
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Craig A. Plauschinat
PharmD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Grant H. Skrepnek
PhD, MS, RPh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Douglas Gause
MS, DrPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360: 1903–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: 2006 Update. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 2005.
  3. ↵
    Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Vander Hoorn S, Murray CJL, and the Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborating Group. Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet 2002; 360: 1347–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Fields LE, Burt VL, Cutler JA, et al. The burden of adult hypertension in the United States 1999 to 2000: A rising tide. Hypertension 2004; 44: 398–404.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, et al. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet 2005; 365: 217–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. Effects of different blood-pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events: results of prospectively-designed overviews of randomised trials. Lancet 2003; 362: 1527–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Staessen JA, Wang J-G, Thijs L. Cardiovascular prevention and blood pressure reduction: a quantitative overview updated until 1 March 2003. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1055–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2004; 42: 1206–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    Carol JJ, Salas M, Speckman JL, Raggio G, Jackson JD. Persistence with treatment for hypertension in actual practice. CMAJ 1999; 160: 31–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. Degli Esposti L, Degli Esposti E, Valpiani G, et al. A retrospective, population-based analysis of persistence with antihypertensive drug therapy in primary care practice in Italy. Clin Ther 2002; 24: 1347–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    Gregoire JP, Moisan J, Guibert R, et al. Determinants of discontinuation of new courses of antihypertensive medications. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55: 728–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    Black HR, Graff A, Shute D, et al. Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist for the treatment of essential hypertension: efficacy, tolerability and safety compared to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, lisinopril. J Hum Hypertens 1997; 11: 483–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. Bremner AD, Baur M, Oddou-Stock P, Bodin F. Valsartan: long-term efficacy and tolerability compared to lisinopril in elderly patients with essential hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens 1997; 19: 1263–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. Corea L, Cardoni O, Fogari R, et al. Valsartan, a new angiotensin II antagonist for the treatment of essential hypertension: a comparative study of the efficacy and safety against amlodipine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1996; 60: 341–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Weber M, et al., for the VALUE trial group. Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 2022–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. Malacco E, Santonastaso M, Vari NA, et al. Comparison of valsartan 160 mg with lisinopril 20 mg, given as monotherapy or in combination with a diuretic, for the treatment of hypertension: the Blood Pressure Reduction and Tolerability of Valsartan in Comparison with Lisinopril (PREVAIL) study. Clin Ther 2004; 26: 855–65.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    Malacco E, Varì N, Capuano V, et al. for the Val-Syst Investigators. A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group comparison of valsartan and amlodipine in the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension in elderly patients: The Val-Syst study. Clin Ther 2003; 25: 2765–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    Rizzo JA, Simons WR. Variations in compliance among hypertensive patients by drug class: Implications for health care costs. Clin Ther 1997; 19: 1446–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    Bloom BS. Continuation of initial antihypertensive medication after 1 year of therapy. Clin Ther 1998; 20: 671–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    Caro JJ, Speckman JL, Salas M, Raggio G, Jackson JD. Effect of initial drug choice on persistence with antihypertensive therapy: The importance of actual practice data. CMAJ 1999; 160: 41–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Conlin PR, Gerth WC, Fox J, Roehm JB, Boccuzzi SJ. Four-year persistence patterns among patients initiating therapy with the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan versus other antihypertensive drug classes. Clin Ther 2001; 23: 1999–2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    Degli Esposti E, Sturani A, Di Martino M, et al. Long-term persistence with antihypertensive drugs in new patients. J Hum Hypertens 2002; 16: 439–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    Marentette MA, Gerth WC, Billings DK, Zarnke KB. Antihypertensive persistence and drug class. Can J Cardiol 2002; 18: 649–56.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Hasford J, Mimran A, Simons WR. A population-based European cohort study of persistence in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. J Hum Hypertens 2002; 16: 569–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients randomized to doxazosin vs chlorthalidone: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2000; 283: 1967–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA 2002; 288: 2981–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    Esposti LD, Di Martino M, Saragoni S, et al. Pharmacoeconomics of antihypertensive drug treatment: an analysis of how long patients remain on various antihypertensive therapies. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2004; 6: 76–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. Elliott WJ. Compliance–and improving it–in hypertension. Manag Care 2003; 12(8 Suppl): 56–61.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    Skrepnek GH. Cost-effectiveness analysis. In: Bootman JL, Townsend RJ, McGhan WF, eds. Principles of Pharmacoeconomics. Third edition. Cincinnati, OH: Harvey Whitney Books, 2005.
  30. ↵
    McCombs JS, Nichol MB, Newman CM, Sclar DA. The costs of interrupting antihypertensive drug therapy in a Medicaid population. Med Care 1994; 32: 214–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    The Top 300 Prescriptions for 2004 by Number of US Prescriptions Dispensed. Available at: www.rxlist.com/top200.htm. Accessed March 27, 2006.
  32. ↵
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 1987; 40: 373–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 613–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: Differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 1075–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    Skrepnek GH. Regression methods in the empiric analysis of health care data. J Manag Care Pharm 2005; 11: 240–51.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    Burke LE, Ockene IS, ed. Compliance in Health Care and Research. New York: Futura Publishing, 2001.
  37. ↵
    Cheung BM, Ong KL, Man YB, Lam KS, Lau CP. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension: United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001–2002. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2006; 8: 93–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    Xu KT, Moloney M, Phillips S. Economics of suboptimal drug use: cost-savings of using JNC-recommended medications for the management of uncomplicated essential hypertension. Am J Manag Care 2003; 9: 529–36.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    Wogen J, Kreilick CA, Livornese RC, Yokoyama K, Frech F. Patient adherence with amlodipine, lisinopril, or valsartan therapy in a usual-care setting. J Manag Care Pharm 2003; 9: 424–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    Wu SC, Liu CP, Chiang HT, Lin SL. Prospective and randomized study of the antihypertensive effect and tolerability of three antihypertensive agents, losartan, amlodipine, and lisinopril, in hypertensive patients. Heart Vessels 2004; 19: 13–18.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. ↵
    Gerth WC. Compliance and persistence with newer antihypertensive agents. Curr Hypertens Rep 2002; 4: 424–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    Spence JD, Hurley TC, Spence JD. Actual practice in hypertension: Implications for persistence with and effectiveness of therapy. Curr Hypertens Rep 2001; 3: 481–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. ↵
    Elliott WJ. Compliance strategies. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 1994; 3: 271–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Neutel JM, Smith DH. Improving patient compliance: A major goal in the management of hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2003; 5: 127–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 20 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 20, Issue 1
January-February 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Persistence, Adherence, and Risk of Discontinuation Associated with Commonly Prescribed Antihypertensive Drug Monotherapies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Persistence, Adherence, and Risk of Discontinuation Associated with Commonly Prescribed Antihypertensive Drug Monotherapies
William J. Elliott, Craig A. Plauschinat, Grant H. Skrepnek, Douglas Gause
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2007, 20 (1) 72-80; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.01.060094

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Persistence, Adherence, and Risk of Discontinuation Associated with Commonly Prescribed Antihypertensive Drug Monotherapies
William J. Elliott, Craig A. Plauschinat, Grant H. Skrepnek, Douglas Gause
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2007, 20 (1) 72-80; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.01.060094
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Trends in antihypertensive drug utilization in British Columbia, 2004-2019: a descriptive study
  • Treatment and prescribing trends of antihypertensive drugs in 2.7 million UK primary care patients over 31 years: a population-based cohort study
  • Sex differences in the adherence of antihypertensive drugs: a systematic review with meta-analyses
  • Systolic Blood Pressure and Biochemical Assessment of Adherence: A Cross-Sectional Analysis in the Emergency Department
  • Trends in Antihypertensive Medication Discontinuation and Low Adherence Among Medicare Beneficiaries Initiating Treatment From 2007 to 2012
  • Generating Evidence From Computerized Healthcare Utilization Databases
  • Meta-Analysis: Impact of Drug Class on Adherence to Antihypertensives
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Practical Recommendations for Minimizing Pain and Anxiety with IUD Insertion
  • A Simplified Approach to Evaluate and Manage Shoulder Pain
  • Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms
Show more Evidence-Based Clinical Medicine

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire