Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
  • Log out
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleEvidence-Based Clinical Medicine

Practical Recommendations for Minimizing Pain and Anxiety with IUD Insertion

Viktoriya Ovsepyan, Petra Kelsey and Ann E. Evensen
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2024, 37 (6) 1150-1155; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240079R1
Viktoriya Ovsepyan
From the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health – Department of Family Medicine and Community Health Madison, Wisconsin (VO, AEE); One Medical Austin, Texas (PK).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Petra Kelsey
From the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health – Department of Family Medicine and Community Health Madison, Wisconsin (VO, AEE); One Medical Austin, Texas (PK).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ann E. Evensen
From the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health – Department of Family Medicine and Community Health Madison, Wisconsin (VO, AEE); One Medical Austin, Texas (PK).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are one of the most effective, long-lasting, and convenient contraceptive methods available in the United States. Unfortunately, the anticipated pain and anxiety associated with an IUD insertion procedure deter many people from using this contraceptive method.

Methods: A literature review was conducted on PubMed by searching the terms “IUD insertion”, “pain management”, “anxiety”, “gynecologic procedures”. The Cochrane database was also searched for reviews about pain management methods during IUD insertions. Findings were summarized using the American Academy of Family Physicians’ Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) scale.

Results: Pharmacologic methods that can be used to reduce pain with IUD insertion include naproxen, tramadol, lidocaine paracervical blocks, 10% lidocaine spray, lidocaine-prilocaine cream, and EMLA cream. Non-pharmacologic methods for reducing pain or anxiety during gynecologic procedures include pre-insertion counseling, “verbal analgesia”, lavender aromatherapy, distraction with music or television, using Valsalva maneuver instead of tenaculum during IUD insertion, and use of heating pad during procedure.

Conclusion: Moderately effective pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic methods exist for reducing pain and anxiety with IUD insertion. These treatment methods should be offered to create a more comfortable experience for patients. Additional research is needed to determine the comparative efficacy of these methods.

  • Anxiety
  • Contraceptives
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Intrauterine Devices
  • Pain Management
  • Reproductive Health
  • Women's Health

Introduction

Half of all pregnancies in the US, about 3 million annually, are unplanned.1 Unplanned pregnancies impose a significant socioeconomic burden on individuals and society. Individuals with unintended pregnancies are more likely to receive late prenatal care and as a result, their infants are at greater risk of being born with a low birth weight, dying in the first year of life, and are at greater risk of not receiving adequate resources for healthy development.2 It is crucial to increase access to effective contraceptive methods, especially now that abortion care has become more restricted with the Dobbs vs Jackson Women’s Health Decision.3

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are one of the most effective, long-lasting, and convenient contraceptive methods available in the US The failure rates of IUDs and implants are less than 1% per year, significantly lower than other contraceptive options.4,5 IUDs are also very cost-effective, with studies showing that individuals who use an IUD or etonogestrel implant may save thousands of dollars over a 5-year period compared with the use of birth control pills, condoms, patch, or vaginal ring.6

Unfortunately, the anticipated pain and anxiety associated with an IUD insertion procedure deter many people from using this contraceptive method. In one study of nulliparous and parous women who underwent IUD insertion, 17% of nulliparous women reported severe pain with placement of the IUD and 11% of parous women reported severe insertion-related pain.7 Certain past experiences may increase anxiety and pain with IUD insertions as well, such as a history of sexual trauma, previous negative experience with a pelvic examination, or awareness of potential pain learned from a friend or family member.8,9 Transgender patients who struggle with pelvic exams may also have more fear and anxiety with IUD insertions.10 Publications on pain and anxiety related to IUD insertion have mostly been systematic reviews that did not offer guidance on how to apply this information to clinical cases. This article will summarize the available research about pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic methods for decreasing pain and anxiety with IUD insertions and explain how to apply this information in clinical medicine.

Methods

A literature review was conducted on PubMed by searching the terms “IUD insertion,” “pain management,” “anxiety,” “gynecologic procedures.” The Cochrane database was also searched for reviews about pain management methods during IUD insertions. Articles that discussed methods for reducing both pain and/or anxiety were reviewed since anxiety levels influence pain scores.9 Because data about nonpharmacologic methods for decreasing pain is more limited than pharmacologic means, we expanded our search to include nonpharmacologic methods for reducing pain in gynecologic procedures in general, not just with IUD insertions. Tables 1 and 2 were created using the American Academy of Family Physicians’ Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) scale.11

Results

Pharmacologic Methods for Reducing Pain and Anxiety with IUD Insertion

Multiple systematic reviews have shown that both naproxen and tramadol decrease pain with IUD insertion, with tramadol having a greater effect on pain reduction.12,13–14 Naproxen can also decrease pain after IUD insertion, with one study showing that pain scores were lower 5 and 15 minutes after IUD insertion among patients who took naproxen, compared with placebo.15 Pain scores were also lower with tenaculum placement, during uterine sounding, and with IUD insertion among patients treated with lidocaine and prilocaine cream, eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) cream, or 10% lidocaine spray before the start of the procedure.12,16⇓⇓–19 Patients who received a paracervical block during the procedure also reported decreased pain with tenaculum placement, uterine sounding, and IUD insertion compared with placebo and pain scores were also lower 5 minutes after IUD insertion.8,12,20–21 These recommendations are summarized in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Effective Pharmacologic Methods for Reducing Pain with IUD Insertion

Generally, lidocaine gel has not been showed to be effective for reducing pain with IUD insertion.12,22 One study found that self-administered 2% vaginal lidocaine gel before IUD insertion helped to reduce pain with tenaculum placement but had no effect on pain level with IUD insertion.23 A novel 4% lidocaine formulation was shown to be effective for reducing pain with IUD insertion in a phase 2 clinical trial, but further studies of this lidocaine formulation are needed before its use can be medically recommended.24

Cervical ripening methods are also not effective at reducing pain with IUD insertion. There is a strong recommendation to avoid misoprostol because it is associated with cramping and higher pain scores during IUD insertion.12,25 A recent meta-analysis of vaginal dinoprostone use vs placebo with IUD insertion showed statistically significant reduction in pain scores with tenaculum placement, sounding of uterus, and IUD insertion but these results were not clinically meaningful.26

Nonpharmacologic Methods for Reducing Pain and Anxiety with Gynecologic Procedures

The data about nonpharmacologic methods for decreasing pain with IUD insertions and other gynecologic procedures is limited.

A preprocedure counseling appointment is recommended. During this visit, the clinician should review what to expect during the IUD insertion procedure and discuss measures that can be taken to minimize discomfort. This visit is also an opportunity to provide reassurance and build a trusting relationship with the patient. These measures will help to alleviate a patient’s anxiety and may decrease patient’s pain during the procedure.7,27–28

Creating a calm, relaxing environment for the patient during the procedure can help to minimize discomfort during the IUD insertion as well. For instance, lavender aromatherapy has been shown to reduce anxiety during IUD insertions as well as during intrauterine insemination procedures.29–30 Music has been shown to reduce anxiety and perception of pain during hysteroscopy and colposcopy.28,31⇓–33 Watching television during reproductive health care procedures, including IUD insertions, has a been effective at reducing anxiety.34 Holding a warm compress to the lower abdomen during a procedure can also serve as a distraction and minimize discomfort.7

Since higher levels of anxiety contribute to higher levels of pain during gynecologic procedures, it is important to take steps to minimize patient’s anxiety.9,12 “Verbal analgesia” is effective at reducing pain and anxiety during gynecologic procedures.7,35⇓–37 Verbal analgesia is a technique in which the clinician calms and relaxes the patient by providing reassurance throughout the procedure multiple times using a low voice volume and slow rate of speech.35 With this “verbal local” approach the clinician maintains continuous communication with the patient and explains each step of the procedure in a soothing, calming tone. One study that analyzed use of verbal analgesia during IUD insertion showed that verbal analgesia has the same analgesic effect as 50 mg of oral tramadol.35

Valsalva maneuver can be used instead of a tenaculum during IUD insertion to reduce pain and anxiety. One study compared the efficacy of IUD insertion with Valsalva maneuver versus tenaculum use and found that both methods were equally successful. In addition, the Valsalva maneuver was associated with less anxiety, less pain, and less bleeding with IUD insertion.38 This study determined that immobilization of the cervix was the most important factor for passing an IUD through the cervical canal, and this could be achieved with Valsalva, which immobilizes the cervix and uterus by increasing intra-abdominal pressure. There were no cases of uterine perforation with use of Valsalva during IUD insertion. Another study compared the use of Valsalva vs tenaculum to pass a Pipelle device into the uterus for an endometrial biopsy; both methods were equally successful.39 These recommendations are summarized in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Nonpharmacologic Methods for Reducing Pain or Anxiety with Gynecologic Procedures

Evidence-based recommendations for choosing one pain-relieving measure over another do not exist. Shared decision making with the patient is an important alternative to help patients understand options and trade-offs for the different pain relief methods that the clinician has available in their setting. For instance, it is important for patients to know that lidocaine paracervical blocks can reduce pain with tenaculum placement and IUD insertion but may cause pain when injected into the cervix.20 It is also helpful to offer more pain relief options to patients who are at higher risk for experiencing discomfort with IUD insertion, such as patients who are nulliparous, have a history of cervical stenosis, dysmenorrhea, or have significant preprocedure anxiety.7,9,40 Please refer to Figure 1 for a case study that shows how to use pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic methods to reduce pain and anxiety with IUD insertion.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Case study.

Conclusion

Moderately effective pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic methods exist for reducing pain and anxiety with IUD insertion. These treatment methods should be offered to create a more comfortable experience for patients. Additional research is needed to determine the comparative efficacy of these methods.

Acknowledgments

Mindy Smith, MD, MS provided editing assistance.

Notes

  • This article was externally peer reviewed.

  • Funding: None.

  • Conflict of interest: None.

  • To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/37/6/1150.full.

  • Received for publication February 21, 2024.
  • Revision received May 17, 2024.
  • Accepted for publication May 28, 2024.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Winner B,
    2. Peipert JF,
    3. Zhao Q,
    4. et al
    . Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1998–2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Brown SS,
    2. Eisenberg L
    Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Unintended Pregnancy, Brown SS, Eisenberg L, eds. The Best Intentions: Unintended Pregnancy and the Well-Being of Children and Families. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 1995.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Rader B,
    2. Upadhyay UD,
    3. Sehgal NKR,
    4. Reis BY,
    5. Brownstein JS,
    6. Hswen Y
    . Estimated travel time and spatial access to abortion facilities in the US before and after the Dobbs v Jackson women's health decision. JAMA 2022;328:2041–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Trussell J
    . Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 2011;83:397–404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Britton LE,
    2. Alspaugh A,
    3. Greene MZ,
    4. McLemore MR
    . CE: an evidence-based update on contraception. Am J Nurs 2020;120:22–33.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Trussell J
    . Update on and correction to the cost-effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States. Contraception 2012;85:611.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bahamondes L,
    2. Mansour D,
    3. Fiala C,
    4. Kaunitz AM,
    5. Gemzell-Danielsson K
    . Practical advice for avoidance of pain associated with insertion of intrauterine contraceptives. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2014;40:54–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Gemzell-Danielsson K,
    2. Jensen JT,
    3. Monteiro I,
    4. et al
    . Interventions for the prevention of pain associated with the placement of intrauterine contraceptives: an updated review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2019;98:1500–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Akdemir Y,
    2. Karadeniz M
    . The relationship between pain at IUD insertion and negative perceptions, anxiety and previous mode of delivery. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2019;24:240–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Schwartz BI,
    2. Bear B,
    3. Short VL,
    4. Kazak AE
    . Outcomes of menstrual management use in transgender and gender-diverse adolescents. Obstet Gynecol 2023;141:748–55.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Ebell MH,
    2. Siwek J,
    3. Weiss BD,
    4. et al
    . Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. Am Fam Physician 2004;69:548–56.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Lopez LM,
    2. Bernholc A,
    3. Zeng Y,
    4. et al
    . Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2015:CD007373.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Karabayirli S,
    2. Ayrim AA,
    3. Muslu B
    . Comparison of the analgesic effects of oral tramadol and naproxen sodium on pain relief during IUD insertion. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2012;19:581–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Edgren RA,
    2. Morton CJ
    . Naproxen sodium for OB/GYN use, with special reference to pain states: a review. Int J Fertil 1986;31:135–42.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Ngo LL,
    2. Braaten KP,
    3. Eichen E,
    4. Fortin J,
    5. Maurer R,
    6. Goldberg AB
    . Naproxen sodium for pain control with intrauterine device insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:1306–13.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Nguyen L,
    2. Lamarche L,
    3. Lennox R,
    4. et al
    . Strategies to mitigate anxiety and pain in intrauterine device insertion: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2020;42:1138–46.e2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Abbas AM,
    2. Abdellah MS,
    3. Khalaf M,
    4. et al
    . Effect of cervical lidocaine-prilocaine cream on pain perception during copper T380A intrauterine device insertion among parous women: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Contraception 2017;95:251–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Aksoy H,
    2. Aksoy Ü,
    3. Ozyurt S,
    4. Açmaz G,
    5. Babayigit M
    . Lidocaine 10% spray to the cervix reduces pain during intrauterine device insertion: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2016;42:83–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Tavakolian S,
    2. Doulabi MA,
    3. Baghban AA,
    4. Mortazavi A,
    5. Ghorbani M
    . Lidocaine-prilocaine cream as analgesia for IUD insertion: a prospective, randomized, controlled, triple blinded study. Glob J Health Sci 2015;7:399–404.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Mody SK,
    2. Farala JP,
    3. Jimenez B,
    4. Nishikawa M,
    5. Ngo LL
    . Paracervical block for intrauterine device placement among nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2018;132:575–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Akers AY,
    2. Steinway C,
    3. Sonalkar S,
    4. et al
    . Reducing pain during intrauterine device insertion: a randomized controlled trial in adolescents and young women. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:795–802.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Fouda UM,
    2. Salah Eldin NM,
    3. Elsetohy KA,
    4. Tolba HA,
    5. Shaban MM,
    6. Sobh SM
    . Diclofenac plus lidocaine gel for pain relief during intrauterine device insertion. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Contraception 2016;93:513–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Rapkin RB,
    2. Achilles SL,
    3. Schwarz EB,
    4. et al
    . Self-administered lidocaine gel for intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:621–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Tornblom-Paulander S,
    2. Tingåker BK,
    3. Werner A,
    4. et al
    . Novel topical formulation of lidocaine provides significant pain relief for intrauterine device insertion: pharmacokinetic evaluation and randomized placebo-controlled trial. Fertil Steril 2015;103:422–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Waddington A,
    2. Reid R
    . More harm than good: the lack of evidence for administering misoprostol prior to IUD insertion. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2012;34:1177–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Abu-Zaid A,
    2. Alshahrani MS,
    3. Albezrah NA,
    4. et al
    . Vaginal dinoprostone versus placebo for pain relief during intrauterine device insertion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2021;26:357–66.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Newton JR,
    2. Reading AE
    . The effects of psychological preparation on pain at intrauterine device insertion. Contraception 1977;16:523–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. McCarthy C
    . Intrauterine contraception insertion pain: nursing interventions to improve patient experience. J Clin Nurs 2018;27:9–21.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Shahnazi M,
    2. Nikjoo R,
    3. Yavarikia P,
    4. Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S
    . Inhaled lavender effect on anxiety and pain caused from intrauterine device insertion. J Caring Sci 2012;1:255–61.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Jones T,
    2. Purdy M,
    3. Stewart EA,
    4. et al
    . Lavender aromatherapy to reduce anxiety during intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled trial. Glob Adv Health Med 2021;10:21649561211059074.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Angioli R,
    2. De Cicco Nardone C,
    3. Plotti F,
    4. et al
    . Use of music to reduce anxiety during office hysteroscopy: prospective randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014;21:454–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Galaal K,
    2. Bryant A,
    3. Deane KHO,
    4. Al-Kha- Duri M,
    5. Lopes AD
    . Interventions for reducing anxiety in women undergoing colposcopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;2011:CD006013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Chan YM,
    2. Lee PW,
    3. Ng TY,
    4. Ngan HY,
    5. Wong LC
    . The use of music to reduce anxiety for patients undergoing colposcopy: a randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol 2003;91:213–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Akintomide H,
    2. Doshi J,
    3. Power J,
    4. Wilkinson C
    . Television: a way of distracting patients during sexual and reproductive healthcare procedures. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2016;42:220–1.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Daykan Y,
    2. Battino S,
    3. Arbib N,
    4. et al
    . Verbal analgesia is as good as oral tramadol prior to intrauterine device (IUD) insertion, among nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021;258:443–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Gemzell-Danielsson K,
    2. Mansour D,
    3. Fiala C,
    4. Kaunitz AM,
    5. Bahamondes L
    . Management of pain associated with the insertion of intrauterine contraceptives. Hum Reprod Update 2013;19:419–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Guillebaud J
    . (2004) Contraception: Your Questions Answered, 4th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.
  38. 38.↵
    1. Cimsir MT,
    2. Yildiz MS
    . Could the Valsalva manoeuvre be an alternative to the tenaculum for intrauterine device insertion? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2021;26:503–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Narin R,
    2. Uysal G,
    3. Baş S,
    4. Narin MA,
    5. Küçükbingöz EG
    . Is Valsalva maneuver an alternative to use tenaculum for endometrial sampling procedure in cases where the cervix cannot be passed spontaneously with pipelle? A randomized study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2021;47:529–32.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Schneyer R,
    2. Lerma K,
    3. Conti J,
    4. Shaw K
    . Dysmenorrhoea as a risk factor for pain with intrauterine device insertion. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2022;48:e31–e37.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.
    1. Johnson BA
    . Insertion and removal of intrauterine devices. Am Fam Physician 2005;71:95–102.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 37 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 37, Issue 6
November-December 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Practical Recommendations for Minimizing Pain and Anxiety with IUD Insertion
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Practical Recommendations for Minimizing Pain and Anxiety with IUD Insertion
Viktoriya Ovsepyan, Petra Kelsey, Ann E. Evensen
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 37 (6) 1150-1155; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240079R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Practical Recommendations for Minimizing Pain and Anxiety with IUD Insertion
Viktoriya Ovsepyan, Petra Kelsey, Ann E. Evensen
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 37 (6) 1150-1155; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240079R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Improving Health Through Family Medicine: New Opportunities, Missed Opportunities
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A Simplified Approach to Evaluate and Manage Shoulder Pain
  • Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms
Show more Evidence-Based Clinical Medicine

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • Contraceptives
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Intrauterine Devices
  • Pain Management
  • Reproductive Health
  • Women's Health

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire