Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticlePolicy Brief

Pandemic Disruption in Residency Did Not Alter Trends in Intended Scope of Practice

Kento Sonoda, Zachary J. Morgan and Lars E. Peterson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2022, jabfm.2022.220081R1; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2022.220081R1
Kento Sonoda
From Department of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO (KS); American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (ZJM, LEP); Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (LEP).
MD, AAHIVS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zachary J. Morgan
From Department of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO (KS); American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (ZJM, LEP); Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (LEP).
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars E. Peterson
From Department of Family and Community Medicine, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO (KS); American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (ZJM, LEP); Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (LEP).
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

We found the intended scope of practice remained unchanged in graduating family medicine residents between pre-pandemic and pandemic period. Tracking these trends with later cohorts will fully assess the pandemics’ impact on training so that residencies can adjust their education accordingly.

  • Career Choice
  • Comprehensive Health Care
  • COVID-19
  • Family Medicine
  • Family Physicians
  • Pandemics
  • Residency
  • Scope of Practice

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted both the health care system and medical education. In response to the pandemic, family medicine residency (FMR) programs had to adjust rotations, didactic lectures, and decrease the availability of office-based procedures.1⇓–3 A 2020 national survey of FMR program directors showed that curricula in geriatrics, gynecology, surgery, musculoskeletal medicine, pediatrics, and continuity practice were most disrupted by the pandemic.1 Family physicians with a broader scope of practice reduce costs for patients and are less likely to experience burnout.4,5 The 2021 cohort was the first graduating residents whose medical education was disrupted because COVID-19 lockdown began at the end of the 2020 cohort’s program training. Our objective was to investigate whether the pandemic affected the intended scope of practice of graduating family medicine residents.

We used 2017 through 2021 data from the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Family Medicine Certification Examination Registration Questionnaire.6 The examination is administered twice per year, spring and fall, and the questionnaire is completed 3 to 4 months before the examination date. Most graduating residents take the spring examination, with registration complete before March, for example, in the 2021 cohort, 98.0% (3,983/4,066) completed the questionnaire before March 2021. The questionnaire is a required component of registration, which has a 100% response rate. The respondents are asked if they plan to provide a series of services and procedures after residency. The American Academy of Family Physicians Institutional Review Board approved this study.

Our sample included 18,479 graduating residents. We selected 16 items from the full list of intended scope of practice as the representatives of core disciplines in Family Medicine (see Figure 1). Full list of intended scope of practice data are available in the appendix. The overall patterns and trends in intended scope of practice in these services and procedures remained unchanged among 2021 graduating residents, compared with the prepandemic residents from 2017 to 2020.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

Intended scope of practice of graduating family medicine residents, 2017 to 2021 (n = 18,479). Abbreviations: IUD, intrauterine device; ICU, intensive care unit; CCU, critical care unit.

We did not detect a change in the intended scope of practice between prepandemic and pandemic period residency graduates despite the disruption of their medical education and higher burnout rates among family physicians.7 Our findings suggest that FMR flexibly adjusted their curriculum to ensure resident training on a broad number of services and procedures in response to the pandemic. As it is possible that 2021 graduates developed competencies before the pandemic, tracking these trends with later cohorts will be needed to fully assess the pandemics’ impact on training.

Appendix

Appendix Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Appendix Figure 1.

Intended scope of practice of graduating family medicine residents, 2017-2021 (n = 18,479). Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit; CCU, critical care unit; D & C, dilation and curettage; IUD, intrauterine device; LARC, long-acting reversible contraception; OB, obstetric.

Notes

  • This article was externally peer reviewed.

  • See Related Commentary on Page XXX.

  • This is the Ahead of Print version of the article.

  • Funding: Dr. Sonoda received financial support from the American Board of Family Medicine Foundation.

  • Conflicts of interest: Dr. Peterson and Mr. Morgan are employees of the American Board of Family Medicine.

  • To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/35/6/000.full.

  • Received for publication February 25, 2022.
  • Revision received April 23, 2022.
  • Accepted for publication April 27, 2022.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Fashner J,
    2. Espinoza A,
    3. Mainous IIA
    . COVID-19 disruption to family medicine residency curriculum: results from a 2020 US programme directors survey. Fam Med Com Health 2021;9:e001144.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Flattau A,
    2. Cristallo J,
    3. Duggan M,
    4. et al.
    Clinical redeployment of an academic family medicine department in an early, severe COVID-19 pandemic in the Bronx, NY. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:466–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Devitt J,
    2. Malam N,
    3. Montgomery L
    . A family medicine residency program’s response to an impending COVID-19 surge. J Am Board Fam Med 2021;34:S217–S221.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bazemore A,
    2. Petterson S,
    3. Peterson LE,
    4. Phillips RL
    . More comprehensive care among family physicians is associated with lower costs and fewer hospitalizations. Ann Fam Med 2015;13:206–13.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Weidner AKH,
    2. Phillips RL,
    3. Fang B,
    4. Peterson LE
    . Burnout and scope of practice in new family physicians. Ann Fam Med 2018;16:200–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Peterson LE,
    2. Fang B,
    3. Phillips RL,
    4. et al.
    The American Board of Family Medicine’s data collection method for tracking their specialty. J Am Board Fam Med 2019;32:89–95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kane L
    . Physician burnout and depression report 2022: stress, anxiety, and anger. Medscape; January 2022 [accessed 3 November 2022]. Available from: https://www.medscape.com/slideshow/2022-lifestyle-burnout-6014664.
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 38 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 38, Issue 1
January-February 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pandemic Disruption in Residency Did Not Alter Trends in Intended Scope of Practice
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
13 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Pandemic Disruption in Residency Did Not Alter Trends in Intended Scope of Practice
Kento Sonoda, Zachary J. Morgan, Lars E. Peterson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2022, jabfm.2022.220081R1; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220081R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Pandemic Disruption in Residency Did Not Alter Trends in Intended Scope of Practice
Kento Sonoda, Zachary J. Morgan, Lars E. Peterson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2022, jabfm.2022.220081R1; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220081R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Appendix
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Ready (or Not)—Here They Come
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Clinically Useful Family Medicine Research
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Rural Family Physicians Are More Likely to Collaborate with Multisector Community Organizations
  • Family Medicine Residents Intentions to Provide Gender Affirming Care
  • Only One Quarter of Family Physicians Are Very Satisfied with Their Electronic Health Records Platform
Show more Policy Brief

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Career Choice
  • Comprehensive Health Care
  • COVID-19
  • Family Medicine
  • Family Physicians
  • Pandemics
  • Residency
  • Scope of Practice

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire