Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticlePolicy Brief

Rural Family Physicians Are More Likely to Collaborate with Multisector Community Organizations

Haritomane Brillakis, Sarah Fleischer, Rachel Hogg-Graham and Lars E. Peterson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2024, 37 (6) 1167-1169; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240104R1
Haritomane Brillakis
From the Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (HB, RHG, LEP); American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (SF, LEP); Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (LEP).
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Fleischer
From the Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (HB, RHG, LEP); American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (SF, LEP); Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (LEP).
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rachel Hogg-Graham
From the Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (HB, RHG, LEP); American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (SF, LEP); Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (LEP).
DrPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars E. Peterson
From the Department of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (HB, RHG, LEP); American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (SF, LEP); Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY (LEP).
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Based on our analysis of data from 10,802 family physicians, we found significant variation in collaboration with local social service agencies by rurality. This variation highlights the need for tailored strategies that address disparities in health care resource utilization and collaboration, particularly improving service access and delivery.

  • Community Medicine
  • Family Physicians
  • Health Services
  • Primary Health Care
  • Public Health
  • Social Determinants of Health
  • Social Service

Collaboration between primary care and community organizations is essential for addressing social determinants of health (SDOH) and improving health care outcomes.1⇓–3 Primary care is critical in this effort, taking an active role in identifying social risks, coordinating with community-based resources, advocating for policy reform, and striving toward health equity.2 Integrating primary care with public health and other sectors requires collective action from all stakeholders involved in health care, with a specific focus on disparities in rural versus urban systems.3,4 While a recent study found that 55.6% of family physicians felt their practices were well equipped to address patient’s SDOH needs, there is a limited detailed understanding of how collaboration with other sectors may fulfill these needs.5 Significant variation exists in population health networks, with emerging research suggesting urban systems typically engage more partners than their rural counterparts.6,7 Our objective was to examine the connections between primary care practices and multisector community organizations -encompassing health care, education, social services, and local government - with a particular focus on differences with rurality. These organizations play key roles in driving multisector approaches to address social determinants of health creating comprehensive strategies that bridge diverse sectors.

We utilized data from the 2023 American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Continuing Certification Questionnaire completed by practicing family physicians whose examination requirement was due in 2023.8 Family physicians who practiced outpatient continuity care were asked if their practice collaborated with a number of community organizations. We used the 2023 Rural Urban Continuum Codes (RUCC) to assign metropolitan, micropolitan, small rural, and frontier status based on county population. We tested for the association between rurality and collaboration with each type of community organization. This study was approved by the American Academy of Family Physician Institutional Review Board.

Among 10,802 family physicians, we found significant variation in collaboration with community organizations overall, with rates generally increasing with rurality. Bivariate tests were significant for all variables, indicating strong associations between rurality and the extent of collaboration across different sectors. Overall, 22% of physicians reported collaborating with transit and faith-based organizations whereas more than half collaborated with local public health and behavioral health agencies. The highest collaboration rates for family physicians in metropolitan areas were with local public health departments (52.0%), followed by behavioral health agencies (51.3%), and emergency medical services (45.1%). In smaller rural areas, collaboration rates were higher, for example, in local public health agencies (72.2%), schools (53.2%), and emergency medical services (69.8%). However, in frontier counties, family physicians reported the highest collaboration rates across all types of organizations, with emergency medical services being the highest level of collaboration (82.2%) (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Practice Collaboration with Local Multisector Organizations as Reported by Family Physicians Registering for the American Board of Family Medicine Certification Examination in 2023 by County Level Rurality*

Our research revealed significant variations and diverse collaboration patterns between family physician practices and community organizations, both by sector and by rurality. These patterns suggest that rural family physicians might collaborate with other organizations at a higher rate to meet the multifaceted needs of their patients. This collaboration could include activities such as screening for social risks, referring to appropriate services, and actively following up on these referrals to ensure ongoing support and seamless care coordination. By fostering collaborative partnerships between family physicians and multisector community organizations, communities can enhance the sharing of resources, further strengthen care coordination, and improve community-level health outcomes.4 These findings have important implications for policy makers and health care administrators. They underscore the necessity of designing interventions that prioritize clinical collaborations involving health professionals, community stakeholders, and social services. This holistic approach is essential for enhancing health care delivery and effectively addressing SDOH, with the potential to inform policy reforms aimed at reducing health disparities across different geographic locales.

Notes

  • This article was externally peer reviewed.

  • Funding: None.

  • Conflict of interest: Dr. Peterson and Ms. Fleischer are employees of the American Board of Family Medicine.

  • To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/37/6/1167.full.

  • Received for publication March 4, 2024.
  • Revision received May 10, 2024.
  • Accepted for publication May 20, 2024.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Pratt C,
    2. Taylor R,
    3. Smith SD
    . Health equity and access to health care as a social determinant of health: the role of the primary care provider. Prim Care 2023;50:549–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Sherin K,
    2. Adebanjo T,
    3. Jani A
    . Social determinants of health: family physicians’ leadership role. Am Fam Physician 2019;99:476–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Committee on Integrating Primary Care and Public Health, Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice, Institute of Medicine. Primary Care and Public Health: Exploring Integration to Improve Population Health [Internet]. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2012 [cited 2024 Mar 1]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK201594/.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Mays GP,
    2. Scutchfield FD
    . Improving public health system performance through multiorganizational partnerships. Prev Chronic Dis 2010;7:A116.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Sand J,
    2. Morgan ZJ,
    3. Peterson LE
    . Addressing social determinants of health in family medicine practices. Popul Health Manag 2024;27:26–33.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Hogg-Graham R,
    2. Mamaril CB,
    3. Benitez JA,
    4. Gatton K,
    5. Mays GP
    . Impact of state Medicaid expansion on cross-sector health and social service networks: Evidence from a longitudinal cohort study. Health Serv Res 2023;58:634–41.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Owsley KM,
    2. Hamer MK,
    3. Mays GP
    . The growing divide in the composition of public health delivery systems in US rural and urban communities, 2014-2018. Am J Public Health 2020;110:S204–S210.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Peterson LE,
    2. Fang B,
    3. Phillips RL,
    4. Avant R,
    5. Puffer JC
    . The American Board of Family Medicine’s data collection method for tracking their specialty. J Am Board Fam Med 2019;32:89–95.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 37 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 37, Issue 6
November-December 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rural Family Physicians Are More Likely to Collaborate with Multisector Community Organizations
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Rural Family Physicians Are More Likely to Collaborate with Multisector Community Organizations
Haritomane Brillakis, Sarah Fleischer, Rachel Hogg-Graham, Lars E. Peterson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 37 (6) 1167-1169; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240104R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Rural Family Physicians Are More Likely to Collaborate with Multisector Community Organizations
Haritomane Brillakis, Sarah Fleischer, Rachel Hogg-Graham, Lars E. Peterson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2024, 37 (6) 1167-1169; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240104R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Improving Health Through Family Medicine: New Opportunities, Missed Opportunities
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Family Medicine Residents Intentions to Provide Gender Affirming Care
  • Only One Quarter of Family Physicians Are Very Satisfied with Their Electronic Health Records Platform
Show more Policy Brief

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Community Medicine
  • Family Physicians
  • Health Services
  • Primary Health Care
  • Public Health
  • Social Determinants of Health
  • Social Service

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire