Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Patient and Patient Caregiver Perspectives on Social Screening: A Review of the Literature

Erika M. Brown, Vishalli Loomba, Emilia De Marchis, Benjamín Aceves, Melanie Molina and Laura M. Gottlieb
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine February 2023, 36 (1) 66-78; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2022.220211R1
Erika M. Brown
From the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (EMB, EDM, BA, LMG); Joint Medical Program, University of California, Berkeley (VL); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (MM).
PhD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vishalli Loomba
From the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (EMB, EDM, BA, LMG); Joint Medical Program, University of California, Berkeley (VL); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (MM).
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emilia De Marchis
From the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (EMB, EDM, BA, LMG); Joint Medical Program, University of California, Berkeley (VL); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (MM).
MD, MAS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamín Aceves
From the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (EMB, EDM, BA, LMG); Joint Medical Program, University of California, Berkeley (VL); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (MM).
PhD, MPH, MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melanie Molina
From the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (EMB, EDM, BA, LMG); Joint Medical Program, University of California, Berkeley (VL); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (MM).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura M. Gottlieb
From the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (EMB, EDM, BA, LMG); Joint Medical Program, University of California, Berkeley (VL); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (MM).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Gusoff G,
    2. Fichtenberg C,
    3. Gottlieb LM
    . Professional medical association policy statements on social health assessments and interventions. Perm J 2018;22:18–092.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Hinton E,
    2. Stolyar L
    [Internet]. Medicaid authorities and options to address social determinants of health (SDOH); 2021 [Accessed 3 May 2022]. Available from: https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/medicaid-authorities-and-options-to-address-social-determinants-of-health-sdoh/.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Crumley D,
    2. Lloyd J,
    3. Pucciarello M,
    4. Stapelfeld B
    [Internet]. Addressing social determinants of health via Medicaid managed care contracts and section 1115 demonstrations. Center for Health Care Strategies; 2018 [Accessed 3 May 2022]. Available from: https://www.chcs.org/resource/addressing-social-determinants-of-health-via-medicaid-managed-care-contracts-and-section-1115-demonstrations/.
  4. 4.↵
    1. McGinnis JM,
    2. Williams-Russo P,
    3. Knickman JR
    . The case for more active policy attention to health promotion. Health Aff 2002;21:78–93.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    KFF [Internet]. States reporting social determinant of health related policies required in Medicaid managed care contracts; 2021 [Accessed 3 May 2022]. Available from: https://www.kff.org/other/state-indicator/states-reporting-social-determinant-of-health-related-policies-required-in-medicaid-managed-care-contracts/.
  6. 6.↵
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [Internet]. List of measures under consideration for December 2021; 2021 [Accessed 10 June 2022]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/measures-under-consideration-list-2021-report.pdf.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Cartier Y,
    2. Gottlieb L
    . The prevalence of social care in US health care settings depends on how and whom you ask. BMC Health Serv Res 2020;20:481.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. 8.↵
    1. De Marchis EH,
    2. Brown E,
    3. Aceves B,
    4. et al.
    [Internet]. State of the science on social screening in healthcare settings. Social Interventions Research and Evaluation Network; 2022 [Accessed 29 Aug 2022]. Available from: https://sirenetwork.ucsf.edu/sites/default/files/2022-06/final%20SCREEN%20State-of-Science-Report%5B55%5D.pdf.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Arksey H,
    2. O'Malley L
    . Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodology 2005;8:19–32.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Henrikson NB,
    2. Blasi PR,
    3. Dorsey CN,
    4. et al
    . Psychometric and pragmatic properties of social risk screening tools: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2019;57:S13–S24.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    Covidence [Internet] Covidence; 2022 [Accessed 3 Jan 2022]. Available from: https://www.covidence.org/.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Mishra K,
    2. Gutierrez B,
    3. Hempel S,
    4. Atkins DE,
    5. Wu J,
    6. Cousineau MR
    . Screening for adverse childhood experiences in preventive medicine settings: a scoping review. J Public Health 2021.
  13. 13.↵
    1. Feltner C,
    2. Wallace I,
    3. Berkman N,
    4. et al
    . Screening for intimate partner violence, elder abuse, and abuse of vulnerable adults: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2018;320:1688–701.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Loveday S,
    2. Hall T,
    3. Constable L,
    4. et al
    . Screening for adverse childhood experiences in children: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2022;149:e2021051884.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Guyatt GH,
    2. Oxman AD,
    3. Vist GE
    , GRADE Working Groupet al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008;336:924–6.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Byhoff E,
    2. De Marchis EH,
    3. Gottlieb L,
    4. Halperin-Goldstein S,
    5. Nokes K,
    6. LeClair AM
    . Screening for immigration-related health concerns in a federally qualified health center serving a diverse Latinx community: a mixed methods study. J Immigr Minor Health 2020;22:988–95.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Byhoff E,
    2. De Marchis EH,
    3. Hessler D,
    4. et al
    . Part II: a qualitative study of social risk screening acceptability in patients and caregivers. Am J Prev Med 2019;57:S38–S46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Emengo VN,
    2. Williams MS,
    3. Odusanya R,
    4. et al
    . Qualitative program evaluation of social determinants of health screening and referral program. PLoS One 2020;15:e0242964.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Hamity C,
    2. Jackson A,
    3. Peralta L,
    4. Bellows J
    . Perceptions and experience of patients, staff, and clinicians with social needs assessment. Perm J 2018;22:18–105.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Spain AK,
    2. Monahan EK,
    3. Alvarez K,
    4. Finno-Velasquez M
    . Latinx family perspectives on social needs screening and referral during well-child visits. MCN 2021;46:143–9.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    1. Wallace AS,
    2. Luther BL,
    3. Sisler SM,
    4. Wong B,
    5. Guo JW
    . Integrating social determinants of health screening and referral during routine emergency department care: evaluation of reach and implementation challenges. Implement Sci Commun 2021;2:114.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. Wylie SA,
    2. Hassan A,
    3. Krull EG,
    4. et al
    . Assessing and referring adolescents’ health-related social problems: qualitative evaluation of a novel web-based approach. J Telemed Telecare 2012;18:392–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Colvin JD,
    2. Bettenhausen JL,
    3. Anderson-Carpenter KD,
    4. Collie-Akers V,
    5. Chung PJ
    . Caregiver opinion of in-hospital screening for unmet social needs by pediatric residents. Acad Pediatr 2016;16:161–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. De Marchis EH,
    2. Hessler D,
    3. Fichtenberg C,
    4. et al
    . Part I: a quantitative study of social risk screening acceptability in patients and caregivers. Am J Prev Med 2019;57:S25–S37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Hassan A,
    2. Blood EA,
    3. Pikcilingis A,
    4. et al
    . Youths’ health-related social problems: concerns often overlooked during the medical visit. J Adolesc Health 2013;53:265–71.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Langerman SD,
    2. Badolato GM,
    3. Rucker A,
    4. Jarvis L,
    5. Patel SJ,
    6. Goyal MK
    . Acceptability of adolescent social and behavioral health screening in the emergency department. J Adolesc Health 2019;65:543–8.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Oldfield BJ,
    2. Casey M,
    3. DeCew A,
    4. Morales SI,
    5. Olson DP
    . Screening for social determinants of health among children: patients’ preferences for receiving information to meet social needs and a comparison of screening instruments. Popul Health Manag 2021;24:141–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Palakshappa D,
    2. Benefield AJ,
    3. Furgurson KF,
    4. et al
    . Feasibility of mobile technology to identify and address patients’ unmet social needs in a primary care clinic. Popul Health Manag 2021;24:385–92.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Rogers AJ,
    2. Hamity C,
    3. Sharp AL,
    4. Jackson AH,
    5. Schickedanz AB
    . Schickedanz AB. Patients’ attitudes and perceptions regarding social needs screening and navigation: multi-site survey in a large integrated health system. J Gen Intern Med 2020;35:1389–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Careyva BA,
    2. Hamadani R,
    3. Friel T,
    4. Coyne CA
    . A social needs assessment tool for an urban Latino population. J Community Health 2018;43:137–45.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Kocielnik R,
    2. Agapie E,
    3. Argyle A,
    4. et al
    . HarborBot: a chatbot for social needs screening. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2019;2019:552–61.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Garg A,
    2. Boynton-Jarrett R,
    3. Dworkin PH
    . Avoiding the unintended consequences of screening for social determinants of health. JAMA 2016;316:813–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Butler ED,
    2. Morgan AU,
    3. Kangovi S
    . Screening for unmet social needs: patient engagement or alienation? N Engl J Med Catalyst 2020;10.
  34. 34.↵
    1. Perrin EC
    . Ethical questions about screening. J Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics 1998;19:350–2.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 36 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 36, Issue 1
January/February 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patient and Patient Caregiver Perspectives on Social Screening: A Review of the Literature
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Patient and Patient Caregiver Perspectives on Social Screening: A Review of the Literature
Erika M. Brown, Vishalli Loomba, Emilia De Marchis, Benjamín Aceves, Melanie Molina, Laura M. Gottlieb
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Feb 2023, 36 (1) 66-78; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220211R1

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Patient and Patient Caregiver Perspectives on Social Screening: A Review of the Literature
Erika M. Brown, Vishalli Loomba, Emilia De Marchis, Benjamín Aceves, Melanie Molina, Laura M. Gottlieb
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Feb 2023, 36 (1) 66-78; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220211R1
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Appendix.Appendix 1. Search Strings Used to Identify Studies Within the Academic Literature That Pertain to Multidomain Social Screening in US Health Care Settings
    • Appendix 2. Evidence Quality of 16 Studies Describing Patient and Patient Caregiver Perspectives Regarding Multidomain Social Screening in US Health Care Settings
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Clinician and Staff Perspectives on a Social Drivers of Health Program Implementation
  • Relationship Between Social Risks and Diabetes Metrics in a US Health System
  • Assessing Implementation of Social Screening Within US Health Care Settings: A Systematic Scoping Review
  • Family Physicians Can/Should Do: What? Where? And How?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Caregivers
  • Clinical Medicine
  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Social Determinants of Health
  • Social Care
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Screening
  • Systematic Review

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire