Examining the Effects of Formal Education Level on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Nasreddine ZS,
   2. Phillips NA,
   3. Bédirian V,
   4. et al

   . The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:695–9.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Cordell CB,
   2. Borson S,
   3. Boustani M

   . Medicare Detection of Cognitive Impairment Workgroupet al. Alzheimer's association recommendations for operationalizing the detection of cognitive impairment during the Medicare annual wellness visit in a primary care setting. Alzheimers Dement 2013;9:141–50.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Lorentz WJ,
   2. Scanlan JM,
   3. Borson S

   . Brief screening tests for dementia. Can J Psychiatry 2002;47:723–33.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Luis CA,
   2. Keegan AP,
   3. Mullan M

   . Cross-validation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in community-dwelling older adults residing in the Southeastern US. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009;24:197–201.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Bernstein IH,
   2. Lacritz L,
   3. Barlow CE,
   4. et al

   . Psychometric evaluation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in three diverse samples. Clin Neuropsychol 2011;25:119–26.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Rossetti HC,
   2. Lacritz LH,
   3. Cullum CM,
   4. Weiner MF

   . Normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in a population-based sample. Neurology 2011;77:1272–5.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Hilgeman MM,
   2. Boozer EM,
   3. Snow AL,
   4. et al

   . Use of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in a rural outreach program for military veterans. Journal of Rural Social Sciences 2019;34:2.

   OpenUrl
8. 8.↵
   1. Dubois B,
   2. Padovani A,
   3. Scheltens P,
   4. et al

   . Timely diagnosis for Alzheimer’s disease: a literature review on benefits and challenges. J Alzheimers Dis 2016;49:617–31.

   OpenUrl
9. 9.↵
   1. Ouellet M-C,
   2. Sirois M-J,
   3. Beaulieu-Bonneau S,
   4. et al

   . Correlates of cognitive functioning in independent elderly patients discharged home from the emergency department after a minor injury. Int Psychogeriat 2016;28:1313–22.

   OpenUrl
10. 10.↵
    1. Rossetti HC,
    2. Lacritz LH,
    3. Hynan LS,
    4. et al

    .Montreal cognitive assessment performance among community-dwelling African Americans. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2017;32:238–44.

    OpenUrl
11. 11.↵
    1. Blair M,
    2. Coleman K,
    3. Jesso S,
    4. et al

    . Depressive symptoms negatively impact Montreal Cognitive Assessment performance: a memory clinic experience. Can J Neurol Sci 2016;43:513–7.

    OpenUrl
12. 12.↵
    1. Langeard A,
    2. Pothier K,
    3. Morello R,
    4. et al

    . Polypharmacy cut-off for gait and cognitive impairments. Front Pharmacol 2016;7:296.

    OpenUrl
13. 13.↵
    1. Dao E,
    2. Hsiung G-YR,
    3. Sossi V,
    4. et al

    . Exploring the effects of coexisting amyloid in subcortical vascular cognitive impairment. BMC Neurol 2015;15:197.

    OpenUrl
14. 14.↵
    1. Liu W,
    2. Wong A,
    3. Au L,
    4. et al

    . Influence of amyloid-β on cognitive decline after stroke/transient ischemic attack: three-year longitudinal study. Stroke 2015;46:3074–80.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Szcześniak D,
    2. Rymaszewska J,
    3. Zimny A,
    4. et al

    . Cerebral small vessel disease and other influential factors of cognitive impairment in the middle-aged: a long-term observational cohort PURE-MIND study in Poland. GeroScience 2021;43:279–17.

    OpenUrl
16. 16.↵
    1. Jiao F,
    2. Yi F,
    3. Wang Y,
    4. et al

    . The validation of multifactor model of plasma Aβ42 and total-tau in combination with MoCA for diagnosing probable Alzheimer disease. Front Aging Neurosci 2020;12:212.

    OpenUrl
17. 17.↵
    1. Caldwell JZ,
    2. Berg J-L,
    3. Cummings JL,
    4. et al

    . Moderating effects of sex on the impact of diagnosis and amyloid positivity on verbal memory and hippocampal volume. Alzheimer’s Res Ther 2017;9:72.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. 18.↵
    1. LaRose M,
    2. Aschenbrenner AJ,
    3. Benzinger TL,
    4. et al

    . A comparison of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and standard cognitive measures in the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center and Knight Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center cohorts: Neuropsychology/early detection of cognitive decline with neuropsychological tests. Alzheimer’s & Dementia 2020;16:e046780.

    OpenUrl
19. 19.↵
    1. Lee J-Y,
    2. Lee DW,
    3. Cho S-J,
    4. et al

    . Brief screening for mild cognitive impairment in elderly outpatient clinic: validation of the Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology 2008;21:104–10.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.
    1. Freitas S,
    2. Prieto G,
    3. Simões MR,
    4. Santana I

    . Psychometric properties of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): an analysis using the Rasch model. Clin Neuropsychol 2014;28:65–83.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Gómez F,
    2. Zunzunegui M,
    3. Lord C,
    4. Alvarado B,
    5. García A

    . Applicability of the MoCA‐S test in populations with little education in Colombia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2013;28:813–20.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Mueller SG,
    2. Weiner MW,
    3. Thal LJ,
    4. et al

    . The Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2005;15:869–77.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.
    1. Beckett LA,
    2. Donohue MC,
    3. Wang C,
    4. et al

    . The Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative phase 2: increasing the length, breadth, and depth of our understanding. Alzheimer’s Dement 2015;11:823–31.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Weiner MW,
    2. Veitch DP,
    3. Aisen PS,
    4. et al

    . The Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative 3: continued innovation for clinical trial improvement. Alzheimer’s Dement 2017;13:561–71.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Besser L,
    2. Kukull W,
    3. Knopman DS,
    4. et al

    . Version 3 of the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center’s Uniform Data Set. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2018;32:351–8.

    OpenUrl
26. 26.↵
    1. Weintraub S,
    2. Besser L,
    3. Dodge HH,
    4. et al

    . Version 3 of the Alzheimer Disease Centers’ Neuropsychological Test Battery in the Uniform Data Set (UDS). Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2018;32:10–7.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Sheikh JI,
    2. Yesavage JA

    . Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clinical Gerontologist: The Journal of Aging and Mental Health 1986;5:(1–2), 165–173

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. 28.↵
    1. Donohue MC,
    2. Sperling RA,
    3. Salmon DP,
    4. et al

    . The preclinical Alzheimer cognitive composite: measuring amyloid-related decline. JAMA Neurol 2014;71:961–70.

    OpenUrlPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Morris JL,
    2. Hu L,
    3. Hunsaker A,
    4. et al

    . Patients’ and family members’ subjective experiences of a diagnostic evaluation of mild cognitive impairment. J Patient Exp 2020;7:124–31.

    OpenUrl
30. 30.↵
    1. Gaugler JE,
    2. Ascher-Svanum H,
    3. Roth DL,
    4. et al

    . Characteristics of patients misdiagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease and their medication use: an analysis of the NACC-UDS database. BMC Geriatr 2013;13:137–10.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Tombaugh TN,
    2. Kozak J,
    3. Rees L

    . Normative data stratified by age and education for two measures of verbal fluency: FAS and animal naming. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1999;14:167–77.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Fernaeus S-E,
    2. Almkvist O,
    3. Bronge L,
    4. et al

    . White matter lesions impair initiation of FAS flow. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2001;12:52–6.

    OpenUrlPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Chertkow H,
    2. Nasreddine Z,
    3. Johns E,
    4. et al

    . P1‐143: The Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA): Validation of alternate forms and new recommendations for education corrections. Alzheimer’s & Dementia 2011;7:S157–S157.

    OpenUrl
34. 34.↵
    1. Franzen S,
    2. van den Berg E,
    3. Goudsmit M,
    4. et al

    . A systematic review of neuropsychological tests for the assessment of dementia in non-western, low-educated or illiterate populations. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2020;26:331–51.

    OpenUrl
35. 35.↵
    1. Julayanont P,
    2. Tangwongchai S,
    3. Hemrungrojn S,
    4. et al

    . The Montreal Cognitive Assessment—basic: a screening tool for mild cognitive impairment in illiterate and low‐educated elderly adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015;63:2550–4.

    OpenUrlPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Cecato JF,
    2. Martinelli JE,
    3. Izbicki R,
    4. et al

    . A subtest analysis of the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA): which subtests can best discriminate between healthy controls, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease? Int Psychogeriatr 2016;28:825–32.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Fengler S,
    2. Kessler J,
    3. Timmermann L,
    4. et al

    . Screening for cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: improving the diagnostic utility of the MoCA through subtest weighting. PloS One 2016;11:e0159318.

    OpenUrl
38. 38.↵
    1. Bocti C,
    2. Legault V,
    3. Leblanc N,
    4. et al

    . Vascular cognitive impairment: most useful subtests of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in minor stroke and transient ischemic attack. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2013;36:154–62.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Carvalho JO,
    2. Tommet D,
    3. Crane PK,
    4. et al

    . Deconstructing racial differences: The effects of quality of education and cerebrovascular risk factors. GERONB 2015;70:545–56.

    OpenUrl
40. 40.↵
    1. Milani SA,
    2. Marsiske M,
    3. Cottler LB,
    4. et al

    . Optimal cutoffs for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment vary by race and ethnicity. Alzheimer’s Dement 2018;10:773–81.

    OpenUrlPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Sisco S,
    2. Gross AL,
    3. Shih RA,
    4. et al

    . The role of early-life educational quality and literacy in explaining racial disparities in cognition in late life. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2015;70:557–67.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed