Ambulatory Medication Safety in Primary Care: A Systematic Review

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Sarkar U,
   2. Lopez A,
   3. Maselli JH,
   4. Gonzales R

   . Adverse drug events in U.S. adult ambulatory medical care. Health Serv Res 2011;46:1517–33.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Gandhi TK,
   2. Weingart SN,
   3. Borus J,
   4. et al

   . Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1556–64.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Elder NC,
   2. Pallerla H,
   3. Regan S

   . What do family physicians consider an error? A comparison of definitions and physician perception. BMC Fam Pract 2006;7:73.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Young RA,
   2. Roberts RG,
   3. Holden RJ

   . The challenges of measuring, improving, and reporting quality in primary care. Ann Fam Med 2017;15:175–82.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Tinetti M,
   2. Dindo L,
   3. Smith CD,
   4. et al

   . Challenges and strategies in patients' health priorities—aligned decision-making for older adults with multiple chronic conditions. PloS One 2019;14:e0218249.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Scott IA,
   2. Hilmer SN,
   3. Reeve E,
   4. et al

   . Reducing inappropriate polypharmacy: the process of deprescribing. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:827–34.

   OpenUrl
7. 7.↵
   1. Ferdinand KC,
   2. Yadav K,
   3. Nasser SA,
   4. et al

   . Disparities in hypertension and cardiovascular disease in blacks: the critical role of medication adherence. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2017;19:1015–24.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Elder NC,
   2. Dovey SM

   . Classification of medical errors and preventable adverse events in primary care: a synthesis of the literature. J Fam Pract 2002;51:927–32.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Feng C,
   2. Le D,
   3. McCoy AB

   . Using electronic health records to identify adverse drug events in ambulatory care: a systematic review. Appl Clin Inform 2019;10:123–8.

   OpenUrl
10. 10.↵
    1. Panesar SS,
    2. deSilva D,
    3. Carson-Stevens A,
    4. et al

    . How safe is primary care? A systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf 2016;25:544–53.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Garfield S,
    2. Barber N,
    3. Walley P,
    4. Willson A,
    5. Eliasson L

    . Quality of medication use in primary care—mapping the problem, working to a solution: a systematic review of the literature. BMC Med 2009;7:50.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Munn Z,
    2. Moola S,
    3. Lisy K,
    4. Riitano D,
    5. Tufanaru C

    . Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015;13:147–53.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Internet]; 2021 [cited 2021 Aug 10]. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-07.
14. 14.↵
    Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) [Internet]. EPOC resources for review authors; 2017 [cited 2021 May 15]. Available from: epoc.cochrane.org/resources/epoc-resources-review-authors.
15. 15.↵
    1. Abramson EL,
    2. Barron Y,
    3. Quaresimo J,
    4. Kaushal R

    . Electronic prescribing within an electronic health record reduces ambulatory prescribing errors. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2011;37:470–8. Oct.

    OpenUrlPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Abramson EL,
    2. Bates DW,
    3. Jenter C,
    4. et al

    . Ambulatory prescribing errors among community-based providers in two states. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19:644–8.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Al-Busaidi S,
    2. Al-Kharusi A,
    3. Al-Hinai M,
    4. et al

    . Potentially inappropriate prescribing among elderly patients at a primary care clinic in Oman. J Cross Cult Gerontol 2020;35:209–16.

    OpenUrl
18. 18.↵
    1. Almeida TA,
    2. Reis EA,
    3. Pinto IVL,
    4. et al

    . Factors associated with the use of potentially inappropriate medications by older adults in primary health care: an analysis comparing AGS Beers, EU(7)-PIM List, and Brazilian Consensus PIM criteria. Res Social Adm Pharm 2019;15:370–7.

    OpenUrl
19. 19.↵
    1. Amos TB,
    2. Keith SW,
    3. Del Canale S,
    4. et al

    . Inappropriate prescribing in a large community-dwelling older population: a focus on prevalence and how it relates to patient and physician characteristics. J Clin Pharm Ther 2015;40:7–13.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Aspinall MB,
    2. Whittle J,
    3. Aspinall SL,
    4. Maher RL Jr..,
    5. Good CB

    . Improving adverse-drug-reaction reporting in ambulatory care clinics at a Veterans Affairs hospital. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2002;59:841–5.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Aubert CE,
    2. Streit S,
    3. Da Costa BR,
    4. et al

    . Polypharmacy and specific comorbidities in university primary care settings. Eur J Int Med 2016;35:35–42.

    OpenUrl
22. 22.↵
    1. Avery AJ,
    2. Ghaleb M,
    3. Barber N,
    4. et al

    . The prevalence and nature of prescribing and monitoring errors in English general practice: a retrospective case note review. Br J Gen Pract 2013;63:e543–e553.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Awad A,
    2. Hanna O

    . Potentially inappropriate medication use among geriatric patients in primary care setting: a cross-sectional study using the Beers, STOPP, FORTA and MAI criteria. PloS One 2019;14:e0218174.

    OpenUrlPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Barry HE,
    2. Cooper JA,
    3. Ryan C,
    4. et al

    . Potentially inappropriate prescribing among people with dementia in primary care: a retrospective cross-sectional study using the Enhanced Prescribing Database. J Alzheimers Dis 2016;52:1503–13.

    OpenUrl
25. 25.↵
    1. Ble A,
    2. Masoli JA,
    3. Barry HE,
    4. et al

    . Any versus long-term prescribing of high risk medications in older people using 2012 Beers criteria: results from three cross-sectional samples of primary care records for 2003/4, 2007/8 and 2011/12. BMC Geriatr 2015;15:146.

    OpenUrlPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Bregnhoj L,
    2. Thirstrup S,
    3. Kristensen MB,
    4. Bjerrum L,
    5. Sonne J

    . Prevalence of inappropriate prescribing in primary care. Pharm World Sci 2007;29:109–15.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Brekke M,
    2. Rognstad S,
    3. Straand J,
    4. et al

    . Pharmacologically inappropriate prescriptions for elderly patients in general practice: How common? Baseline data from the Prescription Peer Academic Detailing (Rx-PAD) study. Scand J Prim Health Care 2008;26:80–5.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Bruin-Huisman L,
    2. Abu-Hanna A,
    3. van Weert H,
    4. Beers E

    . Potentially inappropriate prescribing to older patients in primary care in the Netherlands: a retrospective longitudinal study. Age Ageing 2017;46:614–9.

    OpenUrl
29. 29.↵
    1. Cahir C,
    2. Bennett K,
    3. Teljeur C,
    4. Fahey T

    . Potentially inappropriate prescribing and adverse health outcomes in community dwelling older patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2014;77:201–10.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Castillo-Páramo A,
    2. Clavería A,
    3. Verdejo González A,
    4. Rey Gómez-Serranillos I,
    5. Fernández-Merino MC,
    6. Figueiras A

    . Inappropriate prescribing according to the STOPP/START criteria in older people from a primary care setting. Eur J Gen Pract 2014;20:281–9.

    OpenUrlPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Chen YF,
    2. Avery AJ,
    3. Neil KE,
    4. Johnson C,
    5. Dewey ME,
    6. Stockley IH

    . Incidence and possible causes of prescribing potentially hazardous/contraindicated drug combinations in general practice. Drug Saf 2005;28:67–80.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Clark RC,
    2. Maxwell SRJ,
    3. Kerr S,
    4. et al

    . The influence of primary care prescribing rates for new drugs on spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions. Drug Saf 2007;30:357–66.

    OpenUrlPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Corona RJ,
    2. Altagracia MM,
    3. Kravzov JJ,
    4. Vazquez CL,
    5. Perez ME,
    6. Rubio-Poo C

    . Potential prescription patterns and errors in elderly adult patients attending public primary health care centers in Mexico City. CIA 2009;4:343–50.

    OpenUrl
34. 34.↵
    1. Dhabali AA,
    2. Awang R,
    3. Zyoud SH

    . Pharmaco-epidemiologic study of the prescription of contraindicated drugs in a primary care setting of a university: a retrospective review of drug prescription. CP 2011;49:500–9.

    OpenUrl
35. 35.↵
    1. Dhabali AA,
    2. Awang R,
    3. Zyoud SH

    . Clinically important drug-drug interactions in primary care. J Clin Pharm Therapeutics 2012;37:426–30.

    OpenUrl
36. 36.↵
    1. Diaz Hernandez SH,
    2. Cruz-Gonzalez I

    . Incidence and preventability of medication errors and ADEs in ambulatory care older patients. Consult Pharm 2018;33:454–66.

    OpenUrl
37. 37.↵
    1. Doubova Dubova SV,
    2. Reyes-Morales H,
    3. Torres-Arreola LP,
    4. Suarez-Ortega M

    . Potential drug-drug and drug-disease interactions in prescriptions for ambulatory patients over 50 years of age in family medicine clinics in Mexico City. BMC Health Serv Res 2007;7:147.

    OpenUrlPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Fiss T,
    2. Dreier A,
    3. Meinke C,
    4. van den Berg N,
    5. Ritter CA,
    6. Hoffmann W

    . Frequency of inappropriate drugs in primary care: analysis of a sample of immobile patients who received periodic home visits. Age Ageing 2011;40:66–73.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. 39.↵
    1. Gnadinger M,
    2. Conen D,
    3. Herzig L,
    4. et al

    . Medication incidents in primary care medicine: a prospective study in the Swiss Sentinel Surveillance Network (Sentinella). BMJ Open 2017;7:e013658.

    OpenUrl
40. 40.↵
    1. Goren Z,
    2. Demirkapu MJ,
    3. Akpinar Acet G,
    4. Cali S,
    5. Gulcebi Idriz Oglu M

    . Potential drug-drug interactions among prescriptions for elderly patients in primary health care. Turk J Med Sci 2017;47:47–54.

    OpenUrl
41. 41.↵
    1. Guthrie B,
    2. McCowan C,
    3. Davey P,
    4. Simpson CR,
    5. Dreischulte T,
    6. Barnett K

    . High risk prescribing in primary care patients particularly vulnerable to adverse drug events: cross sectional population database analysis in Scottish general practice. BMJ 2011;342:d3514.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
42. 42.↵
    1. Jayaweera A,
    2. Chung Y,
    3. Jabbarpour Y

    . Primary care physician characteristics associated with prescribing potentially inappropriate medication for elderly patients: Medicare Part D data. J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:561–8.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
43. 43.↵
    1. Kheir N,
    2. Awaisu A,
    3. Sharfi A,
    4. Kida M,
    5. Adam A

    . Drug-related problems identified by pharmacists conducting medication use reviews at a primary health center in Qatar. Int J Clin Pharm 2014;36:702–6.

    OpenUrl
44. 44.↵
    1. Khoja T,
    2. Neyaz Y,
    3. Qureshi NA,
    4. Magzoub MA,
    5. Haycox A,
    6. Walley T

    . Medication errors in primary care in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. Eastern Mediterranean Health J 2011;17:156–9.

    OpenUrlPubMed
45. 45.↵
    1. Komagamine J,
    2. Hagane K

    . Effect of total exemption from medical service co-payments on potentially inappropriate medication use among elderly ambulatory patients in a single center in Japan: a retrospective cross-sectional study. BMC Res Notes 2018;11:199.

    OpenUrl
46. 46.↵
    1. Kovacevic SV,
    2. Miljkovic B,
    3. Culafic M,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of drug-related problems in older polypharmacy primary care patients. J Eval Clin Pract 2017;23:860–5.

    OpenUrlPubMed
47. 47.↵
    1. Kunac DL,
    2. Tatley MV,
    3. Seddon ME

    . A new web-based Medication Error Reporting Programme (MERP) to supplement pharmacovigilance in New Zealand—findings from a pilot study in primary care. N Z Med J 2014;127:69–81.

    OpenUrlPubMed
48. 48.↵
    1. Henriksen K,
    2. Battles JB,
    3. Keyes MA,
    4. Grady ML

    1. Lynch J,
    2. Rosen J,
    3. Selinger HA,
    4. Hickner J

    . Medication management transactions and errors in family medicine offices: a pilot study. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, Grady ML, editors. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 4, Technology and Medication Safety). Rockville, MD: AHRQ; 2008.
49. 49.↵
    1. Miller GC,
    2. Britth HC,
    3. Valenti L

    . Adverse drug events in general practice patients in Australia. Med J Aust 2006;184:321–4.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
50. 50.↵
    1. Oliveira MG,
    2. Amorim WW,
    3. de Jesus SR,
    4. Heine JM,
    5. Coqueiro HL,
    6. Passos LC

    . A comparison of the Beers and STOPP criteria for identifying the use of potentially inappropriate medications among elderly patients in primary care. J Eval Clin Pract 2015;21:320–5.

    OpenUrlPubMed
51. 51.↵
    1. Perez T,
    2. Moriarty F,
    3. Wallace E,
    4. McDowell R,
    5. Redmond P,
    6. Fahey T

    . Prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people in primary care and its association with hospital admission: longitudinal study. BMJ 2018;363:k4524.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
52. 52.↵
    1. Ryan C,
    2. O'Mahony D,
    3. Kennedy J,
    4. et al

    . Appropriate prescribing in the elderly: an investigation of two screening tools, Beers criteria considering diagnosis and independent of diagnosis and improved prescribing in the elderly tool to identify inappropriate use of medicines in the elderly in primary care in Ireland. J Clin Pharm Ther 2009;34:369–76.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
53. 53.↵
    1. Ryan C,
    2. O'Mahony D,
    3. Kennedy J,
    4. Weedle P,
    5. Byrne S

    . Potentially inappropriate prescribing in an Irish elderly population in primary care. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2009;68:936–47.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
54. 54.↵
    1. Stocks SJ,
    2. Kontopantelis E,
    3. Akbarov A,
    4. Rodgers S,
    5. Avery AJ,
    6. Ashcroft DM

    . Examining variations in prescribing safety in UK general practice: cross sectional study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. BMJ 2015;351:h5501.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
55. 55.↵
    1. Trinkley KE,
    2. Weed HG,
    3. Beatty SJ,
    4. Porter K,
    5. Nahata MC

    . Identification and characterization of adverse drug events in primary care. Am J Med Qual 2017;32:518–25.

    OpenUrl
56. 56.↵
    1. Wallace E,
    2. McDowell R,
    3. Bennett K,
    4. Fahey T,
    5. Smith SM

    . Impact of potentially inappropriate prescribing on adverse drug events, health related quality of life and emergency hospital attendance in older people attending general practice: a prospective cohort study. GERONA 2017;72:271–7.

    OpenUrl
57. 57.↵
    1. Wauters M,
    2. Elseviers M,
    3. Vaes B,
    4. et al

    . Too many, too few, or too unsafe? Impact of inappropriate prescribing on mortality, and hospitalization in a cohort of community-dwelling oldest old. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2016;82:1382–92.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
58. 58.↵
    1. Wucherer D,
    2. Thyrian JR,
    3. Eichler T,
    4. et al

    . Drug-related problems in community-dwelling primary care patients screened positive for dementia. Int Psychogeriatr 2017;29:1857–68.

    OpenUrl
59. 59.↵
    1. Benson H,
    2. Lucas C,
    3. Benrimoj SI,
    4. Kmet W,
    5. Williams KA

    . Pharmacists in general practice: recommendations resulting from team-based collaborative care. Aust J Prim Health 2018;24:448–54.

    OpenUrl
60. 60.↵
    1. Clyne B,
    2. Smith SM,
    3. Hughes CM

    , OPTI-SCRIPT study team, Effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients in primary care: a cluster-randomized controlled trial (OPTI-SCRIPT Study). Ann Fam Med 2015;13:545–53.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
61. 61.↵
    1. Clyne B,
    2. Smith SM,
    3. Hughes CM

    , OPTI-SCRIPT study team, Sustained effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients in primary care (OPTI-SCRIPT study). Implement Sci. 2016;11:79.

    OpenUrlPubMed
62. 62.↵
    1. Gibert P,
    2. Cabaret M,
    3. Moulis M,
    4. et al

    . Optimizing medication use in elderly people in primary care: impact of STOPP criteria on inappropriate prescriptions. Arch Gerontology Geriatrics 2018;75:16–9.

    OpenUrl
63. 63.↵
    1. Howard R,
    2. Rodgers S,
    3. Avery AJ,
    4. Sheikh A

    , PINCER trialists. Description and process evaluation of pharmacists' interventions in a pharmacist-led information technology-enabled multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial for reducing medication errors in general practice (PINCER trial). Int J Pharm Pract 2014;22:59–68.

    OpenUrl
64. 64.↵
    1. Leendertse AJ,
    2. de Koning GH,
    3. Goudswaard AN,
    4. et al

    . Preventing hospital admissions by reviewing medication (PHARM) in primary care: an open controlled study in an elderly population. J Clin Pharm Ther 2013;38:379–87.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
65. 65.↵
    1. Lenander C,
    2. Elfsson B,
    3. Danielsson B,
    4. Midlov P,
    5. Hasselstrom J

    . Effects of a pharmacist-led structured medication review in primary care on drug-related problems and hospital admission rates: a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Prim Health Care 2014;32:180–6.

    OpenUrlPubMed
66. 66.↵
    1. Lopez-Picazo JJ,
    2. Ruiz JC,
    3. Sanchez JF,
    4. Ariza A,
    5. Aguilera B

    . A randomized trial of the effectiveness and efficiency of interventions to reduce potential drug interactions in primary care. Am J Med Qual 2011;26:145–53.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
67. 67.↵
    1. Peek N,
    2. Gude WT,
    3. Keers RN,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of a pharmacist-led actionable audit and feedback intervention for improving medication safety in UK primary care: an interrupted time series analysis. PLoS Med 2020;17:e1003286.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
68. 68.↵
    1. Singh R,
    2. Anderson D,
    3. McLean-Plunkett E,
    4. et al

    . Effects of self-empowered teams on rates of adverse drug events in primary care. Int J Fam Med 2012;2012:374639.

    OpenUrl
69. 69.↵
    1. Vanderman AJ,
    2. Moss JM,
    3. Bryan WE 3rd.,
    4. Sloane R,
    5. Jackson GL,
    6. Hastings SN

    . Evaluating the impact of medication safety alerts on prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications for older veterans in an ambulatory care setting. J Pharm Pract 2017;30:82–8.

    OpenUrl
70. 70.↵
    1. Wessell AM,
    2. Nietert PJ,
    3. Jenkins RG,
    4. Nemeth LS,
    5. Ornstein SM

    . Inappropriate medication use in the elderly: results from a quality improvement project in 99 primary care practices. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 2008;6:21–7.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
71. 71.↵
    1. Wessell AM,
    2. Ornstein SM,
    3. Jenkins RG,
    4. Nemeth LS,
    5. Litvin CB,
    6. Nietert PJ

    . Medication safety in primary care practice: results from a PPRNet quality improvement intervention. Am J Med Qual 2013;28:16–24.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
72. 72.↵
    1. Elder NC,
    2. Vonder Meulen M,
    3. Cassedy A

    . The identification of medical errors by family physicians during outpatient visits. Ann Fam Med 2004;2:125–9.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
73. 73.↵
    1. Kuzel AJ,
    2. Woolf SH,
    3. Gilchrist VJ,
    4. et al

    . Patient reports of preventable problems and harms in primary health care. Ann Fam Med 2004;2:333–40.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
74. 74.↵
    1. Dovey SM,
    2. Phillips RL,
    3. Green LA,
    4. Fryer GE

    . Types of medical errors commonly reported by family physicians. Am Fam Physician 2003;67:697.

    OpenUrlPubMed
75. 75.↵
    1. Dovey SM,
    2. Phillips RL,
    3. Green LA,
    4. Fryer GE

    . Consequences of medical errors observed by family physicians. Am Fam Physician 2003;67:915.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
76. 76.↵
    1. Brody AA,
    2. Gibson B,
    3. Tresner-Kirsch D,
    4. et al

    . High prevalence of medication discrepancies between home health referrals and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services home health certification and plan of care and their potential to affect safety of vulnerable elderly adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2016;64:e166–e170.

    OpenUrl
77. 77.↵
    1. Coleman EA,
    2. Smith JD,
    3. Raha D,
    4. Min SJ

    . Posthospital medication discrepancies: prevalence and contributing factors. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1842–7.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
78. 78.↵
    1. Harris CM,
    2. Sridharan A,
    3. Landis R,
    4. Howell E,
    5. Wright S

    . What happens to the medication regimens of older adults during and after an acute hospitalization? J Patient Saf 2013;9:150–3.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
79. 79.↵
    1. Henriksen K,
    2. Battles JB,
    3. Marks ES,
    4. Lewin DI

    1. O'Connor PJ,
    2. Sperl-Hillen JAM,
    3. Johnson PE,
    4. Rush WA

    . Identification, classification, and frequency of medical errors in outpatient diabetes care. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI, editors. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation (Vol. 1, Research Findings). Rockville, MD: AHRQ; 2005.
80. 80.↵
    1. Henriksen K,
    2. Battles JB,
    3. Keyes MA,
    4. Grady ML

    1. Raebel MA,
    2. Chester EA,
    3. Brand DW,
    4. Magid DJ

    . Imbedding research in practice to improve medication safety. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, Grady ML, editors. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 4, Technology and Medication Safety). Rockville, MD: AHRQ; 2008.
81. 81.↵
    1. Lai AY,
    2. Yuan CT,
    3. Marsteller JA,
    4. et al

    . Patient safety in primary care: conceptual meanings to the health care team and patients. J Am Board Fam Med 2020;33:754–64.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
82. 82.↵
    1. Geller AI,
    2. Shehab N,
    3. Lovegrove MC,
    4. et al

    . National estimates of insulin-related hypoglycemia and errors leading to emergency department visits and hospitalizations. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:678–86.

    OpenUrl
83. 83.↵
    1. Gurwitz JH,
    2. Kapoor A,
    3. Garber L,
    4. et al

    . Effect of a multifaceted clinical pharmacist intervention on medication safety after hospitalization in persons prescribed high-risk medications: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2021;181:610.

    OpenUrl
84. 84.↵
    1. Weingart SN,
    2. Toth M,
    3. Sands DZ,
    4. Aronson MD,
    5. Davis RB,
    6. Phillips RS

    . Physicians' decisions to override computerized drug alerts in primary care. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2625–31.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
85. 85.↵
    1. Smith LB,
    2. Golberstein E,
    3. Anderson K,
    4. et al

    . The association of EHR drug safety alerts and co-prescribing of opioids and benzodiazepines. J Gen Intern Med 2019;34:1403–5.

    OpenUrl
86. 86.↵
    1. Friebe MP,
    2. LeGrand JR,
    3. Shepherd BE,
    4. Breeden EA,
    5. Nelson SD

    . Reducing inappropriate outpatient medication prescribing in older adults across electronic health record systems. Appl Clin Inform 2020;11:865–72.

    OpenUrl
87. 87.↵
    1. Hirschtritt ME,
    2. Olfson M,
    3. Kroenke K

    . Balancing the risks and benefits of benzodiazepines. JAMA 2021;325:347–8.

    OpenUrlPubMed
88. 88.↵
    1. Gandhi TK,
    2. Seger AC,
    3. Overhage JM,
    4. et al

    . Outpatient adverse drug events identified by screening electronic health records. J Patient Saf 2010;6:91–6.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
89. 89.↵
    1. Elliott RA,
    2. Camacho E,
    3. Jankovic D,
    4. Sculpher MJ,
    5. Faria R

    . Economic analysis of the prevalence and clinical and economic burden of medication error in England. BMJ Qual Saf 2021;30:96–105.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
90. 90.↵
    1. Lainer M,
    2. Vogele A,
    3. Wensing M,
    4. Sonnichsen A

    . Improving medication safety in primary care: a review and consensus procedure by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care. Eur J Gen Pract 2015;21 Suppl:14–8.

    OpenUrl
91. 91.↵
    1. Lainer M,
    2. Mann E,
    3. Sonnichsen A

    . Information technology interventions to improve medication safety in primary care: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care 2013;25:590–8.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
92. 92.↵
    1. Ranji SR,
    2. Rennke S,
    3. Wachter RM

    . Computerised provider order entry combined with clinical decision support systems to improve medication safety: a narrative review. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:773–80.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
93. 93.↵
    1. Olaniyan JO,
    2. Ghaleb M,
    3. Dhillon S,
    4. Robinson P

    . Safety of medication use in primary care. Int J Pharm Pract 2015;23:3–20.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
94. 94.↵
    1. Bates DW,
    2. Cullen DJ,
    3. Laird N,
    4. et al

    . Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events: implications for prevention. JAMA 1995;274:29–34.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
95. 95.↵
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [Internet]. Medication errors and adverse drug events; 2019 [cited 2020 Mar 13]. Available from: https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer/medication-errors-and-adverse-drug-events.
96. 96.↵
    1. Crane S,
    2. Sloane PD,
    3. Elder N,
    4. et al

    . Reporting and using near-miss events to improve patient safety in diverse primary care practices: a collaborative approach to learning from our mistakes. J Am Board Fam Med 2015;28:452–60.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
97. 97.↵
    1. Isaac T,
    2. Weissman JS,
    3. Davis RB,
    4. et al

    . Overrides of medication alerts in ambulatory care. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:305–11.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
98. 98.↵
    1. Thio SL,
    2. Nam J,
    3. van Driel ML,
    4. Dirven T,
    5. Blom JW

    . Effects of discontinuation of chronic medication in primary care: a systematic review of deprescribing trials. Br J Gen Pract 2018;68:e663–e672.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
99. 99.↵
    1. Wasson JH

    . A patient-reported spectrum of adverse health care experiences: harms, unnecessary care, medication illness, and low health confidence. J Ambul Care Manage 2013;36:245–50.

    OpenUrl
100. 100.↵
     1. Fernald DH,
     2. Pace WD,
     3. Harris DM,
     4. West DR,
     5. Main DS,
     6. Westfall JM

     . Event reporting to a primary care patient safety reporting system: a report from the ASIPS collaborative. Ann Fam Med 2004;2:327–32.

     OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
101. 101.↵
     1. Henriksen K,
     2. Battles JB,
     3. Marks ES,
     4. Lewin DI

     1. Linzer M,
     2. Baier Manwell L,
     3. Mundt M,
     4. et al

     . Organizational climate, stress, and error in primary care: the MEMO study. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, Lewin DI, editors. Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation (Vol. 1, Research Findings). Rockville, MD: AHRQ; 2005.
102. 102.↵
     1. Grant S,
     2. Mesman J,
     3. Guthrie B

     . Spatio-temporal elements of articulation work in the achievement of repeat prescribing safety in UK general practice. Sociol Health Illn 2016;38:306–24.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed