Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Differences Between Women and Men Are Present in the Rate of Diagnosed Diseases After a Diagnostic Intervention is Conducted in Primary Care

Aranka V. Ballering, Judith G. M. Rosmalen and Tim C. olde Hartman
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2022, 35 (1) 73-84; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2022.01.210289
Aranka V. Ballering
From University of Groningen, University Medical Center of Groningen, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE), Groningen, the Netherlands. P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands (AVB, JGMR); Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (TCOH)
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Judith G. M. Rosmalen
From University of Groningen, University Medical Center of Groningen, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE), Groningen, the Netherlands. P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands (AVB, JGMR); Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (TCOH)
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tim C. olde Hartman
From University of Groningen, University Medical Center of Groningen, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation (ICPE), Groningen, the Netherlands. P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, the Netherlands (AVB, JGMR); Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (TCOH)
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Relative frequency of the performed interventions in female and male episodes of care related to common somatic symptoms (*P < .001, χ2 test). Abbreviation: EoC, episode of care.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Overview of the Study Population

    CharacteristicFemaleMaleP Value
    Patients, n10,541 (57.1%)7,915 (42.9%)
    Patients' age in years, mean (SD)43.4 (23.1)42.3 (23.9)<0.001§
    Patient years,* n78,954 (52.3%)75,734 (47.7%)
    Unique EoC, n21,025 (61.4%)13,243 (38.6%)
    EoC with intervention
        No intervention3,218 (15.3%)1,827 (13.8)
        ≥1 intervention17,807 (84.7%)11,416 (86.2%)<0.001†
    EoC with final diagnosis
        Disease diagnosis7,470 (35.5%)4,924 (37.2%)0.002†
        Symptom diagnosis13,555 (64.5%)8,319 (62.8%)
    Encounters within an EoC
        1 encounter13,619 (64.8%)8,697 (65.7%)0.090†
        >1 encounter7,406 (35.2%)4,546 (34.3%)
    RFE per EoC
        1 RFE14,739 (70.1%)9,839 (74.3%)<0.001†
        >1 RFE6,286 (29.9%)3,404 (25.7%)
    EoC with comorbidities, n8,282 (39.4%)5,295 (43.7%)0.271†
        Cardiovascular disease5,741 (27.3%)3,827 (28.9%)0.001†
        Asthma and/or COPD3,106 (14.8%)1,998 (15.1%)0.427†
        Malignancies1,684 (8.0%)979 (7.4%)0.038†
    • Abbreviations: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; EoC, episode of care; RFE, reason for encounter; SD, standard deviation.

    • ↵* The cumulative years included patients were at risk of an incident common somatic symptom.

    • ↵† χ2 test.

    • ↵§ Independent t-test.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Adjusted Associations Between Diagnostic Interventions and Disease Diagnoses in Episodes of Care Starting with Common Somatic Symptoms, Stratified by Sex

    Odds Ratio (95%CI)*
    Independent VariablesTotal EoC (n = 34,268)Female EoC (n = 21,025)Male EoC (n = 13,243)
    Physical examination2.32 (2.17-2.49)2.33 (2.14-2.54)2.32 (2.07-2.60)
    Laboratory diagnostics†0.50 (0.47-0.54)0.47 (0.44-0.52)0.56 (0.50-0.62)
    Imaging0.96 (0.86-1.06)0.92 (0.81-1.06)1.00 (0.85-1.17)
    Referral to a specialist†1.38 (1.27-1.49)1.29 (1.17-1.43)1.50 (1.33-1.69)
    • Abbreviations: EoC, episode of care; RFE, reason for encounter; CI, confidence interval.

    • ↵* Adjusted for patients' sex (total EoC), patients' age, presence of comorbidities at the start of an EoC, number of contacts within an EoC, type of consult, and type of RFE.

    • ↵† The interaction term between the patient's sex and the respective diagnostic intervention was statistically significant.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Adjusted Odds Ratios and Significant Intervention-by-Female-Sex Interaction Terms for the Association Between Diagnostic Interventions and Disease Diagnosis, Stratified by Reason for Encounter

    OR* (95% CI)
    Headache (n = 3,411)Dizziness (n = 2,709)Heart Pain (n = 660)(Lower) Back Pain (n = 5,962)
    Physical examination2.07 (1.74-2.47)2.12 (1.68-2.67)0.98 (0.59-1.64)1.35 (1.11-1.63)†
    Laboratory diagnostics0.59 (0.47-0.74)0.30 (0.25-0.37)0.94 (0.56-1.58)1.49 (1.18-1.88)
    Imaging0.67 (0.37-1.22)0.43 (0.14-1.36)0.51 (0.12-2.23)0.87 (0.70-1.07)†
    Specialist referral0.77 (0.60-0.98)1.11 (0.84-1.46)1.14 (0.73-1.77)†2.78 (2.18-3.55)†
    OR* (95% CI)
    Nausea (n = 1,222)Muscle Pain (n = 554)Shortness of Breath (n = 3,593)Chills (n = 132)
    Physical examination1.93 (1.46-2.56)1.19 (0.71-2.01)2.58 (2.02-3.31)3.35 (1.23-9.11)
    Laboratory diagnostics0.49 (0.35-0.68)0.71 (0.41-1.23)0.78 (0.65-0.92)0.81 (0.29-2.28)
    Imaging0.57 (0.26-1.21)0.30 (0.06-1.39)0.49 (0.38-0.64)0.69 (0.02-19.9)
    Specialist referral1.25 (0.82-1.90)0.66 (0.27-1.59)1.07 (0.87-1.31)0.57 (0.19-1.74)
    OR* (95% CI)
    Tingling in Fingers, Feet, and/or Toes (n = 609)Swallowing/Throat Symptoms (n = 4,961)Weakness/General Tiredness (n = 5,608)Arm and/or Leg Symptoms (n = 4,847)
    Physical examination1.16 (0.72-1.87)5.42 (4.56-6.44)2.57 (2.14-3.09)1.70 (1.40-2.06)
    Laboratory diagnostics0.40 (0.25-0.64)†0.97 (0.80-1.18)0.20 (0.18-0.24)†0.51 (0.41-0.63)†
    Imaging0.47 (0.11-2.06)0.40 (0.23-0.72)1.62 (1.14-2.32)1.11 (0.93-1.32)
    Specialist referral1.72 (1.05-2.81)0.64 (0.51-0.81)1.25 (0.99-1.58)1.86 (1.55-2.23)†
    • Abbreviations: EoC, episode of care; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

    • ↵* Adjusted for the patients' age at diagnosis, comorbidities, number of contacts per EoC, and sex. †Significant intervention-by-female-sex interaction term.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 35 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 35, Issue 1
January/February 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Differences Between Women and Men Are Present in the Rate of Diagnosed Diseases After a Diagnostic Intervention is Conducted in Primary Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Differences Between Women and Men Are Present in the Rate of Diagnosed Diseases After a Diagnostic Intervention is Conducted in Primary Care
Aranka V. Ballering, Judith G. M. Rosmalen, Tim C. olde Hartman
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2022, 35 (1) 73-84; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.01.210289

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Differences Between Women and Men Are Present in the Rate of Diagnosed Diseases After a Diagnostic Intervention is Conducted in Primary Care
Aranka V. Ballering, Judith G. M. Rosmalen, Tim C. olde Hartman
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2022, 35 (1) 73-84; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.01.210289
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Background
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Appendix 1
    • Appendix 2
    • Appendix 3
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Enhancing Equity in Clinical Research: A Multifaceted Proposal for Spondyloarthritis
  • Patients Characteristics and General Practitioners Management of Patients with Symptom Diagnoses
  • Health Care Equity for Family Medicine Patients and Family Physician Equity
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Episode of Care
  • Gender Differences
  • Medically Unexplained Symptoms
  • Primary Health Care

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire