The American Board of Family Medicine's 8 Years of Experience with Differential Item Functioning

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Newton WP,
   2. Baxley E,
   3. Peterson LE,
   4. et al

   . How the ABFM will address health equity. Ann Fam Med 2020;18:468–70.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Jencks C,
   2. Phillips M

   , eds. [Internet]. The black-white test score gap. Brookings Institute Press; 1998 [cited 2021 March 26]. Available from: https://www.brookings.edu/book/the-black-white-test-score-gap/2.
3. 3.↵
   1. Hinton I,
   2. Howell J,
   3. Merwin E,
   4. et al

   . The educational pipeline for health care professionals: understanding the source of racial differences. J Human Resources 2010;45:116–58.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. O'Neill TR,
   2. Peabody MR,
   3. Stelter KL,
   4. Puffer JC,
   5. Brady JE

   . Validating the test plan specifications for the American Board of Family Medicine's certification examination. J Am Board Fam Med 2019;32:876–82.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. O'Neill TR,
   2. Peabody MR,
   3. Puffer JC

   . The ABFM begins to use differential item functioning. J Am Board Fam Med 2013;26:807–9.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Cardall C,
   2. Coffman WE

   . A method for comparing the performance of different groups on the same items of a test. Ewing (NJ): Educational Testing Service; 1964. p. 64–5.
7. 7.↵
   1. Wainer H,
   2. Braun H

   1. Holland PW,
   2. Thayer DT

   . Differential item performance and the Mantel–Haenszel procedure. In: Wainer H, Braun H, eds. Test validity. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988. p. 129–45.
8. 8.↵
   1. Mantel N,
   2. Haenszel W

   . Statistical aspects of the analysis of the data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1959;22:719–48.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Wright BD,
   2. Panchapakesan N

   . A procedure for sample-free item analysis. Educ Psychol Meas 1969;29:23–48.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Rasch G

    . Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Danish Institute for Educational Research; 1960.
11. 11.↵
    1. Angoff WH,
    2. Ford SF

    . Item–race interaction on a test of scholastic aptitude. J Educational Measurement 1973;10:95–106.

    OpenUrl
12. 12.↵
    1. Bond TG,
    2. Fox CM

    . Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum; 2001.
13. 13.↵
    1. Norris TE,
    2. Rovinelli RJ,
    3. Puffer JC,
    4. Rinaldo J,
    5. Price DW

    . From specialty-based to practice-based: a new blueprint for the American Board of Family Medicine cognitive examination. J Am Board Fam Pract 2005;18:546–54.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Peabody MR,
    2. O'Neill TR,
    3. Stelter KL,
    4. Puffer JC

    . Frequency and criticality of diagnoses in family medicine practices: from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS). J Am Board Fam Med 2018;31:126–38.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. O'Neill TR,
    2. Peabody MR

    . Impact of one versus two content-specific modules on American Board of Family Medicine certification examination scores. J Am Board Fam Med 2017;30:85–90.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. O'Neill TR,
    2. Li Z,
    3. Peabody MR,
    4. Lybarger M,
    5. Royal K,
    6. Puffer JC

    . The predictive validity of ABFM's In-Training Examination. Fam Med 2015;47:349–56.

    OpenUrl
17. 17.↵
    1. O'Neill TR,
    2. Peabody MR,
    3. Song H

    . The predictive validity of the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners' COMLEX-USA examinations with regard to outcomes on American Board of Family Medicine examinations. Acad Med 2016;91:1568–75.

    OpenUrl
18. 18.↵
    1. O'Neill TR,
    2. Raddatz MM,
    3. Royal KD

    . Demonstrating the construct stability of a translated exam for family medicine residents. Int J Educ Psychol Assess 2011;6:31–41.

    OpenUrl
19. 19.↵
    1. Peabody MR,
    2. Eden AR,
    3. Douglas M,
    4. Phillips RL

    . Board certified family physician workforce: progress in racial and ethnic diversity. J Am Board Fam Med 2018;31:842–3.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text