Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

The American Board of Family Medicine's 8 Years of Experience with Differential Item Functioning

Thomas R. O'Neill, Ting Wang and Warren P. Newton
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2022, 35 (1) 18-25; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2022.01.210208
Thomas R. O'Neill
From the American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ting Wang
From the American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Warren P. Newton
From the American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY.
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Percentage of questions reviewed by DIF review process stage.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Family Medicine Certification Examination Core Content Questions Flagged for DIF by Racial Group 2013-2020

    Focal GroupCategory20132014201520162017201820192020Count Mean (SD)Percentage Mean (SD)
    BlackAdvantage11 (2.6%)10 (2.4%)10 (2.3%)11 (2.6%)11 (2.6%)10 (2.3%)10 (2.3%)18 (3.7%)11.4 (2.9)2.6% (0.5)
    Disadvantage19 (4.4%)9 (2.1%)8 (1.9%)7 (1.6%)13 (3.0%)11 (2.6%)10 (2.3%)11 (2.3%)10.7 (3.9)2.5% (0.9)
    Total30 (7.0%)19 (4.5%)18 (4.2%)18 (4.2%)24 (5.6%)21 (4.9%)20 (4.6%)29 (7.6%)22.1 (5.1)5.3% (1.3)
    Net advantage−8 (−1.9%)1 (0.2%)2 (0.5%)4 (0.9%)−2 (−0.5%)−1 (−0.2%)0 (0%)7 (1.4%)0.7 (4.7)0.1% (1.0)
    HispanicAdvantage6 (3.3%)5 (3.6%)6 (5.4%)3 (4.0%)7 (5.8%)2 (4.9%)5 (3.7%)7 (1.4%)4.9 (1.8)4.0% (1.4)
    Disadvantage4 (0.9%)4 (1.0%)2 (0.5%)7 (1.6%)2 (0.5%)5 (1.2%)3 (0.7%)7 (1.4%)4.6 (1.9)1.0% (0.4)
    Total10 (4.2%)9 (4.6%)8 (5.9%)10 (5.6%)9 (6.3%)7 (6.1%)8 (4.4%)14 (2.8%)9.4 (2.3)5.0% (1.2)
    Net advantage2 (0.5%)1 (0.2%)4 (0.9%)−4 (−0.9%)5 (1.2%)−3 (−0.7%)2 (0.5%)0 (0%)0.3 (2.9)0.2% (0.7)
    AsianAdvantage14 (3.3%)15 (3.6%)23 (5.4%)17 (4.0%)25 (5.8%)21 (4.9%)16 (3.7%)19 (3.9%)17.9 (3.3)4.3% (0.9)
    Disadvantage19 (4.4%)10 (2.4%)14 (3.3%)7 (1.6%)10 (2.3%)10 (2.3%)8 (1.9%)8 (1.7%)10.9 (4.3)2.5% (0.9)
    Total33 (7.7%)25 (6.0%)37 (8.7%)24 (5.6%)35 (8.1%)31 (7.2%)24 (4.6%)27 (5.6%)28.7 (5.1)6.7% (1.4)
    Net advantage−5 (−1.2%)5 (1.2%)9 (2.1%)10 (2.3%)15 (3.5%)11 (2.6%)8 (1.9%)11 (2.3%)7.0 (5.7)1.8% (1.4)
    Total number of flags735363526859527061.3 (8.5)
    Number of core questions430430426426429430432484435.9 (19.6)
    • Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.

    • Note: The thresholds used to flag questions using the Rasch differential item functioning procedure were an absolute value of the logit contrast ≥ 0.70 and P < .05. The reference group was White. Advantage means that the question was easier for the focal group. Disadvantage means that the question was more difficult for the focal group. Net advantage = Advantage – Disadvantage. Flagging questions was not attempted if there were fewer than 200 responses overall or if the smaller of the 2 groups had fewer than 50 responses. Some questions received multiple flags.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 35 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 35, Issue 1
January/February 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The American Board of Family Medicine's 8 Years of Experience with Differential Item Functioning
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The American Board of Family Medicine's 8 Years of Experience with Differential Item Functioning
Thomas R. O'Neill, Ting Wang, Warren P. Newton
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2022, 35 (1) 18-25; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.01.210208

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The American Board of Family Medicine's 8 Years of Experience with Differential Item Functioning
Thomas R. O'Neill, Ting Wang, Warren P. Newton
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2022, 35 (1) 18-25; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.01.210208
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods—Psychometric Rationale and ABFM Context
    • Methods—Review of Results of DIF
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Family Physician Racial Identity: An Analysis of "Other" Race Selection and Implications for Future Data Collection
  • Health Care Equity for Family Medicine Patients and Family Physician Equity
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Bias
  • Certification
  • Ethnic Groups
  • Medical Education
  • Minority Groups
  • Family Medicine
  • Psychometrics
  • Quality Control
  • Social Justice

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire