Research ArticleOriginal Research

Adapting Diabetes Shared Medical Appointments to Fit Context for Practice-Based Research (PBR)

Bethany M. Kwan, Jenny Rementer, Natalie D. Ritchie, Andrea L. Nederveld, Phoutdavone Phimphasone-Brady, Martha Sajatovic, Donald E. Nease and Jeanette A. Waxmonsky
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2020, 33 (5) 716-727; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.200049

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Riley WT,
    2. Glasgow RE,
    3. Etheredge L,
    4. Abernethy AP
    . Rapid, responsive, relevant (R3) research: a call for a rapid learning health research enterprise. Clin Transl Med 2013;2:10.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kessler R,
    2. Glasgow RE
    . A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: dramatic change is needed. Am J Prev Med 2011;40:637–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Loudon K,
    2. Treweek S,
    3. Sullivan F,
    4. Donnan P,
    5. Thorpe KE,
    6. Zwarenstein M
    . The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ 2015;350:h2147.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Ford I,
    2. Norrie J
    . Pragmatic trials. N Engl J Med 2016;375:454–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Glasgow RE,
    2. Chambers D
    . Developing robust, sustainable, implementation systems using rigorous, rapid and relevant science. Clin Transl Sci 2012;5:48–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Treweek S,
    2. Zwarenstein M
    . Making trials matter: pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability. Trials 2009;10:37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Kirsh SR,
    2. Lawrence RH,
    3. Aron DC
    . Tailoring an intervention to the context and system redesign related to the intervention: a case study of implementing shared medical appointments for diabetes. Implement Sci 2008;3:34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kowalski CP,
    2. Veeser M,
    3. Heisler M
    . Formative evaluation and adaptation of pre-and early implementation of diabetes shared medical appointments to maximize sustainability and adoption. BMC Fam Pract 2018;19:109.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kwan BM,
    2. Dickinson LM,
    3. Glasgow RE,
    4. et al
    . The Invested in Diabetes Study Protocol: a cluster randomized pragmatic trial comparing standardized and patient-driven diabetes shared medical appointments. Trials 2020;21:65.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    1. Sajatovic M,
    2. Dawson NV,
    3. Perzynski AT,
    4. et al
    . Best practices: optimizing care for people with serious mental illness and comorbid diabetes. Psychiatr Serv 2011;62:1001–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Sajatovic M,
    2. Gunzler DD,
    3. Kanuch SW,
    4. et al
    . a 60-week prospective rct of a self-management intervention for individuals with serious mental illness and diabetes mellitus. Psychiatr Serv 2017;68:883–90.
    OpenUrl
  12. 12.↵
    1. McKibbin CL,
    2. Patterson TL,
    3. Norman G,
    4. et al
    . A lifestyle intervention for older schizophrenia patients with diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. Schizophr Res 2006;86:36–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Bauer MS,
    2. McBride L
    . Structured group psychotherapy for bipolar disorder: the life goals program. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Springer Publishing Co.; 2003.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Heintzman J,
    2. Gold R,
    3. Krist A,
    4. Crosson J,
    5. Likumahuwa S,
    6. DeVoe JE
    . Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are promising laboratories for conducting dissemination and implementation research. J Am Board Fam Med 2014;27:759–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Andrews JE,
    2. Pearce KA,
    3. Ireson C,
    4. Love MM
    . Information-seeking behaviors of practitioners in a primary care practice-based research network (PBRN). J Med Libr Assoc 2005;93:206–12.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Cohen DJ,
    2. Crabtree BF,
    3. Etz RS,
    4. et al
    . Fidelity versus flexibility: translating evidence-based research into practice. Am J Prev Med 2008;35:S381–389.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Dickinson LM,
    2. Beaty B,
    3. Fox C,
    4. et al
    . Pragmatic cluster randomized trials using covariate constrained randomization: a method for practice-based research networks (PBRNs). J Am Board Fam Med 2015;28:663–72.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Holtrop JS,
    2. Rabin BA,
    3. Glasgow RE
    . Dissemination and implementation science in primary care research and practice: contributions and opportunities. J Am Board Fam Med 2018;31:466–78.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kilbourne AM,
    2. Neumann MS,
    3. Pincus HA,
    4. Bauer MS,
    5. Stall R
    . Implementing evidence-based interventions in health care: application of the replicating effective programs framework. Implement Sci 2007;2:42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kitson AL,
    2. Rycroft-Malone J,
    3. Harvey G,
    4. McCormack B,
    5. Seers K,
    6. Titchen A
    . Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci 2008;3:1.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Stetler CB,
    2. Damschroder LJ,
    3. Helfrich CD,
    4. Hagedorn HJ
    . A guide for applying a revised version of the PARIHS framework for implementation. Implement Sci 2011;6:99.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Kilbourne AM,
    2. Neumann MS,
    3. Waxmonsky J,
    4. et al
    . Public-academic partnerships: evidence-based implementation: the role of sustained community-based practice and research partnerships. Psychiatr Serv 2012;63:205–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Dickinson WP,
    2. Dickinson LM,
    3. Nutting PA,
    4. et al
    . Practice facilitation to improve diabetes care in primary care: a report from the EPIC randomized clinical trial. Ann Fam Med 2014;12:8–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Jortberg BT,
    2. Fernald DH,
    3. Hessler DM,
    4. et al
    . Practice characteristics associated with better implementation of patient self-management support. J Am Board Fam Med 2019;32:329–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Ohman-Strickland PA,
    2. John Orzano A,
    3. Nutting PA,
    4. et al
    . Measuring organizational attributes of primary care practices: development of a new instrument. Health Serv Res 2007;42:1257–73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Crabtree BF,
    2. Miller WL
    . Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1999.
  27. 27.↵
    1. Addison RB
    . Grounded hermeneutic research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1999.
  28. 28.↵
    1. Miles MB,
    2. Huberman AM,
    3. Saldaña J
    . Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 3rd. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2014.
  29. 29.↵
    1. Waxmonsky J,
    2. Kilbourne AM,
    3. Goodrich DE,
    4. et al
    . Enhanced fidelity to treatment for bipolar disorder: results from a randomized controlled implementation trial. Psychiatr Serv 2014;65:81–90.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Nease DE Jr..,
    2. Daly JM,
    3. Dickinson LM,
    4. et al
    . Impact of a boot camp translation intervention on self-management support in primary care: a report from the INSTTEPP trial and meta-LARC consortium. J Patient Cent Res Rev 2018;5:256–66.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Westfall JM,
    2. Zittleman L,
    3. Felzien M,
    4. et al
    . Reinventing the wheel of medical evidence: how the boot camp translation process is making gains. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016;35:613–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Kwan BM,
    2. Jortberg B,
    3. Warman MK,
    4. et al
    . Stakeholder engagement in diabetes self-management: patient preference for peer support and other insights. Fam Pract 2017;34:358–63.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. Stirman SW,
    2. Miller CJ,
    3. Toder K,
    4. Calloway A
    . Development of a framework and coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci 2013;8:65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Stirman SW,
    2. Baumann AA,
    3. Miller CJ
    . The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci 2019;14:58.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    Peers for Progress. Take action: train peer supporters. Available from: http://peersforprogress.org/take-action/train-peer-supporters. Accessed January 29, 2020.
  36. 36.↵
    1. Huebschmann AG,
    2. Leavitt IM,
    3. Glasgow RE
    . Making health research matter: a call to increase attention to external validity. Annu Rev Public Health 2019;40:45–63.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    1. Kwan BM,
    2. Sills MR,
    3. Graham D,
    4. et al
    . Stakeholder engagement in a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure implementation: a report from the SAFTINet practice-based research network (PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2016;29:102–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Baskerville NB,
    2. Liddy C,
    3. Hogg W
    . Systematic review and meta-analysis of practice facilitation within primary care settings. Ann Fam Med 2012;10:63–74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Harvey G,
    2. Lynch E
    . Enabling continuous quality improvement in practice: the role and contribution of facilitation. Front Public Health 2017;5:27.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    1. La Bash H,
    2. Galovski T,
    3. Stirman SW
    . Adapting evidence-based psychotherapies while maintaining fidelity. Curr Treat Options Psych 2019;6:198–209.
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.↵
    1. Miller CJ,
    2. Wiltsey-Stirman S,
    3. Baumann AA
    . Iterative Decision-making for Evaluation of Adaptations (IDEA): A decision tree for balancing adaptation, fidelity, and intervention impact. J Community Psychol 2020;48:1163–77.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.↵
    1. Escoffery C,
    2. Lebow-Skelley E,
    3. Haardoerfer R,
    4. et al
    . A systematic review of adaptations of evidence-based public health interventions globally. Implement Sci 2018;13:125.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Brownson RC,
    2. Colditz GA,
    3. Proctor EK
    1. Owen NE,
    2. Goode A,
    3. Sugiyama TA,
    4. et al
    . Designing for dissemination in chronic disease prevention and management. In: Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK, eds. Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice. New York, NY: Oxford Scholarship Online; 2017.
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section

Keywords