Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Brief ReportPolicy Brief

Gender Differences in Reported Weekly Work Hours Among Family Physicians

Elizabeth Wilkinson, Megan Coffman, Stephen Petterson and Yalda Jabbarpour
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2020, 33 (5) 653-654; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.190462
Elizabeth Wilkinson
From the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC.
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Megan Coffman
From the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC.
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Petterson
From the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yalda Jabbarpour
From the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care, Washington, DC.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

While women are entering family medicine at higher rates than men, little is known about the present differences in practice patterns between male and female family physicians (FPs). We used 2017 and 2018 American Board of Family Medicine Family Medicine Certification Examination practice demographic questionnaires to assess average weekly total hours and direct patient care hours by age and gender reported by FPs. We found a gender gap between both overall hours worked and direct patient care hours, with female FPs reporting fewer hours across age groups.

  • Family Physicians
  • Health Services Accessibility
  • Patient Care
  • Retirement
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Women Physicians
  • Workforce

As female physicians' role in the family medicine workforce expands, systematic assessment is needed on the extant data on gender-specific family physician practice patterns, including work hours. It has been well established in the literature that, across all specialties, male physicians have higher average weekly work hours than female physicians and have lower rates of part-time work.1,2 A 1999 study of US women family physicians (FPs) reported that the median clinical hours per week for women were 35.9 hours.3 A 2019 Medscape survey found that male FPs reported 39 hours and female FPs reported 35 hours per week spent seeing patients.4 However, to the authors' knowledge, work hours have not been examined across age and gender in the FP workforce.

This study compares hours worked by gender for FPs, considering age and hours in direct patient care. The sample consists of 2017 and 2018 survey data from the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Family Medicine Certification practice demographic questionnaires. ABFM diplomates are required to complete an examination every 10 years to maintain board certification and are required to complete the questionnaire during examination registration 3 to 4 months before the examination date (yielding a 100% response rate). The sample does not include FPs certifying for the first time.

Diplomates self identified their gender as male or female. They were asked to estimate weekly hours worked in the categories of direct patient care, administrative activities, telephone patient care, e-visits, teaching/precepting, and other. Total weekly hours worked were calculated as the sum of these categories. We restricted the sample to physicians reporting work hours and without missing age and gender. Direct patient care hours encompass the time FPs spent in patient care visits. We categorized age using 5-year cohorts. We conducted simple t-tests comparing the average reported weekly hours worked by gender for each age group for direct patient care hours and for total hours.

The survey sample consisted of 8261 FPs: 4776 (57.81%) male and 3485 (42.19%) female. Respondent ages span from 28 to 84 years, and there was an average of 826 physicians per 5-year age group; the largest group were ages 45 to 49 years (n = 1887) and smallest group was age 75+ years (n = 37). Overall, female FPs reported an average of 49.22 weekly total hours and 33.53 weekly direct patient care hours, and male FPs reported an average of 54.32 weekly total hours and 39.09 weekly direct patient care hours (direct patient care male vs female P < .001, total male vs female P < .001). The average weekly reported hours in direct patient care were higher for male FPs in each age category from 35 to 39 years through 65 to 69 years (P < .01 for each) (Figure 1). Reported average weekly total hours were higher for male FPs than female FPs between ages 35 to 39 years through 55 to 59 years and 60 to 64 years through 65 to 69 years (P < .05 for each).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1.

2017 and 2018 American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Family Medicine Certification Examination Practice Demographic Questionnaires

These findings indicate that gaps in overall and direct patient care hours between male and female FPs are widest between 35 through 49 years and 60 through 69 years, ages that align with childbearing and caretaking life stages.5,6 We found a modest reduction in the gap between male and female FPs in both total hours and direct patient care in the 50-to-59-year age range.

These findings are limited by recall bias and potential confounding differences by gender in reporting hours worked. The findings are also limited by small numbers of younger (< 35 years) and older (75 + years) physicians in the sample, resulting in wide margins of error for these categories.

As women comprised over 50% of first year medical students for the first time in 2017 to 2018, and over half of family medicine residents were female in 2018, these findings may have implications for the FP workforce and patient access to primary care if female FPs see fewer patients in practice.7,8 The gender gap in direct patient care hours requires continued attention and consideration in workforce planning as patient demand continues to rise with an aging US population and an aging FP workforce.9

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Mingliang Dai, Lars Peterson, and Andrew Bazemore for their assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Notes

  • This article was externally peer reviewed.

  • Conflict of interest: None.

  • Funding: None.

  • To see this article online, please go to: http://jabfm.org/content/33/5/653.full.

  • See Related Article on Page 650.

  • Received for publication December 20, 2019.
  • Revision received April 27, 2020.
  • Accepted for publication May 2, 2020.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Staiger DO,
    2. Auerbach DI,
    3. Buerhaus PI
    . Trends in the work hours of physicians in the United States. JAMA 2010;303:747–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Medscape Female Physician Compensation Report 2018. Available from: www.medscape.com/slideshow/2018-compensation-female-physician-6010006. Accessed November 27, 2019.
  3. 3.↵
    1. Frank E,
    2. Lutz LJ
    . Characteristics of women US family physicians. Archives of Fam Med 1999;8:313–8.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    Medscape family physician compensation report 2019. April 24, 2019. Available from: https://www.medscape.com/slideshow/2019-compensation-family-physician-6011329#4.
  5. 5.↵
    1. Martin J,
    2. Hamilton B,
    3. Osterman M
    . Births in the United States, 2018. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db346-h.pdf. Accessed November 27, 2019.
  6. 6.↵
    National Alliance for Caregiving. Caregiving in the U.S. 2015. AARP Public Policy Institute; 2015.
  7. 7.↵
    American Association of Medical Colleges. 2019 FACTS: applicants and matriculants data. 2019. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/system/files/2019-10/2019_FACTS_Table_A-7.2.pdf. Accessed April 20, 2020.
  8. 8.↵
    American Association of Medical Colleges. Report on Residents. 2018. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/students-residents/report/report-residents. Accessed December 3, 2019.
  9. 9.↵
    1. Petterson SM,
    2. Liaw WR,
    3. Phillips RL,
    4. Rabin DL,
    5. Meyers DS,
    6. Bazemore AW
    . Projecting US primary care physician workforce needs: 2010–2025. Ann Fam Med 2012;10:503–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 33 (5)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 33, Issue 5
September/October 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Gender Differences in Reported Weekly Work Hours Among Family Physicians
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Gender Differences in Reported Weekly Work Hours Among Family Physicians
Elizabeth Wilkinson, Megan Coffman, Stephen Petterson, Yalda Jabbarpour
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2020, 33 (5) 653-654; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.190462

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Gender Differences in Reported Weekly Work Hours Among Family Physicians
Elizabeth Wilkinson, Megan Coffman, Stephen Petterson, Yalda Jabbarpour
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2020, 33 (5) 653-654; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.190462
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • The Gender Penalty: Reasons for Differences in Reported Weekly Work Hours Among Male and Female Family Physicians
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Trends and determinants of GPs work hours in the UK: a quantitative study
  • Extensive gender disparity in top medical schools and their affiliated dermatology departments: a cross-sectional study
  • Winning the Peace: Measuring Faculty Time to Support Residency Redesign
  • Informing Equity & Diversity in Primary Care Policy and Practice: Introducing a New Series of Policy Briefs, Commentaries, and Voices in JABFM
  • Practical Family Medicine: After-Hours Video Telehealth, Office Procedures, Polyp Follow-up in Older Patients, Terminology for Domestic Violence Intervention
  • The Gender Penalty: Reasons for Differences in Reported Weekly Work Hours Among Male and Female Family Physicians
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Rural Family Physicians Are More Likely to Collaborate with Multisector Community Organizations
  • Family Medicine Residents Intentions to Provide Gender Affirming Care
  • Only One Quarter of Family Physicians Are Very Satisfied with Their Electronic Health Records Platform
Show more Policy Brief

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Family Physicians
  • Health Services Accessibility
  • Patient Care
  • Retirement
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Women Physicians
  • Workforce

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire