Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Patterns of Clinical Care Subsequent to Nonindicated Vitamin D Testing in Primary Care

Michelle S. Rockwell, YingXing Wu, Mariana Salamoun, Matthew W. Hulver and John W. Epling
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine July 2020, 33 (4) 569-579; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.04.200007
Michelle S. Rockwell
From Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg (MSR, MWH); Center for Transformative Research on Health Behaviors, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke (MSR, MWH, JWE); Health Analytics Research Team, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA (YW, MS); Department of Family and Community Medicine, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA (JWE); Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke (JWE).
PhD, RD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YingXing Wu
From Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg (MSR, MWH); Center for Transformative Research on Health Behaviors, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke (MSR, MWH, JWE); Health Analytics Research Team, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA (YW, MS); Department of Family and Community Medicine, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA (JWE); Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke (JWE).
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mariana Salamoun
From Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg (MSR, MWH); Center for Transformative Research on Health Behaviors, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke (MSR, MWH, JWE); Health Analytics Research Team, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA (YW, MS); Department of Family and Community Medicine, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA (JWE); Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke (JWE).
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew W. Hulver
From Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg (MSR, MWH); Center for Transformative Research on Health Behaviors, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke (MSR, MWH, JWE); Health Analytics Research Team, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA (YW, MS); Department of Family and Community Medicine, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA (JWE); Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke (JWE).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John W. Epling
From Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg (MSR, MWH); Center for Transformative Research on Health Behaviors, Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke (MSR, MWH, JWE); Health Analytics Research Team, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA (YW, MS); Department of Family and Community Medicine, Carilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA (JWE); Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke (JWE).
MD, MSEd
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Vitamin D-relevant services incurred in the 24 months following a nonindicated vitamin D test. An alluvial diagram showing the flow of vitamin D-relevant service utilization for 2 years following a nonindicated vitamin D test in 2015.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2.

    Proportion of low and normal vitamin D test results following vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 prescriptions *The highest vitamin D test result attained during the 24 months following a nonindicated index vitamin D test.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Indicators for Vitamin D Testing

    Category of Indication*ICD-10 Text DiagnosisICD-10 Code(s)†
    Vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency, osteomalacia, ricketsRickets, activeE55.0
    Vitamin D deficiency, unspecifiedE55.9
    Sequelae of ricketsE64.3
    Adult osteomalaciaM83
    Adult osteomalacia due to malnutritionM83.3
    Disorder of bone density and structure, unspecifiedM85.9
    Disorder of bone, unspecifiedM89.9
    Osteoporosis, osteopeniaOsteoporosis with current pathological fractureM80
    Osteoporosis without current pathological fractureM81
    Pathological fracture or stress fractureStress fractureM84.3
    Pathological fractureM84.4
    Malabsorption or inflammatory bowel diseaseCrohn's disease [regional enteritis]K50
    Ulcerative colitisK51
    Celiac disease, tropical sprue, blind loop syndrome, pancreatic steatorrhea, other malabsorption due to intoleranceK90.0-K90.4
    Other intestinal malabsorptionK90.89
    Intestinal malabsorption, unspecifiedK90.9
    Postsurgical malabsorption, not elsewhere classifiedK91.2
    Parathyroid, calcium, or phosphate disorderIdiopathic hypoparathyroidismE20.0
    Hypoparathyroidism, unspecifiedE20.9
    Secondary hyperparathyroidismE21.0-E21.5
    HypocalcemiaE83.51
    HypercalcemiaE83.52
    Chronic kidney diseaseChronic kidney disease, stages 3–5; end-stage renal diseaseN18.3-18.5; N18.6
    • ↵* Indicators for vitamin D testing based on Choosing Wisely criteria.1

    • ↵† Patients with a diagnosis of any of these ICD-10 codes were excluded from the subset of patients identified as having nonindicated vitamin D testing in 2015.

    • ICD-10, International classification of diseases, tenth revision.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Vitamin D Test Result Reference Range

    Category25(OH)D (ng/mL)*
    Low0 to 29.9
        Vitamin D deficient0 to 19.9
        Vitamin D insufficient20 to 29.9
    Normal30 to 99.9
    High>100
    • ↵* Vitamin D test result reference range based on the reference range established by Carilion Clinic and Quest Diagnostics2.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients Who Had Vitamin D Testing in 2015

    CharacteristicPatients Who Had Vitamin D Test with Indication (N = 7468)*Nonindicated Vitamin D Test Subset (N = 574)*
    Age (years)
        Means (range)65.7 ± 13.5 (19.8 to 101.3)56.9 ± 11.1† (19.9 to 95.3)
        18 to 29.955 (0.7%)20 (3.5%)
        30 to 39.9244 (3.3%)54 (9.4%)
        40 to 49.9658 (8.8%)104 (18.1%)‡
        50 to 59.91388 (18.6%)165 (28.7%)‡
        60 to 69.92154 (28.8%)126 (22.0%)§
        70 to 79.91884 (25.2%)68 (11.8%)‡
        80 to 89.9949 (12.7%)31 (5.4%)§
        90 to 99.9135 (1.8%)6 (1.0%)
        >1001 (0.1%)0 (0.0%)
    Sex
        Male1779 (23.8%)227 (39.5%)‡
        Female5689 (76.2%)347 (60.5%)‡
    Race/ethnicity
        White6792 (90.9%)526 (91.6%)
        Black522 (7.0%)35 (6.1%)
        Asian53 (0.7%)3 (0.5%)
        Hispanic22 (0.3%)2 (0.3%)
        Other79 (1.1%)8 (1.4%)
    BMI (kg/m2)
        Overall mean (range)30.1 ± 7.5‖ (9.9 to 74.4)30.7 ± 9.0¶ (17.2 to 56.8)
        <18.573 (1.9%)1 (0.3%)
        18.5 to 24.9899 (23.0%)70 (22.4%)
        25.0 to 29.91252 (32.1%)99 (31.7%)
        30.0 to 34.9873 (22.4%)71 (22.8%)
        35.0 to 39.9418 (10.7%)44 (14.8)
        >40.0388 (9.9%)27 (8.7)
    Insurer
        Medicare3564 (47.7%)98 (17.1%)†
        Medicaid108 (1.4%)12 (2.1%)
        Commercial2092 (28.0%)240 (41.8%)‡
        Self-pay1675 (22.4%)220 (38.3%)†
        Other29 (0.38%)4 (0.70%)
    Top 5 diagnoses associated with vitamin D test
    Vitamin D deficiency: 4202 (56.3%)
    Osteoporosis/osteopenia: 2276 (30.5%)
    Chronic kidney disease: 336 (4.5%)
    Malabsorption: 300 (4.0%)
    Fracture: 24 (0.3%)
    Fatigue: 274 (48%)
    Wellness exam/screening: 113 (20%)
    Pain: 90 (16%)
    Rheumatological condition: 28 (5%)
    Depression: 25 (4%)
    • ↵* Values are n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

    • ↵† P < .001.

    • ↵‡ P < .01.

    • ↵§ P < .05

    • ↵‖ n = 3904.

    • ↵¶ n = 312.

    • BMI, body mass index.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Results of Initial Vitamin D Tests in Primary Care Patients in 2015

    ResultPatients Who Had Vitamin D Test with Indication (N = 7468), n (% of Indicated Tests)Nonindicated Vitamin D Test Subset (N = 574), n (% of Nonindicated Tests)
    Vitamin D deficient (0 to 19.9 ng/mL)469 (6.3%)49 (8.6%)
    Vitamin D insufficient (20 to 29.9 ng/mL)1302 (17.5%)171 (30.0%)*
    Normal vitamin D (30 to 99.9 ng/mL)5658 (75.7%)352 (61.3%)*
    High vitamin D (>100 ng/mL)39 (0.5%)2 (0.5%)
    • ↵* P < .01.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Vitamin D Prescriptions Provided to the Subset of Patients Who Had Nonindicated Index Vitamin D Tests in 2015

    FormDoseFrequencyDurationnPrescription Category
    Ergocalciferol/vitamin D2 (n = 73)50,000 IUWeekly4 weeks2High-dose vitamin D2
    50,000 IUWeekly8 weeks35
    50,000 IUWeekly12 weeks20
    50,000 IUWeekly16 weeks9
    50,000 IUWeekly20 weeks4
    50,000 IUWeekly24 weeks2
    50,000 IUWeekly48 weeks1
    Cholecalciferol/vitamin D3 (n = 39)50,000 IUDaily2 months1High-dose vitamin D3
    50,000 IUWeekly12 weeks1
    10,000 IUDaily4 months1
    5,000 IUDaily3 months5
    5,000 IUDaily2 months1
    4,000 IUDaily3 months1
    2,000 IUDaily10 months1Moderate-dose vitamin D3
    2,000 IUDaily6 months3
    2,000 IUDaily4 months3
    2,000 IUDaily3 months4
    2,000 IUDaily2 months3
    2,000 IUDaily1 month1
    1,000 IUDaily12 months1
    1,000 IUDaily8 months1
    1,000 IUDaily6 months4
    1,000 IUDaily4 months2
    1,000 IUDaily3 months1
    400 IUDaily6 months1Low-dose vitamin D3
    400 IUDaily3 months2
    600 mg calcium + 400 IUDaily3 months2
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 33 (4)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 33, Issue 4
July-August 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patterns of Clinical Care Subsequent to Nonindicated Vitamin D Testing in Primary Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Patterns of Clinical Care Subsequent to Nonindicated Vitamin D Testing in Primary Care
Michelle S. Rockwell, YingXing Wu, Mariana Salamoun, Matthew W. Hulver, John W. Epling
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2020, 33 (4) 569-579; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.04.200007

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Patterns of Clinical Care Subsequent to Nonindicated Vitamin D Testing in Primary Care
Michelle S. Rockwell, YingXing Wu, Mariana Salamoun, Matthew W. Hulver, John W. Epling
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2020, 33 (4) 569-579; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.04.200007
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Reduire les dosages systematiques inutiles de la vitamine D
  • Reduce unnecessary routine vitamin D testing
  • Health, financial and environmental impacts of unnecessary vitamin D testing: a triple bottom line assessment adapted for healthcare
  • Do not routinely test for vitamin D
  • Retrieving Family Medicine's Lost Literature: The Journal of Family Practice 1974-1999 Archive
  • Medications, Medicating, and Medicated--When, Where, and How--Opioids and Others
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Electronic Health Record
  • Low Value Care
  • Overuse
  • Primary Health Care
  • Quality Improvement
  • Uncertainty
  • 25-hydroxyvitamin D

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire