Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Impact of a Rapid Point of Care Test for Influenza on Guideline Consistent Care and Antibiotic Use

Ariella Perry Dale, Mark Ebell, Brian McKay, Andreas Handel, Ronald Forehand and Kevin Dobbin
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2019, 32 (2) 226-233; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2019.02.180183
Ariella Perry Dale
From Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Georgia, Athens (APD, ME, BM, AH, KD); Center for Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens (AH); University Health Center, University of Georgia, Athens (RF).
PhD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Ebell
From Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Georgia, Athens (APD, ME, BM, AH, KD); Center for Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens (AH); University Health Center, University of Georgia, Athens (RF).
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian McKay
From Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Georgia, Athens (APD, ME, BM, AH, KD); Center for Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens (AH); University Health Center, University of Georgia, Athens (RF).
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Handel
From Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Georgia, Athens (APD, ME, BM, AH, KD); Center for Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens (AH); University Health Center, University of Georgia, Athens (RF).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald Forehand
From Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Georgia, Athens (APD, ME, BM, AH, KD); Center for Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens (AH); University Health Center, University of Georgia, Athens (RF).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin Dobbin
From Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Georgia, Athens (APD, ME, BM, AH, KD); Center for Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens (AH); University Health Center, University of Georgia, Athens (RF).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Pragmatic trial diagram of recruitment of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) guided and usual care patients across 3 clinics. EHR, electronic health record.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Guide for Determining Guideline Consistency of Treatment

    DiagnosisGuideline Treatment
    OseltamivirAntibiotics
    Influenza positive (PCR confirmed or final clinical diagnosis)Consistent (<48 hours onset)Inconsistent
    No influenza, but high risk for pneumonia or other bacterial infection diagnosisInconsistentConsistent
    No influenza, low risk for pneumonia and no bacterial infection diagnosisInconsistentInconsistent
    • PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Signs, Symptoms, and Clinic Assignments for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Guided Care and Usual Care

    CharacteristicPCR Guided Care (n = 264)Usual Care (n = 771)P value PCR Vs Usual Care
    NFrequency (%)NFrequency (%)
    Cough264100.0771100.0
    Sore throat25395.872694.2.30
    Nasal discharge24392.167086.9.03
    Headache23488.662080.4<.01
    Chills22986.755672.1<.01
    Fever19272.742855.5<.01
    Congestion19272.753469.3.29
    Myalgia17967.839951.8<.01
    Pharynx erythema15458.337148.1<.01
    Nausea5520.812115.7.06
    Enlarged tonsils2911.08110.5.83
    Vomit2710.2607.8.22
    Unclear lungs2710.2536.9.08
    Diarrhea238.79612.5.10
    Pharynx exudate124.6253.2.33
    Tonsillar exudate72.7354.5.18
    Rales51.9293.8.14
    Lung distress00.030.4.31
    Clinic 17528.423830.9<.01
    Clinic 213450.827035.0
    Clinic 35520.826334.1
    Duration ≤ 2 days13149.629638.4<.01
    >2 days13350.447561.6
    Day of visit Friday5922.420518.7.20
    Day of visit other weekday20577.662781.3
    • Bold text indicates statistically significant values.

    • PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Final Adjusted Model* for the Association between polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Guided Care and Guideline Consistent Care

    Sign/SymptomEstimate (β coefficient)aOR (95% CI)
    PCR guided care0.221.24 (0.83–1.88)
    Tonsillar exudate−1.760.17 (0.07–0.39)
    Clinic 2−0.280.76 (0.48–1.18)
    Clinic 30.581.79 (1.09–2.93)
    Myalgia0.852.35 (1.61–3.42)
    Pharynx erythema−0.600.55 (0.37–0.82)
    Pharynx exudate−1.250.29 (0.13–0.63)
    Rales−0.980.38 (0.17–0.81)
    Enlarged tonsils−0.800.45 (0.26–0.78)
    Duration of symptoms (≤2 days Vs >2 days)0.551.74 (1.17–2.57)
    Unclear lungs−0.780.46 (0.26–0.82)
    Intercept1.49———————
    • ↵* H-L χ2 statistic, 10.9; P = .21; AUROCC, 0.77.

    • aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidential interval; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Final Adjusted Model*† for the Likelihood of Antiviral Prescription

    Sign/SymptomEstimate (β coefficient)aOR (95% CI)
    PCR guided care†0.461.57 (1.09–2.28)
    Myalgia1.303.65 (2.35–5.68)
    Duration of symptoms (≤2 days Vs >2 days)1.775.89 (4.18–8.28)
    Fever0.932.52 (1.57–4.05)
    Tonsillar exudate−1.670.19 (0.05–0.77)
    Unclear lungs1.052.86 (1.58–5.17)
    Clinic 20.131.13 (0.75–1.72)
    Clinic 30.742.09 (1.34–3.25)
    Nasal discharge0.802.24 (1.19–4.19)
    Chills0.872.38 (1.25–4.53)
    Enlarged tonsils−0.710.49 (0.25–0.95)
    Intercept−5.13————
    • ↵* Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 statistic, 3.16; df = 10; P = .92; AUROCC, 0.86.

    • ↵† Unadjusted OR, 2.10 (1.57–2.82).

    • aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidential interval; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Final Adjusted Model*† for the Likelihood of Antibiotic Prescription

    Sign/SymptomEstimate (β coefficient)aOR (95% CI)
    PCR guided care†−0.310.61 (0.40–0.94)
    Tonsil exudate1.635.10 (2.14–12.1)
    Pharynx erythema0.962.60 (1.73–3.93)
    Pharynx exudate1.785.94 (2.56–13.8)
    Duration of symptoms (≤2 days vs >2 days)−0.730.48 (0.33–0.71)
    Sore throat0.601.83 (0.63–5.26)
    Enlarged tonsils0.892.43 (1.42–4.16)
    Unclear lungs0.792.21 (1.26–3.88)
    Nasal discharge−0.650.52 (0.31–0.87)
    Clinic 20.091.10 (0.70–1.73)
    Clinic 3−0.440.64 (0.39–0.05)
    Intercept−1.99————
    • ↵* Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 statistic, 6.32; df = 8; P = .61; AUROCC, 0.79.

    • ↵† Unadjusted OR, 0.71 (0.48–1.04).

    • aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidential interval; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

    • View popup
    Table 6.

    Final Adjusted Model* for the Likelihood of Return Visit

    Sign/SymptomEstimate (β coefficient)aOR (95% CI)
    PCR guided care−1.660.19 (0.04–0.81)
    Day of visit (Friday Vs other weekdays)1.042.83 (1.29–6.19)
    Pharynx erythema0.972.65 (1.15–6.10)
    Intercept−4.22————
    • ↵* Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 statistic, 2.56; P = .63; AUROCC, 0.70.

    • aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidential interval; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

    • View popup
    Table 7.

    Final Adjusted Model*† for the Likelihood of Guideline Consistent Antiviral Prescription

    Sign/SymptomEstimate (β coefficient)aOR (95% CI)
    PCR guided care0.531.71 (1.18–2.46)
    Duration of symptoms (≤2 days vs >2 days)1.765.82 (4.14–8.19)
    Myalgia1.293.62 (2.32–5.63)
    Fever0.882.41 (1.50–3.89)
    Enlarged tonsils−1.040.35 (0.20–0.64)
    Clinic 20.121.13 (0.75–1.71)
    Clinic 30.772.15 (1.39–3.35)
    Unclear lungs0.822.28 (1.27–4.08)
    Nasal discharge0.792.20 (1.18–4.10)
    Chills0.802.20 (1.17–4.24)
    Intercept−5.10—————-
    • ↵* Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 statistic, 5.67; P = .68; AUROCC, 0.86.

    • aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidential interval; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 32 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 32, Issue 2
March-April 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of a Rapid Point of Care Test for Influenza on Guideline Consistent Care and Antibiotic Use
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Impact of a Rapid Point of Care Test for Influenza on Guideline Consistent Care and Antibiotic Use
Ariella Perry Dale, Mark Ebell, Brian McKay, Andreas Handel, Ronald Forehand, Kevin Dobbin
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2019, 32 (2) 226-233; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.02.180183

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Impact of a Rapid Point of Care Test for Influenza on Guideline Consistent Care and Antibiotic Use
Ariella Perry Dale, Mark Ebell, Brian McKay, Andreas Handel, Ronald Forehand, Kevin Dobbin
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2019, 32 (2) 226-233; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.02.180183
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Accuracy of individual signs and symptoms and case definitions for the diagnosis of influenza in different age groups: a systematic review with meta-analysis
  • Use of Patient-Reported Symptom Data in Clinical Decision Rules for Predicting Influenza in a Telemedicine Setting
  • Re: Impact of a Rapid Point of Care Test for Influenza on Guideline Consistent Care and Antibiotic Use
  • Response: Re: Impact of a Rapid Point of Care Test for Influenza on Guideline Consistent Care and Antibiotic Use
  • Multiple Research Methodologies Can Advance the Science of Family Medicine
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Antibiotics
  • Antiviral Agents
  • Diagnostic Tests
  • Influenza
  • Point of Care Testing
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire