Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Physician Opinions about American Board of Family Medicine Self-Assessment Modules (2006–2016)

Mingliang Dai, Michael Hagen, Aimee R. Eden and Lars E. Peterson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2019, 32 (1) 79-88; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2019.01.170472
Mingliang Dai
From the American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (MD, MH, ARE, LEP); Department of Family Community Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington (MH, LEP).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Hagen
From the American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (MD, MH, ARE, LEP); Department of Family Community Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington (MH, LEP).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aimee R. Eden
From the American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (MD, MH, ARE, LEP); Department of Family Community Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington (MH, LEP).
PhD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars E. Peterson
From the American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (MD, MH, ARE, LEP); Department of Family Community Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington (MH, LEP).
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Overall ratings of American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Self-Assessment Module (SAM) Knowledge Assessment (KA) content appropriateness by increasing numbers of modules completed and by age at first module completion.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2.

    Overall ratings of American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Self-Assessment Module (SAM) Clinical Simulation (CS) content appropriateness by increasing numbers of modules completed and by age at first module completion.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Response Rates to American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Self-Assessment Module (SAM) Feedback Surveys 2006 to 2016

    20062007200820092010201120122013201420152016*Overall by SAM
    Overall by year89%91%93%79%74%64%56%67%68%74%73%71%
    Diabetes91%92%94%79%73%65%59%68%70%71%76%73%
    Hypertension90%91%93%79%74%64%60%67%70%74%77%73%
    Asthma90%93%94%81%74%67%64%72%71%77%74%77%
    Coronary artery disease89%90%92%80%74%67%59%67%68%72%70%73%
    Depression88%91%93%78%72%64%57%67%64%71%68%73%
    Heart failure87%90%91%78%74%66%58%64%67%74%71%72%
    Pain management92%92%78%75%64%55%67%71%76%75%72%
    Well child care92%91%80%74%65%56%63%66%75%73%71%
    Health behavior93%77%74%63%56%63%64%72%68%70%
    Maternity care93%80%77%67%58%62%64%72%71%71%
    Care of vulnerable elders78%74%64%56%67%71%76%72%69%
    Childhood illness79%76%64%56%62%65%72%72%68%
    Cerebrovascular disease76%63%55%69%67%73%71%66%
    Preventive care56%49%69%67%74%74%59%
    Hospital medicine57%67%71%76%74%71%
    Mental health52%65%65%73%65%63%
    • Data from 2006 to 2012 reported by Brooks et al18.

    • ↵* Data from January 2016 to July 2016.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Ratings of Content Appropriateness of American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Self-Assessment Module (SAM) Knowledge Assessment (KA) from 2006 to 2016

    Module NameContent Is Appropriate for My Practice, Mean (95% CI)
    20062007200820092010201120122013201420152016*
    Diabetes5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.0)
    Hypertension5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.2–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)
    Asthma5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.1)
    Coronary artery disease4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.8–4.8)4.8 (4.8–4.8)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.7–4.8)4.7 (4.7–4.8)4.6 (4.6–4.7)4.7 (4.6–4.7)
    Depression5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–4.9)5.0 (4.9–5.0)
    Heart failure5.1 (5.0–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)4.9 (4.9–5.0)
    Pain management†5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.2 (5.2–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.2–5.3)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.2–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.0–5.1)
    Well child care†4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.9 (4.8–5.0)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.3 (5.2–5.3)5.2 (5.2–5.2)5.2 (5.2–5.3)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.2)
    Health behavior†5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.0–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.0–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (4.9–5.1)
    Maternity care†4.8 (4.8–4.9)5.0 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.7 (4.6–4.8)4.8 (4.7–4.9)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.1)
    Care of vulnerable elders5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)
    Childhood illness4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.9 (4.8–4.9)4.9 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.9 (4.8–4.9)
    Cerebrovascular disease4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–4.9)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–4.9)4.9 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.7 (4.6–4.8)
    Preventive care5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)
    Hospital medicine4.9 (4.8–5.1)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.7 (4.7–4.8)4.8 (4.7–4.8)
    Mental health4.9 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.7–4.9)4.8 (4.7–4.9)4.7 (4.6–4.8)4.8 (4.7–4.9)
    • The ratings are on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree) with 95% confidential interval (CI) in parentheses.

    • ↵* Data from January 2016 to July 2016.

    • ↵† The ratings of these 4 SAMs were rescaled from 1 to 4 to 1 to 6.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Ratings of Content Appropriateness of American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Self-Assessment Module (SAM) Knowledge Assessment (KA) from 2006 to 2016

    Module nameContent Was Presented at an Appropriate Level, Mean (95% CI)
    20062007200820092010201120122013201420152016*
    Diabetes5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)
    Hypertension5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)
    Asthma5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)
    Coronary artery disease4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–4.9)4.9 (4.9–4.9)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–4.9)4.9 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.7–4.8)4.8 (4.7–4.8)
    Depression5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–4.9)4.9 (4.9–5.0)
    Heart failure5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.0 (5.0–5.1)4.9 (4.9–5.0)
    Pain management†5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.2–5.2)5.2 (5.2–5.2)5.2 (5.2–5.3)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.2–5.3)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.0–5.1)
    Well child care†4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.8–4.9)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.2–5.3)5.3 (5.2–5.3)5.2 (5.2–5.3)5.2 (5.2–5.3)5.2 (5.2–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.3)
    Health behavior†5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.2–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.2–5.3)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.0)
    Maternity care†5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.3)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.2)
    Care of vulnerable elders5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)
    Childhood illness5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)
    Cerebrovascular disease5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.8 (4.7–4.9)
    Preventive care5.1 (5.1–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)
    Hospital medicine4.9 (4.8–5.1)5.0 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.7–4.8)4.8 (4.7–4.9)
    Mental health4.9 (4.8–5.0)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.7–4.9)4.7 (4.6–4.8)4.8 (4.7–4.9)
    • The ratings are on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree) with 95% confidential interval (CI) in parentheses.

    • ↵* Data from January 2016 to July 2016.

    • ↵† The ratings of these 4 SAMs were rescaled from 1 to 4 to 1 to 6.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Ratings of Content Appropriateness of American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Self-Assessment Module (SAM) Clinical Simulation (CS) from 2006 to 2016

    Module NameContent Is Appropriate for My Practice, Mean (95% CI)
    20062007200820092010201120122013201420152016*
    Diabetes5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)
    Hypertension5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.0)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)
    Asthma5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.8 (4.8–4.9)
    Coronary artery disease4.8 (4.7–4.8)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.9 (4.9–4.9)4.9 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–4.9)4.9 (4.8–4.9)
    Depression5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.9 (4.8–5.0)
    Heart failure5.0 (4.9–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–5.0)
    Pain management†4.9 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–5.0)
    Well child care†4.7 (4.7–4.8)4.8 (4.7–4.8)4.7 (4.6–4.8)4.9 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.1)
    Health behavior†5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (4.9–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.2)5.0 (4.9–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)4.8 (4.7–4.9)
    Maternity care†4.7 (4.6–4.8)4.6 (4.5–4.7)4.6 (4.5–4.7)4.6 (4.5–4.7)4.5 (4.4–4.6)4.5 (4.4–4.6)4.6 (4.5–4.7)4.7 (4.6–4.7)4.6 (4.5–4.8)
    Care of vulnerable elders4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.9 (4.8–4.9)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.7–4.9)
    Childhood illness4.7 (4.6–4.7)4.7 (4.6–4.7)4.7 (4.6–4.7)4.7 (4.6–4.8)4.8 (4.7–4.8)4.7 (4.7–4.8)4.7 (4.7–4.8)4.7 (4.6–4.8)
    Cerebrovascular disease4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–4.9)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.7–4.9)4.8 (4.7–4.9)
    Preventive care5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–5.0)
    Hospital medicine5.1 (4.9–5.2)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.8 (4.7–4.8)4.7 (4.7–4.8)
    Mental health4.9 (4.8–5.0)4.8 (4.7–4.9)4.8 (4.7–4.9)4.7 (4.6–4.8)4.8 (4.6–4.9)
    • The ratings are on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree) with 95% confidential interval (CI) in parentheses.

    • ↵* Data from January 2016 to July 2016.

    • ↵† The ratings of these 4 SAMs were rescaled from 1 to 4 to 1 to 6.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Ratings of Content Appropriateness of American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Self-Assessment Module (SAM) Clinical Simulation (CS) from 2006 to 2016

    Module NameContent Was Presented at an Appropriate Level, Mean (95% CI)
    20062007200820092010201120122013201420152016*
    Diabetes5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–5.0)
    Hypertension4.9 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)
    Asthma5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–4.9)
    Coronary artery disease4.8 (4.7–4.8)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–5.0)
    Depression4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.8–4.9)
    Heart failure5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (4.9–5.1)4.9 (4.9–5.0)
    Pain management†4.9 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (4.9–5.0)4.8 (4.8–4.9)
    Well child care†4.6 (4.6–4.7)4.7 (4.6–4.7)4.6 (4.5–4.7)4.7 (4.6–4.7)4.8 (4.7–4.8)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–5.0)4.9 (4.8–4.9)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.0–5.1)
    Health behavior†5.1 (5.0–5.2)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.2 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.1 (5.0–5.2)5.1 (5.1–5.2)5.0 (4.9–5.1)
    Maternity care†4.7 (4.6–4.8)4.5 (4.5–4.6)4.5 (4.4–4.6)4.5 (4.4–4.6)4.6 (4.5–4.7)4.6 (4.5–4.7)4.6 (4.6–4.7)4.6 (4.5–4.7)4.6 (4.5–4.7)
    Care of vulnerable elders4.8 (4.7–4.8)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.9 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.7–4.8)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.7–4.9)
    Childhood illness4.5 (4.4–4.5)4.5 (4.5–4.6)4.5 (4.5–4.6)4.5 (4.5–4.6)4.6 (4.6–4.7)4.6 (4.5–4.7)4.6 (4.6–4.7)4.6 (4.5–4.7)
    Cerebrovascular disease5.0 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.0 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–5.0)4.9 (4.8–4.9)4.8 (4.7–4.9)
    Preventive care5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (4.9–5.0)5.1 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (5.0–5.1)5.0 (4.9–5.0)4.9 (4.8–5.0)
    Hospital medicine4.8 (4.7–5.0)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.9 (4.8–4.9)4.7 (4.7–4.8)4.7 (4.6–4.8)
    Mental health4.9 (4.8–5.0)4.9 (4.8–5.0)4.8 (4.8–4.9)4.7 (4.6–4.8)4.8 (4.7–4.9)
    • The ratings are on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree) with 95% confidential interval (CI) in parentheses.

    • ↵* Data from January 2016 to July 2016.

    • ↵† The ratings of these 4 SAMs were rescaled from 1 to 4 to 1 to 6.

    • View popup
    Appendix 1.

    Numbers of American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Self-Assessment Modules (SAM) completed from 2006 to 2016

    20062007200820092010201120122013201420152016*
    Diabetes38444117558267301061510159122786132714081213574
    Hypertension4361398751847011952510370116876139626778223251
    Asthma51723686428056247204763274144384496851302354
    Coronary artery disease39883555389144235991629478654120422645022001
    Depression39773131317943675207559659822994304336581716
    Heart failure22522080193029643641415853673403327133571432
    Pain management2584272443404679526265653506384943712074
    Well child care347933816804068461268513491387638251722
    Health behavior227043074196294131831913246429741152
    Maternity care172622352382195423061474208826261378
    Care of vulnerable elders42726713547056592940363546612253
    Childhood illness48095763541861063370369240461943
    Cerebrovascular disease4353561166943126292435281587
    Preventive care13708187156721583562622645
    Hospital medicine9073432338033401651
    Mental health2714177219611807962
    • Data from 2006 to 2012 reported by Brooks et al18.

    • ↵* Data from January 2016 to July 2016.

    • View popup
    Appendix 2.

    Demographic Differences between Self-Assessment Module (SAM) Feedback Survey Respondents and Non-Respondents in 2015

    SAM TopicFemale, %Doctor of Medicine Versus Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine, %International Medical Graduates, %Age (y), Mean
    RespondentsNonrespondentsRespondentsNonrespondentsRespondentsNonrespondentsRespondentsNonrespondents
    Diabetes424488882924*45.945.4
    Hypertension4043*8987*3025*46.445.0*
    Asthma4247*88893225*45.243.6*
    Coronary artery disease3439*8990292747.545.4*
    Depression47508888232246.444.2*
    Heart failure3745*89883127*46.643.6*
    Pain management41419088222347.845.6*
    Well child care57568585242242.141.1*
    Health behavior50499089191946.548.5*
    Maternity care61608485252538.937.6*
    Care of vulnerable elders4752*8988262347.745.3*
    Childhood illness48498787202145.043.4*
    Cerebrovascular disease3542*9090282648.646.2*
    Preventive care51508986*2622*45.144.5
    Hospital medicine404388873329*42.440.2*
    Mental health51518985*1926*46.343.2*
    • ↵* P < .05.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family   Medicine: 32 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 32, Issue 1
January-February 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physician Opinions about American Board of Family Medicine Self-Assessment Modules (2006–2016)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Physician Opinions about American Board of Family Medicine Self-Assessment Modules (2006–2016)
Mingliang Dai, Michael Hagen, Aimee R. Eden, Lars E. Peterson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2019, 32 (1) 79-88; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.01.170472

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Physician Opinions about American Board of Family Medicine Self-Assessment Modules (2006–2016)
Mingliang Dai, Michael Hagen, Aimee R. Eden, Lars E. Peterson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2019, 32 (1) 79-88; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.01.170472
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Appendix
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Conversations, Communication and Counseling Are Key Family Medicine Tactics to Improve Patient Health
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Certification
  • Family Physicians
  • Self-Assessment
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire