Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

The Full Scope of Family Physicians’ Work Is Not Reflected by Current Procedural Terminology Codes

Richard A. Young, Sandy Burge, Kaparaboyna Ashok Kumar and Jocelyn Wilson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2017, 30 (6) 724-732; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2017.06.170155
Richard A. Young
From the Department of Family Medicine, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, TX (RAY); Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (SB, KAK); Baylor Family Medicine Residency, Garland, TX (JW).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sandy Burge
From the Department of Family Medicine, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, TX (RAY); Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (SB, KAK); Baylor Family Medicine Residency, Garland, TX (JW).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kaparaboyna Ashok Kumar
From the Department of Family Medicine, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, TX (RAY); Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (SB, KAK); Baylor Family Medicine Residency, Garland, TX (JW).
MD, FRCS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jocelyn Wilson
From the Department of Family Medicine, JPS Health Network, Fort Worth, TX (RAY); Department of Family Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX (SB, KAK); Baylor Family Medicine Residency, Garland, TX (JW).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Katerndahl D,
    2. Parchman M,
    3. Wood R
    . Perceived complexity of care, perceived autonomy, and career satisfaction among primary care physicians. J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22:24–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Katerndahl D,
    2. Parchman M,
    3. Wood R
    . Trends in the perceived complexity of primary health care: A secondary analysis. J Eval Clin Pract 2010;16:1002–1008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Grant RW,
    2. Ashburner JM,
    3. Hong CS,
    4. et al
    . Defining patient complexity from the primary care physician’s perspective: A cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:797–804.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Nardi R,
    2. Scanelli G,
    3. Corrao S,
    4. Iori I,
    5. Mathieu G,
    6. Cataldi Amatrian R
    . Co-morbidity does not reflect complexity in internal medicine patients. Eur J Intern Med 2007;18:359–368.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Peek CJ,
    2. Baird MA
    . Point-of-care complexity assessment helps primary care clinicians identify barriers to improved health and craft integrated care plans. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2009.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Safford MM,
    2. Allison JJ,
    3. Kiefe CI
    . Patient complexity: More than comorbidity. The vector model of complexity. J Gen Intern Medic 2007;22(Suppl 3):382–390.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    1. Schaink AK,
    2. Kuluski K,
    3. Lyons RF,
    4. et al
    . A scoping review and thematic classification of patient complexity: Offering a unifying framework. J Comorbidity 2012;2:1–9.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Shippee ND,
    2. Shah ND,
    3. May CR,
    4. Mair FS,
    5. Montori VM
    . Cumulative complexity: A functional, patient-centered model of patient complexity can improve research and practice. J Clin Epidemiol 2012;65:1041–1051.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Smucker DR,
    2. Zink T,
    3. Susman JL,
    4. Crabtree BF
    . A framework for understanding visits by frequent attenders in family practice. J Fam Pract 2001;50:847–852.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    American Medical Association. CPT 2014 Standard Edition (Current Procedural Terminology). Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2014.
  11. 11.↵
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 1997 Documentation Guidelines for Evaluation and Management Services. Available from: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/MLNProducts/Downloads/MASTER1.pdf.
  12. 12.↵
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Evaluation and Management Services Guide. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/eval-mgmt-serv-guide-ICN006764.pdf. Accessed April 26, 2016.
  13. 13.↵
    State of Vermont Department of Banking I, Securities, and Health Care Administration. 2009 Provider reimbursement report: Primary care services. Available from: http://www.leg.state.vt.us/reports/2010ExternalReports/251708.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2016.
  14. 14.↵
    1. Stange KC,
    2. Zyzanski SJ,
    3. Jaén CR,
    4. et al
    . Illuminating the ‘black box’. A description of 4454 patient visits to 138 family physicians. J Fam Pract 1998;46:377–389.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Beasley JW,
    2. Hankey TH,
    3. Erickson R,
    4. et al
    . How many problems do family physicians manage at each encounter? A WReN study. Ann Fam Med 2004;2:405–410.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Flocke SA,
    2. Frank SH,
    3. Wenger DA
    . Addressing multiple problems in the family practice office visit. J Fam Pract 2001;50:211–216.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Tai-Seale M,
    2. McGuire TG,
    3. Zhang W
    . Time allocation in primary care office visits. Health Serv Res 2007;42:1871–1894.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kaplan KC
    . Physician compensation fair market value: The perils of “compensation per work RVU” benchmarks. Healthcare Financial Management Association. Available from: http://www.veralon.com/articles/physician-compensation-fair-market-value-the-perils/. Accessed Oct 9, 2017.
  19. 19.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Questionnaires, datasets, and related documentation. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/ahcd/ahcd_questionnaires.htm. Accessed Feb 25, 2016.
  20. 20.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. New ambulatory care drug database system. Available from: http://www2.cdc.gov/drugs/applicationnav1.asp. Accessed Feb 25, 2016.
  21. 21.↵
    MLN Matters. Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Prolonged Services (Codes 99354–99359). Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNMattersArticles/downloads/mm5972.pdf. Accessed April 5, 2017.
  22. 22.↵
    1. Katerndahl D,
    2. Wood R,
    3. Jaén CR
    . Family medicine outpatient encounters are more complex than those of cardiology and psychiatry. J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24:6–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    National Government Services. NGS Focused Audit Review for CPT 99215, April-June 2015. Available from: https://www.ngsmedicare.com/ngs/portal/ngsmedicare/newngs/home-lob/pages/complianceandaudits/medical-review/medical-review-focus-areas/medical-review-focus-areas-detail/. Accessed March 23, 2016.
  24. 24.↵
    1. Edsall RL,
    2. Moore KJ
    . Thinking on paper: Documenting decision making. Fam Pract Manag 2010;17:10–15.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Leigh JP,
    2. Tancredi D,
    3. Jerant A,
    4. Kravitz RL
    . Annual work hours across physician specialties. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:1211–1213.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Medical Group Management Association. MGMA 2015 Physician Compensation and Production. Available from: http://www.mgma.com/Libraries/Assets/Industry%20Data/Survey%20Reports/MGMA-Physician-Compensation-Executive-Summary-Report.pdf?ext=.pdf. Accessed Oct 9, 2017.
  27. 27.↵
    1. Berenson RA,
    2. Zuckerman S,
    3. Stockley K
    . What if All physician services were paid under the medicare fee schedule? March 2010. Available from: www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/412051_physcian_service.pdf. Accessed Oct 9, 2012.
  28. 28.↵
    1. Baron RJ
    . What’s keeping us so busy in primary care? A snapshot from one practice. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1632–1636.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Chen MA,
    2. Hollenberg JP,
    3. Michelen W,
    4. Peterson JC,
    5. Casalino LP
    . Patient care outside of office visits: A primary care physician time study. J Gen Intern Med 2011;26:58–63.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Gottschalk A,
    2. Flocke SA
    . Time spent in face-to-face patient care and work outside the examination room. Ann Fam Med 2005;3:488–493.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Young RA,
    2. Bayles B,
    3. Hill JH,
    4. Kumar KA
    . Family physicians’ opinions on the primary care documentation, coding, and billing system: A qualitative study from the Residency Research Network of Texas. Fam Med 2014;46:378–384.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Young RA,
    2. Bayles B,
    3. Hill JH,
    4. Kumar KA,
    5. Burge S
    . Family physicians’ suggestions to improve the documentation, coding, and billing system: A study from the Residency Research Network of Texas. Fam Med 2014;46:470–472.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. Holman GT,
    2. Beasley JW,
    3. Karsh BT,
    4. Stone JA,
    5. Smith PD,
    6. Wetterneck TB
    . The myth of standardized workflow in primary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016;23:29–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Linzer M,
    2. Manwell LB,
    3. Williams ES,
    4. et al
    . Working conditions in primary care: Physician reactions and care quality. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:28–36, W26–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Anderson G
    . Chronic conditions: Making the case for ongoing care. Available from: https://www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2010/01/chronic-care.html. Accessed Oct 9, 2017.
  36. 36.↵
    1. Sinsky CA,
    2. Dugdale DC
    . Medicare payment for cognitive vs procedural care: minding the gap. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:1733–1737.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    1. Berenson RA,
    2. Goodson JD
    . Finding value in unexpected places–fixing the medicare physician fee schedule. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1306–1309.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 30 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 30, Issue 6
November-December 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Full Scope of Family Physicians’ Work Is Not Reflected by Current Procedural Terminology Codes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Full Scope of Family Physicians’ Work Is Not Reflected by Current Procedural Terminology Codes
Richard A. Young, Sandy Burge, Kaparaboyna Ashok Kumar, Jocelyn Wilson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2017, 30 (6) 724-732; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.06.170155

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Full Scope of Family Physicians’ Work Is Not Reflected by Current Procedural Terminology Codes
Richard A. Young, Sandy Burge, Kaparaboyna Ashok Kumar, Jocelyn Wilson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2017, 30 (6) 724-732; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.06.170155
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Appendix
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Diagnoses per Encounter by Telephone, Televideo, and In-Office Visits
  • Use of Advance Care Planning Billing Codes in a Tertiary Care Center Setting
  • Multiple Practical Facts and Ideas to Improve Family Medicine Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Ambulatory Care
  • Current Procedural Terminology
  • Family Physicians
  • Health Care Financing
  • Insurance
  • Physician’s Office
  • Practice Management
  • Physicians’ Practice Patterns
  • Primary Health Care

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire