Fertility Treatment, Use of in Vitro Fertilization, and Time to Live Birth Based on Initial Provider Type

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Dahlgren E,
   2. Janson PO,
   3. Johansson S,
   4. Lapidus L,
   5. Oden A

   . Polycystic ovary syndrome and risk for myocardial infarction. Evaluated from a risk factor model based on a prospective population study of women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1992;71:599–604.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Brinton LA,
   2. Westhoff CL,
   3. Scoccia B,
   4. et al

   . Causes of infertility as predictors of subsequent cancer risk. Epidemiology 2005;16:500–7.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Simonsen SE,
   2. Baksh L,
   3. Stanford JB

   . Infertility treatment in a population-based sample: 2004–5. Matern Child Health J 2012;16:877–86.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Vannuccini S,
   2. Clifton VL,
   3. Fraser IS,
   4. et al

   . Infertility and reproductive disorders: impact of hormonal and inflammatory mechanisms on pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod Update 2016;22:104–15.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Chandra A,
   2. Martinez GM,
   3. Mosher WD,
   4. Abma JC,
   5. Jones J

   . Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Stat 23 2005;(25):1–160.
6. 6.↵
   1. Stanford JB

   . What is the true prevalence of infertility? Fertil Steril 2013;99:1201–2.

   OpenUrl
7. 7.↵
   1. Thoma ME,
   2. McLain AC,
   3. Louis JF,
   4. et al

   . Prevalence of infertility in the United States as estimated by the current duration approach and a traditional constructed approach. Fertil Steril 2013;99:1324–31.e1.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National public health action plan for the detection, prevention, and management of infertility. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014.
9. 9.↵
   1. Zegers-Hochschild F,
   2. Adamson GD,
   3. de Mouzon J,
   4. et al

   . International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril 2009;92:1520–4.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    1. Greil AL,
    2. Shreffler KM,
    3. Schmidt L,
    4. McQuillan J

    . Variation in distress among women with infertility: evidence from a population-based sample. Hum Reprod 2011;26:2101–12.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Pook M,
    2. Krause W,
    3. Rohrle B

    . Coping with infertility: distress and changes in sperm quality. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1487–92.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Dunlop AL,
    2. Jack BW,
    3. Bottalico JN,
    4. et al

    . The clinical content of preconception care: women with chronic medical conditions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199(6 Suppl 2):S310–27.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Stanford JB,
    2. Sanders JN,
    3. Simonsen SE,
    4. Hammoud A,
    5. Gibson M,
    6. Smith KR

    . Methods for a retrospective population-based and clinic-based subfertility cohort study: the Fertility Experiences Study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2016;30:397–407.

    OpenUrl
14. 14.↵
    1. DuVall SL,
    2. Fraser AM,
    3. Rowe K,
    4. Thomas A,
    5. Mineau GP

    . Evaluation of record linkage between a large healthcare provider and the Utah Population Database. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19:e54–9.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Thomas FS,
    2. Stanford JB,
    3. Sanders JN,
    4. et al

    . Development and initial validation of a fertility experiences questionnaire. Reprod Health 2015;12:62.

    OpenUrl
16. 16.↵
    1. Chandra A,
    2. Copen CE,
    3. Stephen EH

    . Infertility service use in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 1982–2010. Natl Health Stat Rep 2014;(73):1–21.
17. 17.↵
    1. Davies MJ,
    2. Moore VM,
    3. Willson KJ,
    4. et al

    . Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1803–13.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Schieve LA,
    2. Rasmussen SA,
    3. Buck GM,
    4. Schendel DE,
    5. Reynolds MA,
    6. Wright VC

    . Are children born after assisted reproductive technology at increased risk for adverse health outcomes? Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:1154–63.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada; Okun N,
    2. Sierra S

    . Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2014;36:64–83.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Stanford JB,
    2. Mikolajczyk RT,
    3. Lynch CD,
    4. Simonsen SE

    . Cumulative pregnancy probabilities among couples with subfertility: effects of varying treatments. Fertil Steril 2010;93:2175–81.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Sanders J,
    2. Simonsen S,
    3. Porucznik CA,
    4. Baksh L,
    5. Stanford JB

    . Use of fertility treatments in relation to the duration of pregnancy attempt among women who were trying to become pregnant and experienced a live birth. Matern Child Health J 2014;18:258–67.

    OpenUrl
22. 22.↵
    1. Stanford JB,
    2. Smith KR

    . Marital fertility and income: moderating effects of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints religion in Utah. J Biosoc Sci 2013;45:239–48.

    OpenUrl
23. 23.↵
    1. Wilkes S,
    2. Hall N,
    3. Crosland A,
    4. Murdoch A,
    5. Rubin G

    . General practitioners' perceptions and attitudes to infertility management in primary care: focus group study. J Eval Clin Pract 2007;13:358–63.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Hinton L,
    2. Kurinczuk JJ,
    3. Ziebland S

    . Reassured or fobbed off? Perspectives on infertility consultations in primary care: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract 2012;62:e438–45.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Bazemore A,
    2. Petterson S,
    3. Peterson LE,
    4. Phillips RL

    . More comprehensive care among family physicians is associated with lower costs and fewer hospitalizations. Ann Fam Med 2015;13:206–13.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text