Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Brief ReportPolicy Brief

Less AND More Are Needed to Assess Primary Care

Rebecca S. Etz, Martha M. Gonzalez, E. Marshall Brooks and Kurt C. Stange
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2017, 30 (1) 13-15; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2017.01.160209
Rebecca S. Etz
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (RSE, MMG, EMB); Departments of Family Medicine & Community Health, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, and Sociology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martha M. Gonzalez
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (RSE, MMG, EMB); Departments of Family Medicine & Community Health, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, and Sociology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS).
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Marshall Brooks
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (RSE, MMG, EMB); Departments of Family Medicine & Community Health, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, and Sociology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kurt C. Stange
From the Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA (RSE, MMG, EMB); Departments of Family Medicine & Community Health, Epidemiology & Biostatistics, and Sociology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (KCS).
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Clinician Responses (n = 3,524) Coded Using a Combination of 1) Measures-based Coding and 2) Emergent Coding

    Measure-based codes used (n = 27) informed by measures used and located with the following entities: National Committee for Quality Assurance, Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set, National Quality Forum, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    Code GroupCodes in code groupPercent responses to which group code applied*
    Measure-basedChronic disease; control of disease; counseling; evidence-based medicine, guidelines, benchmarks; prevention, immunization, vaccination; risk stratification; access; continuity; documentation or recording; follow up; medication management; patient received something; patient satisfaction; patient understands doctor; productivity; referrals, tracking systems; cost and utilization; written care plan; compliance or adherence; specific targets; quality of life; functional status; rates or percentages of population57.7%
    Emergent codes used (n = 65) based on concepts identified through the patterned appearance of key words, phrases, or ideas as determined through iterative data reading and discussion by three co-authors (RSE, MMG, EMB)
        Patient-focusedAsk the patient; family; patient real understanding; patient as partner or team member; patient experience and perspective; patient feels known; patient goals or values; patient involved in decisions of care; patient needs are met; patient outreach; personalized or tailored care7.5%
        Patient-centeredEngagement; patient centered; patient education; patient grade of practice; patient responsibility18.8%
        Tenets of primary careComprehensiveness; coordination, including transitions; equity and social justice; longitudinal; problem recognition; relationship or trust; wholism or whole person12.5%
        Employee focusCollaborative; employee satisfaction, joy, retention, turnover; interprofessional or multidisciplinary; staff; team talk; top of license/skill set; training, continuing education12.0%
        Work processesEfficiency; electronic medical record; information management; learning organization; self assess, adapts, changes; quality improvement; timeliness13.6%
        Practice qualitiesCommunication; integration; promotion of health or wellness; qualities a practice should have; health information technology; transparency10.8%
        Outside clinic wallsCommunity connections, practice networks; more, less, limit, too much, too little of something; payment; social determinants of health4.5%
        CliniciansAdvocates for patients and communities; understands the patient; competent and up to date; empathy, caring, compassion, respect; complexity and ambiguity, listens to or talks to patient; qualities a clinician should have; setting priorities13.5%
        Care focusAppropriate; behavioral health, substance use; care agnostic to constraints; right care, right time, right place; targeted condition or type of care; weight, food, nutrition, physical activity11.2%
        Patient talkCare management; litmus test; missing measures; social history and habits (not smoking); symptom reduction; weighing of risks and benefits2.6%
    • ↵* Percentages in this column exceed 100% when added. This is because one response could be assigned more than one code.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 30 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 30, Issue 1
January-February 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Less AND More Are Needed to Assess Primary Care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Less AND More Are Needed to Assess Primary Care
Rebecca S. Etz, Martha M. Gonzalez, E. Marshall Brooks, Kurt C. Stange
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2017, 30 (1) 13-15; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.01.160209

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Less AND More Are Needed to Assess Primary Care
Rebecca S. Etz, Martha M. Gonzalez, E. Marshall Brooks, Kurt C. Stange
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2017, 30 (1) 13-15; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2017.01.160209
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • It Matters What Is Measured
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • How the Novel Person-Centered Primary Care Measure Performs in Canada
  • A New Comprehensive Measure of High-Value Aspects of Primary Care
  • Primary Care and Public Health Perspectives on Integration at the Local Level: A Multi-State Study
  • Counterpoint: How Quality Reporting Made Me a Worse Doctor
  • Practice Innovation for Care Integration, Opioid Management, and Quality Measurement in Family Medicine
  • It Matters What Is Measured
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Rural Family Physicians Are More Likely to Collaborate with Multisector Community Organizations
  • Family Medicine Residents Intentions to Provide Gender Affirming Care
  • Only One Quarter of Family Physicians Are Very Satisfied with Their Electronic Health Records Platform
Show more Policy Brief

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Community Health Care
  • Patient-Centered Care
  • Primary Health Care

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire