The Need to Systematically Evaluate Clinical Practice Guidelines

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Genuis SJ

   . The proliferation of clinical practice guidelines: professional development or medicine-by-numbers? J Am Board Fam Pract 2005;18:419–25.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Dobrow MJ,
   2. Goel V,
   3. Lemieux-Charles L,
   4. Black NA

   . The impact of context on evidence utilization: a framework for expert groups developing health policy recommendations. Soc Sci Med 2006;63:1811–24.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Garber AJ,
   2. Abrahamson MJ,
   3. Barzilay JI,
   4. et al

   . Consensus statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology on the comprehensive type 2 diabetes management algorithm - 2016 executive summary. Endocrine Pract 2016;22:84–113.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Redmon B,
   2. Caccamo D,
   3. Flavin P,
   4. et al

   . Diagnosis and management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults. Guideline summary. 16th ed. Revised July 2014. Available from: https://www.icsi.org/guidelines_more/catalog_guidelines_and_more/catalog_guidelines/catalog_endocrine_guidelines/diabetes/. Accessed April 4, 2016.
5. 5.↵
   1. Moyer VA

   ; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2012;157:120–34.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Carter HB,
   2. Albertsen PC,
   3. Barry MJ,
   4. et al

   . Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA guideline. J Urol 2013;190:419–26.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:716–26, W-236.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Lee CH,
   2. Dershaw DD,
   3. Kopans D,
   4. et al

   . Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2010;7:18–27.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
9. 9.
   1. Niederman MS,
   2. Bass JB Jr.,
   3. Campbell GD,
   4. et al

   . Guidelines for the initial management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia: diagnosis, assessment of severity, and initial antimicrobial therapy. American Thoracic Society. Medical Section of the American Lung Association. Am Rev Resp Dis 1993;148:1418–26.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.
    1. Gleason PP,
    2. Kapoor WN,
    3. Stone RA,
    4. et al

    . Medical outcomes and antimicrobial costs with the use of the American Thoracic Society guidelines for outpatients with community-acquired pneumonia. JAMA 1997;278:32–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.
    1. Camm AJ,
    2. Lip GY,
    3. De Caterina R,
    4. et al

    . 2012 Focused update of the ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation–developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Europace 2012;14:1385–413.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
12. 12.
    1. Andrade AA,
    2. Li J,
    3. Radford MJ,
    4. Nilasena DS,
    5. Gage BF

    . Clinical benefit of American College of Chest Physicians versus European Society of Cardiology guidelines for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30:777–82.

    OpenUrl
13. 13.
    1. Alper BS,
    2. Malone-Moses M,
    3. McLellan JS,
    4. Prasad K,
    5. Manheimer E

    . Thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: time for a rethink? BMJ 2015;350:h1075.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
14. 14.
    1. Shekelle PG,
    2. Kravitz RL,
    3. Beart J,
    4. Marger M,
    5. Wang M,
    6. Lee M

    . Are nonspecific practice guidelines potentially harmful? A randomized comparison of the effect of nonspecific versus specific guidelines on physician decision making. Health Serv Res 2000;34:1429–48.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Quanstrum KH,
    2. Hayward RA

    . Lessons from the mammography wars. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1076–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Kahneman D,
    2. Tversky A

    . On the reality of cognitive illusions. Psychol Rev 1996;103:582–91; discussion 592–6.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Guyatt G,
    2. Akl EA,
    3. Hirsh J,
    4. et al

    . The vexing problem of guidelines and conflict of interest: a potential solution. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:738–41.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Immel BK

    . A brief history of the GMPs for pharmaceuticals. Pharm Technol 2001:44–52.
19. 19.↵
    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Developing NICE guidelines: the manual. Published October 2014; updated April 2016. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/article/pmg20/chapter/14-Updating-guidelines. Accessed March 30, 2016.
20. 20.↵
    Institute of Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.
21. 21.↵
    1. Schunemann HJ,
    2. Al-Ansary LA,
    3. Forland F,
    4. et al

    . Guidelines international network: principles for disclosure of interests and management of conflicts in guidelines. Ann Intern Med 2015;163:548–53.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Shaneyfelt TM,
    2. Centor RM

    . Reassessment of clinical practice guidelines: go gently into that good night. JAMA 2009;301:868–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Burda BU,
    2. Norris SL,
    3. Holmer HK,
    4. Ogden LA,
    5. Smith ME

    . Quality varies across clinical practice guidelines for mammography screening in women aged 40–49 years as assessed by AGREE and AMSTAR instruments. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:968–76.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Coyne DW

    . Influence of industry on renal guideline development. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;2:3–7; discussion 13–4.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Berg M,
    2. Horstman K,
    3. Plass S,
    4. Van Heusden M

    . Guidelines, professionals and the production of objectivity: standardisation and the professionalism of insurance medicine. Sociol Health Illn 2000;22:765–91.

    OpenUrl
26. 26.↵
    1. Norris SL,
    2. Burda BU,
    3. Holmer HK,
    4. et al

    . Author's specialty and conflicts of interest contribute to conflicting guidelines for screening mammography. J Clin Epidemiol 2012;65:725–33.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Norris CL,
    2. Holmer HK,
    3. Ogden LA,
    4. Burda BU

    . Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review. PloS One 2011;6:e25153.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    AGREE Next Steps Consortium. Appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation II. AGREE II instrument. May 2009. Available from: http://www.agreetrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/AGREE_II_Users_Manual_and_23-item_Instrument_ENGLISH.pdf. Accessed September 29, 2016.
29. 29.↵
    1. Lenzer J,
    2. Hoffman JR,
    3. Furberg CD,
    4. Ioannidis JP

    ; Guideline Panel Review Working Group. Ensuring the integrity of clinical practice guidelines: a tool for protecting patients. BMJ 2013;347:f5535.

    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Semlitsch T,
    2. Blank WA,
    3. Kopp IB,
    4. Siering U,
    5. Siebenhofer A

    . Evaluating guidelines: a review of key quality criteria. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2015;112:471–8.

    OpenUrl
31. 31.↵
    1. Cosgrove L,
    2. Shaughnessy AF

    . Development of a clinician-friendly guideline assessment tool. Guideline International Network Scientific Programme 2015; 2015; Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
32. 32.↵
    Australian Government, National Health and Medical Research Council (August 10). Procedures and requirements for meeting the 2011 NHMRC standard for clinical practice guidelines. May 2011, version 1.1. Available from: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/cp133_nhmrc_procedures_requirements_guidelines_v1.1_120125.pdf. Accessed March 30, 2016.