Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Article CommentaryCommentary

The Need to Systematically Evaluate Clinical Practice Guidelines

Allen F. Shaughnessy, Lisa Cosgrove and Joel R. Lexchin
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2016, 29 (6) 644-648; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2016.06.160115
Allen F. Shaughnessy
From the Department of Family Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Tufts University Family Medicine Residency at Cambridge Health Alliance, Boston, MA (AFS); the Department of Counseling and School Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston (LC); and the School of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, Canada (JRL).
PharmD, MMedEd
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Cosgrove
From the Department of Family Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Tufts University Family Medicine Residency at Cambridge Health Alliance, Boston, MA (AFS); the Department of Counseling and School Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston (LC); and the School of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, Canada (JRL).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joel R. Lexchin
From the Department of Family Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Tufts University Family Medicine Residency at Cambridge Health Alliance, Boston, MA (AFS); the Department of Counseling and School Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston (LC); and the School of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, Canada (JRL).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Examples of Harm Associated with Guidelines

    GuidelineHarmful Effect
    American Thoracic Society guidelines for the treatment of pneumonia.9Prescribing consistent with guidelines had a trend toward higher mortality and subsequent hospitalization.10
    European Society of Cardiology guidelines for anticoagulant treatment of atrial fibrillation.11Recommendation by this group result in a 3-fold higher rate of hemorrhage compared with guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians.12
    Guidelines from Australia, Canada, China, Europe, France, Japan, South Africa, United Kingdom, and United States recommending thrombolytic treatment from 3 to 4.5 hours after the onset of acute ischemic stroke.Administering the thrombolytic alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after the onset of stroke increases mortality 2%, without evidence of benefit.13
    Draft guidelines on the use of electrodiagnostic testing for patients with low-back pain.Given clinical vignettes, physicians increased ordering of tests when given specific guidance recommending against their use compared with physicians given nonspecific guidelines also recommending against routine use of the tests.14
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 29 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 29, Issue 6
November-December 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Need to Systematically Evaluate Clinical Practice Guidelines
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Need to Systematically Evaluate Clinical Practice Guidelines
Allen F. Shaughnessy, Lisa Cosgrove, Joel R. Lexchin
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2016, 29 (6) 644-648; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.06.160115

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Need to Systematically Evaluate Clinical Practice Guidelines
Allen F. Shaughnessy, Lisa Cosgrove, Joel R. Lexchin
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2016, 29 (6) 644-648; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.06.160115
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Clinical Practice Guidelines—Is “Regulation” the Answer?
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Becoming a Phronimos: Evidence-Based Medicine, Clinical Decision Making, and the Role of Practical Wisdom in Primary Care
  • Ten years later: a review of the US 2009 institute of medicine report on conflicts of interest and solutions for further reform
  • Practice-based Research Network (PBRN) Engagement: 20+ Years and Counting
  • When is a guideline not a guideline? The devil is in the details
  • Guideline recommendations and antimicrobial resistance: the need for a change
  • Guidelines in family practice--help wanted
  • Content Usage and the Most Frequently Read Articles of 2016
  • Bread and Butter of Family Medicine: Guidelines, Population Screening, Diagnostic Evaluations, and Practice Models
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines--Is "Regulation" the Answer?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Empowering Family Physicians in Medical Staff Leadership to Foster Physician Well-Being
  • Maternity Care Deserts: Key Drivers of the National Maternal Health Crisis
  • The One Taboo Question
Show more Commentaries

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire