Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Access to Primary Care in US Counties Is Associated with Lower Obesity Rates

Anne H. Gaglioti, Stephen Petterson, Andrew Bazemore and Robert Phillips
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2016, 29 (2) 182-190; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2016.02.150356
Anne H. Gaglioti
From the Department of Family Medicine, National Center for Primary Care, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (AHG); and the Robert Graham Center, Washington, DC (SP, AB, RP).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Petterson
From the Department of Family Medicine, National Center for Primary Care, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (AHG); and the Robert Graham Center, Washington, DC (SP, AB, RP).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Bazemore
From the Department of Family Medicine, National Center for Primary Care, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (AHG); and the Robert Graham Center, Washington, DC (SP, AB, RP).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Phillips
From the Department of Family Medicine, National Center for Primary Care, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (AHG); and the Robert Graham Center, Washington, DC (SP, AB, RP).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Obesity odds ratios across quintiles of US counties from the highest to lowest primary care physician (PCP) supply. Obesity odds ratios are based on a model that controls for individual and county characteristics. Obesity is defined as a body mass index >30 kg/m2. Population-to-PCP ratios varied in each quintile: I (highest PCP supply), 339–1232 people/PCP; II, 1233–1430 people/PCP; III, 1431–1657 people/PCP; IV, 1658–2126 people/PCP; V (lowest PCP supply) >2126 people/PCP. Data are from the 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, the 2012 AMA Physician Masterfile, and 2010 Census estimates of county population.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Distribution of Individual and County-Level Variables by Quintile of Primary Care Physician Supply
    Quintile I (Highest PCP Supply)Quintile IIQuintile IIIQuintile IVQuintile V (Lowest PCP Supply)Mean
    Individual variables
        Obesity prevalence*25.827.126.828.230.827.7
        Demographic
            Mean age (years)47.547.747.647.647.547.6
            Is a parent33.936.236.838.638.636.8
            Is insured84.885.083.080.379.482.5
        Education
            <High school education12.111.513.316.116.914
            High school graduate25.527.228.129.432.428.5
            Some college30.131.030.931.031.230.8
            College/postgraduate32.330.227.523.519.426.6
        Race/ethnicity
            White66.467.063.562.468.765.6
            Black13.414.312.410.69.512.0
            Hispanic13.18.415.719.816.714.8
            Other7.110.28.47.15.17.6
        Income ($/year)
            <15,0005.14.65.15.86.15.4
            <20,0007.46.87.37.38.17.4
            <25,0007.97.87.58.99.18.2
            <35,0009.29.29.69.710.19.6
            <50,00012.212.512.412.413.012.5
            <75,00013.314.113.013.314.013.5
            ≥75,00027.528.827.524.321.525.9
        Smoking history
            Current smoker18.018.417.618.420.918.6
            Former smoker25.325.225.224.824.425.0
            Never smoker55.155.055.955.553.455.0
    County-level variables
        Black category
            Low11.78.86.07.216.610.1
            Low/medium15.616.518.813.917.716.5
            Medium17.913.425.227.625.421.9
            Medium/high24.832.123.930.918.726.1
            High30.029.326.220.421.725.5
        In a metropolitan area85.691.390.081.268.983.4
        Poverty
            Low17.327.922.520.720.621.8
            Low/mid30.022.422.714.220.922.0
            Mid/high32.627.130.244.523.531.6
            High20.122.524.620.635.124.6
    • Data are percentages unless otherwise indicated (N = 392,535 individuals).

    • ↵* Obesity is defined as a body mass index ≥30 kg/m2.

    • Data sources: 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2012 AMA Masterfile, 2010 Census estimates, 2003 rural-urban continuum codes, 2012–2013 area resource files.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Obesity Odds Ratios by Individual and Contextual Variables from the Multivariate Regression Model That Adjusted for Individual and County-Level Variables
    VariablesOdds Ratio95% Confidence Interval
    PCP supply in county of residence
        Quintile 1 (most access)1.000Index
        Quintile 21.081*1.031–1.133
        Quintile 31.053†1.004–1.105
        Quintile 41.088*1.039–1.139
        Quintile 5 (least access)1.187*1.136–1.241
    Individual variables
        Demographic
            Age1.120*
        Education
            Some high school1.080*1.023–1.141
            High school graduate1.00Index
            Some college0.9660.931–1.002
            College graduate0.668*0.642–0.694
        Parental status
            No children1.00Index
            Parent1.063*1.023–1.104
        Race/ethnicity
            Non-Hispanic white1.00Index
            Black1.611*1.527–1.701
            Hispanic1.124*1.061–1.191
            Other race0.681*0.631–0.735
        Marital status
            Married1.00Index
            Never married1.0480.999–1.100
            Divorced0.9930.956–1.030
        Insured**1.0761.025–1.130
        Income ($/year)
            <15,0001.119*1.025–1.130
            15,000–20,0001.022†1.025–1.222
            20,000–25,0001.0020.924–1.086
            25,000–35,0000.890*0.821–0.966
            35,000–50,0000.827*0.766–0.894
            50,000–75,0000.842*0.766–0.894
            >75,0000.659*0.682–0.713
        Smoking status
            Never smoker1.00Index
            Smoker0.768*0.735–0.802
            Former smoker1.175*1.136–1.215
    County-level variables
        Black race (%)1.0420.916–1.185
        Rural-urban continuum codes
            1 (Most urban)1.000Index
            21.133*1.089–1.178
            31.171*1.117–1.227
            41.222*1.156–1.292
            51.179*1.098–1.265
            61.187*1.122–1.256
            71.190*1.110–1.274
            81.0810.950–1.231
            9 (Most rural)1.245*1.070–1.448
        County poverty
            Low1.000Index
            Low/mid1.0380.994–1.084
            Mid/high1.0491.006–1.094
            High1.0951.043–1.150
    • Data are based on N = 392,535 individuals. Obesity is defined as body mass index ≥30 kg/m2.

    • ↵* P ≤ .05.

    • ↵† P ≤ .01.

    • Data Sources: 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2012 AMA Masterfile, 2010 Census estimates of county population, 2003 rural urban continuum codes, and 2012–2013 Area Resource Files.

    • PCP, primary care physician.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 29 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 29, Issue 2
March-April 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Access to Primary Care in US Counties Is Associated with Lower Obesity Rates
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Access to Primary Care in US Counties Is Associated with Lower Obesity Rates
Anne H. Gaglioti, Stephen Petterson, Andrew Bazemore, Robert Phillips
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2016, 29 (2) 182-190; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.02.150356

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Access to Primary Care in US Counties Is Associated with Lower Obesity Rates
Anne H. Gaglioti, Stephen Petterson, Andrew Bazemore, Robert Phillips
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2016, 29 (2) 182-190; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.02.150356
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Outcomes of Health System Structures, Highly Pertinent Clinical Information, Idea Stimulators, Clinical Reviews, and Prediction Tools: JABFM Exemplified
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Access to Health Care
  • Health Services
  • Geographic Accessibility
  • Obesity
  • Primary Health Care
  • Public Health

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire