Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

The Cost to Successfully Apply for Level 3 Medical Home Recognition

Jacqueline R. Halladay, Kathleen Mottus, Kristin Reiter, C. Madeline Mitchell, Katrina E. Donahue, Wilson M. Gabbard and Kimberly Gush
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2016, 29 (1) 69-77; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2016.01.150211
Jacqueline R. Halladay
From the Department of Family Medicine (JRH, KED), Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (JRH, KED, KM, CMM), the Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (KR), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; the University of North Carolina Physicians Network, Morrisville (WMG); and Village Pediatrics of Chapel Hill (KG).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathleen Mottus
From the Department of Family Medicine (JRH, KED), Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (JRH, KED, KM, CMM), the Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (KR), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; the University of North Carolina Physicians Network, Morrisville (WMG); and Village Pediatrics of Chapel Hill (KG).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristin Reiter
From the Department of Family Medicine (JRH, KED), Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (JRH, KED, KM, CMM), the Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (KR), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; the University of North Carolina Physicians Network, Morrisville (WMG); and Village Pediatrics of Chapel Hill (KG).
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Madeline Mitchell
From the Department of Family Medicine (JRH, KED), Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (JRH, KED, KM, CMM), the Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (KR), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; the University of North Carolina Physicians Network, Morrisville (WMG); and Village Pediatrics of Chapel Hill (KG).
MURP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katrina E. Donahue
From the Department of Family Medicine (JRH, KED), Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (JRH, KED, KM, CMM), the Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (KR), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; the University of North Carolina Physicians Network, Morrisville (WMG); and Village Pediatrics of Chapel Hill (KG).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wilson M. Gabbard
From the Department of Family Medicine (JRH, KED), Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (JRH, KED, KM, CMM), the Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (KR), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; the University of North Carolina Physicians Network, Morrisville (WMG); and Village Pediatrics of Chapel Hill (KG).
MBA-HSM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kimberly Gush
From the Department of Family Medicine (JRH, KED), Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (JRH, KED, KM, CMM), the Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health (KR), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill; the University of North Carolina Physicians Network, Morrisville (WMG); and Village Pediatrics of Chapel Hill (KG).
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1. Patient-centered Medical Home Cost Categories: Making Practice Changes and Applying to the National Committee for Quality Assurance for Patient-centered Medical Home Recognition
    CategoryDefinitionExamples
    Nonpersonnel costsExpenses to cover supplies and other fees not related to staff timeApplication fees, website updates, software purchases (eg, Adobe Acrobat, patient satisfaction survey software)
    Development phaseStaff time required to develop new PCMH processesDeveloping new report in EHR, creating or writing policies or job descriptions, creating new documents or procedures
    Implementation phaseStaff time required for implementing new processesStaff training, incorporating new process such as previsit prevention planning; medication reconciliation; standing orders for flu vaccines, labs, etc.; quality improvement meetings; conducting patient satisfaction surveys; providing enhanced or new care management services
    Maintenance phaseStaff time required to maintain new activities after application submittedLogging after hours patient calls, care management visits, quality improvement meetings
    Application document preparationTime required to create application documents such as screenshotsTaking screenshots to provide evidence of activities, redacting patient health information from examples, annotating to demonstrate compliance with requirements
    External consultantServices provided by staff not on the practice payrollConsultant time to complete chart review workbook, coach time guiding practice through the NCQA application process
    • EHR, electronic health record; NCQA, National Committee for Quality Assurance; PCMH, patient-centered medical home.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Practice Demographics for 4 North Carolina Primary Care Practices Receiving Patient-centered Medical Home Recognition in 2013 or 2014 via the National Committee for Quality Assurance 2011 Patient-centered Medical Home Standards*
    Practice IDProvider FTEs†Patient visits/year (n)Medicaid (%)Uninsured (%)Commercial Insurance (%)Nonwhite Patients (%)Date of PCMH Level 3 RecognitionStudy Interview Dates
    1 (Pediatrics)2.54,477758821December 2013March 2014
    2 (Pediatrics)10.539,172430.35753January 2014May 2014
    3 (Pediatrics)3.512,8133056519July 2014August 2014
    4 (Family medicine)415,09415105535July 2014November 2014
    • ↵* Patient-centered medical home (PCMH) 2011 standards were released in the spring of 2011; the 2014 standards, in the spring of 2014. Depending on a practice's start date and initial PCMH level attained, practices could be working on 2011 standards up until 2018.

    • ↵† Includes medical doctors, doctors of osteopathy, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants.

    • FTE, full-time equivalent.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Costs of Patient-centered Medical Home Recognition via 2011 Standards among 4 Practices
    PracticeCosts By Category ($)
    Nonstaff* (Application Fees, Supplies)Development Phase* (Creating New Processes, Reports, Policies)Implementation Phase* (Providing Enhanced Care Services†)Application Document Prep*‡ (Screen Shots)Total Costs to Apply*§Maintenance Phase (Ongoing Costs for Staff and Supplies), Annualized
    1 (Pediatrics)6969,2942,60697513,57110,151
    2 (Pediatrics)4197,2493,64913711,4537,789
    3 (Pediatrics)5548,6433,48784613,5310
    4 (Family medicine)1313,27512,26930315,97723,494
    • Costs are expressed as per full-time provider (nurse practitioner/physician assistant/DO/MD).

    • ↵* Costs accrued from decision date to apply for patient-centered medical home status to application date. The time interval for the activities listed before the maintenance phase ranged from 9 to 18 months in this sample of practices.

    • ↵† Includes both new hires and enhanced activities and training for existing staff.

    • ↵‡ Does not include staff time dedicated to uploading and sending application to the National Committee for Quality Assurance.

    • ↵§ Does not include practice level consultation costs listed in Table 4.

    • View popup
    Table 4. Costs of External Consultants (Per Practice)
    Practice 1 (Pediatrics)$2700
    Practice 2 (Pediatrics)$1050
    Practice 3 (Pediatrics)$2600
    Practice 4 (Family medicine)$750
    • View popup
    Table 5. Activities That Required the Greatest Time Investment* and the Highest Value for Improving Patient Care
    Practice 1 (Pediatrics)Practice 2 (Pediatrics)Practice 3 (Pediatrics)Practice 1 (Family Medicine)
    Previsit planning and care coordination processes new work to pre-populate patient charts, prepare for visits, identify overdue or upcoming screening or other tests to recommend)TVTVTV
    Defining 3 preventive care services, 3 different chronic care services and identifying patients not recently seen and patients on specific medicationsTVTVTVTV
    Writing office policies defining processes to define work flows for following up on laboratory, imaging, and other care processes including drafting agreements with consultants; drafting job descriptionsTVTVTTV
    Demonstrating that >50% of patients who request an e-copy of their information receive it within 3 business daysTT
    Establish patient satisfaction survey processTVTVT
    Starting new office meetings dedicated to quality improvement and working to complete NCQA application requirementsTT
    Creating and processing screenshots to demonstrate existence of required elementsTTTT
    Providing after-hours access to care (providing advice to patients electronically, and via phone, demonstrating hat afterhours advice is then incorporated into the patient record)TTT
    Workbook preparation and documentationTTTT
    Clinical advice via secure messages during office (via establishment of a patient portal purchased for PCMH work)TT
    • ↵* All activities required at least one full working day (8 hours) of staff time to complete. Many activities, especially regarding preparing policy documents, job descriptions, screenshots, documenting chart data into workbooks, and devising plans managing populations, took much longer than 8 hours.

    • NCQA, National Committee for Quality Assurance; PCMH, patient-centered medical home; T, greatest time investment; TV, highest value for improving patient care.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 29 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 29, Issue 1
January-February 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Cost to Successfully Apply for Level 3 Medical Home Recognition
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Cost to Successfully Apply for Level 3 Medical Home Recognition
Jacqueline R. Halladay, Kathleen Mottus, Kristin Reiter, C. Madeline Mitchell, Katrina E. Donahue, Wilson M. Gabbard, Kimberly Gush
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2016, 29 (1) 69-77; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.01.150211

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Cost to Successfully Apply for Level 3 Medical Home Recognition
Jacqueline R. Halladay, Kathleen Mottus, Kristin Reiter, C. Madeline Mitchell, Katrina E. Donahue, Wilson M. Gabbard, Kimberly Gush
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2016, 29 (1) 69-77; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.01.150211
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Strategies for Addressing the Challenges of Patient-Centered Medical Home Implementation: Lessons from Oregon
  • Improving the Health of Patients and Communities: Evolving Practice-based Research (PBR) and Collaborations
  • Costs of Transforming Established Primary Care Practices to Patient-Centered Medical Homes (PCMHs)
  • Medical Home Implementation in Small Primary Care Practices: Provider Perspectives
  • Are We Learning More about Patient-centered Medical Homes (PCMHs), or Learning More about Primary Care?
  • Family Medicine Research That Provides Compelling, Urgent Data to Improve Patient Care
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Cost Control
  • Medical Home
  • Patient-Centered Care
  • Practice Management

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire