Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Impact of and Satisfaction with a New eConsult Service: A Mixed Methods Study of Primary Care Providers

Clare Liddy, Amir Afkham, Paul Drosinis, Justin Joschko and Erin Keely
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2015, 28 (3) 394-403; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140255
Clare Liddy
From the C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (CL, PD, JJ); the Departments of Family Medicine (CL) and Medicine (EK), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; the Champlain Local Health Integration Network, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (AA); and the Division of Endocrinology/Metabolism, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (EK).
MD, MSc, CCFP, FCFP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amir Afkham
From the C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (CL, PD, JJ); the Departments of Family Medicine (CL) and Medicine (EK), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; the Champlain Local Health Integration Network, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (AA); and the Division of Endocrinology/Metabolism, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (EK).
BEng
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Drosinis
From the C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (CL, PD, JJ); the Departments of Family Medicine (CL) and Medicine (EK), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; the Champlain Local Health Integration Network, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (AA); and the Division of Endocrinology/Metabolism, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (EK).
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Justin Joschko
From the C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (CL, PD, JJ); the Departments of Family Medicine (CL) and Medicine (EK), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; the Champlain Local Health Integration Network, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (AA); and the Division of Endocrinology/Metabolism, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (EK).
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erin Keely
From the C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (CL, PD, JJ); the Departments of Family Medicine (CL) and Medicine (EK), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; the Champlain Local Health Integration Network, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (AA); and the Division of Endocrinology/Metabolism, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (EK).
MD, FRCPC
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Closeout survey administered upon the completion of each eConsult.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 2.

    Flow of electronic consults (eConsults) completed between April 15, 2011, and December 31, 2013, through qualitative analysis.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 3.

    Chart of primary care physician (PCP) responses to questions 3 and 4 of close-out survey, completed between April 15, 2011, and December 31, 2013, enquiring about the perceived value of the electronic consult (eConsult) service for their patients and for themselves. Questions were answered on a 5-point Likert scale (5 = excellent, 1 = minimal).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1. Characteristics of Primary Care Physicians Who Are Registered to Use the Service and Left a Comment Between April 15, 2011, and December 31, 2013, Those Who are Registered and Have Yet to Submit an eConsult, and the Entire of Sample of Primary Care Physicians
    CharacteristicsPCPs Leaving a Comment (n = 137)PCPs Who Have Yet to Submit an eConsult (n = 160)All PCPs* (n = 357)
    Female sex73.7 (101)68.1 (109)73.1 (261)
    MD provider type78.1 (107)72.5 (116)78.2 (279)
    Rural practice location11.7 (16)11.9 (19)10.6 (38)
    eConsults submitted per PCP (n), median (IQR)8 (4–17)N/A6 (2–12)
    Years registered for the service (n), median (IQR)1.20 (0.63–2.23)0.93 (0.42–1.97)1.14 (0.48–1.97)
    • ↵* Total includes PCPs who submitted an eConsult but chose not to leave a comment.

    • Data are % (n) unless otherwise indicated.

    • eConsult, electronic consultation; IQR, interquartile range; NA, not applicable; PCP, primary care physician.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Specialty Distribution of Electronic Consultations Completed Between April 15, 2011 and December 31, 2013 for All Cases and Those Where a Written Comment Was Left
    SpecialtyCases Where PCP Elected to Leave a Comment* (n = 554)Total† (n = 2047)
    Cardiology26 (41)156
    Clinical pharmacist13 (1)8
    Dermatology34 (127)374
    Diabetes education50 (1)2
    Endocrinology29 (63)218
    Ear, nose, and throat21 (10)48
    Gastroenterology25 (7)28
    General pediatrics17 (19)109
    Genetics33 (1)3
    Hematology26 (48)185
    Infectious diseases17 (7)42
    Internal medicine33 (43)129
    Nephrology27 (19)71
    Neurology24 (48)196
    Obstetrics/gynecology33 (49)148
    Pain medicine and anesthesiology26 (7)27
    PainConnect (reconsultation)100 (3)3
    Palliative care100 (1)1
    Pediatric hematology/oncology13 (2)15
    Psychiatry26 (16)61
    Radiology
        Abdominal22 (4)18
        Musculoskeletal33 (5)15
        Neuroradiology0 (0)9
        Thoracic0 (0)7
    Rheumatology18 (16)89
    Thrombosis32 (10)31
    Urology11 (6)54
    Total2047
    • ↵* Data are % (n).

    • ↵† Data are numbers.

    • PCP, primary care physician.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Themes Arising from Primary Care Physician Responses to Open-Ended Questions in a Mandatory Closeout Survey Completed Between April 15, 2011, and December 31, 2013 (n = 554)
    Major ThemeSubtheme
    PCP appreciation of the eConsult serviceSatisfaction
    Response time
    Reassurance to the PCP
    Cost savings
    Perceived benefits to the quality of patient careEducational benefits of using eConsult
    Face-to-face referral still needed
    Rerouting referrals
    Access to specialist knowledge
    Reassurance for the patient
    Reduced patients' burden
    Attitudes toward using a new health technologyAdoption
    Challenges
    Request additional specialties
    • eConsult, electronic consultation; PCP, primary care physician.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 28 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 28, Issue 3
May-June 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of and Satisfaction with a New eConsult Service: A Mixed Methods Study of Primary Care Providers
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 13 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Impact of and Satisfaction with a New eConsult Service: A Mixed Methods Study of Primary Care Providers
Clare Liddy, Amir Afkham, Paul Drosinis, Justin Joschko, Erin Keely
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2015, 28 (3) 394-403; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140255

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Impact of and Satisfaction with a New eConsult Service: A Mixed Methods Study of Primary Care Providers
Clare Liddy, Amir Afkham, Paul Drosinis, Justin Joschko, Erin Keely
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2015, 28 (3) 394-403; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.03.140255
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Electronic consultation questions asked to addiction medicine specialists by primary care providers: Retrospective content analysis
  • COVID-19 and beyond: virtual consultations in primary care--reflecting on the evidence base for implementation and ensuring reach: commentary article
  • A comparison of faxed referrals and eConsult questions for rheumatology referrals: a descriptive study
  • Does total triage and remote-by-default consulting impact vulnerable groups: A pilot study
  • Patients Assess an eConsult Models Acceptability at 5 US Academic Medical Centers
  • Primary Care Clinician Adherence to Specialist Advice in Electronic Consultation
  • Assessment of the Generalizability of an eConsult Service through Implementation in a New Health Region
  • Development of a virtual benign hematology consultation service: results of a pilot project involving 5 medical centers
  • Barriers and facilitators for implementation of electronic consultations (eConsult) to enhance specialist access to care: a scoping review protocol
  • Using the Quadruple Aim Framework to Measure Impact of Heath Technology Implementation: A Case Study of eConsult
  • Use of an electronic consultation system in primary care: a qualitative interview study
  • Improving Access to Rheumatologists: Use and Benefits of an Electronic Consultation Service
  • Use of a primary care online consultation system, by whom, when and why: evaluation of a pilot observational study in 36 general practices in South West England
  • Supporting Better Access to Chronic Pain Specialists: The Champlain BASE™ eConsult Service
  • Improving access to allied health professionals through the Champlain BASE™ eConsult service: a cross-sectional study in Canada
  • Prevention of delayed referrals through the Champlain BASE eConsult service
  • What are the cost savings associated with providing access to specialist care through the Champlain BASE eConsult service? A costing evaluation
  • Electronic Health Record Innovations for Healthier Patients and Happier Doctors
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Access to Health Care
  • Health Information Systems
  • Medical Informatics
  • Primary Health Care
  • Specialization

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire