Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Improving Quality of Care and Guideline Adherence for Asthma Through a Group Self-Assessment Module

Kurt Elward, Brenna Blackburn, Lars E. Peterson, Mark Greenawald and Michael D. Hagen
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2014, 27 (3) 391-398; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2014.03.130241
Kurt Elward
From Family Medicine of Albemarle, Charlottesville, VA (KE); Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (KE), the Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; The American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (BB, LEP, MDH); the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington (LEP, MDH); and the Department of Family and Community Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine and Research Institute, Roanoke (MG).
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brenna Blackburn
From Family Medicine of Albemarle, Charlottesville, VA (KE); Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (KE), the Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; The American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (BB, LEP, MDH); the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington (LEP, MDH); and the Department of Family and Community Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine and Research Institute, Roanoke (MG).
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lars E. Peterson
From Family Medicine of Albemarle, Charlottesville, VA (KE); Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (KE), the Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; The American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (BB, LEP, MDH); the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington (LEP, MDH); and the Department of Family and Community Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine and Research Institute, Roanoke (MG).
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Greenawald
From Family Medicine of Albemarle, Charlottesville, VA (KE); Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (KE), the Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; The American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (BB, LEP, MDH); the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington (LEP, MDH); and the Department of Family and Community Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine and Research Institute, Roanoke (MG).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael D. Hagen
From Family Medicine of Albemarle, Charlottesville, VA (KE); Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (KE), the Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond; The American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY (BB, LEP, MDH); the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington (LEP, MDH); and the Department of Family and Community Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine and Research Institute, Roanoke (MG).
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1. Personal Characteristics of Group Self-Assessment Module (SAM) Participants from Virginia Versus All American Board of Family Medicine Physicians
    CharacteristicsGroup Asthma SAM Participants (n = 38)Virginia Family Physicians (n = 2812)
    Age (years)50.9 (7.7)50.3 (10.5)
    Years practicing19.7 (8.7)17.9 (11.1)
    Total MC-FP modules completed5.5 (2.3)4.4 (3.1)*
    SAMs completed3.9 (1.9)3.6 (2.4)
    PPMs completed1.7 (0.9)0.8 (0.9)*
    Last primary exam score557.9 (87.0)512.5 (93.1)*
    Male sex55.362.1
    MD degree97.493.5
    Currently board certified97.490.3
    • Data are means (standard deviations) or percentages.

    • ↵* P < .05.

    • MC-FP, Maintenance of Certification for Family Physicians; PPM, Performance in the Practice of Medicine module.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Physicians' Abstracted Adherence to Asthma Guidelines Before and 6 Months After a Group Self-Assessment Module (SAM)
    Before SAM6 Months after SAM
    Diagnosed according to NAEPP criteria48.380.2*
    ACT or ATAQ used at last asthma visit11.253.3*
    Planned asthma visit in the past year50.775.0*
    Asthma action plan in chart8.154.1*
    Controller medication prescribed for persistent asthma75.780.4
        ICS32.148.7*
        LTA29.528.1
        ICS/LABA combination58.556.3
    • ↵* P < .05.

    • ACT, Asthma Control Test; ATAQ, Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire; ICS, inhaled corticosteroid; LABA, long-acting β-agonist; LTA, leukotriene agonist; NAEPP, National Asthma Education and Prevention Program.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Physician-Reported Assessment and Perceptions of Asthma Treatment Guidelines Before, Immediately After, and 6 Months After a Group Self-Assessment Module (SAM)*
    StatementAgreementBefore SAM (n = 39)Immediately after SAM (n = 39)6 Months after SAM (n = 32)
    Inhaled steroids are recommended for all persistent asthmaticsAgree89.5100100†
    The approach to severity assessment is clear for me.Agree55.310086.2†
    There are four steps in the asthma classification system: mild intermittent, moderate intermittent, moderate persistent and severe persistent.Disagree47.484.259.4†
    I feel comfortable with my ability to assess control as recommended in the guidelines.Agree47.482.197.8†
    • ↵* Before SAM indicates the initial assessment of EPR-3 guidelines. Immediately after SAM and 6 months after SAM indicate questions related to perceptions of the NHLBI asthma guideline recommendations and format.

    • ↵† P < .05.

    • EPR-3, Expert Panel Report 3; NHLBI, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

    • View popup
    Table 4. Physician-Reported Challenges in Delivering Asthma Care Before Participation in the Group Self-Assessment Module (SAM) (n = 38)
    Major Challenges That Are Never or Rarely a ProblemRespondents (%)
    Assessment of severity31.6
    Assessment of control (eg, using ACT or ATAQ)18.4
    Planned visits23.7
    Use of action plans7.9
    Environmental assessment18.4
    Use of inhaled steroids for persistent asthma81.6
    Making the diagnosis62.5
    Allergy evaluation42.1
    Time constraints for evaluation21.0
    Treatment grids39.5
    Referral criteria63.2
    • * P < .05.

    • ACT, Asthma Control Test; ATAQ, Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire.

    • View popup
    Table 5. Physician-Reported Confidence in and Likelihood of Providing Guideline-Adherent Asthma Care After Participation in a Group Self-Assessment Module (SAM)
    AgreementImmediately after SAM (n = 38)6 Months after SAM (n = 32)
    The SAM helped me feel more confident in this area.
        Assessment of severityAgree/strongly agree10093.8
        Assessment of control (eg, using ACT or ATAQ)Agree/strongly agree94.796.9
        Planned visitsAgree/strongly agree10090.6
        Use of action plansAgree/strongly agree94.775.0*
        Environmental assessmentAgree/strongly agree94.780.7
        Use of inhaled steroids for persistent asthmaAgree/strongly agree100100
        Making the diagnosisAgree/strongly agree92.193.8
        Allergy evaluationAgree/strongly agree96.871.0
        Time constraints for evaluationAgree/strongly agree67.665.6
        Treatment gridsAgree/strongly agree96.884.4
    At the end of this SAM, how likely were you to:Immediately after SAM (n = 38)6 Months after SAM (n = 25)
        Use inhaled corticosteroids as the preferred controller agent for treatmentLikely/very likely100100
        Begin planned asthma visits for patients with persistent asthmaLikely/very likely10092.0
        Assess severity based on EPR-3 criteriaLikely/very likely92.196.0*
        Assess control using the ACT or ATAQLikely/very likely94.788.0*
        Refer for allergy evaluationLikely/very likely84.280.0
        Seek an environmental assessment for persistent asthmaticsLikely/very likely89.584.0
    • ↵* P < .05.

    • ACT, Asthma Control Test; ATAQ, Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire; EPR-3, Expert Panel Report 3.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 27 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 27, Issue 3
May-June 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Improving Quality of Care and Guideline Adherence for Asthma Through a Group Self-Assessment Module
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Improving Quality of Care and Guideline Adherence for Asthma Through a Group Self-Assessment Module
Kurt Elward, Brenna Blackburn, Lars E. Peterson, Mark Greenawald, Michael D. Hagen
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2014, 27 (3) 391-398; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.03.130241

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Improving Quality of Care and Guideline Adherence for Asthma Through a Group Self-Assessment Module
Kurt Elward, Brenna Blackburn, Lars E. Peterson, Mark Greenawald, Michael D. Hagen
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2014, 27 (3) 391-398; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.03.130241
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE STRATEGY TO SUPPORT AND PROMOTE DIPLOMATE LEARNING
  • The American Board of Family Medicine: Celebrating 50 Years of Continuing Transformation
  • Physician Opinions about American Board of Family Medicine Self-Assessment Modules (2006-2016)
  • Planning for Action: The Impact of an Asthma Action Plan Decision Support Tool Integrated into an Electronic Health Record (EHR) at a Large Health Care System
  • A Panoply of Information for the Practice of Family Medicine
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Asthma
  • Certification
  • Educational Assessment
  • Guideline Adherence

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire