Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Incidental Computer Tomography Radiologic Findings through Research Participation in the North Texas Healthy Heart Study

Anna Espinoza, Kendra Malone, Elizabeth Balyakina, Kimberly G. Fulda and Roberto Cardarelli
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2014, 27 (3) 314-320; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2014.03.130250
Anna Espinoza
From the Primary Care Research Center/Texas Prevention Institute (AE, KM, EB, KGF, RC), the Department of Family Medicine (KGF), and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (RC), University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kendra Malone
From the Primary Care Research Center/Texas Prevention Institute (AE, KM, EB, KGF, RC), the Department of Family Medicine (KGF), and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (RC), University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington.
BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Balyakina
From the Primary Care Research Center/Texas Prevention Institute (AE, KM, EB, KGF, RC), the Department of Family Medicine (KGF), and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (RC), University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington.
MS, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kimberly G. Fulda
From the Primary Care Research Center/Texas Prevention Institute (AE, KM, EB, KGF, RC), the Department of Family Medicine (KGF), and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (RC), University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington.
DrPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roberto Cardarelli
From the Primary Care Research Center/Texas Prevention Institute (AE, KM, EB, KGF, RC), the Department of Family Medicine (KGF), and the Department of Family and Community Medicine (RC), University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington.
DO, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Brenner DJ,
    2. Elliston CD
    . Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology 2004;232:735–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Smith-Bindman R,
    2. Lipson J,
    3. Marcus R,
    4. et al
    . Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:2078–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Haaga JR
    . Radiation dose management: weighing risk versus benefit. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:289–91.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lee CI,
    2. Haims AH,
    3. Monico EP,
    4. Brink JA,
    5. Forman HP
    . Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 2004;231:393–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Brenner DJ
    . Slowing the increase in the population dose resulting from CT scans. Radiat Res 2010;174:809–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Dougeni E,
    2. Faulkner K,
    3. Panayiotakis G
    . A review of patient dose and optimisation methods in adult and paediatric CT scanning. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:e665–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bach PB,
    2. Jett JR,
    3. Pastorino U,
    4. Tockman MS,
    5. Swensen SJ,
    6. Begg CB
    . Computed tomography screening and lung cancer outcomes. JAMA 2007;297:953–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Wolf SM,
    2. Paradise J,
    3. Caga-anan C
    . The law of incidental findings in human subjects research: establishing researchers' duties. J Law Med Ethics 2008;36:361–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Aldington S,
    2. Shirtcliffe P,
    3. Nowitz M,
    4. et al
    . Incidental findings from lung CT scans: implications for research. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2011;55:20–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Orme NM,
    2. Fletcher JG,
    3. Siddiki HA,
    4. et al
    . Incidental findings in imaging research: evaluating incidence, benefit, and burden. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:1525–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Seki A,
    2. Uchiyama H,
    3. Fukushi T,
    4. Sakura O,
    5. Tatsuya K
    . Incidental findings of brain magnetic resonance imaging study in a pediatric cohort in Japan and recommendation for a model management protocol. J Epidemiol 2010;20(Suppl 2):S498–504.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Wolf SM,
    2. Lawrenz FP,
    3. Nelson CA,
    4. et al
    . Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics 2008;36:219–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Jefford M,
    2. Moore R
    . Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents. Lancet Oncol 2008;9:485–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, Welfare U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1979.
  15. 15.↵
    1. Hara AK
    . Extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2005;26:24–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Siddiki H,
    2. Fletcher JG,
    3. McFarland B,
    4. et al
    . Incidental findings in CT colonography: literature review and survey of current research practice. J Law Med Ethics 2008;36:320–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Stone JH
    . Incidentalomas–clinical correlation and translational science required. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2748–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. Bioethics Commission on Incidental Findings: anticipate and communicate. Presss Release. December 12, 2013. Available from: http://bioethics.gov/node/3186. Accessed March 7, 2014.
  19. 19.↵
    1. Wolf SM
    . The role of law in the debate over return of research results and incidental findings: the challenge of developing law for translational science. Minn J Law Sci Technol 2012;13:435–48.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    1. Richardson HS
    . Incidental findings and ancillary-care obligations. J Law Med Ethics 2008;36:256–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Gutmann A
    . Policy forum ethics: the Bioethics Commission on Incidental Findings. Science 2013;342:1321–3.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Goel R,
    2. Garg P,
    3. Achenbach S,
    4. et al
    . Coronary artery calcification and coronary atherosclerotic disease. Cardiol Clin 2012;30:19–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    Safety: radiation exposure in x-ray examinations. 2009. Radiological Society of North America. Available from: http://oralcancerfoundation.org/facts/pdf/x-ray_safety.pdf. Accessed March 20, 2014.
  24. 24.↵
    National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III): final report. Circulation 2002;106:3143–421.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Jacobs PC,
    2. Mali WP,
    3. Grobbee DE,
    4. van der Graaf Y
    . Prevalence of incidental findings in computed tomographic screening of the chest: a systematic review. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008;32:214–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Messersmith WA,
    2. Brown DFM,
    3. Barry MJ
    . The prevalence and implications of incidental findings on ED abdominal CT scans. Am J Emerg Med 2001;19:479–81.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Lee CI,
    2. Tsai EB,
    3. Sigal BM,
    4. Plevritis SK,
    5. Garber AM,
    6. Rubin GD
    . Incidental extracardiac findings at coronary CT: clinical and economic impact. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:1531–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Booth TC,
    2. Jackson A,
    3. Wardlaw JM,
    4. Taylor SA,
    5. Waldman AD
    . Incidental findings found in “healthy” volunteers during imaging performed for research: current legal and ethical implications. Br J Radiol 2010;83:456–65.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Booth TC,
    2. Waldman AD,
    3. Wardlaw JM,
    4. Taylor SA,
    5. Jackson A
    . Management of incidental findings during imaging research in “healthy” volunteers: current UK practice. Br J Radiol 2012;85:11–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Cramer SC,
    2. Wu J,
    3. Hanson JA,
    4. et al
    . A system for addressing incidental findings in neuroimaging research. NeuroImage 2011;55:1020–3.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 27 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 27, Issue 3
May-June 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Incidental Computer Tomography Radiologic Findings through Research Participation in the North Texas Healthy Heart Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Incidental Computer Tomography Radiologic Findings through Research Participation in the North Texas Healthy Heart Study
Anna Espinoza, Kendra Malone, Elizabeth Balyakina, Kimberly G. Fulda, Roberto Cardarelli
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2014, 27 (3) 314-320; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.03.130250

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Incidental Computer Tomography Radiologic Findings through Research Participation in the North Texas Healthy Heart Study
Anna Espinoza, Kendra Malone, Elizabeth Balyakina, Kimberly G. Fulda, Roberto Cardarelli
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2014, 27 (3) 314-320; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.03.130250
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • A Panoply of Information for the Practice of Family Medicine
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Computed Tomography
  • Incidental Findings
  • Medical Ethics
  • Practice-Based Research Networks
  • Research Subjects

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire