Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Maternal Depressive Symptoms, Employment, and Social Support

Dwenda Gjerdingen, Patricia McGovern, Laura Attanasio, Pamela Jo Johnson and Katy Backes Kozhimannil
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2014, 27 (1) 87-96; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2014.01.130126
Dwenda Gjerdingen
From the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis (DG); Medica Research Institute (PJJ) and Divisions of Environmental Health Sciences (PM), Health Policy and Management (LA, KBK), and Epidemiology and Community Health (PJJ), University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis.
MD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia McGovern
From the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis (DG); Medica Research Institute (PJJ) and Divisions of Environmental Health Sciences (PM), Health Policy and Management (LA, KBK), and Epidemiology and Community Health (PJJ), University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis.
PhD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Attanasio
From the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis (DG); Medica Research Institute (PJJ) and Divisions of Environmental Health Sciences (PM), Health Policy and Management (LA, KBK), and Epidemiology and Community Health (PJJ), University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis.
BA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pamela Jo Johnson
From the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis (DG); Medica Research Institute (PJJ) and Divisions of Environmental Health Sciences (PM), Health Policy and Management (LA, KBK), and Epidemiology and Community Health (PJJ), University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis.
MPH, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katy Backes Kozhimannil
From the Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis (DG); Medica Research Institute (PJJ) and Divisions of Environmental Health Sciences (PM), Health Policy and Management (LA, KBK), and Epidemiology and Community Health (PJJ), University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis.
PhD, MPA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1. Sample Characteristics by Postpartum Employment Status
    CharacteristicsNot Employed (n = 447; 63.9%)Employed (n = 253; 36.1%)Total (n = 700)P Value*
    Race/ethnicity†
        Non-Hispanic white68.467.167.9
        Non-Hispanic black7.518.011.3
        Hispanic20.310.016.5
        Other race3.94.94.2.007
    Maternal age (years)†
        18–2427.731.829.2
        25–2929.023.927.1
        30–3425.330.027.0
        ≥3518.014.416.7.475
    Educational attainment†
        High school or less48.930.742.3
        College44.355.948.5
        More than college6.813.59.2.004
    Marital status‡
        Unmarried20.133.625.0
        Married79.966.475.0.013
    Partnership status‡
        Does not have partner5.99.17.0
        Has partner94.190.993.0.369
    Family income†
        Low (<$50,000)54.743.550.6
        Medium ($50,000–99,999)32.336.033.6
        High (≥$100,000)13.120.515.8.098
    Baby's health status‡
        Good health96.996.096.6
        Poor health3.14.03.4.558
    Parity†
        133.847.838.9
        >166.252.261.2.016
    Recent maternal depression (first 8 weeks)‡
        No depression63.561.562.8
        Minor depression24.423.424.0
        Major depression12.115.113.2.756
    Maternal postpartum problems (mean)§
        Minor physical problems2.82.72.8.761
        Major physical problems1.31.71.5.123
    Depressive symptoms (PHQ-2 = 3+)‡
        No79.287.382.1
        Yes20.912.717.9.093
    • Data are percentages unless otherwise indicated. Note that estimates are self-weighted in accordance with the survey design for national representativeness. Reported

    • ↵* P values are from χ2 tests for categorical variables and adjusted Wald tests for continuous variables.

    • ↵† Measure was created from item(s) on the Listening to Mothers II survey (baseline).

    • ↵‡ Measure was created from item(s) on the Listening to Mothers II–Postpartum survey (follow-up).

    • ↵§ Measure was created from Listening to Mothers II baseline and postpartum surveys combined.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Social Support: Component Measures and Social Support Scales by Postpartum Employment Status (n = 700)
    Measures/ScalesNot EmployedEmployedTotalP value*
    Partner support (among women with partners)
        Components of social support from partner/husband (mean)
            Mean emotional support2.62.62.6.652
            Mean practical support2.32.52.4.434
            Mean affectionate support2.72.82.7.782
            Mean enjoyment support2.42.52.4.652
         Partner support index (%)
            Low (0–4)15.910.614.0
            Medium (5–8)19.119.919.4
            High (9–12)33.839.735.9
            Very high (13–16)31.329.930.8.565
    Other support (among all women)
         Components of social support from others (mean)
            Mean emotional support2.52.42.5.242
            Mean practical support2.02.22.1.199
            Mean affectionate support2.12.02.1.347
            Mean enjoyment support2.02.22.1.336
         Other support index (%)
            Low (0–4)15.118.616.4
            Medium (5–8)35.033.434.4
            High (9–12)35.834.035.1
            Very high (13–16)14.114.114.1.873
    Combined support (among women who answered both support questions) (%)
        No high support23.020.722.2
        High partner support only27.129.027.8
        High other support only11.99.811.2
        High partner and other support38.040.638.9.886
    • Women who do not have partners are excluded from calculations related to partner support variables, resulting in a weighted n of 651 for those variables.

    • ↵* Reported P values are from χ2 tests for categorical variables and adjusted Wald tests for continuous variables.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Odds of Depressive Symptoms by Postpartum Employment Status and Social Support
    Women with Partners (n = 651)All Women (n = 700)
    AOR95% CIPAOR95% CIP
    Postpartum employment
        Not employed1.001.00
        Employed0.350.14–0.87.0230.350.16–0.79.011
    Social support
        No high partner support1.00
        High partner support0.590.29–1.22.154
        No high other support1.00
        High other support0.400.20–0.81.011
    • Models control for race/ethnicity, age, education, marital status, family income, baby's health status, parity, maternal depression in the first 8 weeks postpartum, and a count of postpartum physical symptoms. Models are weighted to be nationally representative.

    • AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

    • View popup
    Table 4. Odds of Depressive Symptoms by Postpartum Employment Status and Combined Forms of Social Support (n = 651)
    Unadjusted ModelModel Adjusted for Social SupportFully Adjusted Model*
    OR95% CIPOR95% CIPOR95% CIP
    Postpartum employment
        Not employed1.001.001.00
        Employed0.510.24–1.11.0900.510.23–1.13.0980.330.13–0.81.015
    Social support
        No high support1.001.00
        High partner support only0.400.18–0.92.0310.510.21–1.26.145
        High other support only0.210.07–0.67.0090.270.08–0.85.025
        High partner and other support0.310.14–0.72.0060.370.15–0.91.031
    • Models are weighted to be nationally representative. Women without partners are excluded.

    • ↵* The fully adjusted model controls for race/ethnicity, age, education, marital status, family income, baby's health status, parity, maternal depression in the first 8 weeks postpartum, and a count of postpartum physical symptoms.

    • OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 27 (1)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 27, Issue 1
January-February 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Maternal Depressive Symptoms, Employment, and Social Support
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
13 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Maternal Depressive Symptoms, Employment, and Social Support
Dwenda Gjerdingen, Patricia McGovern, Laura Attanasio, Pamela Jo Johnson, Katy Backes Kozhimannil
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2014, 27 (1) 87-96; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.01.130126

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Maternal Depressive Symptoms, Employment, and Social Support
Dwenda Gjerdingen, Patricia McGovern, Laura Attanasio, Pamela Jo Johnson, Katy Backes Kozhimannil
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jan 2014, 27 (1) 87-96; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.01.130126
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Postpartum stress in the first 6 months after delivery: a longitudinal study in Nantong, China
  • Internet-based acceptance and commitment therapy programme 'Happiness Mom for well-being: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial
  • No Magic Pill: A Prescription for Enhanced Shared Decision-Making for Depression Treatment
  • Social support and the incidence and persistence of depression between antenatal and postnatal examinations in Turkey: a cohort study
  • Family Physicians are Complex Care Physicians and Quality of Care Advancement Experts
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Behavioral Sciences
  • Mental Health
  • Postpartum Care
  • Social Problems

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire