Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in Family Medicine: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study

Dewey C. Scheid, Robert M. Hamm, Kalyanakrishnan Ramakrishnan, Laine H. McCarthy, James W. Mold and the Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2013, 26 (5) 498-507; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.120230
Dewey C. Scheid
From the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert M. Hamm
From the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kalyanakrishnan Ramakrishnan
From the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laine H. McCarthy
From the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
MLIS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James W. Mold
From the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
From the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK.
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Levin B,
    2. Lieberman D,
    3. McFarland B,
    4. et al
    . Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008;134:1570–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:627–37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Yee J,
    2. Rosen MP,
    3. Blake MA,
    4. et al
    . ACR Appropriateness Criteria on colorectal cancer screening. J Am Coll Radiol 2010;7:670–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Rex DK,
    2. Johnson DA,
    3. Anderson JC,
    4. Schoenfeld PS,
    5. Burke CA,
    6. Inadomi JM
    ; American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected]. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:739–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Qaseem A,
    2. Denberg TD,
    3. Hopkins RH Jr.,
    4. et al
    . Screening for colorectal cancer: a guidance statement from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med 2012;156:378–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of colorectal cancer tests–United States, 2002, 2004, and 2006. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep 2008;57:253–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Patel P,
    2. Forjuoh SN,
    3. Avots-Avotins A,
    4. Patel T
    . Identifying opportunities for improved colorectal cancer screening in primary care. Prev Med 2004;39:239–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Taylor V,
    2. Lessler D,
    3. Mertens K,
    4. et al
    . Colorectal cancer screening among African Americans: the importance of physician recommendation. J Natl Med Assoc 2003;95:806–12.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Holden DJ,
    2. Jonas DE,
    3. Porterfield DS,
    4. Reuland D,
    5. Harris R
    . Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:668–76.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Taylor ML,
    2. Anderson R
    . Colorectal cancer screening: physician attitudes and practices. WMJ 2002;101:39–43.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Klabunde CN,
    2. Lanier D,
    3. Nadel MR,
    4. McLeod C,
    5. Yuan G,
    6. Vernon SW
    . Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: recommendations and practices, 2006–2007. Am J Prev Med 2009;37:8–16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Nemeth LS,
    2. Nietert PJ,
    3. Ornstein SM
    . High performance in screening for colorectal cancer: a Practice Partner Research Network (PPRNet) case study. J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22:141–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. McQueen A,
    2. Bartholomew LK,
    3. Greisinger AJ,
    4. et al
    . Behind closed doors: physician-patient discussions about colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med 2009;24:1228–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Ling BS,
    2. Trauth JM,
    3. Fine MJ,
    4. et al
    . Informed decision-making and colorectal cancer screening: is it occurring in primary care? Med Care 2008;46(9 Suppl 1):S23–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Lafata JE,
    2. Cooper GS,
    3. Divine G,
    4. et al
    . Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussions: delivery of the 5A's in practice. Am J Prev Med 2011;41:480–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Ferrell CW,
    2. Mold JW,
    3. Aspy CB
    . Management of prescription refills in primary care: an Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19:31–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Mold JW,
    2. Cacy DS,
    3. Dalbir DK
    . Management of laboratory test results in family practice. An OKPRN study. Oklahoma Physicans Resource/Research Network. J Fam Pract 2000;49:709–15.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Mold JW,
    2. Gregory ME
    . Best practices research. Fam Med 2003;35:131–4.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Mold JW,
    2. Mathew MK,
    3. Belgore S,
    4. DeHaven M
    . Prevalence of night sweats in primary care patients: an OKPRN and TAFP-Net collaborative study. J Fam Pract 2002;51:452–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Nagykaldi Z,
    2. Mold JW
    . Diabetes Patient Tracker, a personal digital assistant-based diabetes management system for primary care practices in Oklahoma. Diabetes Technol Ther 2003;5:997–1001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.
    1. Lemelin J,
    2. Hogg W,
    3. Baskerville N
    . Evidence to action: a tailored multifaceted approach to changing family physician practice patterns and improving preventive care. CMAJ 2001;164:757–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    DOPC Writing Group. Conducting the Direct Observation of Primary Care Study. J Fam Pract 2001;50:345–52.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Cabana MD,
    2. Rand CS,
    3. Powe NR,
    4. et al
    . Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999;282:1458–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Woolf SH
    . Overcoming the barriers to change: screening for colorectal cancer. Am Fam Physician 2000;61:1621–2, 1628.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Pommerenke FA,
    2. Dietrich A
    . Improving and maintaining preventive services. Part 1: applying the patient path model. J Fam Pract 1992;34:86–91.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Johnson BJ,
    2. Mold JW,
    3. Pontious JM
    . Reduction and management of no-shows by family medicine residency practice exemplars. Ann Fam Med 2007;5:534–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Guerra CE,
    2. Schwartz JS,
    3. Armstrong K,
    4. Brown JS,
    5. Halbert CH,
    6. Shea JA
    . Barriers of and facilitators to physician recommendation of colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med 2007;22:1681–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Lafata JE,
    2. Divine G,
    3. Moon C,
    4. Williams LK
    . Patient-physician colorectal cancer screening discussions and screening use. Am J Prev Med 2006;31:202–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Charlin B,
    2. van der Vleuten C
    . Standardized assessment of reasoning in contexts of uncertainty: the script concordance approach. Eval Health Prof 2004;27:304–19.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Schmidt HG,
    2. Norman GR,
    3. Boshuizen HP
    . A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: theory and implication. Acad Med 1990;65:611–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Abernathy CM,
    2. Hamm RM
    . Surgical scripts: master surgeons think aloud about 43 common surgical problems. Philadelphia, PA: Hanley & Belfus; 1994.
  32. 32.↵
    1. Pengchit W,
    2. Walters ST,
    3. Simmons RG,
    4. et al
    . Motivation-based intervention to promote colonoscopy screening: an integration of a fear management model and motivational interviewing. J Health Psychol 2011;16:1187–97.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Wahab S,
    2. Menon U,
    3. Szalacha L
    . Motivational interviewing and colorectal cancer screening: a peek from the inside out. Patient Educ Couns 2008;72:210–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Iyengar SS,
    2. Lepper MR
    . When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? J Pers Soc Psychol 2000;79:995–1006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Hoffman RM,
    2. Lewis CL,
    3. Pignone MP,
    4. et al
    . Decision-making processes for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening: the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making 2010;30(5 Suppl):53S–64S.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Inadomi JM
    . Why you should care about screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med 2012;366:2421–2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Zapka JM,
    2. Klabunde CN,
    3. Arora NK,
    4. Yuan G,
    5. Smith JL,
    6. Kobrin SC
    . Physicians' colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011;20:509–21.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Inadomi JM,
    2. Vijan S,
    3. Janz NK,
    4. et al
    . Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:575–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    1. Klabunde CN,
    2. Frame PS,
    3. Meadow A,
    4. Jones E,
    5. Nadel M,
    6. Vernon SW
    . A national survey of primary care physicians' colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices. Prev Med 2003;36:352–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 26 (5)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 26, Issue 5
September-October 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in Family Medicine: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in Family Medicine: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study
Dewey C. Scheid, Robert M. Hamm, Kalyanakrishnan Ramakrishnan, Laine H. McCarthy, James W. Mold, the Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2013, 26 (5) 498-507; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.120230

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in Family Medicine: An Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network (OKPRN) Study
Dewey C. Scheid, Robert M. Hamm, Kalyanakrishnan Ramakrishnan, Laine H. McCarthy, James W. Mold, the Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2013, 26 (5) 498-507; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.120230
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Effects of Academic Detailing, Panel Management and Mailed Multi-Target Stool-DNA Testing on Colorectal Cancer Screening
  • Patient-Centered Research Happens in Practice-based Research Networks
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Cancer Screening
  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Practice-based Research
  • Prevention
  • Primary Health Care

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire