Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

A Comparison of Cesarean Delivery Outcomes for Rural Family Physicians and Obstetricians

Fay F. Homan, Ardis L. Olson and Deborah J. Johnson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine July 2013, 26 (4) 366-372; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2013.04.120203
Fay F. Homan
From the Dartmouth CO-OP Project, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ardis L. Olson
From the Dartmouth CO-OP Project, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deborah J. Johnson
From the Dartmouth CO-OP Project, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.
MHA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1. Demographic Indicators of Study Population
    DemographicsFamily Medicine (n = 125)Obstetrics (n = 125)P
    Age, years (mean ± SD)26.2 ± 5.427.2 ± 5.1.14
    Pregnancies (mean ± SD)2.25 ± 1.32.23 ± 1.3.88
    Prior births (mean ± SD)0.78 ± 0.970.75 ± 1.0.76
    Insurance
        Public59 (47.2)72 (58.1).2
        Private62 (49.6)50 (40.3)
        Self-pay4 (3.2)2 (1.6)
        Not specified0 (0)1 (0.8)
    Race
        White116 (95.9)120 (96.8).71
        Asian/Hispanic/Native American5 (4.0)4 (0.8)
        Not specified4 (3.2)1 (0.8)
    • Values are n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

    • SD, standard deviation.

    • View popup
    Table 2. Prenatal Risk Factors
    Risk FactorsFamily Medicine (n = 125)Obstetrics (n = 125)P
    Total prenatal risks (mean ± SD)0.77 ± 2.10.44 ± 1.2.61
    Advanced maternal age10 (8)11 (8.8).82
    Diabetes
        All types16 (12.8)14 (11.2).70
        Gestational13 (11)13 (10)
        Type 10 (0)1 (1)
        Type 23 (2)0 (0)
    Hypertension
        All types18 (14.4)7 (5.6).02
        Pregnancy Induced12 (11)7 (5)
        Chronic Hypertension6 (5)0 (0)
    Obesity60 (48)54 (43.2).45
    Excess weight gain76 (62.8)70 (56).55
    Preterm labor4 (3.2)6 (4.8).52
    Psychiatric illness31 (24.8)23 (18).22
    Smoking35 (28.8)31 (25).89
    Twin gestation2 (2)2 (2)1.0
    Substance abuse4 (3.2)8 (6.4).38
    Significant other issues*:11 (8.8)6 (4.8).31
        Chlamydia02
        Coagulopathy12
        IUGR21
        Active herpes01
        PROM11
        Hepatitis C20
        Oligohydramnios40
    • Values are n (%) unless otherwise indicated.

    • ↵* Total is >100% because of multiple issues per patient.

    • SD, standard deviation; IGUR, intrauterine growth restrictions; PROM, premature rupture of membranes.

    • View popup
    Table 3. Indications for Cesarean Delivery
    IndicationsFamily Medicine (n = 125)Obstetrics (n = 125)P
    Arrest of dilation21 (16)25 (20).51
    Arrest of descent18 (14.4)19 (15.2).86
    Fetal distress22 (17.6)20 (16.0).74
    Scheduled repeat38 (30.4)40 (32.0).79
    Malpresentation12 (9.6)18 (14.4).24
    Placental abruption4 (3.2)0 (0).12*
    Elective primary caesarian section0 (0)2 (1.6)†1.0
    Placenta previa1 (0.8)0 (0)1.0*
    Other indications (eg, macrosomia with gestational diabetes, twins, active herpes, preeclampsia, failed post-dates induction)11 (8.8)9 (7.2).64
    • Values are n (%). The totals are greater than 100% because of multiple indications per patient.

    • ↵* Fisher's exact test.

    • ↵† One had the relative indication of a prior fourth-degree tear. The other was a true elective primary section.

    • View popup
    Table 4. Maternal Outcomes
    OutcomesFamily Medicine (n = 125)Obstetrics (n = 125)P
    Intraoperative complications
        Total (mean ± SD)0.02 ± 0.1802 ± 0.201.0
        Caesarian section/hysterectomy for placenta accreta01
        Uterine artery laceration10
        Cervical laceration01
        Intraoperative hematuria, no source10
    Infectious complications
    Total (mean ± SD)0.03 ± 0.180.04 ± 0.20.74
        Endometritis or endomyometritis15
        Transient fever to 100.4°F20
        Fever/UTI10
    Postoperative complications
        Total (mean ± SD)0.03 ± 0.180.12 ± 0.41.03
        ICU transfer02
        Return to operating room01
        Transfusion15
        Readmission for pregnancy-related diagnosis
    27
        Readmission for other diagnosis10
    Maternal length of stay (mean ± SD)3.0 ± 0.682.6 ± 0.87<.01
    • Values are n unless otherwise indicated.

    • ICU, intensive care unit; UTI, urinary tract infection.

    • View popup
    Table 5. Newborn Outcomes
    OutcomesFamily Medicine (n = 125)Obstetrics (n = 125)P
    Gestational age (weeks)
        <37.08 (6.2)10 (7.8).40
         ≥37.0120 (93.8)118 (92.2)
    Apgar score
        1 minute8.0 ± 1.88.0 ± 1.6.80
        5 minutes8.7 ± 1.38.8 ± 1.1.68
    Length of stay3.0 ± 0.892.9 ± 1.3.21
    Transfer to neonatal intensive care unit5 (3.9)8 (6.3).22
    Fetal death at community hospital1*0*1.0
    Readmission3 (2.3)7 (5.5).35
    • Values are n (%) or mean ± standard deviation.

    • ↵* See narrative.

    • View popup
    Table 6. Cesarean Section Quality Indicators
    IndicatorsFamily MedicineObstetricsP
    Decision to incision time (minutes)*44.0 ± 16.855.1 ± 22.5.08
    Total surgical time (minutes)55.2 ± 14.742.5 ± 13.7<.01
    Scheduled at ≥39 weeks†29/32 (91%)26/32 (82%).47
    • ↵* Only cases in which fetal distress is an indication for surgery: 22 cases at family medicine site, 20 cases at obstetrics site.

    • ↵† Only cases for which a Cesarean section was scheduled.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 26 (4)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 26, Issue 4
July-August 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Comparison of Cesarean Delivery Outcomes for Rural Family Physicians and Obstetricians
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
11 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A Comparison of Cesarean Delivery Outcomes for Rural Family Physicians and Obstetricians
Fay F. Homan, Ardis L. Olson, Deborah J. Johnson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2013, 26 (4) 366-372; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.04.120203

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A Comparison of Cesarean Delivery Outcomes for Rural Family Physicians and Obstetricians
Fay F. Homan, Ardis L. Olson, Deborah J. Johnson
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2013, 26 (4) 366-372; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.04.120203
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Maternity Access in Rural America: The Role of Family Physicians in Providing Access to Cesarean Sections
  • Family Physicians Ability to Perform Cesarean Sections Can Reduce Maternal and Infant Mortality
  • Effect of Access to Obstetrical Care in Rural Alabama on Perinatal, Neonatal, and Infant Outcomes: 2003-2017
  • Obstetric Care by Family Physicians and Infant Mortality in Rural Alabama
  • Family Medicine and Obstetrics: Let's Stop Pretending
  • Maternity Care Services Provided by Family Physicians in Rural Hospitals
  • Common Illnesses, Patient Physician Interactions, Continuity, and Practice Organization
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Associations Between Modifiable Preconception Care Indicators and Pregnancy Outcomes
  • Perceptions and Preferences for Defining Biosimilar Products in Prescription Drug Promotion
  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Cesarean Section
  • Maternal Morbidity
  • Obstetrics
  • Rural Health Services

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire