Research ArticleOriginal Research

A Randomized Colorectal Cancer Screening Intervention Trial in the Iowa Research Network (IRENE): Study Recruitment Methods and Baseline Results

Jeanette M. Daly, Yinghui Xu, John W. Ely and Barcey T. Levy
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine January 2012, 25 (1) 63-72; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2012.01.110054

References

  1. 1.↵
    American Cancer Society. Colorectal cancer facts and figures 2011–2013. Available at http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-028323.pdf. Accessed November 3, 2011.
  2. 2.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Increased use of colorectal cancer tests–United States, 2002 and 2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2006;55(11):308–11.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Sankaranarayanan J,
    2. Watanabe-Galloway S,
    3. Sun J,
    4. Qiu F,
    5. Boilesen E,
    6. Thorson AG
    . Rurality and other determinants of early colorectal cancer diagnosis in Nebraska: a 6-year cancer registry study, 1998–2003. J Rural Health 2009;25(4):358–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Milgrom PM,
    2. Hujoel PP,
    3. Weinstein P,
    4. Holborow DW
    . Subject recruitment, retention, and compliance in clinical trials in periodontics. Ann Periodontol 1997;2(1):64–74.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Smith CA,
    2. Coyle ME
    . Recruitment and implementation strategies in randomized controlled trials of acupuncture and herbal medicine in women's health. Complement Ther Med 2006;14(1):81–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Mold JW,
    2. Aspy CA,
    3. Nagykaldi Z
    , Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network. Implementation of evidence-based preventive services delivery processes in primary care: an Oklahoma physicians Resource/Research network (OKPRN) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2008;21(4):334–44.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Aspy CB,
    2. Enright M,
    3. Halstead L,
    4. Mold JW
    , Oklahoma Physicians Resource/Research Network. Improving mammography screening using best practices and practice enhancement assistants: an Oklahoma physicians Resource/Research network (OKPRN) study. J Am Board Fam Med 2008;21(4):326–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Bakken S,
    2. Lantigua RA,
    3. Busacca LV,
    4. Bigger JT
    . Barriers, enablers, and incentives for research participation: a report from the ambulatory care research network (ACRN). J Am Board Fam Med 2009;22(4):436–45.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Pearce KA,
    2. Love MM,
    3. Shelton BJ,
    4. et al
    . Cardiovascular risk education and social support (CaRESS): report of a randomized controlled trial from the Kentucky ambulatory network (KAN). J Am Board Fam Med 2008;21(4):269–81.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Wallerstein N,
    2. Duran B
    . Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. Am J Public Health 2010;100(Suppl 1):S40–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Yawn BP,
    2. Pace W,
    3. Dietrich A,
    4. et al
    . Practice benefit from participating in a practice-based research network study of postpartum depression: a National Research Network (NRN) report. J Am Board Fam Med 2010;23(4):455–64.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Love MM,
    2. Pearce KA,
    3. Williamson MA,
    4. Barron MA,
    5. Shelton BJ
    . Patients, practices, and relationships: challenges and lessons learned from the Kentucky Ambulatory Network (KAN) CaRESS clinical trial. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19(1):75–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Westfall JM,
    2. Mold J,
    3. Fagnan L
    . Practice-based research–“blue highways” on the NIH roadmap. JAMA 2007;297(4):403–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Green LW
    . Translation 2 research: the roadmap less traveled. Am J Prev Med 2007;33(2):137–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Zauber AG,
    2. Lansdorp-Vogelaar I,
    3. Knudsen AB,
    4. Wilschut J,
    5. van Ballegooijen M,
    6. Kuntz KM
    . Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med 2008;149(9):659–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Levin B,
    2. Lieberman DA,
    3. McFarland B,
    4. et al
    . Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008;134(5):1570–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    United States Postal Service. Guide to move update. Available at http://ribbs.usps.gov/move_update/documents/tech_guides/GuidetoMoveUpdate.pdf. Updated 2010. Accessed November 18, 2010.
  18. 18.↵
    1. Dillman DA
    . Mail and Internet surveys: the tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2000.
  19. 19.↵
    1. Levy BT,
    2. Nordin T,
    3. Sinift S,
    4. Rosenbaum M,
    5. James PA
    . Why hasn't this patient been screened for colon cancer? An Iowa research network study. J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20(5):458–68.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Levy BT,
    2. Dawson J,
    3. Hartz AJ,
    4. James PA
    . Colorectal cancer testing among patients cared for by Iowa family physicians. Am J Prev Med 2006;31(3):193–201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Daly JM,
    2. Levy BT,
    3. Joshi M,
    4. Xu Y,
    5. Jogerst GJ
    . Patient clock drawing and accuracy of self-report compared with chart review for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2010;50(3):341–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Brawarsky P,
    2. Brooks DR,
    3. Mucci LA,
    4. Wood PA
    . Effect of physician recommendation and patient adherence on rates of colorectal cancer testing. Cancer Detect Prev 2004;28(4):260–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Gilbert A,
    2. Kanarek N
    . Colorectal cancer screening: physician recommendation is influential advice to Marylanders. Prev Med. 2005;41(2):367–379.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Klabunde C,
    2. Vernon SW,
    3. Nadel MR,
    4. Breen N,
    5. Seeff LC,
    6. Brown ML
    . Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average-risk adults. Med Care 2005;43(9):939–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Seeff LC,
    2. Nadel MR,
    3. Klabunde C,
    4. et al
    . Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult U.S. population. Cancer 2004;100(10):2093–103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Klabunde C,
    2. Schenck AP,
    3. Davis WW
    . Barriers to colorectal cancer screening among Medicare consumers. Am J Prev Med 2006;30(4):313–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Kuwada SK
    . Colorectal cancer 2000. Education and screening are essential if outcomes are to improve. Postgrad Med 2000;107(5):96–8, 101–4, 107.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Levy BT,
    2. Daly JM,
    3. Luxon B,
    4. et al
    . The “Iowa Get Screened” colon cancer screening program. J Prim Care Com Health 2010;1(1):43–9.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    1. Perquin DA,
    2. de Craen AJ,
    3. Helmerhorst FM
    . Difficulties in recruitment for a randomized controlled trial involving hysterosalpingography. Reprod Health 2006;3:5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Natarajan K,
    2. Stein D,
    3. Jain S,
    4. Elhadad N
    . An analysis of clinical queries in an electronic health record search utility. Int J Med Inform 2010;79(7):515–22.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section