Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

Do Urine Cultures for Urinary Tract Infections Decrease Follow-up Visits?

Jeremy Daniel Johnson, Heather M. O'Mara, Hyrum F. Durtschi and Branko Kopjar
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine November 2011, 24 (6) 647-655; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2011.06.100299
Jeremy Daniel Johnson
MD, MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heather M. O'Mara
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hyrum F. Durtschi
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Branko Kopjar
MD PhD, MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    Figure 1.

    Patient exclusions. *Improperly coded diagnoses included asymptomatic bacteruria, history of urinary tract infection (UTI), abdominal pain, vaginal complaint, pyelonephritis, and upper respiratory infection. **Complicated UTIs included patients with Wilms tumor, hydronephrosis and chronic renal failure, solitary kidney, lymphoma, renal stent, small kidney, and unspecified genetic disorder causing UTIs.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Demographic Characteristics of Study Cohorts

    CharacteristicTotal Population (N = 783)Cohort 1* (n = 332)Cohort 2† (n = 447)P
    Average age (mean years ± SD)32.9 ± 120.132.4 ± 11.833.2 ± 12.3.38
    Race‡.53
        White32567%61%
        African American6713%13%
        Asian/Pacific Islander427%9%
        Other7814%16%
    Socioeconomic status‡.26
        Lower24333%30%
        Higher53467%70%
    Active duty soldier19329%22%.02
    • ↵* No urine culture ordered.

    • ↵† Urine culture ordered.

    • ↵‡ Some patients were missing data from these variables: race, n = 267; socioeconomic status, n = 2. Unpaired t test was used to compare means, χ2 test was used to compare proportions (missing data excluded).

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Clinical Characteristics of Study Cohorts

    CharacteristicTotal Population (N = 783)Cohort 1* (n = 332)Cohort 2† (n = 447)P
    Clinic seeing patient<.001
        Hospital clinic55466%75%
        Community clinic #112615%17%
        Community clinic #29920%7%
        Seen by midlevel provider (PA/NP), not physician54274%66%.02
    Initial antibiotic used.01
        TMP-SMX41158%49%
        Fluoroquinolone14920%19%
        Nitrofurantoin18719%28%
        Other medicine242%4%
        No medication prescribed80.3%1.6%
    Allergic to TMP-SMX9112%11%.78
    Fever at initial visit‡10%0.2%1.0
    Nausea or vomiting‡626%9%.27
    Flank pain or CVA tenderness‡11513%16%.61
    • ↵* No urine culture ordered.

    • ↵† Urine culture ordered.

    • ↵‡ Some patients (n) were missing data from these variables: fever, n = 32; nausea/vomiting, n = 221; flank pain/CVA tenderness, n = 172. Unpaired t test was used to compare means. χ2 test was used to compare proportions (missing data excluded), and Fisher's exact test was used for fever.

    • PA, physician's assistant; NP, nurse practitioner; TMP-SMX, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; CVA, costovertebral angle.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Did Ordering a Urine Culture Change Outcomes?

    OutcomeCohort 1* (%) (n = 332)Cohort 2† (%) (n = 447)Pearson χ2 resultP
    Follow-up visit within 2 weeks8.48.70.02.89
    New antibiotic ordered within 2 weeks6.68.91.4.24
    Patient-initiated telephone consult for continued symptoms within 2 weeks1.83.62.18.14
    • ↵* No urine culture ordered.

    • ↵† Urine culture ordered.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Bivariate Testing: Patients Who Followed Up Within 2 Weeks for Continued Urinary Tract Infection Symptoms (n = 779)

    CharacteristicTotal Patients (n [%])Patients Who Followed Up Within 2 Weeks for UTI Symptoms (%)P
    Average age (mean years ± SD)32.9 ± 12.131.3 ± 11.8.28
    Race*.30
        White325 (64)10
        African American67 (13)4
        Asian/Pacific Islander42 (8)5
        Other78 (15)11
    Socioeconomic status.16
        Lower243 (31)11
        Higher534 (69)8
    Clinic seeing patient.62
        Hospital based clinic554 (71)8
        Community based clinic #1126 (16)9
        Community based clinic #299 (13)11
        Seen by midlevel provider (PA/NP) not physician542 (70)9.91
    Initial antibiotic used.48
        TMP-SMX411 (53)9
        Fluoroquinolone149 (19)6
        Nitrofurantoin187 (24)11
        Other medicine24 (3)13
        No medication prescribed8 (1)0
    Active duty soldier193 (25)11.11
    Allergic to TMP-SMX91 (12)10.64
    Fever at initial visit1 (0.1)01.00
    Nausea or vomiting*62 (11)15.08
    Flank pain or CVA tenderness*115 (19)13.14
    Medication filled at pharmacy751 (97)9.69
    Urine culture obtained447 (57)9.89
    Urine culture not obtained332 (43)8
    Urine culture results.70
        Urine culture grew specific organism243 (54)9
        Urine culture grew mixed flora94 (21)11
        Urine culture had no growth110 (25)7
    Urine culture resistance to prescribed antibiotic<.001
        Organism resistant21 (10)52
        Organism not resistant200 (90)5
    • ↵* Some patients were missing data from these variables: race, n = 267; socioeconomic status, n = 2; fever, n = 32; nausea/ vomiting, n = 221; flank pain/CVA tenderness, n = 172. Unpaired t test was used to compare means, and χ2 test was used to compare proportions (missing data excluded).

    • UTI, urinary tract infection; PA, physician's assistant; NP, nurse practitioner; NS, Not significant; TMP-SMX, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; CVA, costovertebral angle.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Multivariate Logistic Regression: Which Factors Are Related to Following Up Within 2 Weeks for Continued Urinary Tract Infection Symptoms?

    CharacteristicOdds ratio (95% CI)
    Age (years)0.99 (0.97–1.02)
    Socioeconomic status (senior rank)0.81 (0.43–1.53)
    Clinic seeing patientNS
    Initial antibiotic usedNS
    Civilian family member as opposed to active duty soldier0.70 (0.39–1.26)
    Seen by midlevel provider (PA/NP) not physician1.05 (0.59–1.85)
    Allergic to TMP-SMX1.30 (0.58–2.94)
    Medication filled at pharmacy0.90 (0.20–4.04)
    Urine culture ordered1.11 (0.65–1.90)
    • PA, physician's assistant; NP, nurse practitioner; NS, not significant; TMP-SMX, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole.

    • View popup
    Table A1.

    Bacterial Resistance Rates

    Organism*AmpicillinNitrofurantoinTMP/SMXCiprofloxacin
    Esherichia coli
        %R (n = 191)320.5132
        %IR0.50.500.5
    Klebsiella
        %R (n = 10)601000
        %IR308000
    Staph sp. %R (n = 9)NT0011
    Proteus
        %R (n = 8)13100130
        %IR00013
    Enterococcus %R (n = 2)0000
    Citrobacter
        %R (n = 2)100000
        %IR0000
    Enterobacter %R (n = 1)NTIR00
    Pseudomonas %R (n = 1)NTNTNT0
    Salmonella %R (n = 1)0NT00
    Strep (n = 18)NTNTNTNT
    • ↵* Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen, with 191 isolates (79% of all isolates). Streptococcal (Strep) species were the second most common type of pathogen, with 18 isolates (7%). There were 10 Klebsiella isolates (4%), nine staphylococcal (Staph) species isolates (4%), and eight Proteus isolates (3%).

    • TMP-SMX, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; NT, not tested; R, resistance; IR, intermediate resistance.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family     Medicine: 24 (6)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 24, Issue 6
November-December 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Do Urine Cultures for Urinary Tract Infections Decrease Follow-up Visits?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 15 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Do Urine Cultures for Urinary Tract Infections Decrease Follow-up Visits?
Jeremy Daniel Johnson, Heather M. O'Mara, Hyrum F. Durtschi, Branko Kopjar
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2011, 24 (6) 647-655; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.06.100299

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Do Urine Cultures for Urinary Tract Infections Decrease Follow-up Visits?
Jeremy Daniel Johnson, Heather M. O'Mara, Hyrum F. Durtschi, Branko Kopjar
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Nov 2011, 24 (6) 647-655; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.06.100299
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Appendix
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Guest Family Physician Commentaries
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Overtesting and undertesting in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • Change, Lack of Change, and Creating Optimal Change Out of Chaos
  • Guest Family Physician Commentaries
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
  • A Pilot Comparison of Clinical Data Collection Methods Using Paper, Electronic Health Record Prompt, and a Smartphone Application
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire