Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
OtherFamily Medicine-World Perspective

Physician Specialty and the Quality of Medical Care Experiences in the Context of the Taiwan National Health Insurance System

Jenna Tsai, Leiyu Shi, Wei-Lung Yu, Li-Mei Hung and Lydie A. Lebrun
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2010, 23 (3) 402-412; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2010.03.090222
Jenna Tsai
EdD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leiyu Shi
DrPH, MBA, MPA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wei-Lung Yu
MHA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Li-Mei Hung
MBA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lydie A. Lebrun
MPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Quality of Medical Care Experiences among Patients Seen by Primary Care Physicians Versus Specialists (Total Sample = 646)

    Primary CareSpecialty CareSignificance*
    PC (Sample Range: 261–281)Internal Medicine (Sample Range: 82–90)Family Medicine (Sample Range: 93–95)Pediatrics (Sample Range: 86–96)SC (Sample Range: 261–281)OBGyn (Sample Range: 79–88)Gastroenterology (Sample Range: 91–94)General Surgery (Sample Range: 85–91)Dermatology (Sample Range: 86–92)t TestANOVA
    First contact (utilization)2.94 (0.73)2.91 (0.69)2.85 (0.74)3.05 (0.76)2.69 (1.00)2.43 (0.92)2.95 (1.38)2.67 (0.71)2.69 (0.78)3.53§5.18§
    First contact (access)2.55 (0.72)2.61 (0.72)2.61 (0.68)2.44 (0.75)2.16 (0.74)2.11 (0.87)2.17 (0.69)2.19 (0.66)2.18 (0.76)6.73§8.20§
    Ongoing care2.66 (0.75)2.66 (0.77)2.62 (0.65)2.70 (0.84)2.48 (0.73)2.30 (0.87)2.55 (0.67)2.54 (0.68)2.54 (0.67)2.95‡2.70†
    Coordination (referral)2.72 (0.65)2.67 (0.64)2.69 (0.63)2.80 (0.69)2.58 (0.69)2.35 (0.83)2.77 (0.66)2.49 (0.57)2.68 (0.60)2.62‡5.17§
    Coordination information system2.70 (1.16)2.55 (0.74)2.87 (1.68)2.66 (0.76)2.52 (0.76)2.39 (0.83)2.63 (0.72)2.43 (0.74)2.60 (0.74)2.43‡2.62†
    Comprehensiveness (services available)2.62 (0.76)2.54 (0.71)2.58 (0.70)2.73 (0.85)2.40 (0.83)2.48 (0.91)2.46 (0.76)2.19 (0.75)2.46 (0.86)3.47§3.84§
    Comprehensiveness (Services provided)2.78 (0.73)2.65 (0.71)2.81 (0.62)2.88 (0.84)2.57 (0.72)2.35 (0.89)2.55 (0.71)2.65 (0.63)2.72 (0.58)3.60§5.29§
    Family centeredness2.77 (0.76)2.67 (0.77)2.68 (0.68)2.97 (0.79)2.56 (0.80)2.41 (0.89)2.59 (0.71)2.51 (0.80)2.73 (0.77)3.38§4.84§
    Community orientation2.28 (0.64)2.26 (0.65)2.24 (0.66)2.33 (0.61)2.00 (0.73)2.00 (0.78)2.19 (0.73)1.89 (0.63)1.94 (0.74)5.06§6.08§
    Cultural competence2.65 (0.66)2.75 (0.69)2.65 (0.64)2.55 (0.66)2.46 (0.73)2.21 (0.79)2.61 (0.63)2.29 (0.78)2.69 (0.61)3.39§7.99§
    Overall PC experience26.60 (5.32)26.21 (5.66)26.57 (5.10)27.00 (5.25)24.41 (5.65)23.01 (7.38)25.49 (5.08)23.90 (4.90)25.07 (4.75)4.81§5.85§
    • For each area of PC and SC listed, both minimum and maximum sample sizes are provided. Statistics included in the table are mean scores (SD) for the domains of health care experiences.

    • * t test compares PC with SC. ANOVA compares differences across specialties.

    • † P < .05.

    • ‡ P < .01.

    • § P < .001.

    • PC, primary care; SC, specialty care; OBGyn, obstetrics/gynecology; ANOVA, analysis of variance.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Quality of Overall Medical Care Experiences among Patients by Physician Specialty and Patient Sociodemographic Characteristics

    CharacteristicsPrimary Care AreasSpecialty Care Areas
    Primary CareInternal MedicineFamily MedicinePediatricsSpecialty CareObstetrics/GynecologyGastroenterologyGeneral SurgeryDermatology
    Mean (SD)nMean (SD)nMean (SD)nMean (SD)nMean (SD)nMean (SD)nMean (SD)nMean (SD)nMean (SD)n
    Sex
        Male26.47 (5.93)6327.38 (4.86)3025.79 (6.60)2725.01 (7.88)624.44 (4.91)12724.58 (5.27)3824.28 (4.69)4824.50 (4.93)41
        Female26.69 (4.97)18826.08 (5.63)4726.89 (4.35)6626.90 (5.09)7524.61 (5.91)20726.16 (4.93)5223.35 (5.25)3625.59 (4.58)45
    Age (years)F = 3.76*
        <1826.98 (5.00)78226.24 (2.83)26.97 (2.03)628.31 (1.37)325.37 (2.35)2
        18–4425.82 (5.49)12825.85 (5.73)6025.80 (5.31)6824.36 (5.65)22423.38 (7.26)6626.34 (4.36)4722.83 (4.39)4925.11 (4.94)62
        45–6429.22 (4.16)2928.97 (4.06)1629.51 (4.41)1325.09 (4.98)8528.19 (1.61)424.25 (5.98)3825.15 (4.28)2525.65 (3.85)18
        ≥6528.54 (5.94)526.01 (9.88)230.23 (3.34)324.85 (6.91)1522.57 (0.49)226.50 (7.22)1020.86 (7.53)3
    EducationF = 3.34*
        <High school27.24 (5.39)3427.89 (8.67)928.20 (3.46)926.32 (3.96)1625.19 (5.28)6624.29 (4.77)223.75 (4.97)2023.87 (5.32)3225.74 (2.42)12
        High school27.91 (4.01)6127.41 (3.37)1427.65 (4.03)1828.31 (4.37)2924.68 (5.07)9025.23 (4.57)1325.20 (5.22)2324.59 (4.31)2524.77 (4.37)29
        Some college25.41 (5.70)10425.25 (5.74)3825.79 (5.12)4125.01 (6.68)2525.47 (5.44)10224.73 (5.38)2525.94 (5.49)3621.61 (4.03)1725.22 (5.42)24
        ≥College26.99 (5.42)4827.09 (4.82)1626.98 (6.18)2226.85 (5.08)1025.23 (5.31)6723.80 (7.11)3127.70 (2.76)1125.86 (5.44)825.19 (5.05)17
    Employment
        Full time26.50 (5.61)12525.74 (6.13)2927.41 (5.63)4626.09 (5.27)5024.55 (5.15)16424.97 (5.79)2423.62 (5.44)4622.73 (4.38)4525.01 (4.90)49
        Part time27.37 (4.29)2128.30 (4.20)726.92 (3.11)1026.87 (7.45)423.03 (5.25)3921.65 (7.40)924.15 (5.27)1522.53 (3.11)622.90 (4.13)9
        Unemployed27.84 (5.60)3926.95 (6.93)1125.79 (5.93)1229.99 (3.57)1625.09 (5.97)8423.74 (7.66)2725.99 (4.27)2025.54 (6.10)2125.68 (4.20)16
        Retired, in school, or other25.91 (4.78)6326.40 (5.15)3025.60 (3.78)2425.08 (6.15)925.38 (5.70)4023.89 (7.66)1125.68 (5.64)825.93 (3.85)926.12 (5.24)12
    Household income (New Taiwan $)F = 3.39*
        <650,00027.01 (4.75)4628.14 (5.18)725.42 (4.45)2328.80 (4.47)1623.13 (5.95)7420.05 (7.04)2524.51 (7.57)1323.81 (2.22)1725.63 (3.66)19
        650,000–849,00028.01 (5.40)5227.74 (5.73)2429.12 (3.74)1826.64 (7.07)1024.43 (5.41)9025.38 (5.59)1323.38 (5.53)2023.53 (5.13)3125.84 (5.46)26
        ≥850,00026.95 (5.64)3325.49 (5.51)1328.39 (6.39)1426.75 (3.58)622.81 (5.85)3819.10 (9.58)823.26 (2.35)522.38 (3.52)624.39 (4.60)19
    Health statusF = 6.59‡F = 7.88‡F = 4.41†F = 3.81†
        Excellent26.57 (6.02)2124.96 (7.95)929.01 (3.38)626.55 (4.53)625.35 (3.89)2023.88 (5.68)728.59 (1.22)325.79 (2.54)425.14 (2.17)6
        Very good26.50 (4.96)8725.63 (4.68)2326.64 (4.99)3327.01 (5.20)3125.69 (5.59)6926.21 (4.74)1327.39 (4.02)2325.47 (5.82)923.87 (6.85)24
        Good26.62 (5.12)7026.93 (5.10)2526.43 (5.65)2626.49 (4.62)1925.99 (4.25)9426.46 (4.73)2626.27 (3.81)1924.43 (5.71)1326.06 (3.50)36
        Fair26.52 (5.88)7626.35 (6.61)2225.87 (5.03)2727.31 (6.19)2722.75 (5.94)14418.85 (8.31)3324.87 (4.73)3523.02 (4.25)5724.79 (4.18)19
        Poor26.85 (4.07)328.46 (4.18)223.62 (3.38)122.88 (9.05)1119.85 (8.08)834.83 (1.94)223.24 (3.28)1
    Physical/mental problems
        Yes28.23 (5.23)2626.05 (1.15)328.22 (6.26)1629.19 (3.82)726.79 (3.94)3328.53 (3.98)626.61 (2.91)1327.74 (4.90)824.17 (4.03)6
        No26.70 (5.24)19226.22 (6.08)6826.55 (4.81)6327.40 (4.60)6125.33 (5.01)22725.28 (5.36)5126.83 (4.55)5124.10 (4.82)5225.21 (5.02)73
    Additional private insuranceF = 15.55‡F = 8.70†F = 9.17†F = 4.91*
        Yes28.61 (4.27)8028.43 (4.15)3028.58 (3.69)3128.93 (5.41)1926.11 (4.95)9728.29 (5.57)1428.32 (2.79)2724.99 (5.32)3523.69 (4.58)21
        No25.33 (5.97)7523.45 (7.74)2025.26 (4.45)2426.61 (5.55)3125.07 (3.99)12925.91 (3.33)3025.92 (4.92)2823.65 (4.18)3625.13 (3.15)35
    • Mean (SD) statistics are for the overall quality of primary care experiences. Analysis of variance compares differences across categories of patient characteristics.

    • * P < .05.

    • † P < .01.

    • ‡ P < .001.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Effect of Primary Care Versus Specialty Care on Quality of Medical Care Experiences: Results of Multiple Regressions

    Model 1* (Unadjusted)Model 2† (Adjusted)
    Standardized Coefficients (SE)tScoreStandardized Coefficients (SE)tScore
    Overall primary care experience0.23 (1.61)5.82‡0.14 (1.75)3.19§
    First contact (utilization)0.14 (0.21)3.53‡0.08 (0.25)1.64
    First contact (access)0.26 (0.23)6.73‡0.25 (0.26)5.85‡
    Ongoing care0.12 (0.24)2.95§0.05 (0.27)1.21
    Coordination (referrals)0.07 (0.23)1.870.00 (0.27)−0.09
    Coordination (information systems)0.10 (0.23)2.43‖0.09 (0.28)1.85
    Comprehensiveness (services available)0.14 (0.19)3.43‡0.08 (0.22)1.77
    Comprehensiveness (services provided)0.32 (0.36)8.37‡0.09 (0.37)2.33‖
    Family centeredness0.13 (0.19)3.38‡0.04 (0.22)0.97
    Community orientation0.19 (0.17)4.98‡0.15 (0.19)3.34‡
    Cultural competence0.13 (0.17)3.39‡0.16 (0.20)3.45‡
    • In this table, the reference group is specialty care.

    • * The independent variable in model 1 is physician specialty (primary care vs specialty care).

    • † In model 2, independent variables included patients’ sex, age, education, employment, household income, health status, physical/mental health problem, and additional private health insurance in addition to physician specialty.

    • ‡ P < .001.

    • § P < .01.

    • ‖ P < .05.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 23 (3)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 23, Issue 3
May-June 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physician Specialty and the Quality of Medical Care Experiences in the Context of the Taiwan National Health Insurance System
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Physician Specialty and the Quality of Medical Care Experiences in the Context of the Taiwan National Health Insurance System
Jenna Tsai, Leiyu Shi, Wei-Lung Yu, Li-Mei Hung, Lydie A. Lebrun
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2010, 23 (3) 402-412; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.03.090222

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Physician Specialty and the Quality of Medical Care Experiences in the Context of the Taiwan National Health Insurance System
Jenna Tsai, Leiyu Shi, Wei-Lung Yu, Li-Mei Hung, Lydie A. Lebrun
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine May 2010, 23 (3) 402-412; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.03.090222
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Appendix. Primary Care Assessment Tool: Indicators and Items of Quality Medical Care Experiences
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Guest Family Physician Commentaries
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Experiences of communities with Lebanons model of care for non-communicable diseases: a cross-sectional household survey from Greater Beirut
  • Patients' Experiences in Different Models of Community Health Centers in Southern China
  • Guest Family Physician Commentaries
  • Policy and Financing in Family Medicine and the Medical Home
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Improving Family Medicine in Kosovo with Microsystems
  • Women Family Physicians' Personal Experiences in the Republic of Moldova
Show more Family Medicine-World Perspective

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire