Treatment of Cervical Dysplasia with the Fischer Cone Biopsy Excisor in a Family Medicine Office: A Case Series

References

1. ↵
   Prendiville W, Cullimore J, Norman S. Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ): a new method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 1054–60.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   Scribner DR, Fischer NR, Gagliardi S, et al. Evaluation of a new instrument designed for directed cervical excision: cone biopsy excisor. J Lower Genital Tract Dis 1998; 2: 7–11.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   Mathevet P, Dargent D, Roy M, et al. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 175–9.
4. Krebs H, Pastore L, Helmkamp B. Loop electro-surgical excisional procedure for cervical dysplasia: experience in a community hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 289–95.

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. Montz F, Holschneider C, Thompson D. Large loop excision of the transformation zone: effect on the pathologic interpretation of the resection margins. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 976–82.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. Nauman R, Bell M, Alvarez R, et al. LEETZ is an acceptable alternative to diagnostic cold knife conization. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 55: 224–8.

   OpenUrlPubMed
7. ↵
   Felix JC, Muderspach LI, Duggan BD, Roman LD. The significance of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 996–1000.

   OpenUrlPubMed
8. Gardeil F, Barry-Walsh C, Prendiville W, Clinch J, Turner MJ. Persistent intraepithelial neoplasia after excision for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 419–22.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. Vedel P, Jakobsen H, Kryger-Baggesen N, Rank F, Bostofte E. Five-year follow up of patients with cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia in the cone margins after conization. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1993; 50: 71–6.

   OpenUrlPubMed
10. Zaitoun AM, McKee G, Coppen MJ, Thomas SM, Wilson PO. Completeness of excision and follow up cytology in patients treated with loop excision biopsy. J Clin Pathol 2000; 53: 191–6.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
11. ↵
    Fischer NR, Alexanderian D, Gagliardi S, et al. The Fischer cone biopsy excisor compared with the large loop electrode for cervical conizations. J Lower Genital Tract Dis 1999; 3: 180–4.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    Apgar BS, Wright TC, Pfenninger JL. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure for CIN. Am Fam Physician 1992; 46: 505–20.

    OpenUrlPubMed
13. Ferris DG. Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: preclinical training proficiency. Fam Med 1993; 25: 456–60.

    OpenUrlPubMed
14. Ferris DG, Hainer BL, Pfenninger JL, Zuber TJ, DeWitt DE, Line RL. Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: the experience of family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1995; 41: 337–44.

    OpenUrlPubMed
15. Lyman D, Morris B. LEEP in the family practice setting. J Am Board Fam Pract 2003; 16: 204–8.

    OpenUrlPubMed
16. ↵
    Rosen AP, Hernandez E, Shen T, et al. Loop electroexcision with Fischer excisor versus Utah loop. J Pel Surg 2001; 7: 330–4.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    Boardman LA, Steinhoff MM, Shackelton R, et al. A randomized trial of the Fischer cone biopsy excisor and loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 745–50.

    OpenUrlPubMed
18. ↵
    Wright TC Jr, Massad LS, Dunton CJ, Spitzer M, Wilkinson EJ, Solomon D. 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 346–55.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. ↵
    Dodson MK, Sharp HT. Uses and abuses of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). Clin Obstet Gynecol 1999; 42: 916–21.

    OpenUrlPubMed
20. Ferenczy A, Choukroun D, Arseneau J. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure for squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix: advantages and potential pitfalls. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 332–7.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science