Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Archives
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Article CommentaryCommentary

Treating Cervical Dysplasia: Why Does It Matter?

Niharika Khanna
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2010, 23 (2) 151-153; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2010.02.100005
Niharika Khanna
MBBS, MD, DGO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    Mulhem E, Kennedy EL, Lick D. Treatment of cervical dysplasia with the Fischer cone biopsy excisor in a family medicine office: a case series. J Am Board Fam Med 2010; 23: 154–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Grumbach K. Redesign of the health care delivery system: a Bauhaus “form follows function” approach. JAMA 2009; 302: 2363–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. Starfield B. Family medicine should shape reform, not vice versa. Fam Pract Manag 2009; 16: 6–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. Evans TE, Palmer E, Abercrombie S, et al. Advocacy: the time is now. Ann Fam Med 2009; 7: 376–7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. Rosenthal TC. The medical home: growing evidence to support a new approach to primary care. J Am Board Fam Med 2008; 21: 427–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Khanna N, Nesbitt L, Roghmann MC, Tacket C. Translation of clinical research into practice: defining the clinician scientist. Fam Med 2009; 41: 440–3.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    American Cancer Society. What are the key statistics about cervical cancer? Available at http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_4_1X_What_are_the_key_statistics_for_cervical_cancer_8.asp?sitearea=. Accessed 27 December 2009.
  8. ↵
    Insinga RP, Glass AG, Rush BB. Diagnoses and outcomes in cervical cancer screening: a population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 105–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Brewer NT, Fazekas KI. Predictors of HPV vaccine acceptability: a theory-informed, systematic review. Prev Med 2007; 45: 107–14. Epub 2007 Jun 2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Wright TC Jr, Massad LS, Dunton CJ, Spitzer M, Wilkinson EJ, Solomon D. 2006 ASCCP-Sponsored Consensus Conference. 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical screening tests. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2007; 11: 201–22. Erratum in J Low Genit Tract Dis 2008;12:255.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Khanna N, Dalby R, Tan M, Arnold S, Stern J, Frazer N. Phase I/II clinical safety studies of terameprocol vaginal ointment. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 107: 554–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Massad LS, Jeronimo J, Schiffman M, National Institutes of Health/American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (NIH/ASCCP) Research Group. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of components of colposcopic grading. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111: 1279–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    Wentzensen N, Schiffman M, Dunn ST, et al. Grading the severity of cervical neoplasia based on combined histopathology, cytopathology, and HPV genotype distribution among 1,700 women referred to colposcopy in Oklahoma. Int J Cancer 2009; 124: 964–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Solomon D, Stoler M, Jeronimo J, Khan M, Castle P, Schiffman M. Diagnostic utility of endocervical curettage in women undergoing colposcopy for equivocal or low-grade cytologic abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110(2 Pt 1): 288–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Apple Medical Corporation. Fischer cone biopsy excisor. Available at http://www.applemed.com/product.php?product=fischer_cone_biopsy_excisor. Accessed 27 December 2009.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 23 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 23, Issue 2
March-April 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Treating Cervical Dysplasia: Why Does It Matter?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Treating Cervical Dysplasia: Why Does It Matter?
Niharika Khanna
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2010, 23 (2) 151-153; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.02.100005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Treating Cervical Dysplasia: Why Does It Matter?
Niharika Khanna
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2010, 23 (2) 151-153; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.02.100005
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • The Big Picture
    • HPV Vaccine
    • Management of CIN
    • Family Medicine's Role in the Management of CIN
    • Fischer Cone Biopsy Technique
    • Reimbursement
    • Conclusion
    • Notes
    • References
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Treatment of Cervical Dysplasia with the Fischer Cone Biopsy Excisor in a Family Medicine Office: A Case Series
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Empowering Family Physicians in Medical Staff Leadership to Foster Physician Well-Being
  • Maternity Care Deserts: Key Drivers of the National Maternal Health Crisis
  • The One Taboo Question
Show more Commentaries

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire