Review ArticleClinical Review

Fertility Awareness-Based Methods: Another Option for Family Planning

Stephen R. Pallone and George R. Bergus
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2009, 22 (2) 147-157; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2009.02.080038

References

  1. ↵
    Flynn, AM. Natural methods of family planning. Cl Obstet Gynec 1984; 11: 661.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD. Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. Effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy and sex of the baby. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1517–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    Dunson DB, Baird DD, Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR. Day-specific probabilities of clinical pregnancy based on two studies with imperfect measures of ovulation. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 1835–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Hatcher R, Trussell J, Stewart F, et al. Contraceptive technology, 18th ed. New York: Ardent Media, Inc.; 2004.
  5. ↵
    Dorairaj K. The modified mucus method in India. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 2006–7.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    Bhargava H, Bhatia JC, Ramachandran L, Rohatgi P, Sinha A. Field trial of billings ovulation method of natural family planning. Contraception 1996; 53: 69–74.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    Frank-Herrmann P, Gnoth C, Baur S, Strowitzki T, Freundl G. Determination of the fertile window: reproductive competence of women-European cycle databases. Gynecol Endocrinol 2005; 20: 305–12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Howard M, Stanford J. Pregnancy probabilities during use of the Creighton Model fertility care system. Arch Fam Med 1999; 8: 391–402.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Hilgers TW, Stanford JB. Creighton Model NaProEducation Technology for avoiding pregnancy. Use effectiveness. J Reprod Med 1998; 43: 495–502.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Arevalo M, Jennings V, Nikula M, Sinai I. Efficacy of the new TwoDay Method of family planning. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: 885–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    Fehring R, Lawrence D, Philpot C. Use effectiveness of the Creighton Model Ovulation Method of natural family planning. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1994; 23: 303–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Gosh AK, Saha S, Chattergee G. Symptothermia vis-a-vis fertility control. J Obstet Gynaecol India 1982; 32: 443–7.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    Roetzer J. Symptothermal methods of natural family planning. Int Rev Nat Fam Plann 1981; 5: 200–2.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    Frank-Herrmann P, Freundl G, Burr S, et al. Effectiveness and acceptability of the symptothermal method of natural family planning in Germany. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 2052–4.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  15. Barbato M, Bertolotti G. Natural methods for fertility control: a prospective study. Int J Fertil 1988; 33(Suppl): 48–51.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  16. Clubb EM, Pyper CM, Knight J. A pilot study on teaching natural family planning in general practice. Natural Family Planning: current knowledge and new strategies for the 1990s. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University; 1990: 130–2.
  17. ↵
    Task force on methods of the determination of the fertile period. A prospective multicentre trial of the ovulation method of natural family planning. II. The effectiveness phase. Fertil Steril 1981; 36: 591–8.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  18. Institute for Reproductive Health, Georgetown University. Natural family planning. Available from: http://irh.org/nfp.htm#newsimple. Accessed 1 July 2008.
  19. ↵
    Frank-Herrmann P, Freundl G, Gnoth C, et al. Natural family planning with and without barrier use in the fertile phase: efficacy in relation to sexual behavior: a German prospective long-term study. Adv Contracept 1997; 13: 179–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    Prospective European multi-center study on natural family planning (1989–1992): interim results. The European Natural Family Planning Study Groups. Adv Contracept 1993; 9: 269–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Arevalo M, Jennings V, Sinai I. Efficacy of a new method of family planning: the Standard Days Method. Contraception 2002; 65: 333–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    Morris N, Underwood L, Easterling W Jr. Temporal relationship between basal body temperature nadir and leutinizing hormone surge in normal women. Fertil Steril 1976; 27: 780–3.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    Barron ML, Fehring R. Basal body temperature assessment: is it useful to couples seeking pregnancy? MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2005; 30: 290–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    Bauman, JE. Basal body temperature: unreliable method of ovulation detection. Fertil Steril 1981; 36: 729–33.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    Klaus H, Goebel JM, Muraski B, et al. Use-effectiveness and client satisfaction in six centers teaching the Billings Ovulation Method. Contraception 1979; 19: 613–29.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    Couple to Couple League for Natural Family Planning [homepage]. Available from: http://ccli.org/. Accessed 2008 June 26.
  27. ↵
    Kennedy KI, Rivera R, McNeilly AS. Consensus statement on the use of breastfeeding as a family planning method. Contraception 1989; 39: 477–96.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. Labbok M, Cooney K, Coly S. Guidelines: breastfeeding, family planning, and the Lactational Amenorrhea Method (LAM). Waschington, D.C.: Institute for Reproductive Health, Georgetown University; 1994. 0
  29. The World Health Organization multinational study of breastfeeding and lactational amenorrhea. III. Pregnancy during breastfeeding. World Health Organization Task Force on Methods for the Natural Regulation of Fertility. Fertil Steril 1999; 72: 431–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. Kazi A, Kennedy KI, Visness CM, Khan T. Effectiveness of the Lactational Amenorrhea method in Pakistan. Fertil Steril 1995; 64: 717–23.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  31. Labbok MH, Hight-Laukaran V, Peterson AE, Fletcher V, von Hertzen H, Van Cook PFA. Multicenter study of the Lactational Amenorrhea Method (LAM). I. Efficacy, duration and implications for clinical application. Contraception 1997; 55: 327–36.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. Perez A, Labbok MH, Queenan JT. Clinical study of the Lactational Amenorrhea Method for family planning. Lancet 1992; 339: 968–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. Ramos R, Kennedy KI, Visness CM. Effectiveness of lactational amenorrhea in prevention of pregnancy in Manila, The Philippines: non-comparative prospective trial. Br Med J 1996; 313: 909–12.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Valdes V, Labbok MH, Pugin E, Perez A. The efficacy of the Lactational Amenorrhea Method (LAM) among working women. Contraception 2000; 62: 217–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. Wade ME, McCarthy P, Braustein GD, et al. A randomized prospective study of the use-effectiveness of two methods of natural family planning. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 141: 368–76.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  36. ↵
    Stanford JB, Lemaire JC, Thurman PB. Women's interest in natural family planning. J Fam Pract 1998; 46: 65–71.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    Piccinino LJ, Mosher WE. Trends in contraceptive use in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect 1998; 30: 4–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    United Nations. Level and trends of contraceptive use as assessed in 2002. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division; 2006.
  39. ↵
    Westoff CF, Ryder NB. United States: methods of fertility control, 1955, 1960, and 1965. Stud Fam Plann 1967; 1: 1–5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    Stanford JB, Lemaire JC, Fox A. Interest in natural family planning among female family practice patients. Fam Pract Res J 1994; 14: 237–49.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. ↵
    Stanford JB, Thurman PB, Lemaire JC. Physicians' knowledge and practices regarding natural family planning. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94(5 Pt 1): 672–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. ↵
    Fehring R, Hanson L, Stanford J. Nurse-midwives' knowledge and promotion of lactational amenorrhea and other natural family-planning methods for child spacing. J Midwifery Women's Health 2001; 46: 68–73.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. ↵
    Wilson MA. The practice of natural family planning versus the use of artificial birth control: family, sexual, and moral issues. Catholic Social Science Review 2002; 7.
  44. ↵
    Grimes DA, Gallo MF, Halpern V, Nanda K, Schulz KF. Fertility awareness-based methods for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 4: CD004860.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. ↵
    Che Y, Cleland J, Mohamed A. Periodic abstinence in developing countries: an assessment of failure rates and consequences. Contraception 2004; 69: 15–21.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    Stanford J, Smith K. Characteristics of women associated with continuing instruction in the Creighton Model fertility care system. Contraception 2000; 61: 121–9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. ↵
    Curtis SL, Neitzel K. Contraceptive knowledge use and sources. Demographic and Health Survey 2003. Calverton (MD): Macro International; 2004.
  48. ↵
    Sinai I, Lundgren R, Arevalo M, Jennings V. Fertility awareness-based methods of family planning: predictors of correct use. Int Fam Plan Perspect 2006; 23: 94–100.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    Gnoth C, Frank-Herrmann P, Freundl G, et al. Sexual behavior of natural family planning users in Germany and its changes over time. Adv Contracept 1995; 11: 173–85.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  50. ↵
    Billings EL, Billings JJ. The Billings Ovulation Method: observations, charting and rules. Available from: http://www.woomb.org/bom/rules/index.html. Accessed 1 July 2008.
  51. ↵
    Pope Paul VI Institute for the Study of Human Reproduction. Creighton Model Fertility Care System. Available from: http://www.creightonmodel.com/index.html. Accessed 1 July 2008.
  52. ↵
    Kreider RM, Simmons T. Marital Status: 2000. Census 2000 brief. Washington, D.C.: US Census Bureau; 2003.
  53. ↵
    National Center for Health Statistics. Births, marriages, divorces, and deaths: provisional data for January-December 2000. National Vital Statistics Reports, vol. 49. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2001.
  54. ↵
    LaBarber LP. Psychosocial aspects of NFP instruction: a national survey. Int Rev 1990; 14: 34–53.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  55. ↵
    Fehring R, Lawrence D, Sauvage C. Self-esteem, spiritual well-being, and intimacy: a comparison among couples using NFP and oral contraceptives. Int Rev 1989; 13: 227–36
    OpenUrlPubMed
  56. ↵
    VandeVusse L, Hanson L, Fehring R, Newman A, Fox J. Couple's views of the effects of natural family planning on marital dynamics. J Nurs Scholarsh 2003; 35: 171–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    Stover J, Bartrand J, Smith S, Ruteberg N, Meyer-Ramirezk. Empirically based conversion factors for calculating couple-years of protection. Chapel Hill (NC): Carolina Population Center; 2001.
  58. ↵
    Sinai I, Arevalo M. It's all in the timing: coital frequency and fertility awareness-based methods of family planning. J Biosoc Sci 2006; 38: 763–77.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  59. ↵
    Kambic RT, Lamprecht V. Calendar rhythm efficacy: a review. Adv Contracept 1996; 12: 123–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  60. ↵
    National Statistical Office. The Philippines National Demographic and Health Survey, 2003. Calverton (MD): Macro International; 2004.
  61. ↵
    Latz LJ, Reiner E. Further studies on the sterile and fertile periods in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1942; 43: 74–9.
    OpenUrl
  62. ↵
    Fehring R. New low- and high-tech calendar methods of family planning. J Midwifery Womens Health 2005; 50: 31–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  63. ↵
    Clubb E, Knight J. Fertility awareness and natural family planning. Exeter, UK: Dave and Charles; 1999: 33–57.
  64. ↵
    Bigelow J, Dunson D, Stanford J, Ecochard R, Gnoth C, Colombo B. Mucus observations in the fertile window: a better predictor of conception than timing of intercourse. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 889–92.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    Scarpa B, Dunson D, Colombo B. Cervical mucus secretions on the day of intercourse: an accurate marker of highly fertile days. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 125: 72–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  66. ↵
    A prospective multicentre trial of the ovulation method of natural family planning. I. The teaching phase. Fertil Steril 1981; 36: 152–8.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  67. ↵
    Qian S, Zhang D, Zuo H, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a natural fertility regulation programme in China. Available from: www.woomb.org/omrrca/bulletin/vol27/no4/chinaEvaluation.html. Accessed 10 Oct 2007.
  68. ↵
    Jennings V, Irit S. Further analysis of the theoretical effectiveness of the TwoDay method of family planning. Contraception 2001; 64: 149–53.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  69. ↵
    Fehring R. The future of professional education in natural family planning. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2004; 33: 34–43.
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section