Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
OtherEvidence-Based Clinical Medicine

Efficiency of a Two-Item Pre-Screen to Reduce the Burden of Depression Screening in Pregnancy and Postpartum: An IMPLICIT Network Study

Ian M. Bennett, Andrew Coco, James C. Coyne, Alex J. Mitchell, James Nicholson, Ellen Johnson, Michael Horst and Stephen Ratcliffe
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine July 2008, 21 (4) 317-325; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2008.04.080048
Ian M. Bennett
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Coco
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James C. Coyne
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex J. Mitchell
MBBS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Nicholson
MD, MSCE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ellen Johnson
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Horst
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen Ratcliffe
MD, MSPH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    Buist A, Bilszta J, Barnett B, et al. Recognition and management of perinatal depression in general practice–a survey of GPs and postnatal women. Aust Fam Physician 2005; 34: 787–90.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    Chaudron LH, Szilagyi PG, Kitzman HJ, Wadkins HI, Conwell Y. Detection of postpartum depressive symptoms by screening at well-child visits. Pediatrics Mar 2004; 113(3 Pt 1): 551–8.
    OpenUrl
  3. Cohen LS, Nonacs R, Viguera AC, Reminick A. Diagnosis and treatment of depression during pregnancy. CNS Spectr 2004; 9: 209–16.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    Miranda J, Azocar F, Komaromy M, Golding JM. Unmet mental health needs of women in public-sector gynecologic clinics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 212–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    Healthy People 2010: Understanding and improving health. Washington DC: Department of Health and Human Services; 2000.
  6. Bagedahl-Strindlund M, Borjesson KM. Postnatal depression: a hidden illness. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1998; 98: 272–5.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  7. Coates AO, Schaefer CA, Alexander JL. Detection of postpartum depression and anxiety in a large health plan. J Behav Health Serv Res 2004; 31: 117–33.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. Thio IM, Browne MAO, Coverdale JH, Argyle N. Postnatal depressive symptoms go largely untreated: a probability study in urban New Zealand. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2006; 41: 814–8.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    Seehusen DA, Baldwin LM, Runkle GP, Clark G. Are family physicians appropriately screening for postpartum depression? J Am Board Fam Med 2005; 18: 104–12.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    Berg AO, Allan JD, Frame PS, et al. Screening for depression: USPSTF recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 760–4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    Arroll B, Khin N, Kerse N. Screening for depression in primary care with two verbally asked questions: cross sectional study. BMJ 2003; 327: 1144–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Mitchell AJ, Coyne JC. Do ultra-short screening instruments accurately detect depression in primary care? A pooled analysis and meta-analysis of 22 studies. Br J Gen Pract 2007; 57: 144–51.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Gaynes BN, Gavin N, Meltzer-Brody S, et al. Perinatal depression: prevalence, screening accuracy, and screening outcomes. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005: 119.
  14. ↵
    Antenatal and postnatal mental health clinical management and service guidance (NICE clinical guideline #45). United Kingdom: National Health Service; 2007.
  15. ↵
    Boyd RC, Le HN, Somberg R. Review of screening instruments for postpartum depression. Arch Womens Ment Health 2005; 8: 141–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Eberhard-Gran M, Eskild A, Tambs K, Opjordsmoen S, Samuelsen SO. Review of validation studies of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2001; 104: 243–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Milgrom J, Ericksen J, Negri L, Gemmill AW, Shakespeare J. Evaluation of screening for postnatal depression against the NSC handbook criteria. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2005; 39: 833–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Cox JL, Chapman G, Murray D, Jones P. Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in non-postnatal women. J Affect Disord 1996; 39: 185–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry 1987; 150: 782–6.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Areias ME, Kumar R, Barros H, Figueiredo E. Correlates of postnatal depression in mothers and fathers. Br J Psychiatry 1996; 169: 36–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Bennett I, Switzer J, Aguirre A, Evans K, Barg F. “Breaking it down”: patient-clinician communication and prenatal care among African-American women of low and higher literacy. Ann Fam Med 2006; 4: 334–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Matthey S, Henshaw C, Elliott S, Barnett B. Variability in use of cut-off scores and formats on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale - implications for clinical and research practice. Arch Womens Ment Health 2006; 9: 309–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    Murray D, Cox JL. Screening for depression during pregnancy with the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EPDS). J Reprod Infant Psychol 1990; 8: 99–107.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener. Med Care 2003; 41: 1284–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    Whooley MA, Avins AL, Miranda J, Browner WS. Case-finding instruments for depression. Two questions are as good as many. J Gen Int Med 1997; 12: 439–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    Altshuler LL, Hendrick V, Cohen LS. Course of mood and anxiety disorders during pregnancy and the postpartum period. J Clin Psychiatry 1998; 59(Suppl 2): 29–33.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  27. Berenson AB, Breitkopf CR, Wu ZH. Reproductive correlates of depressive symptoms among low-income minority women. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 1310–7.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. Gotlib IH, Whiffen VE, Mount JH, Milne K, Cordy NI. Prevalence rates and demographic characteristics associated with depression in pregnancy and the postpartum. J Consult Clin Psychol 1989; 57: 269–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. Hobfoll SE, Ritter C, Lavin J, Hulsizer MR, Cameron RP. Depression prevalence and incidence among inner-city pregnant and postpartum women. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995; 63: 445–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. Howell E, Mora P, Leventhal H. Correlates of early postpartum depressive symptoms. Matern Child Health J 2006; 10: 149–57.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  31. Howell EA, Mora PA, Horowitz CR, Leventhal H. Racial and ethnic differences in factors associated with early postpartum depressive symptoms. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105: 1442–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. Kuo WH, Wilson TE, Holman S, Fuentes-Afflick E, O'Sullivan MJ, Minkoff H. Depressive symptoms in the immediate postpartum period among Hispanic women in three US cities. J Immigr Health 2004; 6: 145–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. Larsson D, Lager I, Nilsson PM. Socio-economic characteristics and quality of life in diabetes mellitus–relation to metabolic control. Scand J Public Health 1999; 27: 101–5.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Bernazzani O, Saucier JF, David H, Borgeat F. Psychosocial predictors of depressive symptomatology level in postpartum women. J Affect Disord 1997; 46: 39–49.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. Bernazzani O, Saucier JF, David H, Borgeat F. Psychosocial factors related to emotional disturbances during pregnancy. J Psychos Res 1997; 42: 391–402.
    OpenUrl
  36. O'Hara MW, Schlechte JA, Lewis DA, Wright EJ. Prospective study of postpartum blues. Biologic and psychosocial factors. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1991; 48: 801–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. ↵
    Justice A, Covinsky K, Berlin J. Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130: 515–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    Hanley J, McNeil B. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29–36.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    Klinkman MS, Schwenk TL, Coyne JC. Depression in primary care - more like asthma than appendicitis: The Michigan Depression Project. Can J Psychiatry 1997; 42: 966–73.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    Coyne JC, Thompson R, Racioppo MW. Validity and efficiency of screening for history of depression by self-report. Psychol Assess 2001; 13: 163–70.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. ↵
    Valenstein M, Dalack G, Blow F, Figueroa S, Standiford C, Douglass A. Screening for psychiatric illness with a combined screening and diagnostic instrument. J Gen Int Med 1997; 12: 679–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    Olson AL, Dietrich AJ, Prazar G, Hurley J. Brief maternal depression screening at well-child visits. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 207–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Dubowitz H, Feigelman S, Lane W, et al. Screening for depression in an urban pediatric primary care clinic. Pediatrics 2007; 119: 435–43.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Carter FA, Carter JD, Luty SE, Wilson DA, Frampton CMA, Joyce PR. Screening and treatment for depression during pregnancy: a cautionary note. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2005; 39: 255–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    Horowitz JA, Cousins A. Postpartum depression treatment rates for at-risk women. Nurs Res 2006; 55(2 Suppl): S23–S27.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    Gilbody SD, Sheldon TD, House ADM. Screening and case-finding instruments for depression: a meta-analysis. CMAJ 2008; 178: 997–1003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    Miranda J, Chung JY, Green BL, et al. Treating depression in predominantly low-income young minority women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003; 290: 57–65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    Cutler CB, Legano LA, Dreyer BP, et al. Screening for maternal depression in a low education population using a two item questionnaire. Arch Womens Ment Health 2007; 10: 277–83.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 21 (4)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 21, Issue 4
July-August 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Efficiency of a Two-Item Pre-Screen to Reduce the Burden of Depression Screening in Pregnancy and Postpartum: An IMPLICIT Network Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Efficiency of a Two-Item Pre-Screen to Reduce the Burden of Depression Screening in Pregnancy and Postpartum: An IMPLICIT Network Study
Ian M. Bennett, Andrew Coco, James C. Coyne, Alex J. Mitchell, James Nicholson, Ellen Johnson, Michael Horst, Stephen Ratcliffe
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2008, 21 (4) 317-325; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.04.080048

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Efficiency of a Two-Item Pre-Screen to Reduce the Burden of Depression Screening in Pregnancy and Postpartum: An IMPLICIT Network Study
Ian M. Bennett, Andrew Coco, James C. Coyne, Alex J. Mitchell, James Nicholson, Ellen Johnson, Michael Horst, Stephen Ratcliffe
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Jul 2008, 21 (4) 317-325; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.04.080048
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Delivering Interconception Care During Well-Child Visits: An IMPLICIT Network Study
  • TRIPPD: A Practice-Based Network Effectiveness Study of Postpartum Depression Screening and Management
  • Concordance of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) to Assess Increased Risk of Depression among Postpartum Women
  • Improving Maternal Care with a Continuous Quality Improvement Strategy: A Report from the Interventions to Minimize Preterm and Low Birth Weight Infants through Continuous Improvement Techniques (IMPLICIT) Network
  • The 3 item anxiety subscale of the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale may detect postnatal depression as well as the 10 item full scale
  • Third Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Practice-based Research Theme Issue
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Practical Recommendations for Minimizing Pain and Anxiety with IUD Insertion
  • A Simplified Approach to Evaluate and Manage Shoulder Pain
  • Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms
Show more Evidence-Based Clinical Medicine

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire