Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

2002 ACC/AHA Guideline Versus Clinician Judgment as Diagnostic Tests for Chest Pain

Stephen M. Hagberg, Finbar Woitalla and Paul Crawford
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2008, 21 (2) 101-107; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2008.02.070146
Stephen M. Hagberg
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Finbar Woitalla
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Crawford
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    Pozen MW, D'Agostino RB, Selker HP, et al. A predictive instrument to improve coronary-care unit admission practices in acute ischemic heart disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. N Engl J Med 1984; 310: 1273–8.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    Goldman L, Cook EF, Brand DA, et al. A computer protocol to predict myocardial infarction in emergency department patients with chest pain. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 797–803.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R, et al. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1163–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. Lee TH, Rouan GW, Weisberg MC, et al. Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with acute myocardial infarction sent home from the emergency room. Am J Cardiol. 1987; 60: 219–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. Rusnak RA, Stair TO, Hansen K, Fastow JS. Litigation against the emergency physician: Common features in cases of missed myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med. 1989; 18: 1029–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    Manini AF, Gisondi MA, van der Vlugt TM, Schreiber DH. Adverse cardiac events in emergency department patients with chest pain six months after a negative inpatient evaluation for acute coronary syndrome. Acad Emer Med 2002; 9: 896–902.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Miller CD, Lindsell CJ, Khandelwal S, et al. Is the initial diagnostic impression of “noncardiac chest pain” adequate to exclude cardiac disease? Ann Emerg Med 2004; 44: 565–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Goldman L, Cook EF, Johnson PA, et al. Prediction of the need for intensive care in patients who come to emergency departments with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1498–504.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    Selker HP, Beshansky JR, Griffith JL, et al. Use of the acute cardiac ischemic time-insensitive predictive instrument (ACI-TIPI) to assist with triage of patients with chest pain or other symptoms suggestive of acute cardiac ischemia: A multicenter, controlled clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 845–55.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40: 1366–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    Mitchell AM, Garvey JL, Chandra A, et al. Prospective multicenter study of quantitative pretest probability assessment to exclude acute coronary syndrome for patients evaluated in emergency department chest pain units. Ann Emerg Med 2006; 47: 447.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Collinson PO, Gaze DC. Biomarkers of cardiovascular damage. Med Princ Pract 2007; 16: 247–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    Braunwald E. Application of current guidelines to the management of unstable angina and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation 2003; 108(suppl 3): S28–37.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    Nagurney JT, Brown DFM, Chae C, et al. Disagreement between formal and medical record criteria for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. Acad Emer Med 2005; 12: 446–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Westfall JM, Van Vorst RF, McGloin J, Selker HP. Triage and diagnosis of chest pain in rural hospitals: implementation of the ACI-TIPI in the High Plains Research Network. Ann. Fam Med 2006; 4: 153–8.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    Chase M, Robey JL, Zogby KE, Sease KL, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. Prospective validation of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Risk Score in the emergency department chest pain population. Ann Emerg Med 2006; 48: 252–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Marsan RJ, Shaver KS, Sease KL, et al. Evaluation of a clinical decision rule for young adult patients with chest pain. Acad Emer Med 2005; 12: 26–32.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    Fesmire FM, Hughes AD, Fody EP, et al. The Erlanger Chest Pain Evaluation Protocol: a one-year experience with serial 12-lead ECG monitoring, two-hour delta serum marker measurements, and selective nuclear stress testing to identify and exclude acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med 2002; 40: 584–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    Mushlin AI, Kern LM, Paris M, Lambert DR, Williams G. The value of diagnostic information to patients with chest pain suggestive of coronary artery disease. Med Decis Making 2005; 25: 149–57.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Goodacre S, Calvert N. Cost effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with acute, undifferentiated chest pain. Emerg Med J 2003; 20: 429–33.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 21 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 21, Issue 2
March-April 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
2002 ACC/AHA Guideline Versus Clinician Judgment as Diagnostic Tests for Chest Pain
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
2002 ACC/AHA Guideline Versus Clinician Judgment as Diagnostic Tests for Chest Pain
Stephen M. Hagberg, Finbar Woitalla, Paul Crawford
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2008, 21 (2) 101-107; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.02.070146

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
2002 ACC/AHA Guideline Versus Clinician Judgment as Diagnostic Tests for Chest Pain
Stephen M. Hagberg, Finbar Woitalla, Paul Crawford
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2008, 21 (2) 101-107; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.02.070146
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Three Simple Rules in Pectoral Muscles Trigger Point Treatment, Which May Be a Cause of Chest Pain: Position, Palpation, and Perpendicular Needling
  • Inside the March/April 2008 Issue and the Most Frequently-Read Articles in 2007
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire