Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

2002 ACC/AHA Guideline Versus Clinician Judgment as Diagnostic Tests for Chest Pain

Stephen M. Hagberg, Finbar Woitalla and Paul Crawford
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine March 2008, 21 (2) 101-107; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2008.02.070146
Stephen M. Hagberg
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Finbar Woitalla
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Crawford
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Characteristics of Study Patients and Prevalence of 2002 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guideline Criteria

    FindingPercent with finding (no. of patients with positive troponin-I with finding)
    Age (years)57.4 ±13.6
    Sex
        Male53
        Female47
    Subjective symptoms
        Chest pain99 (7)
        Shortness of breath5 (0)
        Syncope/near syncope3 (0)
        Arm pain2 (0)
        Palpitations1 (0)
        Nausea1 (0)
    Risk level
        ACC/AHA guideline
            Low13
            Intermediate2
            High85
        Clinical judgment
            High47
            Low53
    History of CAD34 (6)
    History of diabetes mellitus22 (5)
    Positive troponin-I within 30 days2 (7)
    Rest pain59 (5)
    Duration >20 minutes or increased tempo of pain64 (6)
    New CP similar to previous anginal episode15 (2)
    New S-T depression or bundle branch block6 (1)
    T-wave inversions with CP10 (2)
    New onset pulmonary edema (rales on exam)3 (0)
    New mitral regurgitant murmur3 (1)
    Abnormal vital signs (tachycardia, bradycardia, hypotension)12 (2)
    Fixed Q-waves on ECG12 (3)
    T-wave inversions in lateral leads with large R-waves21 (4)
    Previous use of daily aspirin41 (4)
    Normal ECG44 (1)
    Reproducible chest pain1 (0)
    Cocaine use0 (0)
    • ACC/AHA, American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association; CAD, coronary artery disease; CP, chest pain; ECG, electrocardiogram.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Utility to Detect Positive Troponin-I Values When Grouped by Risk

    Risk ScorePositive Troponin-I (>0.4) (n = 7)Negative Troponin-I (<0.4) (n = 379)Total (n = 386)
    American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines' utility to detect positive troponin-I values when grouped by high versus intermediate and low risk
    High risk7321328
    Intermediate + low risk05858
    Total7379386
    American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines' utility to detect positive troponin-I values when grouped by high and intermediate versus low risk
    High + intermediate risk7330337
    Low risk04949
    Total7379386
    Clinical judgment's utility to detect positive troponin-I values when grouped by high versus low risk
    High risk7199206
    Low risk0180180
    Total7379386
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Comparison of American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guideline and Clinical Judgment Using Troponin-I for Diagnosis of Patients Having Myocardial Infarction Within 30 Days

    InterventionSensitivitySpecificityPositive Likelihood RatioNegative Likelihood RatioPPVNPV
    2002 ACC/AHA guidelines (high vs. intermediate and low risk)1.00 (0.65–1.00)0.15 (0.15–0.15)1.18 (0.77–1.18)0 (0–2.37)0.02 (0.01–0.02)1.0 (0.96–1.00)
    2002 ACC/AHA guidelines (high and intermediate vs. low risk)1.00 (0.65–1.00)0.13 (0.12–0.13)1.15 (0.75–1.15)0 (0–2.81)0.02 (0.01–0.02)1.00 (0.95–1.00)
    Clinical judgment (high vs. low risk)1.00 (0.65–1.00)0.48 (0.47–0.48)1.91 (1.22–1.91)0 (0–0.75)0.03 (0.02–0.03)1.00 (0.97–1.00)
    • Values in parentheses are 95% CI.

      PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.

    • View popup
    Appendix 1.

    Codebook for Assigning Risk Factors to Individual Patients

    Chart HeadingExplanationDefinition/Rating
    SexGenderM, male
    F, female
    AgeAge in yearsWhole numbers (1–100)
    DOADate of admissionmm/dd/yy
    DODDate of dischargemm/dd/yy
    SxSymptomsDescriptive verbage
    Rest painChest pain at rest0 = absent
    1 = present
    Dur/up tempoDuration of chest pain0 = <20 min
    1= >20 min
    Hx CADHistory of coronary artery disease0 = absent
    1 = present
    New CP = anginaNew chest pain same as prior anginal symptoms0 = absent
    1 = present
    New STD/ BBBNew ST segment depression or bundle branch block0 = absent
    1 = present
    TWI w/SxsT-wave inversions with symptoms of chest pain0 = absent
    1 = present
    RalesPulmonary rales on exam0 = absent
    1 = present
    New MRNew onset mitral regurgitation murmur0 = absent
    1 = present
    Abnl VSAbnormal vital signs (tachycardia, bradycardia, hypotension only)0 = absent
    1 = present
    Prior ASAPrior use of daily aspirin0 = absent
    1 = present
    DMHistory of diabetes mellitus0 = absent
    1 = present
    Fixed QWFixed Q-wave on electrocardiogram0 = absent
    1 = present
    Nml EKGNormal electrocardiogram0 = absent
    1 = present
    TWI/F lg RT-wave inversions or flattening in lateral leads with large R-waves0 = absent
    1 = present
    Repro CPReproducible chest pain0 = absent
    1 = present
    Cocaine useHistory of cocaine use0 = absent
    1 = present
    TpI 1/2/3Troponin I: 1st, 2nd, 3rd sets0 = absent
    1 = present
    Add testAdditional test0 = not done
    1 = negative evaluation
    2 = abnormality on evaluation
    3 = evidence that test was done but results not available
    RiskRisk score0 = low risk
    1 = moderate risk
    2 = high risk
    OutcomeCardiac damage0 = no cardiac damage
    1 = cardiac damage
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 21 (2)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 21, Issue 2
March-April 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
2002 ACC/AHA Guideline Versus Clinician Judgment as Diagnostic Tests for Chest Pain
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
2002 ACC/AHA Guideline Versus Clinician Judgment as Diagnostic Tests for Chest Pain
Stephen M. Hagberg, Finbar Woitalla, Paul Crawford
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2008, 21 (2) 101-107; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.02.070146

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
2002 ACC/AHA Guideline Versus Clinician Judgment as Diagnostic Tests for Chest Pain
Stephen M. Hagberg, Finbar Woitalla, Paul Crawford
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Mar 2008, 21 (2) 101-107; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.02.070146
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Three Simple Rules in Pectoral Muscles Trigger Point Treatment, Which May Be a Cause of Chest Pain: Position, Palpation, and Perpendicular Needling
  • Inside the March/April 2008 Issue and the Most Frequently-Read Articles in 2007
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating Pragmatism of Lung Cancer Screening Randomized Trials with the PRECIS-2 Tool
  • Regional Variation in Scope of Practice by Family Physicians
  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire