Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • Other Publications
    • abfm

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
American Board of Family Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • abfm
American Board of Family Medicine

American Board of Family Medicine

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ARTICLES
    • Current Issue
    • Abstracts In Press
    • Archives
    • Special Issue Archive
    • Subject Collections
  • INFO FOR
    • Authors
    • Reviewers
    • Call For Papers
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
  • SUBMIT
    • Manuscript
    • Peer Review
  • ABOUT
    • The JABFM
    • The Editing Fellowship
    • Editorial Board
    • Indexing
    • Editors' Blog
  • CLASSIFIEDS
  • JABFM on Bluesky
  • JABFM On Facebook
  • JABFM On Twitter
  • JABFM On YouTube
Research ArticleOriginal Research

A Comparison of Unsedated Colonoscopy and Flexible Sigmoidoscopy in the Family Medicine Setting: An LA Net Study

Lyndee Knox, Ricardo G. Hahn and Christianne Lane
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine September 2007, 20 (5) 444-450; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2007.05.060175
Lyndee Knox
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ricardo G. Hahn
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christianne Lane
MS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Guidelines for Modified Colon Endoscopy

    Primary indications:
    • Screening for colorectal cancer in asymptomatic patients according to ACS guidelines

    • Rescreening of patients with history of treated colon cancer

      • –Known familial colon cancer history

    • Diagnostic examinations:

      • –Evaluation of positive FOBT

      • –Evaluation of rectal bleeding

      • –Evaluation of change in bowel habits

      • –Follow-up of selected patients previously found to have benign lesions

    Contraindications:
    • Multiple previous abdominal surgical procedures

    • Known active inflammatory bowel disease or diverticulitis

    • Inability to complete or tolerate bowel prep

    • Inability to cooperate because of mental illness, dementia or disability

    Reasons to terminate procedure and refer to consultant endoscopist:
    • Inability to advance endoscope with reasonable effort and within reasonable time

    • Excessive patient discomfort

    • Extensive diverticulosis with inability to identify lumen

    • Discovery of active inflammatory bowel disease or diverticulitis

    • Discovery of multiple lesions that will require extensive polypectomy

    • Discovery of obstructing lesion

    • Discovery of obvious cancer

    • Visual recognition of incompletely removed dysplastic lesion

    Lesions to biopsy using biopsy forceps:
    • All polyps

    • Most abnormal mucosa

    Lesions to NOT biopsy using biopsy forceps:
    • Diverticuli (perforation risk)

    • Flat lesions within diverticuli (perforation risk)

    Lesions to remove with snare:
    • Pedunculated polyps

    Lesions to NOT remove with snare:
    • Broad-based polyps (perforation risk)

    • Lesions within diverticuli (perforation risk)

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Sample Characteristics for Modified Colon Endoscopy and Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Groups

    CharacteristicMCE† (n = 48)FS‡ (n = 35)
    Age*
        <40 years2 (4.2)6 (17.1)
        40–496 (12.5)8 (22.9)
        50–5916 (33.3)12 (34.3)
        60–6917 (35.4)6 (17.1)
        70+6 (12.5)2 (5.7)
    Female16 (33.3)14 (40.0)
    Ethnicity
        Caucasian22 (45.8)24 (68.6)
        Black/African American4 (8.3)1 (2.9)
        Latino14 (29.2)5 (14.3)
        Asian5 (10.4)4 (11.4)
        Other2 (4.2)1 (2.9)
    • * P < .05.

    • † Mean, 59.6, SD, 12.5; range, 31.2–86.2.

    • ‡ Mean, 51.3, SD, 13.4; range, 25.7–80.0.

    • All data shown as N (%). MCE, modified colon endoscopy; FS, flexible sigmoidoscopy.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Completion Rate, Site Visualized, Depth Reached, Complications

    MCE (n = 48)FS (n = 35)
    Procedure completed40 (83.3)24 (75.0)
    Reasons for noncompletion
        Bleeding0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
        Discomfort4 (8.3)4 (11.4)
        Excessive looping0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
        Poor preparation3 (6.3)0 (0.0)
        Obstructing mass2 (4.2)0 (0.0)
        Not specified0 (0.0)7 (63.6)
    Reached maximum depth* (160 cm for ME/60 cm for FS)9 (18.8)14 (40.0)
    Anatomical site visualized*
        Sigmoid colon0 (0.0)1 (2.9)
        Descending colon0 (0.0)11 (31.4)
        Splenic flexure2 (4.2)12 (34.3)
        Transverse colon6 (12.5)9 (25.7)
        Hepatic flexure1 (2.1)0 (0.0)
        Ascending colon35 (72.9)0 (0.0)
        Cecum3 (6.3)0 (0.0)
    Maximum depth (cm) for procedure*†
        0–200 (0.0)1 (2.9)
        21–400 (0.0)6 (17.1)
        41–603 (6.3)28 (80.0)
        61–801 (2.1)0 (0.0)
        81–1003 (6.3)0 (0.0)
        101–1207 (14.6)0 (0.0)
        121–14015 (31.3)0 (0.0)
        141–16019 (39.6)0 (0.0)
    Complications reported (bleeding, infection, perforation, and other)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
    • * P < .05

    • † For MCE: mean, 130.1; SE, 30.1. For FS: mean, 50.6; SD, 10.0.

    • All data presented as N (%). MCE, modified colon endoscopy; FS, flexible sigmoidoscopy.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Descriptive Data About Clinical Findings for Modified Colon Endoscopy and Flexible Sigmoidoscopy

    MCE (n = 48)FS (n = 35)
    Normal Colon16 (33.3)20 (57.1)
    Diverticula16 (33.3)6 (17.1)
    Hemorrhoids4 (8.3)4 (11.4)
    Inflammatory Bowel Disease3 (6.3)0 (0.0)
    Mass lesions1 (2.1)0 (0.0)
    Polyps6 (12.5)4 (11.4)
    Adenocarcinoma4 (8.3)0 (0.0)
    Hyperperistalisis2 (4.2)4 (11.4)
    Other7 (14.6)0 (0.0)
    • MCE, modified colon endoscopy; FS, flexible sigmoidoscopy.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Variations in Outcomes by Clinician

    MCE*FS†
    χ2(3)Pχ2(5)P
    Procedure completed2.980.401.860.87
    Noncompletion
        Discomfort3.150.373.750.59
        Poor Preparation2.420.49——
    Findings
        Normal Colon3.400.336.980.22
        Diverticula0.650.875.240.39
        Hemorrhoids2.360.507.720.17
        Infl. Bowel Disease2.860.41——
        Mass Lesions0.540.91——
        Polyps5.330.150.2330.80
        Hyperperistalisis1.270.74——
        Other4.970.1710.780.06
    • * Number of clinicians = 4.

    • † Number of clinicians = 6.

    • MCE, modified colon endoscopy; FS, flexible sigmoidoscopy.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: 20 (5)
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Vol. 20, Issue 5
September-October 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Board of Family Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Comparison of Unsedated Colonoscopy and Flexible Sigmoidoscopy in the Family Medicine Setting: An LA Net Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Board of Family Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Board of Family Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 11 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
A Comparison of Unsedated Colonoscopy and Flexible Sigmoidoscopy in the Family Medicine Setting: An LA Net Study
Lyndee Knox, Ricardo G. Hahn, Christianne Lane
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2007, 20 (5) 444-450; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.05.060175

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A Comparison of Unsedated Colonoscopy and Flexible Sigmoidoscopy in the Family Medicine Setting: An LA Net Study
Lyndee Knox, Ricardo G. Hahn, Christianne Lane
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Sep 2007, 20 (5) 444-450; DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.05.060175
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Community-Engagement Strategies of the Developmental Disabilities Practice-based Research Network (DD-PBRN)
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Successful Implementation of Integrated Behavioral Health
  • Identifying and Addressing Social Determinants of Health with an Electronic Health Record
  • Integrating Adverse Childhood Experiences and Social Risks Screening in Adult Primary Care
Show more Original Research

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues

Authors & Reviewers

  • Info For Authors
  • Info For Reviewers
  • Submit A Manuscript/Review

Other Services

  • Get Email Alerts
  • Classifieds
  • Reprints and Permissions

Other Resources

  • Forms
  • Contact Us
  • ABFM News

© 2025 American Board of Family Medicine

Powered by HighWire