The “Measuring Outcomes of Clinical Connectivity” (MOCC) Trial: Investigating Data Entry Errors in the Electronic Primary Care Research Network (ePCRN)

References

1. ↵
   Peterson K, Fontaine P, Speedie S. The electronic Primary Care Research Network (ePCRN): a new era in practice-based research. J Am Board Fam Med 2006; 19: 93–7.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. ↵
   United States Department of Health and Human Services. Computerized systems used in clinical trials. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration 1999.
3. ↵
   Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull 1992; 112: 155–9.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   Kinkman MS, Green LA. Using ICPC in a computer-based primary care information system. Fam Med 1995; 27: 449–56.

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. ↵
   Horbar JD, Leahy KA. An assessment of data quality in the Vermont-Oxford Trials Network database. Control Clin Trials 1995; 16: 51–61.

   OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   Goldberg S, Ancukiewicz M, Niemierko A. The impact of data entry errors on the findings in radiation oncology research. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 63: S191–S192.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   Gibson D, Harvey AJ, Everett V, Parmar HKB. Is double data entry necessary? The CHART trials. Control Clin Trials 1994; 15: 482–8.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. Kreher NE, Sesney JW. Accuracy of on-site data entry in a rural primary care research network. Fam Med 1995; 27: 457–9.

   OpenUrlPubMed
9. ↵
   Samuels RC, Appel L, Reddy SI, Tilson RS. Improving accuracy in a computerized immunization registry. Ambul Pediatr 2002; 2: 187–2.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. ↵
    Van den Broeck J, Cunningham SA, Eeckels R, Herbst K. Data cleaning: detecting, diagnosing and editing data abnormalities. PloS Med 2005; 2: 966–70.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
11. ↵
    Neaton JD, Duchene AG, Svendsen KH, Wentworth D. An examination of the efficiency of some quality assurance methods commonly employed in clinical trials. Stat Med 1990; 9: 115–24.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
12. ↵
    Kawado M, Hinotsu S, Matasuyma Y, Yamaguchi T, Hashimoto S, Ohashi Y. A comparison of error detection rates between the reading aloud method and the double data entry method. Control Clin Trials 2003; 24: 560–9.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed